• On TV.com: Watch NARUTO SHIPPUDEN Episode 133
October 14, 2008 10:38 AM PDT

Checking under the hood of Apple's new MacBooks

by Dan Ackerman
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 66 comments
Share

Tuesday's announcement of new and updated MacBook laptops from Apple could never have lived up to the hype of the past several weeks.

After endless predictions about tablets, touch screens, and cheaper (some would say recession-friendly) products, from an $800 MacBook to an Apple Netbook, the end result was instead a solid list of upgrades and improvements, with a few noteworthy innovations and a few interesting developments that may get lost in the "Where are the $800 MacBooks?" shuffle. Here's our take on what the new developments mean for you.

The new "brick" body construction.

(Credit: James Martin/CNET News)

The most obvious of these is the so-called brick manufacturing process, whereby instead of building a frame and overlaying the chassis, Apple is taking the process used in the making the MacBook Air and expanding it to other MacBooks. The brick comes from a 2.5-pound piece of aluminum (in the case of the Air), which is literally whittled down to 0.5 pounds, meaning the internal frame is part of the same piece of metal as the chassis.

We were impressed with the build quality of the MacBook Air, and hearing that it's made of few individual pieces than other laptops makes sense. But the 13- and 15-inch systems always seemed plenty sturdy to us, so we're not sure if this will be a big selling point for casual consumers.

While switching to Intel CPUs a couple of years ago was a huge breakthrough in terms of mainstream appeal for Macs, Apple is moving away from Intel motherboard chipsets in favor of a new one from Nvidia.

The GeForce 9400 M combines a chipset and GPU, which will hopefully be a big improvement over the Intel integrated graphics found in most MacBooks today. It certainly won't match dedicated gaming laptops (and Mac gaming is still in a sorry state), but we've long decried the sad state of integrated graphics, and in fact, have long given up on finding a decent 3D gaming test to run on systems with integrated graphics. (Note that a dedicated 9600M GT graphics card--with either 256MB or 512MB of graphics memory--will be available in the MacBook Pro.)

The revamped MacBook Pro will come in 15- and 17-inch sizes.

(Credit: James Martin/CNET News)

Multitouch gestures aren't exactly new--we've seen them on the MacBook Air, and they were added to the last round of MacBook Pro upgrades. But one of the biggest physical changes to the new Apple laptops is the inclusion of what is being called a "multitouch glass trackpad."

We got quite used to using gestures on the Air (as well as the iPhone and iPod Touch), and the idea of a bigger (reportedly 39 percent) touchpad is always a good idea--too many PC makers include tiny touchpads that require several swipes to get your cursor across the screen. The big questions are: Will software makers take advantage of it? And will users get used to not having a physical button to click?

Manufacturing process aside, the actual silhouettes of the systems aren't changing much--some observers were hoping for a more radial re-imagining. The MacBook Pro, for example, looks substantially similar, with minor changes to the ports (Mini DisplayPort) and other features (battery meter on the side, easier-to-access hard drive bay).

The MacBook Air likewise looks physically the same, but adds a 128GB SSD option (Sony's got an ultraportable Vaio with a 256GB SSD and an optical drive), and a Mini DisplayPort. We had hoped Apple would take this opportunity to really revamp the Air, which is a product people love conceptually, but are less fond of in real-world applications.

The new aluminum 13-inch MacBook looks just like a shrunken-down MacBook Pro and costs $1,299 or $1,599.

(Credit: Apple)

It may not be $800, but reducing the entry-level price for the regular 13-inch MacBook to $999 is a smart move, and crosses an important psychological barrier. But we can't imagine too many people will want the old white plastic design (couldn't they have at least made the $999 model black?) after they see the sleek new metallic version--which looks just like a shrunken-down MacBook Pro (and costs $1,299 or $1,599). Note that the $999 model also lacks the new Nvidia chipset, the glass trackpad, and the edge-to-edge glass-covered display seen on the new Pros and more expensive 13-inch models.

