• On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!
September 26, 2009 9:45 AM PDT

Microsoft boffin puts brain into e-coffin

by Chris Matyszczyk
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 20 comments

Gordon Bell may well be a slightly peculiar man.

On the other hand, he may simply be the world's first e-philanthropist.

Bell, a researcher at Microsoft, has decided that it is, indeed, in the interests of science for him to commit every single nano-second of his brain's functions to a digital resting place, so that those in future times might see just what human life was like in our woeful, wobbling era.

According to CNN, Bell is just a little enthusiastic about this project. (Click here for a Q & A with Bell from February conducted by ZD Net U.K.)

He wafts around the world carrying more recording equipment than, well, CNN. He tapes conversations, trips, bills, medical records, and, for all I know, visits to the washroom to groom his nasal hair.

It's a lovely place. But would you want every second of your life there to be recorded?

(Credit: CC Robert Scoble/Flickr)

He has even tried out a Microsoft invention called a SenseCam, which attempts to monitor and record as much of your life as is digitally possible in the form of images.

I know many of you will be wondering just how large the Kilimanjaro of information might be. Well, Bell seems to estimate it at some 350GB.

But it's another of his estimates which makes my body feel reluctant to welcome my breakfast. You see, Bell believes that by 2020 the whole of our lives will be online and searchable.

I find myself wondering just what kind of lives some of these big boffins have led. Isn't the real joy of life the mysteries rather than the facts?

Can anything truly replace the serendipity of love, the insanity of coincidence, the maniacal lunacy of the surprise, and the relief at finally forgetting some of the idiotic things we have done in our lives?

There is a woman namedJill Price, who suffers from hyperthymestic syndrome, the ability to remember absolutely everything about her life. It does not seem to make her unusually happy. How do I know? Well, she told ABC News: "It makes me crazy."

If everything is there for us to merely click and search, isn't that the moment when we cease to be human beings and become, well, Ray Kurzweil?

Perhaps you, too, might feel just a twinge of ironic joy at Bell's reply to one searchingly innocent question posed to him by CNN: "Are you on Facebook and Twitter?"

Bell replied: "Yeah, I'm on Facebook and Twitter and occasionally I will tweet something. Somehow my problem is that I don't think I have anything interesting to tweet about."

And yet we are supposed to trawl through 350 Gigabytes of mostly uninteresting life? Oh, its enough to make you want to sip pinot noir with your cornflakes.

Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Technically Incorrect
Black Friday at Best Buy: What's the big deal?
AT&T gets Luke Wilson to hit Verizon again
NBA star won't tweet until he has 1 million followers
Man marries video game character
IKEA's brilliant Facebook campaign
IBM staffer posts pics on Facebook, loses benefits
New Apple ads to Verizon: Can Droid do this?
Police arrest exec for not using Twitter
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (20 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by lkrupp September 26, 2009 10:18 AM PDT
I put this guy right up there with Ted Williams and Ray Kurzweil. Narcissistic egomaniacs all.
Reply to this comment
by globalist_agenda September 26, 2009 10:50 AM PDT
I'd like to see a week's worth of George Soros' life recorded in minute detail so that I can figure out how to make a quick billion dollars. Then I'll make plans to have my head frozen like Ted Williams.
Reply to this comment
by mediocrates--2008 September 26, 2009 11:00 AM PDT
Could someone begin recording Tony Parker's life...please!
Reply to this comment
by Hunnter2k3 September 26, 2009 11:30 AM PDT
Aren't we forgetting Noah? ("Noah takes a picture every day..." blah blah, that Noah)

And i remember Jason Bradbury (from The Gadget Show in the UK) had a webcam system on him that would record his life every so often and upload it to Flickr.
It was certainly an interesting thing to see.

I, too, used to run a webcam in my room pretty much all the time, but i eventually got bored of keeping it up.
And i couldn't justify the use of bandwidth since it had so little gain.
Reply to this comment
by dowell100 September 26, 2009 1:31 PM PDT
"e-coffin" is a very poor description of where Bell is placing the data.

Without this kind of silly hype word, we see that Bell is just creating a library, no different than any of the presidential libraries.

I think it is a very interesting thing to do.
Reply to this comment
by assman September 26, 2009 1:38 PM PDT
This is for historians centuries from now to study. That is the point of this project, not narcissism. It's a record of life in the beginning of the 21st century.
Reply to this comment
by nSeika September 26, 2009 3:21 PM PDT
Where did I put my key? when did I heard that quote before? which wrong turn I take that made me stranded here now?

