• On TechRepublic: 10 cool USB flash drive tricks
September 11, 2008 10:37 AM PDT

First Look: Apple's new in-ear headphones

by Donald Bell
  • Font size
  • Print
  • Post a comment
Share

It was easy to miss, but during last Tuesday's flurry of iPod announcements Apple also introduced two new sets of headphones. The first headphones unveiled were a modest pair of $29 earbuds that include an in-line set of playback controls on the cable (play/pause/skip) along with a tiny microphone. Nothing particularly exciting about these except that they may be the cheapest way to activate the voice-recording feature included on the new iPod Nano, Touch, and Classic. When I asked the nearby Apple rep if these earbuds offered any sound improvement over the standard bundled pair, he shook his head and offered me these.

Apple's in-ear headphones look and feel very nice. I didn't have chance to hear them--but it would have been a lost cause in the din of the product demos taking place behind me. I can tell you this: they include two balanced-armature drivers in each earpiece; three pairs of differently-sized silicone ear tips; a screw-on metal grille covering the aperture; two extra replacement grilles; a plastic case with a cable wrap; and the same in-line controls and microphone included on the previously mentioned earbuds. They also cost $79.

Close up photo of Apple's in-ear headphones.

The metal screen covering the aperture of Apple's new in-ear headphones screws off for easy cleaning.

(Credit: Apple)

Apple makes some amazing software and hardware, but I had doubts that they could (or would) devote internal resources to designing a pair of headphones as nice as the ones I was holding. I naively asked the Apple rep next to me who they had worked with to make these headphones. No comment.

I have a theory about who's cooking up Apple's high-end earphones (any guesses?), but in the end, it doesn't matter. I suspect Apple will sell a shedload of these things, especially to customers who've only ever heard their music through the tin-pan earbuds that come bundled with their iPod. The $79 price point puts the product below Shure's entry-level SE110 in-ear headphones, and level with offerings from V-Moda and Ultimate Ears. Plus, Apple's headphones offers users bonus features such as playback control and voice recording for the current generation of iPods.

Both pairs of Apple's new headphones will be available in October of this year. To see the Apple In-Ear headphones in action, you can take a look at my First Look video.

Update: the Apple iPhone 3GS is capable of supporting both the remote clicker and volume controls used on the in-ear headphones. Previous iPhone models still lack support for the headphones' remote volume control feature.

The following product mentioned is available.

On Sale Now: $66.95 - $79.00
View the latest prices for Apple In-Ear headphones

Donald Bell is CNET Reviews' senior editor for MP3 players and portable audio, and one half of the MP3 Insider blog and weekly podcast. He also likes getting his hands dirty with digital audio tools for musicians and DJs.
Recent posts from Crave
Top 10 2009: Most popular TVs
The 404 482: LIVE NOW at 11 a.m.(ish) EST!
Buy Picasa photo storage, get a free Eye-Fi card
How to fit a pharmacist in your pocket
Crave giveaway of the day: Targus Crave laptop bag
Boxee unveils prototype 'Boxee Box'
The 411: Data talk and music transfer
Top 10 2009: Most popular MP3 players and accessories
by SSchroader September 11, 2008 11:38 AM PDT
The 'news' is that IEMs (canal phones) with dual balanced-armature drivers are currently priced between $200-$350, so "hearing them" and reporting on how they compare with existing models is THE actual info we need. The prime feature of IEMs is isolation, so your attempt at Palin-Rovian misdirection regarding the room ambience was pathetic. Just say Apple wouldn't let me try them. Of course, it's pretty clear that you could also add "but then again, I wouldn't know what to listen for anyway." Typical cnet mediocrity.
Reply to this comment
by gornichecl September 11, 2008 2:59 PM PDT
Palin-Rovian misdirection....? wow. just wow.
by FatalAce September 11, 2008 10:13 PM PDT
hahahhaha
James Kim knew how to make good reviews
by warrenrichards10 September 12, 2008 2:04 AM PDT
Tell me, do you practice writing with such inane crap, if you want super in depth analysis go somewhere else this ? cnet mediocrity ? is for the general public , you know, I bet you buy monster cables don?t you.
by maxwell_edison September 11, 2008 12:42 PM PDT
SSchroader: Here, let me help you with that stick - it can't be too comfortable wedged up your ass like that.
Reply to this comment
by jabberwolf September 11, 2008 1:13 PM PDT
Wow, those are just like um.... 50 other headphones that look exactly alike and have the same functions.

Why is this even news?
Reply to this comment
by melic September 11, 2008 4:28 PM PDT
Maybe you missed this part: With this [heaphone], you can adjust the volume, control music or video playback ? including play/pause and next/previous ? and record voice memos.
by ZephyrVolta September 12, 2008 5:06 PM PDT
I guess it's from Apple, so it's sales will probably better, and because it allows for recording on iPods, which is actually pretty cool.
by iwarrior-poet September 11, 2008 1:24 PM PDT
Anyone know (or willing to take an educated guess) if the microphone will work with the iphone for telephone calls?
Reply to this comment
by UKStory1355 September 12, 2008 7:10 AM PDT
No one knows, I have searched all over forums and at Apple's website. They only mention that the controls work with 4G iPods. If they work with calls I'll buy these in a cocaine-heartbeat. If they don't, I'll stick with my Sonys.
by xZero2007x September 11, 2008 1:54 PM PDT
Think about it this way gentlemen: You guys have seen crowds of people in public always using the ipod stock buds, right? I mean, even working my first retail job at Best Buy a couple months ago, it became very clear that people rarely ever did opt for better earphones, even among the tech enthusiasts and such.