Also interesting to note is that 128GB SSD drives will be available in both the 15-inch and the aluminum 13-inch models, although they'll likely have a hefty premium.

The final word goes to CNET laptop editor Matt Elliott, who says, "They'll sell a lot more MacBooks and fewer Pros."

We'll be bringing you new reviews, videos, benchmarks, and hands-on impressions of the new MacBooks later this week, so stay tuned.

For complete coverage of the Apple notebook news, see "Apple polishes up its MacBook line."

New York native Dan Ackerman, a former radio DJ turned journalist, has written about technology and music for publications including Spin, Blender, The Hollywood Reporter, and USA Today. He hosts the weekly Digital City podcast and the New York edition of Editors' Office Hours. Dan's new album, Tales Out of Night School, is available now. E-mail Dan.
Recent posts from Crave
Top 10 2009: Most popular TVs
The 404 482: LIVE NOW at 11 a.m.(ish) EST!
How to fit a pharmacist in your pocket
Crave giveaway of the day: Targus Crave laptop bag
Boxee unveils prototype 'Boxee Box'
The 411: Data talk and music transfer
Top 10 2009: Most popular MP3 players and accessories
Inside CNET Labs Podcast 72: Depressed, and/or tired.
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (66 Comments)
by Lerianis October 14, 2008 11:44 AM PDT
Like people say, Apple = Too Expensive. They have to lower their prices to live in the REAL WORLD, otherwise they are not going to do well in the notebook market.
Reply to this comment
by skillingssucks October 14, 2008 12:04 PM PDT
...said the pedophile.
by ralfthedog October 14, 2008 1:02 PM PDT
Apple is doing quite well in the notebook market. I would like to see higher price, better quality.
by jonDonson October 14, 2008 1:03 PM PDT
What I think everyone fails to appreciate is the impact on Apple's outstanding customer service infrastructure with the introduction of a low cost computer. One of the most appealing benefits of owning a Mac is that I can make an appointment at the Apple store and bring my computer in for some face-to-face time whenever I'm having problems FOR FREE. Not to mention that repairs are done on-site and the turnaround time is fantastic. This is a model that blows away all the other major major manufactures. The dilution of this level of support by throwing in "cheap" computers to the mix I think would negatively impact the Apple brand. I applaud them for taking such a thoughtful approach to increasing market share and penetration that doesn't outgrow their support infrastructure. Apple is all about ensuring a completely enjoyable ownership experience and their core customers wouldn't accept anything less.
by Jimww October 18, 2008 6:30 AM PDT
Have a G4 powerbook, i'd like to replace it, it's slow, and full. the price here is £1400. a Dell would be around £600 cheaper. I hate Vista and love OSX, but I want an up to date machine for my Photography, does it mater if i run light-room on a mac or PC, the results will be the same. in view of the economic situation I think (hope) Apple will have to drop there prices significantly, or I for one will be switching back
by myles taylor October 14, 2008 11:45 AM PDT
As usual with any Apple event, they surprised me, did what I expected, and disappointed me. The price cuts weren't a drastic as rumored/hoped, but there were some. They took some things off, but I really like the look of the new computers. Overall, I'm happy with the update. I know a lot of people won't be.

The crowd that will be cheering will be the 12" Powerbook club. All those people who wanted a smaller Macbook Pro basically got it back. The Macbook Air did not fill that niche, but I think the new Macbook does quite nicely. Also, I see a reason for upgrading past the white one way more than before. I never saw a compelling reason to go black on the Macbooks before. Now I definitely see a reason for upgrading. Apple filled a gap in their service between the Macbook and the Macbook Pro. They didn't release a sub-notebook, but I'm glad they didn't. I agree with Steve Jobs that Apple doesn't need to get into the netbook. No, they didn't release a laptop for $899, but at $999 (with an educational discount) suddenly all the students who wanted a Mac but had to stay under $1000 will be getting one. I only see their market share increasing after today, even with the disappointments.
Reply to this comment
by catch23 October 14, 2008 1:42 PM PDT
Every Apple event, folks like you say something to the effect of 'see their market share increasing'
Wow, Apple now has less then 1/2 the userbase of Vista ( and Vista has only been around 2 years, not 20+, and a 'failure').
http://tinyurl.com/6lsmdg
let me guess, this is the year of the Linux desktop, right?