For peoples still alive, it?s unlike the girl who accessed the data all the time, the convenience is having it available when needed. Either for the curiosity, or need of a reference from detail in the past.
Wouldn?t like if it?s available to the internet or accessible to others by default though.
Reply to this comment
by ghostofitpast September 26, 2009 4:01 PM PDT
I find it disconcerting (but not surprising) that someone so brilliant in the development of digital technologies should be so oblivious to all the research into the nature of memory (going back to Socrates channeled through Plato) and therefore so ignorant of the nature of the problem he purports to be solving.
Reply to this comment
by baconstang September 26, 2009 4:10 PM PDT
And when re-animated the first thing the 'brain' did was buy a Mac.
Reply to this comment
by cattbv September 26, 2009 9:58 PM PDT
wow that is odd
Reply to this comment
by Codonology September 27, 2009 5:48 AM PDT
Codonology again.The countless images are the items in subset of P (phenomenon) in "-LCP-", the real meaning is explained in subset of C (concept) in "-LCP-", and the full meanings is put in subset of L (law) in "-LCP-". Then you got reasoning chains that make global network computing systems as a spontaneous reasoning tool for you. For example, when you say "I was stupid. I should have not touched that glove. My wife used it in cleaning our backyard that had a bunch of poison ivy". Now, let's put ourselves in an imaginary scenario in which all the image are digitized from the life around us. One of the series images is about "cleaning poison ivy contaminated back yard", another is "the wife wearing the gloves", then "skin sign of poison ivy effect on the body", so on and so forth. Now, let see them in "-LCP-": L: "poison ivy makes people sick with signs on the skin"; C:"poison ivy", "effect", "sickness", "skin sign"; P: those images. so on and so forth... ...
Now, let's imagine again, if such system was in place, are you allowed to touch the gloves without warning?

Thanks for your attention.

A codonologist.
Reply to this comment
by rayzoredge September 28, 2009 7:02 AM PDT
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0364343/
Reply to this comment
by rkwitkoski September 28, 2009 7:17 AM PDT
This sounds suspiciously like the Robin Williams movie "The Final Cut"
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0364343/

A recording device is embedded in a person and when they die a "cutter" pieces together a short video biography for their loved ones to remember them by.
EVERYTHING is recorded. Hmmm....
Reply to this comment
by andrewjcarlson September 28, 2009 7:45 AM PDT
Actually, the approach is not practical but the concept is sound and I feel really will happen.

Most of us have a digital camera. At least on our phone. Often I hear my friends say, "I wish I had that on video." A modified version of the above could be a small unobtrusive video recorder that records a few hours at a time and rolls over. When something wonderful happens in life, you execute a function like, "Save the last 30 minutes." Then that is permanently recorded.

It would simply be a way of running a dvr of real life. In a business meeting and need to save the brain storm ideas? Playing the game of your life and you win the national championship? Saved. Lose? "Delete last 30 minutes..."

I doubt most people would be interested in saving the bad experiences. Seems people posting here have some kind of fear of an Orwellian constraint on their freedom to use such a device. Who knows? Maybe there WOULD be a huge market for seeing life through the eyes of Paris Hilton, Warren Buffet, or Peyton Manning?

Mostly I think it would be cool to automatically save great moments on demand. I see couples on their 10th comparing the first archived recordings they decided to save of each other, times flagged as "This might be the one."
Reply to this comment
by _TruXter_ September 28, 2009 8:24 AM PDT
I wonder how long before the ISo leaks to Pirate bay.

Or have they considered that their o/s might not be around in about ten years..

Leaving his death as .... well. a joke for the next century ?
Reply to this comment
by webrp September 28, 2009 10:11 AM PDT
What a waste of time. My "takeaway" from this is that about only thing graverobbers of the future will have to look forward to is obsolete hardware. There's something to be said for a living oral tradition that concentrates less upon this sort of ultimately worthless artifact and more upon life in the moment.
Reply to this comment
by webrp September 28, 2009 10:12 AM PDT
What a waste of time. My "takeaway" from this is that about only thing graverobbers of the future will have to look forward to is obsolete hardware. There's something to be said for a living oral tradition that concentrates less upon this sort of ultimately worthless artifact and more upon life in the moment.
Reply to this comment
by chrissd September 28, 2009 6:12 PM PDT
"This is for historians centuries from now to study. That is the point of this project, not narcissism. It's a record of life in the beginning of the 21st century. "

No, it's narcissim. You really think histororians will get a decent picture of "now" based off of one persons life? We all have a bias of some form, all they'll get is his.

Some side thoughts:

1: If you can say "save the last 30mn" and it's a permanent record, where is it being stored? If it's external, or even internal, there's communication going on. Watch The Ghost in the Shell: Laughing Man. Then think about the potential security implications of a system like that.

2: Really.. If they're going to record every detail of someones life, and literally every, then make it someone interesting. A female porn star for example.. "I got up, made breakfast, gave a talk on how my brain will be uploaded into digital memory, thought happy thoughts about how awesome I am, went to bed" vs "...". Well, you can guess. =P

3: Recording everything is already being tried out in cars, I don't have the details on me or in any place I've checked so far, but people thought about this a long time ago. To make it easier to catch criminals, find out who did what in an accident, etc.

4: Privacy issues here. Namely the lack of.. Billboards have cameras watching you, stores are wired up with more cameras then a movie recording studio, databases full of personal info.. There is a lack of privacy right now, using that sort of system.. That's insane.
Reply to this comment
by freebird1974 September 29, 2009 6:03 AM PDT
You know something our government does this anyways. What does this guy think he invented it or something. Also why in the hell would anyone want to know every damn detail of the average Joe's life. To say that our lives will be searchable is ridiculous. If that day ever happens, computers will be top of the food chain not humans and we will all be slaves to the computer and I really don't ever see that happen.

People like this need to be institutionalized
Reply to this comment
by J G M September 29, 2009 12:16 PM PDT
The problem with saying that something like this is for "future research" is that it's a self-selecting sample, and one that is likely to be significantly at odds with anything you'd call "typical".
Reply to this comment
(20 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

3G wireless still holds promise

The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.

advertisement

About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right