• On CBSSports.com: Watch NCAA® Championship games live
November 23, 2009 4:22 PM PST

Police arrest exec for not using Twitter

by Chris Matyszczyk
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 35 comments

No, this isn't The Onion.

But just look at that headline and wonder how it could possibly be true.

Well, according to Newsday, Canadian teen sensation Justin Bieber was due to conduct an album signing at the Roosevelt Field mall in Garden City, N.Y.

It seems that thousands of teenage girls turned up to mob the wondrous teen hope, a happening perhaps so frightening that Bieber did not turn up.

The Nassau County police became rather concerned that the crowd might break the glass in store windows with its shrieking. (The official word seems to have been "unruly," but teenage girls are never really that.)

So they asked a senior vice president from Island Def Jam Records (Bieber's record label), James A. Roppo, to do what record label executives often do when solving a difficult situation: tweet.

However, he is alleged to have not complied with this endearing request and thus found himself arrested, pending charges that might, according to the police, comprise criminal nuisance, endangering the welfare of a minor, and obstructing government administration.

Kevin Smith of the Nassau County Police told the AP: "We asked for his help in getting the crowd to go away by sending out a Twitter message. By not cooperating with us, we feel he put lives in danger and the public at risk."

What is somewhat peculiar is that a tweet was sent from Justin Bieber's account around the time of the arrest, reading: "they are not allowing me to come into the mall. if you don't leave, I and my fans will be arrested, as the police just told us."

Bieber followed this message up with another tweet pleading for the high-pitched wailers to disperse, just three minutes later.

All this occurred Friday. And, thanks to Bieber himself, I have embedded YouTube footage of the melee at the mall.

Bieber posted a link to this footage Saturday and tweeted, "wow. this upsets me. the mall should of had proper security. They wouldnt let me in! Gotta make this right 4 the fans."

Well, yes, it should of. Just look at the worried faces of the parents. Just listen to the screams of the aficionadas. This is the kind of nightmare many will have experienced after a large tub of dulce de leche eaten well past midnight.

I cannot imagine what Roppo might have said to the police in order to incite their wrath. However, looking at this footage, I suspect that something like "Look at these people!!!! They're outta their minds!!! You really think a tweet is going to stop them from screaming?!!!" might have been part of the dialogue.

It is also pleasantly reassuring that the mall staff appears, near the end of the footage, to have resorted to analog crowd dispersal means. Yes, someone found a loudhailer.

However, I can find no record of any arrests from the scene other than Roppo's. And certainly, no one else appears to have been arrested for refusing to tweet.

Therefore, this truly seems to be a world first. One can only look forward to the day when someone's Facebook friends cause them to be arrested for not updating their status.

Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Technically Incorrect
Teen gets carpal tunnel from texting, wants iPhone
iPad ad goes viral
Cloak of invisibility becomes more foreseeable
Burger King's secret cameras stun customers
Facebook chatter betrays alleged Mafia hitman
South Park creates new EA Tiger Woods game
Ingenious proof that publishing may have a future
Ex-employee accused of remotely disabling 100 cars
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (35 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
by EvanSei November 23, 2009 4:57 PM PST
WOW! Thank god that was not happening were I live. This sort of thing ranks right up there with the
wal-mart black friday tramplings ;)
Reply to this comment
by xaduurv November 23, 2009 4:59 PM PST
Ye GODS that's insane!
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis3 November 23, 2009 5:10 PM PST
No, not really..... you have to remember that we are talking about TEENAGE GIRLS here, and nothing is really 'insane' with them.
by DatabaseDoctor November 23, 2009 5:00 PM PST
Chris:

The words are "should have" not "should of". You might have have heard the contraction "should've" but it is not "should of". I do enjoy your posts but this one drove me crazy with the improper English. As an advisor to major corporations on content creation and marketing, I would've expected better.
Reply to this comment
by November 23, 2009 5:08 PM PST
This is a quote from Bieber, not Chris' words
by joevai52 November 23, 2009 5:41 PM PST
DatabaseDoctor, you beat me to it. I too enjoy this blog. I can only hope that it was some sort of typo and that he doesn't actually think "should of" is the correct phrase.

