• On TV.com: BATTLESTAR Galactica Maxim Photoshoot
August 20, 2008 2:45 PM PDT

Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte: It's this or a plasma TV

by Andrew Lim

It seems Nokia is rather partial to its luxury 8800 range, and while we'd like to say the Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte is a welcome departure from its predecessors, we would be lying harder than a desperate real estate agent.

Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte (Credit: Nokia)

This is another attractive, yet ultimately boring, phone that tries to allure wallet-bulging buyers with the increasingly tired combination of a preposterous price tag and high-end materials such as carbon fiber, metal, and glass. It's not that we don't like it; we'd just prefer to see something a little less "BMW interior" sometimes.

Feature-wise, you get a 3.2-megapixel camera, 3G, an OLED display and expandable memory. As with older models, Nokia says the Carbon Arte has an anti-fingerprint coating so you won't need to spend hours polishing--and that's about it. There's not as much as you might expect in a luxury phone, but perhaps less is more (or at least you'd hope so).

If you're a yak herder, thinking to yourself that with those kind of features and a fairly old design you're only going to have to trade in a few yaks, think again. The Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte will set you back around 1,100 euros SIM-free--that's abut 1,608 of your precious dollars. To put that into perspective, you could buy a 42-inch plasma TV, such as the Panasonic Viera TH-42PX80B, for that money. Yikes is all we can say.

(Via Crave UK)

Recent posts from Crave
Ricoh goes modular for GXR camera system
Moxi cuts price on its DVR, adds step-up model with a triple tuner
2010 Tesla Roadster Sport first drive
Sneak peek: Xobni e-mail app for BlackBerry
The DIY secret-knock door lock
New BlackBerry software will make your phone cooler
The 411: Storage limits and more on data plans
Can Bheestie Bag save your soaked device?
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by tech_junky48 August 20, 2008 3:12 PM PDT
Huh?

I thought US dollars were worth less than the Euro right now? I think you missed a 1, the correct amount should be around $1,621.30

Check your numbers.
Reply to this comment
by Leslie Katz August 20, 2008 3:29 PM PDT
Yes, a 1 dropped off there. Thanks for the catch!
by jpayork August 21, 2008 11:28 AM PDT
Dude, they said 1100 Euros, ABOUT $1608. Check your own numbers!
Reply to this comment
by tech_junky48 August 21, 2008 12:37 PM PDT
@jpayork

look at the comment on my post. They edited it. Read comments before you comment.
by bornlikethis38 August 22, 2008 12:52 AM PDT
For that kind of money it should have every feature known to man. Its probably only the OLED screen that makes it that expensive. But OLED...MMMM...is like an orgasm for the eyes.
Reply to this comment
by richardmajor86 August 22, 2008 2:09 AM PDT
It's very expensive, but is delicious to look at.

You're paying money for better build quality and materials. Its like the difference between a Casio Calculator watch, and a nice Rolex. The Casio has loads of amazing watch features, but the Rolex, well that's a Rolex. I know which one I'd have....


....The Rolex, then sell it on and buy a Omega. - I'm just not a Rolex fan.
Reply to this comment
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.