Apple has offered an in-ear bud for a while if I'm not mistaken, and some Bose earphones as well at their stores. If they offer their in-ear with decent sound with the competition in its price range, as well as throw in a mic and playback controls for those who weren't initially looking for sound quality, but rather just wanted the added features, think of the market they're creating! If anything, they have the biggest grasp on the portable media player market right now as well as the earphone market. If they can offer something enticing like this, they can, in theory (depending on how many people who don't care about sound go for the added features and the Apple name) open up the small earphone market and enlighten general consumers what they've been missing out on.

At least that's ran through my head after reading this article.
Reply to this comment
by chad.armstrong September 11, 2008 3:06 PM PDT
Had no idea until now that voice recording was now integrated in new iPods (except for the mic). Very cool.
Reply to this comment
by fooldog01 September 11, 2008 3:20 PM PDT
I'm so surprised Apple would release an item that is overpriced for what it is and bank on brain dead consumers and trendy followers to gobble them up like they werent getting ripped off. Maybe they should start doing this with all their products...
Reply to this comment
by gornichecl September 11, 2008 3:27 PM PDT
uh, 1st gen iphone anyone?
by rnaoncfixd September 12, 2008 9:05 AM PDT
I'm not sure if you've shopped for headphones before, but they appear to be priced right online with other headphones of that caliber; specifically in ear head phones.
by RenoDavid September 12, 2008 12:39 PM PDT
Do the people that post this about every friggin' Apple product just cut and paste? We get it already! All Apple products are overpriced and bought by clueless, fashion-obsessed boobs! You happy now? Now, please return to your burrow...
by tipoo_ September 11, 2008 3:35 PM PDT
better earphones dont make up for the only average audio chip in ipods.
Reply to this comment
by tech_junky48 September 11, 2008 5:34 PM PDT
Somewhat less than average, if I recall correctly.
by daedbird September 11, 2008 4:20 PM PDT
My question is what generations of ipods the mic and volume controls these new buds will work on? I suspect that will only be this new generation, exc. for maybe the original ipod, but it would be nice if they worked on the last gen as well. Does this also mean an end to the buds with the FM receiver in them? Just curious
Reply to this comment
by tech_junky48 September 11, 2008 5:36 PM PDT
I think the FM radio antenna was an add-on purchased seperately, which was an inline remote, not actually a set of earbuds. So this shouldn't effect it, as long as it has the throughput to send the signal from the buds to the iPod, not just the other way.
by melic September 11, 2008 5:16 PM PDT
I wonder if other earphone manufacturers can make use of the remote functions (without paying a license fee)?
Reply to this comment
by SSchroader September 11, 2008 6:15 PM PDT
Conflicting reviews of the iPod Nano (4th Gen):

CNet (Don Bell): "sound quality is only average"

PCWorld.com: "According to our tests, the latest iPod Nano improves its audio output as compared with its predecessor, jumping up a notch to receive a rating of Superior on the PC World Test Center's suite of audio tests. The Nano, together with its new Touch sibling, are our new leaders in our audio output results."
Reply to this comment
by RenoDavid September 12, 2008 12:42 PM PDT
Very interesting. Maybe the CNet reviewer just assumed they sounded the same as previous iPods...
by Mosephus September 12, 2008 10:59 AM PDT
If these are indeed dual armature driver in-ear headphones for $79, these are the best deal available. Proof will be in the pudding.
Reply to this comment
by LunaticSX September 13, 2008 2:23 AM PDT
@daedbird

"Does this also mean an end to the buds with the FM receiver in them?"

Apple still offers the iPod Radio Remote, and it's listed as being compatible with the new 4th Gen Nano as well as the Classic (they don't differentiate between the old 80/160 GB and new 120 GB ones, so it'd be all of them). You have to dig around on the Apple Store website a bit to find it, though. Obviously it's not one of their best sellers (personally, I carry a media player so I don't HAVE to listen to the d*mn radio). They're still on the racks at local brick-n-mortar Apple Stores, too.
Reply to this comment
by dexter_birdbrain September 13, 2008 5:51 AM PDT
"I have a theory about who's cooking up Apple's high-end earphones (any guesses?)"

Are you talking about Bose? They offer customized docking stations for iPod and I won't be surprised if they are doing these headphones as well...
Reply to this comment
by DavidMC99 December 29, 2008 1:43 AM PST
Do not believe the hype. They are not worth the money. The $29 set has better sound quality. I just purchased and returned this set for a refund. They sound like a tin can. If you like to hear bass, or you listen to hip-hop music, you will be very disappoint with the frequency respond. It really cut off the low-end of the frequency bandwidth.

The headphone looks good and come in a great-looking package, but Apple should have put the money in engineering the sound quality.

I will keep my Bose for home and use the ones shipped with my iPhone when I'm on the road.

David
Reply to this comment
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

Google hopes to turn the river into a canal

Searching real-time services like Twitter at the moment is like standing in front of a firehose on a hot day: you'll get cooled off, but you'll get knocked over. Google wants to change that.

Will video site Vevo be next-gen MTV?

Vevo is the Web music-video service built by the big record labels with help from YouTube. Can it make an MTV-like splash?