It was disappointing, and everyone but the fan-kiddies will admit it.
by myles taylor October 15, 2008 11:05 AM PDT
@catch23

People like me? What am I like?

Yes, Apple doesn't have the user base that Vista does, but that's not the point. The point is their market share is increasing and $1 in $3 spent on a computer is on a Mac. Apple doesn't want a huge customer base; they want the creme of the crop.

Vista was a "failure" because it people are not upgrading. Apple should have 10% of the userbase as Vista, not 50%. Microsoft had a huge platform to sell Vista to, and failed. Apple is going at just the right pace.
by joshdeboer October 14, 2008 11:46 AM PDT
People have nothing better to do but wait for Apple news, so they can start rumors, get a life!
Reply to this comment
by tejash1104 October 14, 2008 11:52 AM PDT
Am I the only one who noticed the Apple website that you could have bought a 2.4GHZ MacBook $1399 and $1299 with student discount and now it cost $1499 and the same has been seen on the MacBook Pro where the entry level cost was $1799 with student discount and now it is $1899 with student discount.
Reply to this comment
by close5828 October 14, 2008 11:52 AM PDT
I love how ppl argue that Macs are more expensive that Windows machines. Compare any Windows notebook w/ the exact same specs (speed, size, performance, GPU, etc.etc.) and you almost always win w/ Mac.
Reply to this comment
by Rawnchie14 October 14, 2008 12:23 PM PDT
LOL what kind of potent koolaid are you drinking? Where do you look for laptop PC's, Alienware? Voodoo?

Of course they're expensive, they're stylistic and overpriced just like Apple's computers. I got my 2.8ghz Core 2 Duo, 15.4 inch 1680x1050 LCD, 9600 GT 512mb, 128GB SSD, 4gig Ram, HDMI enabled, Blu-Ray drive, and 5.1 sound card all for around 1900$. Just TRY to build an equal Apple laptop in the next year for that price.
by anilsudh October 14, 2008 2:10 PM PDT
@Rawnchie14 - You may have purchased a $1900 piece of junk. Does it even boot up. You are nothing but a big liar.
by DrtyDogg October 14, 2008 3:37 PM PDT
I got a 2.4 GHZ Core 2 Duo w/ 4GB of Ram a 250GB HD and the same intel graphics chipset as yesterday's Macs several months ago for $750. Where is the $750 macbook? I have also compared specs several times dell vs Apple spec for spec Dell always is cheaper, mostly due to the insane prices of upgrades on the Mac to bring it up to the specs of the Dell.
by random truth October 14, 2008 4:14 PM PDT
Rawnchie 3 problems
one the screen you stated does not exist. it would be 1680x1200. Hell I was disappointed at first but now you challenged me to see how much it costs.
HP with the closest config to the macbook pro costs $1,637.99 after rebate. It has less battery life, significantly less processing power, less graphic processing power, no led display. and is 1.31 in. thick vs. 0.95 in. The macbook pro costs 1,999.
HP with closest config to the macbook costs $1,313.99 after rebate. Less processor cache, less graphic power, shorter battery life, no led screen, no multi-touch,1.34 in. vs 0.95 in. Macbook costs $1,299.
Dell with similar config to a macbook pro costs $1,957 after rebates. 1/3 the processor cache. less than 1/2 the graphic processing power, 1.38 vs. 0.95 in of thickness. Macbook pro costs $1,999.
Dell with similar config to a macbook costs $1,567 after rebates. Measely graphic processing power compared to macbook. 1/2 of the cache for the processor, less battery life, and do i really need to show thickness. The macbook costs $1,299.
Now just for the fun of it
Macbook Pro like laptop from Alienware costs $2,789.00
From Voodoo. it is more comparable to the regular macbook and costs $3,299.00.
From Gateway their is none comparable.
From compaq dido.
Did I miss any windows manufactures?
Wow, now maybe ill buy a macbook now.
Thank-you Raqnchie14 for challenging me to see how good of a deal the macbook was, I also believe it surpassed any of those laptops. Now tell me where again did you get your laptop from?
by stevendrs October 15, 2008 3:21 AM PDT
Random truth, seriously, have you ever shopped online? I don't have time to compare the new macbooks to Dells, but 3 days ago I compare the old macbook prices to Dells. Yes, I used the EXACT same configuration for both - processor cache, graphics, battery, etc. I got my Dell for under $850. (And don't say it'll break down. I've had mine for 3 years and I have never had a single problem once...the fools who put crap on their computers or don't take care of them get the problems).

