• On BNET: Online porn struggles for profits
October 14, 2008 5:29 PM PDT

Apple's new MacBooks: Which one is right for you?

by Matt Hickey
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 24 comments
Share
MacBooks side by side

The new MacBooks: eeny, meeny, miny, mo...

(Credit: Matt Hickey, using Apple images)

As you've perhaps heard elsewhere on Crave, Apple on Tuesday held a pretty broad-reaching laptop event in which it updated its entire line of portable computers.

Sure, there's new tech and spec bumps to talk about, but the really interesting part is that Apple dramatically simplified its line. While the 17-inch model is still around (with a modest upgrade to the included RAM), the real stars are the new MacBook and the 15-inch MacBook Pro, as well as the lust-worthy MacBook Air. If you're in the market for a new OS X portable, you've got some choices to make.

Each laptop is geared toward a certain kind of user. These users, in turn, each likely have a primary feature they want out of a laptop: portability, power, or price. While it'd be nice to have all three, that's unrealistic, though these machines are all fairly close to each other on all three fronts.

The power user: MacBook Pro

Pros: If you're going for power of speed on the go, like for video editing or encoding, then you're looking for the MacBook Pro. It boasts a high-resolution display, an ExpressCard slot, and Firewire 800 for high-speed data transfer. The 15.4-inch LED screen is bright enough for editing in daylight while still keeping power consumption low enough that you can stay in the park. And it's powered by dual graphics processors: an Nvidia 9400M GPU and a dedicated 9600M GT dedicated GPU. It also has the fastest processor option of the new MacBooks with a 2.8GHz Intel Core 2 Duo.

Cons: The Pro is the largest of the MacBooks, with the new version weighing 5.5 pounds at just under one inch thick. Because of the 15.4-inch screen, it has the largest footprint. In all, the weight-to-usability trade-off isn't a bad one, but the size will be a deal-breaker for some.

The frugal user: MacBook

Pros: The MacBook is the least expensive of the new laptops, but it packs enough juice to do pretty much anything most users would need. The 13.3-inch LED-backlit screen is made for Web browsing and watching videos. It's small enough that you could carry it to and from work or school without too much fatigue. The 2.0 or 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo processors won't win any races, but a user would be hard-pressed to find issues with its performance, and it now features Nvidia's 9400M GPUs, though not dedicated like the MacBook Pro's.

Cons: At 4.5 pounds, the MacBook might be a little too large to keep with you at all times, but it's not bad for shuttling around once or twice a day. The integrated Nvidia 9400M is fine for most video functions, but if you're looking for hardcore game play or any real video editing or effects work, you'll want to look at the MacBook Pro. There were rumors that Apple was preparing a sub-$1,000 MacBook, but instead it raised the entry price by $100, though you do get a SuperDrive for the price instead of a combo drive. Still, the price point has never been popular among fans.

The mobile user: MacBook Air

Pros: The Air is by far the lightest and most svelte MacBook ever. If you're looking for something truly portable--say you go from class to class a few times a day or move job sites several times--the 3-pound notebook is about perfect. It shares the MacBook's 13.3-inch LED-backlit screen, though in a much thinner frame. It now features the same integrated Nvidia 9400M as the MacBook, but still has the sub-par Intel Core 2 Duo processors (that max out at 1.8GHz). Still, it's light enough that you might even forget it's there when you're on the go, which is the point of this Apple.

Cons: The MacBook Air is expensive, at least for what it is, but consumers seem to be willing to pay for the portability. There are other sacrifices to be made as well, such as a lonely single USB port and no internal optical drive, which is a turnoff for a lot of people. Most consumers, though, don't use either on a day-to day-basis, which is how current users make due, and they don't seem to mind very much.

Since this is the first significant portables upgrade since the original G4 PowerBooks several years ago, it makes it a great time to buy. Chances are you're one of the types I cited above, and if you can figure out which, your choice may be much more simple.

For complete coverage of the Apple notebook news, see "Apple polishes up its MacBook line."

