• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
October 14, 2009 11:03 PM PDT

Prince Philip: I practically have to make love to my TV

by Chris Matyszczyk
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 19 comments

Prince Philip is the tall chap who married the queen of England, enjoys making beautifully inappropriate comments, and feels intimate contact with his television might be necessary in order to make it work.

In a revealing interview, only some of which seems to have appeared on the Buckingham Palace YouTube channel, the prince laid bare his electrical dysfunction, one that many might, secretly or not, actually share.

His interviewer, a rather well spoken chap called Kevin McCloud, brightened up the pages of London's Times newspaper with some of the prince's heartfelt words.

Perhaps the most elegant of the phrases turned by the 88-year-old prince was: "To work out how to operate a television set, you practically have to make love to the thing."

It has never been my habit to wonder about the conjugal behavior of the regal.

However, once one's mind goes quickly beyond boggling in order to consider how one might make one's plasma pulse race, one begins to appreciate that many people do find it rather difficult to grasp even 10 percent of their gizmos' workings.

Prince Philip photographed moving swiftly.

(Credit: CC Steve Punter/Flickr)

Of course, the prince's imagery is so disconcerting that I wonder just what actions came immediately before the creation of, for example, Prince Charles.

However, Phil the Greek, as he is sometimes known in pejorative circles, will no doubt receive some sympathy for his giddy criticism of technology's grave new world. Why can't things be just blindingly simple, especially for those whose eyes are not quite what they used to be?

Not satiated with his criticism of televisual operations, the prince turned his mind and, one feared, his devilishly seductive eyes, toward the Web.

"The Web sites I've seen are so awful it's untrue," he told McCloud. "They're so unfit for purpose I'm surprised anyone tolerates them."

Surely he has a point. There are so many ill-designed sites on the Web that one's eyes sometimes water with pain. However, given the prince's somewhat outre position on the subject of televisions, many will find themselves caught in the uncomfortable posture of now considering which Web sites the prince has, um, actually visited.

Please might readers suggest something appropriate, as I fear my own thinking has been addled and muddled by the prince's highly colorful imagery.

Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Technically Incorrect
The Black Friday deals that aren't
Has Twitter peaked?
NASA signs 'The Rock' to make it seem cool
Can Facebook group change World Cup game result?
How smoking can ruin your Mac
Town to photograph every car that enters and leaves
The dad who only talked to his son in Klingon
Parents take away Xbox; boy dials 911
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (19 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by james_w_uk October 15, 2009 2:17 AM PDT
The Queen is married to the Duke of Edinburgh, NOT Prince Philip. Prince Philip is the Queen's son, and is married to Camilla. Please get simple things like this right! Makes quite the difference.
Reply to this comment
by ChrisAubeck October 15, 2009 3:02 AM PDT
No, no, no. You're getting Philip I, Prince of Taranto, mixed up with the late great Charlie Pace of Manchester, England. Often happens.
by Zomic13 October 15, 2009 2:55 AM PDT
Prince Philip is the Duke of Edinburgh, who is married to the Queen.

Prince Charles is married to Camilla and is the Queen's son.
Reply to this comment
by Paul Isaac October 15, 2009 4:10 AM PDT
So which one recorded 1999 then?
Reply to this comment
by danielj1987 October 15, 2009 4:16 AM PDT
no, no, no, you're all wrong. you're getting henry VIII confused with the duke of ear. henry is the one who married that one queen who had a husband for every day of the week. the duke is the one whose cousin took that one princess to live in the fire swamp, while, according to rumor, they took in an r.o.u.s. to be their pet.
Reply to this comment
by Pishkado October 15, 2009 4:28 AM PDT
I think you're getting the Duke of Ear confused with the Duke of Earl. One is a song. The other is a really good audiologist.
by danielj1987 October 15, 2009 8:25 AM PDT
Ok, yeah, typo, duke of earl. duke duke duke duke of earl duke duke duke of earl, duke duke duke of earl. and yes, it is a song
by c4s2k3 October 15, 2009 11:38 AM PDT
Is Prince Phillip related to Sir Osis of Liver or Sir Loin of Beef? Those guys ROCK!
by sanjayb October 23, 2009 2:41 PM PDT
@danielj1987

Your original post was too funny!! I got a great laugh out of it. Thanks!!!
by jture October 15, 2009 4:32 AM PDT
Dear Prince Philip: I guess you're too old to know about the acronym TMI. We really, really, DON'T want to know about your relationship with your television set. Thank you.
Reply to this comment
by zyxxy October 15, 2009 4:40 AM PDT
You're all off post!

In any case, I can sympathize with Prince Philip. Most consumer product implementations suck. The exceptions that prove the rule are always so startling. When you actually acquire a product that just works, no head scratching, no thumbing back and forth in the manual, it almost takes you aback. Then you look at all the other woeful junk you have to deal with every day, and you want to cry. Conjugal relations with your appliances, indeed, except that you are the one that is being had.
Reply to this comment
by Jon Eiche October 15, 2009 7:46 AM PDT
Hear, hear! We live in the 21st century; why hasn't technology made itself easier to use? Maybe part of the problem is that it's not simply a matter of technology, but of design. The people who make the hundred-button remote controls should be forced to live with them (or better yet, forced to live with a novice trying to use them) before ever releasing them to market.
by tektaktyks October 15, 2009 5:22 AM PDT
and on top of this page i see :On TV.com: GIRLS NEXT DOOR: Wet and Wild
Reply to this comment
by atomD21 October 15, 2009 3:53 PM PDT
I've got Britney's Bikini Clad Top 10... how prurient!
by terminalblue October 15, 2009 5:39 AM PDT
Ok, Chris.

Your one sentence per paragraph writing style is the most elementary thing i have ever seen.

haven't you ever heard of an "inverted pyramid"?

Or have you been busy trying to find new ways to frustrate your readers when they try to read your "Blogs".

Your "blogs" are like reading a high school term paper that had to be flushed out a few more pages by adding extra paragraphs and spaces

I just can't understand Why the Weekly Reader gives awards to full grown pseudo-journalists.
Reply to this comment
by 02cfranklin October 20, 2009 5:15 AM PDT
Finally someone who agrees with me.
by sparrowhyperion October 15, 2009 5:47 AM PDT
I have a novel and innovative idea... Why don't we have an article about say... TECHNOLOGY! And less of this fluff reporting. I for one don't care if Phillip dates the mop from the swiffer commercial. It is totally irrelevant to the type of story CNET should be reporting on...
Reply to this comment
by Paul Isaac October 15, 2009 9:34 AM PDT
An article on usability of technology is actually quite relevant, Chris just made his point in a humorous way. Boo hoo.
by stenar October 15, 2009 3:41 PM PDT
This website itself could be a target of PP's derision. There are so many ads and cluttered links to other areas of CNET that it's difficult to look at.
Reply to this comment
(19 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The 411 on early-termination fees

Verizon Wireless has doubled its early-termination fees for smartphones, but what does it mean for the rest of the industry?

Google has its own plan for Netbooks

No, the search giant isn't saying it will build a Netbook. But it sure knows what it would like one running Chrome OS to resemble, and that's a little different from the Netbook of today.
• Screenshot tour of Chrome OS

advertisement

About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right