Again, I have not compared the new macbooks for prices, but I can GUARANTEE that I can find an exact Dell laptop for less. You do know that there are online Dell discounts that get you $100-500 off the listed price, right?

In regards to ease of use, really, how hard is it to use a windows machine? I have used both macs and pcs for years and I think they both are really easy to use. It's like saying a manual transmission car is not user-friendly because I don't know how to drive stick. Seriously, just spend a few days and learn. Both windows and macs are pretty easy to use.
by zhakidd532 October 14, 2008 11:54 AM PDT
Well not as much of a wow-factor as people as people had hoped, but it was solid nonetheless. I just bought a Macbook (and am loving this thing) so no upgrade for me for awhile. I don't see much in that is making me mad I bought this about 4 months before they came out with new ones. Beefed up a little, but nothing truly innovative user-wise.

Next laptop show around, however, in 2 years or whenever it will be, people will be expecting Tablet Macs.
Reply to this comment
by mjkphoto October 14, 2008 11:57 AM PDT
The Glass Display on the new MacBook Pro is a DEAL BREAKER for me. Apple's decision to abandon the matte finish display is disastrous! To say that a brightness adjustment or turning the notebook is an answer to glare and reflection is an arrogant position! Creative professionals prefer the matte display. Clearly Apple is targeting consumers while abandoning the creative professional. What a shame. I was ready to buy a new MacBook Pro today. But that won't happen. I'd get the previous MacBook Pro issued, but they are being recalled due to video chip problems. So where do I go now?

Creative professionals who are disappointed with Apple's new MacBook Pro with the glass display, please call Apple's Customer Relations Department NOW and file a complaint. A representative will take your comments and give you a case number. Hopefully Apple will get an earful from frustrated creative professionals who prefer the matte display! Maybe they'll change their mind and reinstate the matte finish option.