With more than 15 years experience testing hardware (and being obsessed with it), Crave freelance writer Matt Hickey can tell the good gadgets from the great. He also has a keen eye for future technology trends. Matt has blogged for publications including TechCrunch, CrunchGear, and most recently, Gizmodo. E-mail Matt.
Recent posts from Crave
The most beautiful cars in Los Angeles
FCC questions Verizon over ETF hike
Friday Poll: What's the next big thing in bionics?
An MP3 player for the vintage hi-fi set
Not all cats are bad photographers
iPhone orchestra: Roll over, Beethoven
Sharp's budget LCD puts features before picture quality
The 30 most anticipated games of 2010
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (24 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by backslashtech October 14, 2008 7:07 PM PDT
Does anyone know if the new MacBook Pros open farther? My 15" MBP doesn't physically open nearly as far as my old PC laptop which presents a problem when using a notebook riser. I can't use anything angled as I can't open the notebook far enough to get lined up with the display properly.
Reply to this comment
by gefitz October 14, 2008 7:10 PM PDT
The Macbook that's right for me? The one that costs $800. I'd use the operating system if only they'd ditch the $400 style upgrade.
Reply to this comment
by jacksonwinn October 14, 2008 8:44 PM PDT
Any ideas why the 17" MacBook Pro was left untouched? I hope it will be updated with a quad core CPU, 8+ GB RAM and dual hard drives. I need a powerful desktop replacement. Apple should try to offer something that is comparable to other manufactures high end laptops, such as XPS.
Reply to this comment
by kemar7856 October 15, 2008 9:05 PM PDT
quad core is just being introduced in desktops they would produce to much heat in note books.duel hards are not needed if you just get one large one and 8gbs is alot for a mac
by Dalmatian28 October 14, 2008 9:41 PM PDT
noooop... just not good enough! This hardware would have been good if was shown a year or two ago! This is almost 2009 and for this day and age...it is way outdated. New MacBook with 2 GHz processor...you got to be kidding me! If you have old Mac Book you are wasting money upgrading! Thousand dollars for the outdated hardware and in this economy....wrong move!!!! It should have been at least lowered to $ 800. Does Steve Jobs live in bobble??? His competition is pushing quad-cores with top of the line GPU while he is intoducing 9400 GPU in MacBook at all that at almost the same price like Apples product! You will not only have to be true Apple fan but also you must have totally dysfunctional brain in order to buy into this one!
Reply to this comment
by lawgone October 15, 2008 8:45 AM PDT
I have to agree...although Apple likes to say that their operating system is so much more efficient than Windows that they faster processor and more RAM is not necessary. Fine, but the price point needs to come down a couple hundred dollars - especially when you consider there is still no multi-card reader.
by dreamworks21 October 15, 2008 11:35 AM PDT
"Does Steve Jobs live in bobble???" - I think you meant Does Steve Jobs live in a bubble. But that's OK, I'm willing to look past the lack of an article and the misspelling of a simple word to tell you that no, he doesn't live in a bubble. The company's growth over the last five years is proof enough of this.
by joetwelvepack October 14, 2008 9:54 PM PDT
"There were rumors that Apple was preparing a sub-$1,000 MacBook, but instead it raised the entry price by $100..."

Not so. The entry level MacBook price is $999.00, which is actually hundred dollars LOWER.

