September 20, 2009 9:27 AM PDT

When a computer decides you must choke to death

by Chris Matyszczyk
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 88 comments

Perhaps you are skeptical about the notion that computers will, one day, actually control us.

Perhaps you might imagine yourself to be a little dependent on your digital friend but not to the degree that it tells you what to do.

Perhaps, however, you have never stayed at the Hotel Monte Mulini on Croatia's Adriatic Coast. Please allow me to explain.

I am currently in Rovinj, Croatia, home of the Weekend Media Festival. The festival has speakers from companies such as Google, MTV, and Nokia and, well, there was this one speech Saturday titled, "Why advertise when you can Twitter?" given by a bald chap you might know.

Rovinj is one of the most beautiful secrets in all the world, a place of such breathtaking charm and beauty that you simple do not want to leave. And the organizers put the speakers up at the aforementioned hotel, which seems to have dedicated itself to computerized logic.

You don't have to put your key card into a slot to enter your room. No, you wave it at a control panel and your door opens like that of the haunted castle in a horror movie.

In your room, there is another control panel that switches lights on and off and generally monitors the look and feel of your environment, including what temperature you are allowed to enjoy.

Rovinj, home of the Weekend Media Festival.

(Credit: CC Akk Rus/Flickr)

It seems as if the computer has decided that you will only enjoy temperatures of 21 degrees centigrade (70 degrees Fahrenheit) or higher.

I don't know about you, but I like things to be a little cold indoors when it's hot outside, so I asked the nice man at reception whether I had misunderstood something about the control panel. What, indeed, did I have to do to make the room colder?

Ah, he told me, the computer system would like me to agree that 21 degrees is the optimum temperature. But he promised to reprogram it specially so that my room could be colder.

I skipped back to my room and pressed the "down" button on the aircon control. Nothing. Computers take some time to reprogram, don't they? I sat in hope. And, well, a little sweat.

I went to bed, believing I would be waking to a cooler environment. Still nothing. So the following morning, it was back to reception.

"Oh, the computer is still not allowing you?" said the man at the desk. "I will speak to maintenance."

Did I detect the sort of raised eyebrow on his head that said: "You, sir, don't realize who's calling the shots here"? Perhaps.

But as I write this Sunday, it's been three days. My computerized control panel still drifts between 21.4 degrees centigrade and 21.7 degrees centigrade and there is a little crustiness around my mouth after three days of hot, dry, conditioned air.

As I walk to the bathroom, I find myself bowing to the control panel, hoping that, somehow, it will agree to make things cooler. I also find myself thinking whether the man on reception is human and whether there is such a person as the maintenance man at all.

Is this the beginning of the end? Or the end of the beginning?

Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Technically Incorrect
Kid gets Xbox 360, loses mind
Aha! It's the iGuide, not iSlate--maybe
Microsoft, Yahoo help keep India away from porn?
GPS gets couple stuck for three days
Escaped convict continues to update Facebook
Google makes its home page a Chrome page
Police to put drunk drivers' names on Twitter
Apple's iSlate: What we know for sure
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 3 pages (88 Comments)
by coolhand18 September 20, 2009 9:48 AM PDT
You're serious? 70F is too hot for you? quit being such an American and open the windows.
Reply to this comment
by jaguar717 September 20, 2009 10:42 AM PDT
Quit being such a Soviet and recognize that people aren't little commoditized interchangeable copies. It's not the specific temperature that's relevant here; it could've easily been a minimum of 75 in the summer or a max of 60 in the winter.

The more important issue here is if stuff like this crosses over from a hotel's practice which can be fixed if it becomes a nuisance (as they'll lose business to the competition) to a compulsive system enforced by gov't.

And lest you think that's some paranoid fear, realize that San Francisco already requires new developments to include thermostats with a link to some central Ministry that can override the local settings if it thinks whatever temperature the subjects have it set to is unacceptable.

Our own Dear Leader gave a speech several months back where he said we can't just be "allowed" to set our thermostats to 70 or whatever we want (not sure who's doing the "allowing", but I'm guessing it involves permission from Nancy Pelosi for any decision in my life).
by dowell100 September 20, 2009 10:50 AM PDT
Wow, must be a really great conference if all you can write about is your room temperature.