What are you thinking, Apple? What a HUGE DISAPPOINTMENT.
Reply to this comment
by photog_7 October 14, 2008 12:46 PM PDT
Glossy displays are AWFUL! mjkphoto is absolutely correct. I've owned two of those abominations, and I could hardly concentrate for all the glare. I'll stick with Dell Precision laptops with anti-glare displays. Apple really disappointed me with these high-glare displays.
by ashwinkn October 14, 2008 1:04 PM PDT
It's not as bad as you think it is. The main advantage of matte displays for creative professionals has been greater color accuracy. With the move to LED backlights, it makes almost no difference. I'm saying almost, because glare is still glare, but its not as bad as the glare on PC laptops with glossy screens.
by October 14, 2008 1:20 PM PDT
From Apple Insider 14 Oct 08: ".....Build-to-order options for the 17-inch MacBook Pro include a 2.6 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor, .... anti-glare display....."
by Dleon84 October 14, 2008 2:34 PM PDT
Not true - matte doesn't give contrast and gives lame depth poor "blacks" on screen. Being a graphic designer and photographer I specifically prefer the glossy screen for better image handling.
by Regensburger October 14, 2008 6:28 PM PDT
Agreed. Why doesn't Apple make the glass removable for the minority of users who actually prefer them? If they can still innovate as they did with the integrated oversize trackpad/button, this shouldn't be too much of a "breakthrough" for them.
by azkobushi October 14, 2008 11:57 AM PDT
Any Apple laptop comes loaded with apps, etc. and ready to use 30 seconds after booting it up for the first time. Can you say the same thing for any Windows machine? Anyone who really wants a Mac isn't as concerned about the price as they are for it's ease of use and seamless operation. Anybody whining about the price should stick with DOS, er... uh... I mean Windows machines.
Reply to this comment
by rapier1 October 14, 2008 12:06 PM PDT
Can you say the same about a windows machine? Sure. Depends on who the integrator is and what options you get.
by M_cKade October 14, 2008 12:00 PM PDT
I love the new Macbooks!!! I am going to buy the $1599, version as soon as the Apple store is back online!
Reply to this comment
by bestbuy4ever October 14, 2008 1:11 PM PDT
If you have some money to burn, go for it. Otherwise, don't be stupide!
by dkiriti October 14, 2008 12:03 PM PDT
really fantastic....but i dont think its fast enough.....good graphics......good design.....but too expensive
Reply to this comment
by random truth October 14, 2008 7:40 PM PDT
ya, Im bummed at the processor speed to.
by open-mind October 14, 2008 12:08 PM PDT
The new MacBooks look great to me, except for the removal of Firewire. I wish Apple would decide whether Firwire is a pro interface , a consumer interface, or a dieing interface.

Also was hoping for a 6"x9" iPod Touch Tablet "notebook" with USB. Oh well ... maybe next time.
Reply to this comment
by ReverendRob October 15, 2008 10:13 AM PDT
The MB Pros still have an FW800 port (it's backwards-compatible, so all you need for your FW400 external is a cable). I get the dropping of FW on the regular MB: consumers were never really into FW like the pros, and USB has been sufficient for them (and the $999 one will still have FW).
by sarb2008 October 14, 2008 12:11 PM PDT
Apple you disappoint me. I was really hoping for new innovation instead i just ordered myself a brand new Dell XPS 1530 which will cost me the same price as the base 13 inch aluminum macbook but has 4Gb of memory, 320 GB hard drive, slot loading drive like the mac, built in webcam with creative FX suite and more ports then the Mac (HDMI) oh and its also made of aluminum. So why Apple? Apple might be up on top with innovation but there hardware is way back there. Oh and Vista Ultimate is just as good as Leopard.
Reply to this comment
by anilsudh October 14, 2008 2:12 PM PDT
What are you going to do with an HDMI port? Sleep over it?
by Composer_1777 October 14, 2008 2:49 PM PDT
Yep, you are right. I got a sony full 1080p laptop with HDMI, why, gee so i could use it with my giant 50 inch HDTV thats why. Mac with no 1080p/hdmi support for over 1,000 $ = no way. Mac is for tools who buy into marketing ploys.
by Dalkorian October 15, 2008 2:35 PM PDT
"Oh and Vista Ultimate is just as good as Leopard."