duh.
Reply to this comment
by lawgone October 15, 2008 8:50 AM PDT
I think the poster was refering to the entry level of the new generation, in which case the entry level price has gone up. No duh ;)
by open-mind October 15, 2008 10:41 AM PDT
Lawgone, I thinkDalmation was replying to the article, not to a poster. And the article only said "Macbook", which includes the white model that is now $999. Apparently the author was not aware of this. Nor did the author even mention the removal of Firewire as a con. Apparently this article was not very well researched.
by mikefarren October 14, 2008 10:13 PM PDT
Reasonable upgrades all around, although they're still a bit too pricey for my taste. Quad-core? Not on any reasonably-priced notebook I know of, guys. Trashing Apple for not providing stuff that other people also mostly don't provide (at least, not for less than 2X the Apple price) isn't fair. And I'm rather the polar opposite of a Mac fan, considering that I've been using Thinkpads for years, PCs for even longer, and Macs only when I'm at someone's house who has one.
Reply to this comment
by lawgone October 15, 2008 8:48 AM PDT
With the popularity of digital cameras and other devices, why oh why has Apple yet again decided to leave out a multi-card reader??? It's not expensive to add to the laptop so what's the deal? Apple is supposed to be the best computer for creative purposes yet they make it the most difficult to get your content on their computers. Leaving out cheap yet essential features has become an Apple trademark (still no MMS on iPhone) that I am convinced is just done to tick people off. How hard would it be to add a memory card reader for pete's sake??? Reply if you agree with me.
Reply to this comment
by xxmjumpman23xx October 15, 2008 10:41 AM PDT
Obvious answer, apple is trying to jam high end parts into a laptop that is less than 1 inch thick. A card reader simply takes up too much space. Everything is already packed in as it is.
by dreamworks21 October 15, 2008 11:36 AM PDT
can i reply if i don't agree? how about you take that USB cord that almost certainly came with your digital camera, hook it up, and stop complaining.
by lawgone October 16, 2008 12:10 PM PDT
Yeah, dreamworks, you can reply...many people prefer not to have to keep track of a myriad of cables, which is why the mutli-card reader become so popular. Say I want to upload my photos from my DSLR on to a friend or associates computer...you're saying I should bring the camera and cable with me??? Since you were rude I guess I will be too...in my opinion, if you pay a premium price for a premium computer and don't ask why they don't include what are considered minimum requirements for a budget computer, you're either an idiot or you work for Apple. Case closed.
by lawgone October 16, 2008 12:14 PM PDT
xxxjumpman...a multi card reader is quite thin. The MacBook Air is for people who want form over function. A MacBook or MacBook Pro should enable to perform all basic computing needs. If the form factor of .95 in makes the card reader impossible, make the thing .96 or .97. Again, for people finding that too thick that don't mind hooking up cables, see the MacBook Air.

dreamworks, yeah, you can reply...many people prefer not to have to keep track of a myriad of cables, which is why the mutli-card reader became so popular. Say I want to upload my photos from my DSLR on to a friends or associates computer...you're saying I should bring the camera and cable with me??? Since you were rude I guess I will be too...in my opinion, if you pay a premium price for a premium computer and don't ask why they don't include what are considered minimum requirements for a budget computer, you're either an idiot or you work for Apple. End of story.
by aaydogan October 17, 2008 5:24 PM PDT
CF and SD cards now the de facto standard (do yo know anyone who uses a memory stick?) Most everyone I know has a tiny portable USB reader for their particular card. Including readers for a variety of formats the laptop will never see is not a good design choice. It's included in low price PC laptops just to inflate the features list. Dreamwork21's suggestion (not particularly tactful) was spot on.
by applewiz360 October 15, 2008 10:13 AM PDT
the cons for the macbook doesn't honestly affect me so i still feel good about getting the macbook so im excited for christmas
Reply to this comment
by schneb` October 15, 2008 1:50 PM PDT
This article should have included the Mac Book White, which is the one I just purchased. For one thing, it has Firewire 400 which the new versions lack. This is going to cut in to their Mac Book sales. I hope it stings them real bad, personally.
Reply to this comment
by schneb` October 15, 2008 1:50 PM PDT
This article should have included the Mac Book White, which is the one I just purchased. For one thing, it has Firewire 400 which the new versions lack. This is going to cut in to their Mac Book sales. I hope it stings them real bad, personally.
Reply to this comment
by mspartacus October 16, 2008 11:24 AM PDT
The loss of firewire on the new macbooks coupled with the increase in price on a feature for feature basis over the old macbooks has me looking at pc laptops for my next purchase.
Reply to this comment
by mspartacus October 16, 2008 11:25 AM PDT
The loss of firewire on the new macbooks coupled with the increase in price on a feature for feature basis over the old macbooks has me looking at pc laptops for my next purchase.
Reply to this comment
by connell83 October 16, 2008 3:09 PM PDT
Good advice here. Nice quick rundown of the new line. I am very disappointed there isn't a sub $1000 offering here, but it seems Mac has pretty much abandoned that market -- and likely with good reason. People who are going to buy an $800 laptop are going to do so at WalMart and they're not going to care about a quality operating system, good design or any of the other qualities Apple is known for.

A sub-$800 would likely be a market loser for them.
Reply to this comment
by vicman08 October 22, 2008 11:49 AM PDT
Just bought a MacBook Pro 15-inch 2.5GHz Intel Core 2 Duo (previous generation) @ Best buy for$1,800 no interest for 18 months. Is it worth returning the old one and get the most resent one for $2,499.00.

I appreciate any suggestions.

THX
Reply to this comment
(24 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.