House committee moves to ban in-flight cell phone use
Quiet please: A House committee has moved to prohibit in-flight cell phone use.
(Credit: Kent German/CNET Networks)A House of Representatives committee threw another hurdle into the path of in-flight cell phone use Thursday, when it voted to ban the use permanently. By a voice vote, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee passed the Halting Airplane Noise to Give Us Peace(or Hang Up) Act, which was introduced earlier this year by Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.).
The legislation, which now moves to the full House for consideration, would prohibit "voice communications using communications devices on scheduled flights," with exceptions for flight crew members and a federal law enforcement officer acting in an official capacity. In-flight texting, Wi-Fi, and e-mail on airplanes would not be affected.
In a statement, DeFazio said that not only is cell phone use aloft an annoyance, but also that airlines should be stopped from using in-flight talking as a potential revenue source. "With airline customer satisfaction at an all time low, this is not the time to consider making airplane travel even more torturous," he said. "Polls show the public overwhelmingly doesn't want to be subjected to people talking on their cell phones on increasingly over-packed airplanes." During the hearing, Rep. John Mica (R-Fla.) lodged a dissenting voice, saying, "You are trying to legislate courtesy, folks, and that just doesn't work."
In the past few years, the federal government has not looked kindly at in-flight calling. The Federal Communications Commissions, with support from the Federal Aviation Administration, already bans in-flight cell phone use, but the agency has the power to revisit the issue at any time. The Hang Up Act, however, would write the prohibition into federal law.
CNET News poll
Industry reaction is mixed for now. Though the Airline Transport Association, the industry's main lobbying arm, is not backing the bill, the Association of Flight Attendants, and some consumer groups are supporting a ban on sky-high cell chatting.
Meanwhile, across the Atlantic, the European Union's equivalent of the FAA is moving toward allowing cell phone use on intra-European flights. Air France has already conducted a study of in-flight cell use on one of its aircrafts, albeit to mixed results; Ryanair, Emirates, and Qantas are considering allowing cell phone use as well. Yet, those airlines could also be subject to the Hang Up Act on flights to the United States.
Kent German is a senior editor for cell phone reviews at CNET. When he's not testing the newest handsets on the market, he's blogging about cell phone news for Crave. In his On Call column, he answers reader questions and gives his take on the rapidly changing mobile industry. E-mail Kent. 

Yet we still will have people talking loudly, or kids with their MP3 players (fully legal on airplanes) blasting away. This law is worthless legislation at it's finest! Are we going to put gag's on the passengers to make the flight quiet as well?
Am I the only one that sees this bill as a complete and utter waste? The FAA *could* have passed a FAR barring use in flight, but they were smart and didn't. They knew cell's posed no danger. The Industry for YEARS has told us to turn the phones off (FCC policy) in flight. The individual airlines can have their own rules and enforce them, this didn't happen. Big Brother is tossing his weight around AGAIN.
And even if this law gets passed, there is a very good reason that a judge could use to overturn this law. One could argue, while we do not have the "right" to talk on a cell phone, congress also doesn't have to autority to take away the ability without having a reason to do so. If people don't want people talking on planes, they will ask the airlines to ban cell phone. Airlines do have the right to do that, but it would be wise to either have passengers hold a vote whether phone can be used, or clearly designate which flights allow phone.
But when I first read the headline, it made me think that the government is planning something nefarious seems how they are banning something that is already banned. Why else can you explain redundant laws? It's either that, or they're just wasting our money making useless laws, kind of like how it's illegal to fish while sitting on the back of a giraffe in Illinois. I don't even think it's legal to own a giraffe, so it's pointless to make laws about fishing from them.
The airlines phones saved the Capital on 9/11.
Also it will make tickets go up.
- by renaistre August 4, 2008 9:20 AM PDT
- If we're moving from an issue of safety to an issue of courtesy, how does our government have the right, not to mention the nerve, to pass this ban? If there really are technical problems that would go along with using the phones from 30,000', that is also an issue that needs to be looked at. But to ban them because they are annoying? Give me a break! Of course they can be annoying, but that's an issue for the airlines or even the passengers themselves to deal with.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by willdryden August 4, 2008 8:57 PM PDT
- It is not as easy on an airplane as a city bus. After 45 minutes, I threw a cell phone out the door when the bus stopped. Can't do that with an airplane.
- Like this
-
(21 Comments)