Senator warns of DTV-transition 'crisis'
At a hearing on the impending DTV transition Tuesday, Senator Daniel Inouye, chairman of the Commerce Committee, warned that the loss of analog over-the-air TV reception, occurring just 29 days into a new presidential administration, might spell trouble for a country already beset by the financial crisis.
Will there be a communications crisis when millions of analog TV sets go to snow in February?
(Credit: CNET)"While federal agencies and industry have stepped up their efforts, I continue to be concerned that they are not fully prepared for the flood of coupon requests and calls that we can expect just before and after the transition," said the senator, a Democrat from Hawaii. "As the current administration winds down, both agencies must remain vigilant so that the next administration does not inherit a communications crisis."
Referring to test of the DTV switchover conducted two weeks ago, Inouye wasn't encouraged. "As the recent test in Wilmington, North Carolina, demonstrated, even with a Herculean investment of time and resources that will be impossible to replicate throughout the rest of the country, consumers made thousands of phone calls seeking help with various aspects of the transition. On a national level, this may translate to millions of calls. Unless more is done, February 17, and 18, and 19, will be very long days indeed."
FCC Chairman Dennis Martin, conversely, found some encouraging signs in the recent Wilmington test but agreed with Inouye that additional funding for education about the transition was still needed, calling for another $20 million.
More notes from the hearing include the NTIA's request for additional funding for the DTV converter coupon program given an expected "surge" in coupon requests as the deadline approaches; a finding from the Government Accountability Office that the government hasn't done enough to prevent people from losing TV signals or to plan for the surge; testimony from Wilmington Mayor Bill Saffo, who called the overall effort "outstanding," adding that, "We still had residents who went dark"; and concern from multiple sources that many areas of the country will receive fewer TV stations after the transition than they did before.
What's your take? Is the country facing a massive communications meltdown on transition day, or are the senator's concerns overblown? Any ideas or modest proposals of your own to make the switchover smoother? Let us know in comments.
(Via Broadcasting & Cable)


David Katzmaier reviews HDTVs for CNET.
They should also make it law that Comcast or DirectTV have to give you, FOR FREE, a digital-ready converter box.
Many do not have Cellphones, or Push Button Dial Telephones for that matter. Getting them to understand there is a crisis and to buy a shredder is next to impossible. Tell them they need a new gadget to be able to watch Television, you get this reaction like you just landed from another planet and have no clue what you are talking about.
This was exhibited in the Experiment in North Carolina. I have a Grand Mother in this situation. How many of you have Grand Parents that just do not listen and you can not tell anything or Parents for that matter depending on your age?
This Should be taken into consideration.
Sure You and I are able to deal with this issue and likely already have Digital Televisions, DVR's, and Satelite Television signals so we are pretty well insulated from the crisis. But for those that grew up on farms so many years ago where a TV was some new fangled item that they bought one of and it was in the center of the family room as it was the center of attention. Remember the Sunday Night, Sing along with Mitch Miller? Or Bonanza? or Big Valley. Sure that is on TV Land or the Western Channel now. But not long ago that was Prime Time Television. Long Long before CSI, CSI New York, CSI Miam, and NCIS or the SciFi Channel for that matter.
So when you wheel out your Pompus Act, look around at those people around you. Look to see who actually has a Garden in the back yard that grows, ah yes, Vegetables because they need to have them to make ends meet. Or those that are peddling vegetables at the farmers market in the back of a not quite running pickup truck that should have been trade years back. They seem to be over looked all the time as they are not there. But they are there and they too deserve to get Television just like you do. They get their news, weather and farm reports via the Television. Some still use the Radio too. Now Digital Radio is making its run as well. That will be the last vestage of the old farm world gone when the Digital Radio subplants the AM Band to allow for more resale of the radio waves to pay for something else we absolutely NEED because of some hair brain scheme. Instead of making better use of what we already have.
many of them are unaware of the digital switch.
Also, don't count out the elderly.
All of these people should have free and unfettered access to news and public service announcements and emergency information.
TV has long been one of these outlets.
Without television we run the risk of 300MM citizens having nowhere to go for fake news, mindless entertainment, advertising and countless other activities involving watching other people working, yet doing no work themselves.
This could be the end of the world as we know it. Everyone's greatest fear realized.. extra IQ points and a slimmer figure.
For those viewers who have not yet purchased a converter box, Consumer Reports has upgraded their ratings on some of the available converter boxes at: http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/electronics-computers/televisions/digital-tv-converter/ratings/dtv-converter-boxes-ratings.htm
Here is a quick summary of a lot of models: http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/electronics-computers/televisions/digital-tv-converter/overview/dtv-converter-box-guide.htm
But a bigger variable is the need for the right antenna where Off-Air TV reception starts.
