Man accused of 'peephole hacking' ESPN star
A man has been accused of hacking at hotel peepholes and replacing them with tiny cameras in order to shoot voyeur videos of ESPN presenter Erin Andrews in the nude.
According to the New York Post, the videos, which in July caused many males of uncertain character to risk computer virus invasion in order to view them, were allegedly shot by Michael Barrett, 48, of Westmont, Ill.
Barrett has been arrested and charged with interstate stalking. The criminal complaint states that Barrett allegedly acted "with the intent to harass, to place under surveillance with intent to harass and intimidate, and to cause substantial emotional distress to a person in another state."
In announcing the arrest, FBI agents went into some detail as to the technical means by which the videos were shot. Each of the eight videos is alleged to have been shot through the peepholes of two hotel rooms in which Andrews was staying. Barrett is accused of making efforts to secure the room next to hers.
The criminal complaint contains this quote from an FBI agent: "The inner eyepiece of the peephole screws into the sleeve for the peephole. The eyepiece had been tampered with and was shortened, and it appeared to have been hack-sawed."
The FBI believes that having hacked the peepholes, Barrett allegedly used a cell phone camera or other miniature device to shoot his infamous videos, which were originally thought to have been posted on the French DailyMotion.fr site.
Someone then tried to sell the videos to the nice folks over at TMZ.com. However, being wise to the nuances of invasion of privacy, TMZ contacted the ESPN presenter's lawyers. The feds say that the e-mail address used to make the offer of sale led them to Barrett.
For her part, Andrews, who was understandably outraged by the videos, is now considering legal action against both the person who shot them and any site that published them, according to the Associated Press.
She told Oprah last month that when she learned of their appearance on the Web: "I kept screaming: 'I'm done. My career is over. I'm done. Get it off. Get it off the Internet.'"
However, she has returned to what is, for so many, her rightful role on ESPN's college football coverage.
Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. 





The only reason people are crazy about her, she is thin and a bleach blonde. And why is it our media as this love affair with plain thin Aryan looking women?
I mean if your going to be a stalking peeping tom, go after Scarlette Johansen, or Milka Duno. Erin dosn't have a very nice face. She could use a new nose, would it be her third?
I wasn't raised (thankfully to the nth power) with the idea that my body is somehow 'sinful' and that 'only people who I wish to see me nude' should see me nude. I WAS raised with the idea that only people who I wish to TOUCH ME in a sexual manner should do so, and was raised with the idea that the former and the latter are two totally freaking different things.
you are an idiot for trying to place this in the category as rape. Rape is a violent sexually act carried out against a human being that leaves GENUINE deep and lasting physical and emotional scars on the victim. Erin andrews was some broad, literally caught with her pants down.
you are an idiot for even equating a peeping tom to a rapist.
Okay, then send me a picture of your ugly vagina
Okay, HOW many?
Did Matyszczyk survey ESPN viewers to find out a percentage or something?
Or is this just a pseudojournalistic way of saying, "she has returned to what is, I personally think, her rightful role..."?
It's not as if Matyszczyk has ever been reticent before with his personal opinions... why suddenly so shy and bashful?
What i dont understand is with all if the invasion of privacy videos available on the new today, why does any one care about this one? it is mostly benign and innocent except for the fact that she is naked. she isn't spreading her legs and letting the basketball team breed her Spring Thomas style.
I am kind of disgusted that the FBI has gotten involved in a peeping tom case...honestly, i can't believe that they are wasting tax dollars on some pervert with a hack-saw and a camera phone. Of all the things that they could be doing, they are taking softball cases to try to fix a problem that will never go away...sexual perversion.
And why can`t she fix her roots on her salary ?
Obviously this is a criminal act and huge invasion of her privacy. However the publicity was likely good for her career.
Assume the hotel room is insecure and act accordingly. This isn't your home, it's a room in a public building. What happens in there stays on the internet.
By all means, let's all be like you and how you were raised because the whole world is all about YOU, right! Let's not let other people decide what may be right for them, because YOU know all of the sexual morays and how all of the rest of us and our parents erred in our upbringing.
Please publish your address here so people can start stalking and sticking cameras in your windows,
Rape is not about sex you idiot. Rape is about power and making up for feelings of inadequacy by over powering them and forcing them to do something against their will, strongly against their will. That is EXACTLY what happened to that woman.
The fact that you can't or won't get that point is very scary.
**************************************************************************************************************
"Actually, exotopian, it is TOTALLY different from rape. The fact is that there is NO right to not be seen as a sexual object in this world, and to be honest.... if someone would want to see MY nude body, even if they have to go to these measures, all power to them!
I wasn't raised (thankfully to the nth power) with the idea that my body is somehow 'sinful' and that 'only people who I wish to see me nude' should see me nude. I WAS raised with the idea that only people who I wish to TOUCH ME in a sexual manner should do so, and was raised with the idea that the former and the latter are two totally freaking different things"
- by Markus2008 October 4, 2009 7:38 AM PDT
- I had no idea this many CNET readers were so callus. Anyone who would post that they have seen this video should be banned from society. Watching this crap is promoting it, giving the original perverts a reason to keep doing it. There is plenty of consensual porn made and should be enough to satisfy even the sickest pervert.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by gwailo247 October 4, 2009 9:44 AM PDT
- You would murder someone for doing this?
- Like this
-
- by Dalkorian October 5, 2009 10:45 AM PDT
- This was a disgusting act, no doubt about it, but I'll have to side with gwailo247 on this one. Murder is a little over the top for being publicly exposed like this. She wasn't forced to do anything and it hasn't ended her career, it's just quite embarrassing. I'm guessing Erin will be a little more reserved when alone in a hotel room.
- Like this
-
(21 Comments)Saying this is nothing like rape is like saying that mentally bashing your kids is not really child abuse because there was no physical contact. These are the same people who think sexual harassment is confined to slapping someone on the butt.
Maybe none of the other commenters have children, but I would have to be restrained from ending the life of the creep who did this to one of my daughters.
No offense, but perhaps you shouldn't be making judgments about who should be banned from society.
I'd be OK with someone beating the snot out of this pathetic pervert for what he did, but it's not "evil" enough to warrant death.