Checking under the hood of Apple's new MacBooks
Tuesday's announcement of new and updated MacBook laptops from Apple could never have lived up to the hype of the past several weeks.
After endless predictions about tablets, touch screens, and cheaper (some would say recession-friendly) products, from an $800 MacBook to an Apple Netbook, the end result was instead a solid list of upgrades and improvements, with a few noteworthy innovations and a few interesting developments that may get lost in the "Where are the $800 MacBooks?" shuffle. Here's our take on what the new developments mean for you.
The new "brick" body construction.
(Credit: James Martin/CNET News)The most obvious of these is the so-called brick manufacturing process, whereby instead of building a frame and overlaying the chassis, Apple is taking the process used in the making the MacBook Air and expanding it to other MacBooks. The brick comes from a 2.5-pound piece of aluminum (in the case of the Air), which is literally whittled down to 0.5 pounds, meaning the internal frame is part of the same piece of metal as the chassis.
We were impressed with the build quality of the MacBook Air, and hearing that it's made of few individual pieces than other laptops makes sense. But the 13- and 15-inch systems always seemed plenty sturdy to us, so we're not sure if this will be a big selling point for casual consumers.
While switching to Intel CPUs a couple of years ago was a huge breakthrough in terms of mainstream appeal for Macs, Apple is moving away from Intel motherboard chipsets in favor of a new one from Nvidia.
The GeForce 9400 M combines a chipset and GPU, which will hopefully be a big improvement over the Intel integrated graphics found in most MacBooks today. It certainly won't match dedicated gaming laptops (and Mac gaming is still in a sorry state), but we've long decried the sad state of integrated graphics, and in fact, have long given up on finding a decent 3D gaming test to run on systems with integrated graphics. (Note that a dedicated 9600M GT graphics card--with either 256MB or 512MB of graphics memory--will be available in the MacBook Pro.)
The revamped MacBook Pro will come in 15- and 17-inch sizes.
(Credit: James Martin/CNET News)Multitouch gestures aren't exactly new--we've seen them on the MacBook Air, and they were added to the last round of MacBook Pro upgrades. But one of the biggest physical changes to the new Apple laptops is the inclusion of what is being called a "multitouch glass trackpad."
We got quite used to using gestures on the Air (as well as the iPhone and iPod Touch), and the idea of a bigger (reportedly 39 percent) touchpad is always a good idea--too many PC makers include tiny touchpads that require several swipes to get your cursor across the screen. The big questions are: Will software makers take advantage of it? And will users get used to not having a physical button to click?
Manufacturing process aside, the actual silhouettes of the systems aren't changing much--some observers were hoping for a more radial re-imagining. The MacBook Pro, for example, looks substantially similar, with minor changes to the ports (Mini DisplayPort) and other features (battery meter on the side, easier-to-access hard drive bay).
The MacBook Air likewise looks physically the same, but adds a 128GB SSD option (Sony's got an ultraportable Vaio with a 256GB SSD and an optical drive), and a Mini DisplayPort. We had hoped Apple would take this opportunity to really revamp the Air, which is a product people love conceptually, but are less fond of in real-world applications.
The new aluminum 13-inch MacBook looks just like a shrunken-down MacBook Pro and costs $1,299 or $1,599.
(Credit: Apple)It may not be $800, but reducing the entry-level price for the regular 13-inch MacBook to $999 is a smart move, and crosses an important psychological barrier. But we can't imagine too many people will want the old white plastic design (couldn't they have at least made the $999 model black?) after they see the sleek new metallic version--which looks just like a shrunken-down MacBook Pro (and costs $1,299 or $1,599). Note that the $999 model also lacks the new Nvidia chipset, the glass trackpad, and the edge-to-edge glass-covered display seen on the new Pros and more expensive 13-inch models.
Also interesting to note is that 128GB SSD drives will be available in both the 15-inch and the aluminum 13-inch models, although they'll likely have a hefty premium.
The final word goes to CNET laptop editor Matt Elliott, who says, "They'll sell a lot more MacBooks and fewer Pros."
We'll be bringing you new reviews, videos, benchmarks, and hands-on impressions of the new MacBooks later this week, so stay tuned.
For complete coverage of the Apple notebook news, see "Apple polishes up its MacBook line."
New York native Dan Ackerman, a former radio DJ turned journalist, has written about technology and music for publications including Spin, Blender, The Hollywood Reporter, and USA Today. He hosts the weekly Digital City podcast and the New York edition of Editors' Office Hours. Dan's new album, Tales Out of Night School, is available now. E-mail Dan. 

The crowd that will be cheering will be the 12" Powerbook club. All those people who wanted a smaller Macbook Pro basically got it back. The Macbook Air did not fill that niche, but I think the new Macbook does quite nicely. Also, I see a reason for upgrading past the white one way more than before. I never saw a compelling reason to go black on the Macbooks before. Now I definitely see a reason for upgrading. Apple filled a gap in their service between the Macbook and the Macbook Pro. They didn't release a sub-notebook, but I'm glad they didn't. I agree with Steve Jobs that Apple doesn't need to get into the netbook. No, they didn't release a laptop for $899, but at $999 (with an educational discount) suddenly all the students who wanted a Mac but had to stay under $1000 will be getting one. I only see their market share increasing after today, even with the disappointments.