Viewers should certainly try their old antenna first. It?s true that any of these older antennas will pick up some signals, maybe all the broadcast signals a viewer wants to receive, depending on their location. If they?re getting all the OTA channels they want and some of their local stations aren?t changing from VHF to UHF or UHF to VHF, than they?re good to go.
In order to know if you?ll have the right antenna or combination of antennas, viewers can look up ?DTV Tentative Channel Designations for the First and Second Rounds? at
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...-06-1082A2.pdf and ?Third Round DTV Tentative Channel Designations? at http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...-06-1675A2.pdf to find out from what channels local stations will be broadcasting after the transition.
Or go to antennapoint.com for a quick general look at a specific city and those TV stations in close by cities within range of an Off-Air antenna.
While cable and satellite program providers will continue to serve the great majority of homes as the
primary signal source, missing HD local reception, compression issues, rising costs, billing add-ons, service outages, contact difficulties, in-home service waits and no shows have left many of these subscribers looking to FREE OTA antennas as a good alternatives.
It?s correct that antennas can?t tell the difference between analog and digital signals, but there are definitely certain models which have higher DTV batting averages than others. Not all antennas are equally suited for DTV. A percentage of viewers will require something a little more tailored for DTV reception.
With one of the newer and smaller OTA antennas, with greatly improved performance, power and aesthetics, viewers may also be able to receive out-of-town channels, carrying blacked out sports programs, several additional sub-channels or network broadcasts not originally available with analog. And for those with an HDTV, almost completely uncompressed HD broadcasts, unlike cable or satellite.
And if they decide to buy a newer antenna, they should buy it from a source that will completely refund their purchase price, no questions asked, if it doesn?t do the job for them.
I've played quite a bit with DTV. I have a very good tuner ($200+ unit I can place remotely an run stations back via ethernet), but I'm in a condo. I can almost see the transmission towers (have a building or two in between), but can't get a single stable channel. When conditions are just right, I can sometimes get a station for about 30 sec to a minute between losing it. I can't put up a roof antenna. Maybe as stations up power levels, some of these issues go away... but if a techie like me can't make it work reliably, how is the average person going to get it going? (they will probably put much less time in messing with it than I have before giving up).
So there's gotta be something up where you live. Either with your antenna or the towers, because the HDTV picture here in Idaho is a million times better then analog ever was.
Yes the Weather Factor of Satelite is just that a Weather Factor. Most that have the Satelite Systems that are IN RURAL Areas have Learned this some time back and also have Weather Alert Radios. Many already HAD Weather Alert Radios as they had Learned Long Long Ago that the Weather Services Always Send MORE Weather Alerts over their Radio System than Television Stations do.
Also this is really not that big of a deal in many house holds as Many already use Weather Bug, or First Alert or whatever the local television stations call it so that they can monitor Radar themselves over the internet. The Internet is usuall either Dialup or ADSL or Cable anyway. Very Few are on Satelite to get high speed internet.
But the point is that Television is not the only method to get Weather Reports out to the masses and the masses know this.
We can beat on this horse till the cows come home. This is going to be fun no matter how well it is planned. Yes there will be profiteers out there that will take a $25.00 and turn it into a $250.00 box just because Wilma and Fred did not understand that their Television would go black with out it.
There will still be low power local transmissions is one thing this report has over looked. So those that have GOOD antennas will still get some signals, but very faint signals.
This will take time and effort to roll out. Not sure how much. But this will be the first challenge to the new administration.
If you're getting your TV via any kind of cable coming out of the wall, you're almost certain to be ok. Seriously, how many folks actually still get their television broadcasts via analog antenna anyway?
The worst part about this is that there'll be a huge profit made during the coming months by retailers capitalizing on the fear & hype to sway the uninitiated into needlessly buying new TVs. I'll bet you'll see more TV sold during this holiday season than in several years past.
Good day.
- by cmstratton September 24, 2008 12:12 PM PDT
- All this taxpayer money surrounding this issue is a big waste of resources. It's TV people - c'mon. How many people still use their rabbit-ear antennas for TV anyway? Even if they do lose their TV, then they'll get new ones if they want it. Otherwise they won't. Simple as that. Let's stop wasting government time and resources on it.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by Lerianis September 24, 2008 12:13 PM PDT
- Quite a few people in West Virginia, quite a few people out in the 'sticks', etc.
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (50 Comments)You would be SHOCKED at how many people still use antennas for TV reception.