iPhone software gets an update
The 3G signal seems much better with the 2.1 update.
(Credit: Dong Ngo/CNET Networks)After more than a month of suffering from agonizing 3G data performance and dropped calls, I was very eager to update my phone to the major 2.1 update, especially since it comes with a lot of promises of improvement.
The update process took a long time, mostly because I needed to back up my phone. (I have a 16GB version of the phone that's almost full). The update took exactly nine minutes. Unlike the 2.0.1 update that caused me to have to reinstall some apps, the 2.1 update was able to retain everything: music, contacts, applications, etc.
The first thing I noticed when the updated phone restarted was the 3G signal strength. When I visited the CNET New York office before the update, I barely had one bar, but after the update the signal strength was fluctuating between three and four bars. I used the SpeedTest app and it registered 381Kb/s, which is significantly faster than the pre-2.1 update. I tried making calls and they seemed better too. I was able to place calls in areas where I used to have to use EDGE to hold a stable conversation.
I also noticed the shorter time required for backing up the phone to iTunes, which is nice. Note that it's still time-consuming, taking around 25 minutes for my 16GB version as opposed to around 40 minutes before.
On the downside, the phone seems to take longer time to start up and to sync calendar and contacts with my PC laptop. The 3G signal still varies within small areas--for example, in the CNET N.Y. Labs, there are still a few corners where I have only one bar. Also there's still no sign of MMS, video recording, and the option to sync or copy multimedia content from more than one computer.
So far, though, this seems to be a nice update. I'll keep posting on what I find out about call quality, battery life, and other issues over the next few days, if they are significantly better/different.
Dong Ngo is a CNET editor who covers networking and network storage, and writes about anything else he finds interesting. You can also listen to his podcast at insidecnetlabs.cnet.com. E-mail Dong. 

ownership of these interface concepts, owing me nothing. As such, posting them here in TMO's forum does not
give TMO or anyone else in the world ownership of these ideas. Of course, someone could try to file a patent on
these ideas if they think they can, to try to get royalties from whomever uses them; good luck!
=================
I have iTunes 8 and iPhone 2.1 software installed.
They are still a BAD lot of software updates, GUI-speaking.
So, the word is definitely out that games are *THE* biggest seller on iPhone/Touch 2.x devices from the App
Store.
I'm NOT one of them who has a slew of games installed.
Rather, I have 5 screens of 'productive' apps / icons, or 80 apps total, as there are 16 apps per screen.
So, even if you have 5 screens of 'game' apps, you're in the same boat as I: The HELLish management of those
icons.
Let's even concede that you may only have 3 screens, that's 48 apps. Or lets even concede that you have 48
apps, but choose to use 5 screens, sort of "grouping" apps on each screen.
Thus, working with ANY of these scenarios, have you ever tried to move an app from the MAIN / homescreen to
the 5th screen? DAMN this is friggin' frustrating.
Why haven't any reviewers on CNET, TMO, MacWorld, iPod Observer, MacNN, etc., totally dogged Apple for not providing a better means to "manage" these apps?
Specifically, that when you install a new app, it gets posted to the first available spot on your iPhone/Touch.
THen you have to move it to where you want it, trying to drag it to whatever screen you prefer.
Then there's the RESTORE NIGHTMARE of those 48 to 80 apps. The are all reinstalled. No problem there.
The nightmare comes in re-organizing all these apps on the screen(s) you prefer.
Here are the two methods which need to be implemented in iTunes 8.0.1 and iPhone/Touch 2.1.1:
1) iTunes 8.0.1: The ability to group the icons on a 'screen', similar to manual playlists for songs. I recommend
they call them "ScreenLists". When viewing the Applications list, you can choose to view icons by "ScreenList",
actually seeing an iPhone/Touch like screen wherein wherein you can 'drag' the apps between the various
screens in the order you desire them to appear.
- Secondly, create a NEW screen when installing new apps, versus tossing the app in the first available spot. Let
the user then decide where to put the app icon.
- Thirdly, let the user 'name' each screen for their own category focus.
2) iPhone/Touch 2.1.1:
- A list-view of all installed apps, alphabetical, just like the Artists or Playlist or Songs lists. There'd be an
alphabet scroll area on the right, too. The user can quickly view and click the app they want to launch, versus
having to hunt for the darn thing on which screen it is on.
- What about installing apps on the iPhone/Touch? Install the app in the last screen, creating a new one if
necessary.
- Provide the ability for the user to be able to organize which screen an app is to appear on (basically a
ScreenList editor).
- Put a 'button' (touch area) to the left of the battery presenting a list of category screens the user can jump to.
THis would be 2 touches (clicks) versus the 4+ swipes (touches/clicks) the user would need to do to get to a
preferred category that is on screen 4 or later.
My name is Bryan Carter, 10-year Apple veteran; known at Apple as bRYgUY, and former team member of the
Apple User Interface Group in the late 80's. I solved 3 of the top 5 issues the (then) HyperCard team was facing
in the final weeks before HyperCard was introduced; and in a weekend at that. There's my credentials, for what
their worth.
-----------
Life is rough, they you fly or fry.
I'm pleased so far with the upgrade.
- by srophone September 15, 2008 9:24 AM PDT
- I have Itunes 8.0.1 installed and I have Iphone 2.1 (SF136) installed.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(3 Comments)I have the Phone in 3G mode and it now switches automaticaly into 2 G Edge mode when the 3g signal is not strong enough. I had to do this manually before.