• On TV.com: New TV sex symbol: Vintage black PORSCHE
October 14, 2008 4:19 PM PDT

Apple unveiled a new Cinema Display, too

by Michelle Thatcher
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 6 comments

The spotlight may have been on MacBooks at Tuesday's Apple press conference, but there was one other product on the stage: Apple's new 24-inch Cinema Display.

Admittedly, a monitor is hardly as exciting as an aluminum MacBook, but I do find myself intrigued. The 24-inch display is Apple's first with LED backlighting, which is not only thinner but also reportedly produces more accurate colors while using less energy than traditional monitors. It incorporates an iSight camera, built-in microphone, and speakers. And it includes a second cable at the rear of the display with branches for a MagSafe adapter, USB, and mini-DisplayPort connector.

This last feature is what appeals to me most; combined with three USB ports on the back of the display, it turns the display into a de facto dock for the MacBook and MacBook Pro. The end result is just one cord on your desk, and no more than three connections to unplug when you leave.

Of course, as Apple has shown us time and again, simplicity like that doesn't come cheap: the 24-inch Cinema Display costs $899. To quote CNET Labs' Eric Franklin, "There is no way a 24-inch monitor is worth 900 dollars." Indeed, the HP w2408h is just $500 at HP.com, and Dell currently sells the UltraSharp 2408WFP for $619 on its site. Even the Lenovo ThinkVision L2440x, which also uses LED backlights, costs $750.

So is the unified look and docking function of Apple's 24-inch Cinema Display worth the extra dough? You'll have a little time to decide, because it doesn't start shipping until November.

For complete coverage of the Apple notebook news, see "Apple polishes up its MacBook line."

Michelle Thatcher has been reviewing technology products for nearly a decade. Her current focus is laptop reviews, with some kitchen gadgetry and Web 2.0 thrown in for good measure.
Recent posts from Crave
Killer deals on BlackBerry, Droid, and Palm Pixi
This week in Crave: The boxed-in edition
Ricky Gervais helps reveal pain of cell phone salesmen
Indecent Exposure 68: Inky extents
Apple fixes AirPort problems marring video playback on 27-inch iMacs
iPhone: The board gamer's paradise
Can erasing your iPhone's memory improve performance?
Top 5 best products of the fall
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by pj4614 October 14, 2008 8:02 PM PDT
While the quote from CNET Labs' Eric Franklin appears to indicate a lack of intelligence and vision, it's not really fair for Michelle Thatcher to have used it in the article. How about your own opinion Michelle? The truth is that for $899 Apple provides a superior product with built in iSight video camera, microphone, speakers and convenient/attractive cabling. Apple is providing much more than the competitors mentioned who simply provide a "monitor". (Or......I suppose I could buy one of the other monitors, some speakers, a microphone, a mounted camera and have cables running amok....) Apple will sell plenty of these and deservedly so.
Reply to this comment
by goodspeed8701 October 15, 2008 1:03 AM PDT
Retard
by jandler October 15, 2008 6:17 AM PDT
Wait...integrated microphone...So I have to yell @ my monitor? I have a 20 inch monitor and I keep it at least @ 2 arms length.
by fleurya October 15, 2008 6:03 AM PDT
Why wasn't anything about the acutal specs of the monitor's performance mentioned??? Sure it has camera, speakers and other stuff most people will hardly use (especially the speakers) but what I want to know about is specs like contrast ratios and response time.

Well, I looked them up myself and understand why Jobs nor anyone else is talking about them, because they are flat out disappointing. A mere 1,000:1 contrast ratio and 14ms response time is really sad. The $619 Dell mentioned above has a 3,000:1 contrast ratio and 6ms response time!! I think I'll stick with Dell for my monitor needs.
Reply to this comment
by Christopher Wohlschlegel October 15, 2008 11:33 AM PDT
because all the other monitors are ugly as hell
Reply to this comment
by fleurya October 15, 2008 2:10 PM PDT
Typical lame Apple fanboi response. It's especially lame when it comes to monitors, since they offer little for aesthic difference anyway. For me and most people the more screen and less everything else, the better. That glass bezel will just be a distracting PITA, especially if you have anything bright behind you getting reflected on it. Just give me maximum screen and the thinnes, least distracting bezel possible, like my Dell monitor, and that makes the best monitor in my book.
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

A CNET Conversation with Eric Schmidt

CNET's Tom Krazit and Molly Wood sit down with Google CEO Eric Schmidt to discuss the future of Android, the Chrome OS, the problem of real-time search indexing, and more.

Verizon tests sending RIAA copyright notices

The No. 2 phone company, known for its reluctance to intervene in antipiracy cases, strikes an agreement to forward copyright notices on behalf of the music industry.