ROFLMAO! There goes all credibility you thought you had. Now go tell Billy you have done his bidding, you shill. Maybe he'll pay you!
by Penguinisto October 14, 2008 12:14 PM PDT
$1k I can certainly live with... sure it's $100 more than the rumors, but no problems here - now to check the specs when they come out. :)

/P
Reply to this comment
by ctwendling October 14, 2008 12:18 PM PDT
Apple is awesome. Grip it and rip it.
Reply to this comment
by ssicomputers October 14, 2008 12:31 PM PDT
Hrm... was expecting a lot more from them on this one. Congrats, Apple, for finally bringing the Macbooks up to date.
Reply to this comment
by ssicomputers October 15, 2008 7:36 AM PDT
@bestbuy4ever

Unfortunately for you, the vast majority (and that includes Apple fans) are just as disappointed as I am. I'd consider their hardware if they actually gave me a reason to.
by zephryn October 14, 2008 12:32 PM PDT
"Note that the $999 model also lacks the new Nvidia chipset, the glass trackpad, and the edge-to-edge glass-covered display seen on the new Pros and more expensive 13-inch models."

Uh huh....interesting. So...what exactly makes this new macbook better than the current gen macbooks?
Reply to this comment
by myles taylor October 14, 2008 1:03 PM PDT
Nothing. They never said it was an upgrade. They are selling the same model as always.
by bestbuy4ever October 14, 2008 1:09 PM PDT
Seriously. NOTHING, MAN! W/ all that hype coming in, I was so disappointed.
by open-mind October 14, 2008 1:29 PM PDT
The new aluminum Macbooks have all the features you listed. The old white plastic Macbook is the same as before but $100 less expensive at $999.
by Dalkorian October 15, 2008 2:36 PM PDT
At least open-mind has demonstrated reading comprehension.
by ferretboy88 October 14, 2008 12:35 PM PDT
Looks so so. Nothing great.
Reply to this comment
by fear_and_loathing October 14, 2008 12:45 PM PDT
What a disappointment!
First, I hate hate HATE, that keyboard! I have ever since they introduced it on the first MacBooks. Why do they want to look (and feel) like a cheap calculator? The black keys against the aluminum looks awful!
Second, I totally agree with mjkphoto on the glossy screen. Why should I have to angle my screen to keep from getting a glare. If memory serves, you used to have a choice between the matte and glossy screens on earlier MacBook Pros, I hope that option comes back.
Apple, your MacBook Pro is supposed to be the top of the line, instead, you've turned it into another cheap, PC looking knockoff, that would look more at home with the rest of the toys at Best Buy as opposed to a Mac store!
Reply to this comment
by george Blake October 14, 2008 12:50 PM PDT
One more time your review drips with how you are not impressed with Apple products. You say a few good things but always temper your remarks with flaws of some kind. If you have nothing good to say dont do Apple reviews

George Blake
Reply to this comment
by ferretboy88 October 14, 2008 1:30 PM PDT
George,
You should go to macrumors.com or any other Apple forum and see how upset they are right now. Sure they love Apples but they wanted a matte screen and still have all the inputs.
by dj_erik October 14, 2008 8:07 PM PDT
George, That is about the most insane comment I've ever heard. Reviews should be as impartial as possible. I'm sure the journalist has their own opinions, but they should try and keep to the facts. If your so much of a fanboy to not understand what reviews are about, perhaps you should just stick to reading Apple's website.
by photog_7 October 14, 2008 12:50 PM PDT
Glossy screens are strictly for beginners.
Bring back the anti-glare option or I'll buy Dells.
Reply to this comment
by Two More October 14, 2008 1:54 PM PDT
you are a loser
by thomcarl October 14, 2008 3:47 PM PDT
photog your the beginner, and a troll as well, although a poor one. I'm sure were all gonna lose sleep if you buy a Dell which would make your double looser.
by Dalkorian October 15, 2008 2:38 PM PDT
"Bring back the anti-glare option or I'll buy Dells."

Dude, you deserve a dell.
Showing 1 of 2 pages (66 Comments)
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

Google hopes to turn the river into a canal

Searching real-time services like Twitter at the moment is like standing in front of a firehose on a hot day: you'll get cooled off, but you'll get knocked over. Google wants to change that.

Will video site Vevo be next-gen MTV?

Vevo is the Web music-video service built by the big record labels with help from YouTube. Can it make an MTV-like splash?