• On BNET: 3 worst things about the iPhone 3G S
January 12, 2009 8:41 AM PST

GM to build Chevy Volt batteries

by Candace Lombardi

General Motors has decided to manufacture its own battery packs for its new electric vehicle, the Chevy Volt.

"GM is getting back in the battery business," CEO Rick Wagoner announced Monday.

The company also announced Monday that it has chosen LG Chem to provide the lithium-ion cells for the battery packs GM plans to manufacture.

GM announced in September that it had chosen a battery supplier, but would not reveal which company that was. LG Chem and A123Systems have long been involved in the development of the lithium-ion cells for the Volt's E-Flex electric drive train. While some speculated on other companies getting the contract, it should be no surprise that one of the developers was chosen to be the supplier.

Monday's announcement follows mixed December news on the Chevy Volt's progress. It was reported that because of the financial crisis facing the company, the plant for the Chevy Volt engine may be put on hold. GM followed that news up with an announcement that bringing the Volt to market is one of the company's highest priorities.

GM's Chevy Volt.

(Credit: GM)

Batteries have long been the technological hurdle in developing electric cars, the major showpieces for many car companies at this year's North American International Auto Show in Detroit.

Initially, GM had planned to purchase the battery packs--as well as the cells--from an outside supplier, but eventually it "decided that strategically it's in the company's best interest to move into the pack business," said Bob Kruse, GM's executive director of North American Engineering Operations.

The planned plant will manufacture the T-shaped battery packs for the Chevy Volt, which GM plans to make available by the end of next year. The Volt runs on batteries for 40 miles and then an on-board internal combustion engine runs a generator to recharge the batteries.

GM also tested batteries from A123 Systems, which lost out to LG Chem as a supplier. Kruse said that A123 Systems is in consideration for future work.

Construction of the plant is contingent on GM receiving tax incentives from the state of Michigan to build the facility, Kruse said. Right now, most battery production is done in Asia.

"I think there's an opportunity to create a supply base here in the U.S. but it's going to require some government leadership to say this is strategic," he said.

In tandem with the announcement, GM has also signed a deal with the University of Michigan to open a battery lab in the state. It will be the largest battery lab in the U.S, according to GM.

Automakers are able to work on low volumes of electric cars, but the industry lacks enough skilled personnel to manufacture on a large scale, said Anne Marie Sastry, a professor at the University of Michigan.

CNET News' Martin LaMonica contributed to this report.

Candace Lombardi is a journalist who divides her time between the U.S. and the U.K. Whether it's cars, robots, personal gadgets, or industrial machines, she enjoys examining the moving parts that keep our world rotating. Email her at CandaceLombardi@gmail.com. She is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not a current employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Planetary Gear
Sacramento getting smart grid
Orange unveils solar concept tent at Glastonbury
An LED breakthrough in Korea?
Aggies rethinking truck freight with electric train
Sonic lasers--a shot heard 'round the world
Hybrid trucks strut on Capitol Hill
A Google design contest for Guggenheim fans
Solar bus shelters for San Francisco
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by i8246i January 13, 2009 6:16 AM PST
Lets hope they decide to make their plant in the USA. It would create a ton of new jobs (that is, if they market their hybrids intelligently), and restore some faith in the consumers.
Reply to this comment
by i8246i January 13, 2009 6:19 AM PST
Wow, guess I should read the whole article before making a comment.

*facepalm*
by maxsell January 13, 2009 6:31 AM PST
This is a very good move for GM and the US. We need to create our own battery manufacturing facilities and not be so reliant on other countries. We don't want to be in another crude oil import situation.
Reply to this comment
by i8246i January 13, 2009 6:44 AM PST
I'm also holding onto the pipe dream that with this new Volt, some of the closed down plants will...re-open? And that GM will let their old employees back on?

*sigh* One can only hope
by AmbientShadow January 13, 2009 10:21 AM PST
I guess all we can do is cross our fingers and hope that the Volt will be the savior of american car manufacturing we all hope it to be. Let us also hope that GM improves their interior build quality, 'cause man, the **** got 'em beat hard on that one >.<
Reply to this comment
by JimminieCricket January 15, 2009 1:48 PM PST
This is not new technology...... 1990 California passed a 0% emissions mandate. 1990 GM created an electric car that could go 60-70 miles using NO FUEL. You could plug it in while you slept. It was called the EV1. There was a wait list for these cars. Someone or something scared GM into pulling them all off the street. They went so far as to shred each and every one of them. Check out the documentary "Who killed the electric car" Visit: http://www.pluginamerica.org/
We all need to asure that petroleum companies don't stop the electric car from being created!
Reply to this comment
by January 16, 2009 8:58 PM PST
The EV1's were shredded because they didn't meet US safety standards--that's why they were all leased, not sold. Whether that was right or wrong is irrelevant--it wasn't a conspiracy, just the facts of life.
by polis12 January 28, 2009 7:50 PM PST
The other poster speaks the truth, the GM EV1 was not fully compliant with US safety standards and was not a long-term solution. If I remember correctly, the safety standards were relaxed through legislation on conditions of a test basis, as the whole thing was relatively an experiment for both the government and GM.

In addition, for a more practical reason why the EV1 was a failure, it was mostly just good business practice regardless of what that documentary showed (and yes, I saw it). The EV1 was not a sustainable car for the time, even if the thing had been technologically sound (which it wasn't). For 99.9% of consumers, the EV1 just was not a practical car. Therefore, the thing was expensive to produce, unmarketable, and would have been a poor seller. At the end of the day, a business cannot survive supporting such products. Trust me, GM would have been dead a long time ago had they thrown all their eggs in the EV1's basket.
(8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About Planetary Gear

In a software-driven world, it's easy to forget about the nuts and bolts. Whether it's cars, robots, personal gadgetry or industrial machines, Candace Lombardi examines the moving parts that keep our world rotating in her blog, Planetary Gear. A journalist who divides her time between the US and the UK, Lombardi has written for the sites of The New York Times, CNET, USA Today, MSN, ZDNet, Silicon.com and Gamespot. Email her at CandaceLombardi@gmail.com. She is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not a current employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Planetary Gear topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right