Wow, Apple now has less then 1/2 the userbase of Vista ( and Vista has only been around 2 years, not 20+, and a 'failure').
http://tinyurl.com/6lsmdg
let me guess, this is the year of the Linux desktop, right?
It was disappointing, and everyone but the fan-kiddies will admit it.
People like me? What am I like?
Yes, Apple doesn't have the user base that Vista does, but that's not the point. The point is their market share is increasing and $1 in $3 spent on a computer is on a Mac. Apple doesn't want a huge customer base; they want the creme of the crop.
Vista was a "failure" because it people are not upgrading. Apple should have 10% of the userbase as Vista, not 50%. Microsoft had a huge platform to sell Vista to, and failed. Apple is going at just the right pace.
Of course they're expensive, they're stylistic and overpriced just like Apple's computers. I got my 2.8ghz Core 2 Duo, 15.4 inch 1680x1050 LCD, 9600 GT 512mb, 128GB SSD, 4gig Ram, HDMI enabled, Blu-Ray drive, and 5.1 sound card all for around 1900$. Just TRY to build an equal Apple laptop in the next year for that price.
one the screen you stated does not exist. it would be 1680x1200. Hell I was disappointed at first but now you challenged me to see how much it costs.
HP with the closest config to the macbook pro costs $1,637.99 after rebate. It has less battery life, significantly less processing power, less graphic processing power, no led display. and is 1.31 in. thick vs. 0.95 in. The macbook pro costs 1,999.
HP with closest config to the macbook costs $1,313.99 after rebate. Less processor cache, less graphic power, shorter battery life, no led screen, no multi-touch,1.34 in. vs 0.95 in. Macbook costs $1,299.
Dell with similar config to a macbook pro costs $1,957 after rebates. 1/3 the processor cache. less than 1/2 the graphic processing power, 1.38 vs. 0.95 in of thickness. Macbook pro costs $1,999.
Dell with similar config to a macbook costs $1,567 after rebates. Measely graphic processing power compared to macbook. 1/2 of the cache for the processor, less battery life, and do i really need to show thickness. The macbook costs $1,299.
Now just for the fun of it
Macbook Pro like laptop from Alienware costs $2,789.00
From Voodoo. it is more comparable to the regular macbook and costs $3,299.00.
From Gateway their is none comparable.
From compaq dido.
Did I miss any windows manufactures?
Wow, now maybe ill buy a macbook now.
Thank-you Raqnchie14 for challenging me to see how good of a deal the macbook was, I also believe it surpassed any of those laptops. Now tell me where again did you get your laptop from?
Again, I have not compared the new macbooks for prices, but I can GUARANTEE that I can find an exact Dell laptop for less. You do know that there are online Dell discounts that get you $100-500 off the listed price, right?
In regards to ease of use, really, how hard is it to use a windows machine? I have used both macs and pcs for years and I think they both are really easy to use. It's like saying a manual transmission car is not user-friendly because I don't know how to drive stick. Seriously, just spend a few days and learn. Both windows and macs are pretty easy to use.
Next laptop show around, however, in 2 years or whenever it will be, people will be expecting Tablet Macs.
Creative professionals who are disappointed with Apple's new MacBook Pro with the glass display, please call Apple's Customer Relations Department NOW and file a complaint. A representative will take your comments and give you a case number. Hopefully Apple will get an earful from frustrated creative professionals who prefer the matte display! Maybe they'll change their mind and reinstate the matte finish option.
What are you thinking, Apple? What a HUGE DISAPPOINTMENT.
Also was hoping for a 6"x9" iPod Touch Tablet "notebook" with USB. Oh well ... maybe next time.
ROFLMAO! There goes all credibility you thought you had. Now go tell Billy you have done his bidding, you shill. Maybe he'll pay you!
/P
Unfortunately for you, the vast majority (and that includes Apple fans) are just as disappointed as I am. I'd consider their hardware if they actually gave me a reason to.
Uh huh....interesting. So...what exactly makes this new macbook better than the current gen macbooks?
First, I hate hate HATE, that keyboard! I have ever since they introduced it on the first MacBooks. Why do they want to look (and feel) like a cheap calculator? The black keys against the aluminum looks awful!
Second, I totally agree with mjkphoto on the glossy screen. Why should I have to angle my screen to keep from getting a glare. If memory serves, you used to have a choice between the matte and glossy screens on earlier MacBook Pros, I hope that option comes back.
Apple, your MacBook Pro is supposed to be the top of the line, instead, you've turned it into another cheap, PC looking knockoff, that would look more at home with the rest of the toys at Best Buy as opposed to a Mac store!
George Blake
You should go to macrumors.com or any other Apple forum and see how upset they are right now. Sure they love Apples but they wanted a matte screen and still have all the inputs.
- by photog_7 October 14, 2008 12:50 PM PDT
- Glossy screens are strictly for beginners.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by Two More October 14, 2008 1:54 PM PDT
- you are a loser
- Like this
-
- by thomcarl October 14, 2008 3:47 PM PDT
- photog your the beginner, and a troll as well, although a poor one. I'm sure were all gonna lose sleep if you buy a Dell which would make your double looser.
- Like this
-
- by Dalkorian October 15, 2008 2:38 PM PDT
- "Bring back the anti-glare option or I'll buy Dells."
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (66 Comments)Bring back the anti-glare option or I'll buy Dells.
Dude, you deserve a dell.