This wasn't a quote; the quote ended at the end of the previous paragraph. It was simply a mistake by Chris.
by pjhenry1216 November 23, 2009 6:30 PM PST
::sigh:: it is a quote... kinda. He's responding to Bieber's misuse of the phrase. He was poking fun at his bad grammar. However, I suppose some folks don't have a really good grasp on reading comprehension. I'll admit it was somewhat subtle, but its ambiguous enough that you should have felt there's a chance you may be wrong for calling him out on it or at least do so with a bit more respect.
by inferno2000 November 23, 2009 6:52 PM PST
SIGH. It feels good to know I'm not the only one who cares about such things. Phonetic writing is constantly invading the lexicon, and people pick up the bad examples if there's no correcting influence. In this case, people constantly hear people say "should 'ave" and guess the spelling incorrectly.
by ChrisMatyszczyk November 23, 2009 7:16 PM PST
@DatabaseDoctor,

PJHenry1216 has it right. And, as he's been around here for a while, he should of.

Chris
by 6stringluke November 23, 2009 7:24 PM PST
While it poorly translates to the written word, I believe Chris was being sarcastic.
by kojacked November 23, 2009 8:01 PM PST
Ah... global warming, world hunger, nukes everywhere, terrorism, failing schools, the economy, and on and on and on... Wake up you grammer nazis! There's a big old world out there full of problems much more importnat than this. Unbelieveable...

Oh and does it feel good to know that YOU WERE WRONG?!?!?!?
by gjl229 November 24, 2009 7:28 AM PST
Chris, I'm afraid PJ does NOT have it right.

Quotation marks in your graf and/or "sic" in his tweet would be correct, not to mention helpful. Simply repeating the error is .... um .... incorrect.

You wrote well, probably trying to meet a deadline, but made a small mistake. Why not fess up?
by Dalkorian November 24, 2009 4:41 PM PST
Chris, don't let the fact that subtlety is lost on some discourage you. Some people just don't of a clue.
by yukonsooner November 25, 2009 8:32 AM PST
Hey kojacked, the word is "grammar" not "grammer"... oops!

Also, you misspelled "unbelievable".

Now, on to solving the world hunger problem! *wink*
by littleM November 23, 2009 5:06 PM PST
Guess this sort of thing didn't end with the Beatles.
Reply to this comment
by kenmccaz1 November 23, 2009 5:10 PM PST
Bieber said: ... the mall should of had proper security.
Author said: ... yes, it should of.

Should of ???
I believe you both mean should HAVE, do you not?
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian November 24, 2009 4:42 PM PST
facepalm
by Lerianis3 November 23, 2009 5:12 PM PST
This guy should have shown up at the signing. I am sorry, but when you make something like this public, you are supposed to show up whether you like it or not.
And if it was the police who were keeping this guy from showing up.... the police have some 'splaning' to do!
Reply to this comment
by gerrrg November 23, 2009 5:13 PM PST
Funny. "Oh my gawd."
Reply to this comment
by smookish November 23, 2009 5:16 PM PST
a loudhailer???
Reply to this comment
by Mergatroid Mania November 23, 2009 5:23 PM PST
Yeah...lol. how about a bullhorn?
by Mr_fleabite November 24, 2009 8:01 AM PST
or megaphone... is that one word I don't want to be attacked by the spelling Nazis above. Oh wait all they can do is hurl corrections. eh.
by gsna_dkm November 23, 2009 5:23 PM PST
These charges will be dropped as a matter of logic. The exec refused to tweet and was arrested for "criminal nuisance, endangering the welfare of a minor, and obstructing government administration." The criminal nuisance was the gaggle of teenage girls. The endangerment was due to the behavior of the gaggle of teenage girls. As for the obstruction of government administration, there would have been no reason for the officers to assemble without the presence of the teenage girls. The exec has no culpability in this.
Reply to this comment
by ProfFrink November 23, 2009 5:41 PM PST
I just wonder who they hoped to reach with "twittering"? I failed to see a single person checking their twitter account in the video? they were all too involved with talking with each other or photographing/video recording the event.

Besides, everyone knows Facebook is where it's at these days. lol jk
Reply to this comment
by sfens November 23, 2009 6:15 PM PST
Many legal issues here.

This could be akin to yelling fire in a public place. Free speech is not always free. It can be seen as creating danger in a public place.

Also, I read reports that said he was arrested for not tweeting to cancel the signing. I also read that he continued to tweet that there was a signing. Not sure who is correct here,but if he did continue to tweet that there was a signing, he clearly was arrested for "doing" something as opposed to not doing something. That would get back to the point about yelling fire in a public place.

Lastly, since when do VP's not need to take an English class? Thank goodness others picked up on this.

Oh, and who is Justin Bieber?
Reply to this comment
by Mr_fleabite November 24, 2009 8:12 AM PST
My fisrt thoughts when reading this...
Justin Bieber.
Who the eff is Justin Bieber?
Watching video...
okay, they want Justin.
oh look the running of the teenage girls, brilliant they are hearding them outside through the service doors.
aww they got back in, but they're on the 1st floor now.
who the eff is Justin.
by lfhlaw November 23, 2009 6:56 PM PST
The other problem i see with this is that How many of those teenage girls subscribe to the executive's Twitter account? I know they would be perhaps signed onto Justin Bieber's Twitter, but a Record Label Executive's twitter account? I don't think so.

It would be like saying, Asking Britney Spear's Manager to twitter and say that she's running late, I doubt a single fan would be looking at a manager's twitter.
Reply to this comment
by yukonsooner November 25, 2009 8:36 AM PST
Thank you for making a very logical comment. Clearly, the police don't know a thing about Twitter.
by Patrick5651 November 23, 2009 7:19 PM PST
It sounds like a planned "Stunt" useful to stretch their advertising dollar.
Reply to this comment
by John Steinbruner November 23, 2009 10:10 PM PST
Insane.............

I have never used Twitter and never will...

To be arrested for not using such an inane service is insane...
Reply to this comment
by frankz00 November 24, 2009 6:36 AM PST
Ruh roh! Twitter has jumped the shark!
Reply to this comment
by sonicdivx November 24, 2009 7:23 AM PST
Dang it! I thought this was the "Where's Paul Blart - The Mall Cop" video. I was sure I spotted him near the intimidating mall security golf cart.

I think when the charges are dropped the arresting officer should Facebook the apology, stick that Twitter!
Reply to this comment
by seriouslycgi November 24, 2009 12:30 PM PST
"THROW THE FIRE ALARM" would be as easy as that, it probably would have been over safety capacity anyway.
Reply to this comment
by gggg sssss November 24, 2009 7:24 PM PST
maybe Obama can get the cops and the teen idol to meet over a beer. Or are they all just white?
Reply to this comment
by DeviceGuy November 25, 2009 11:13 AM PST
Well, security had one thing right, actually: try a loudhailer ONLY after attempting to reach them by text (of course, they forgot teens don't use Twitter). You can try hailing teens right next to you with a loudhailer and they won't hear ya! Eh, analog sound is lost on 'em anyway. Kids These Days...sheesh...
Reply to this comment
(35 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
advertisement
CNET River
advertisement

Viacom, Google air dirty laundry in court docs

Copyright confrontation gets fierce. Viacom says YouTube founders always intended to build video version of Napster and looked for ways to "to avoid the copyright bastards."
• Google's statement on YouTube-Viacom

Google's fast pipe to Asia almost ready

An undersea cable built by a group including Google and telecom companies is set to start carrying traffic at any point, with Google to get as much as 20 percent of the capacity.

advertisement

About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right