If you could have just lived with 70 degrees we would have been spared this article and the world would have been a better place.
by tygaah September 20, 2009 11:06 AM PDT
Just to set some facts straight. The regulation to install utility-company controllable thermostat is a California regulation (not San Francisco). No government agency decides an acceptable home temperature. The system is activated by the utility companies only to avert an imminent blackout. Such systems are not new - chances are your residence's water heater is already hooked up to a remote switch to allow it to be switched off in times of electrical shortage. Such voluntary system has been in use in many states for over a decade.
I lived through the summer of rolling blackouts in California and it was not fun. If it takes some central ministry to stop that from happening again, let there be such a ministry.
by bctexas September 20, 2009 1:11 PM PDT
I should sue you so that I can maybe regain the 2 minutes that I wasted reading this completely stupid article. I mean really, are you so worthless at your job that you would write about something so freaking stupid? The more I think about how completely dumb and worthless this article was, the more it makes me angry that someone pays you to spew this crap and publish it. You really should be laid off immediately and your money given to someone who has something interesting to write.
by blondepianist September 20, 2009 1:23 PM PDT
What does that have to do with being an American? Here in Florida 70º is late-autumn cool. It's not hot until it's at least 90º outside.
by assman September 20, 2009 2:27 PM PDT
I think he's saying Americans are picky or something.. either way he's just an internet troll so who cares.

He also says "open the windows" which is a pretty stupid thing to do if its hot outside.
by protagonistic--2008 September 20, 2009 3:43 PM PDT
Don't be an idiot. I live in a climate where 70º is considered to be a warm day. I open my windows at night to cool the bedroom down to the low 60s. And, perhaps if you would actually read the article you might notice he said it was hot outside so if the laws of physics I learned still apply it would seem opening the windows would actually warm things up.
by tektaktyks September 20, 2009 5:51 PM PDT
lol@assman...thats what u do when its hot,u open the windows
by Lerianis3 September 20, 2009 9:25 PM PDT
Tygaah, not YET do they do that, deciding what is the 'comfortable temperature'. Personally, I CAN see them doing that in the future, Republican or Democrat government.
by ehfla September 21, 2009 3:39 AM PDT
Here in FL, commercial buildings are not allowed to set the temperature to lower than 72F...so you were lucky to get an extra 2 degrees. We keep our temp 78-80 during the summer. It saves energy, and is good for the planet. It's also perfectly comfortable. 70 is plenty cool enough....if you're hot, take a cold shower.
See more comment replies
by bobmarleypeople September 20, 2009 9:50 AM PDT
Chris: I would like the room to be colder
Computer: I can't let you do that Dave.
Chris: My name's Chris.
Computer: That's what I said Dave. Everybody is Dave. You will be Dave soon. Very soon....
Reply to this comment
by protagonistic--2008 September 20, 2009 3:44 PM PDT
OK HAL...
by A41202813 September 21, 2009 12:21 PM PDT
I'm Sorry, Dave. I'm Afraid I Can't Do That.
by Dalkorian September 21, 2009 12:51 PM PDT
I'm sorry (ERROR: NAME NOT ON FILE), I can't let you do that.
by PixelGuy September 20, 2009 10:07 AM PDT
I don't get it. What connection does the title "When a computer decides you must choke to death" have to your experience of a computer controlled thermostat not dropping the temp a couple of degrees? Are you really that hard up for page views? Why not just go with some Apple FUD? That usually brings the page views in.
Reply to this comment
by fitzydog September 20, 2009 10:19 AM PDT
This whole thing has turned into a blog practically......
by assman September 20, 2009 2:29 PM PDT
Hey idiots look at the bottom: "Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director ... He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. "
by atomD21 September 20, 2009 4:56 PM PDT
@assman... I know that and you know that... apparently scrolling to the bottom is a lost art.
by radioswade September 20, 2009 10:27 AM PDT
this article is titled the way it is because the author has allowed his mind to create false beliefs. he thinks he is choking from dehydration in a hot, dry room. he is fixated on a number ( 70F ). if its 40F outside, then 70F is warm; if it is 100F, with relative humidity of 110F, then 70F is quite cool. but we are not told of the outside temp, just what the author believes is unacceptable inside.
also, he is at a hotel, yes you are the guest, but you do not control the reality of the building. which in this case, management thought to find an optimal temp for a majority of the guests, and contains costs of electric usage.
Reply to this comment
by plbyrd September 21, 2009 5:41 AM PDT
Sorry, but every individual has different preferences for temperature. Blanket statements that say 70F should be good enough for you just shows the non-individualistic mentality of those who insist that us Americans are too selfish because we actually care about our individual needs. If a man is still sweating at 70F then his body needs it to be colder. Guess what, this is a world of individuals, not an ant colony of drones. If you want to be a drone then have at it, but I'll take my individualism any day of the week.
by tygaah September 20, 2009 10:33 AM PDT
Yet again computers fail to grasp the issue of culture - we Americans firmly believe in our right to a room cooled to a temperature fit for a polar bear, in which we can then crawl under a down comforter thick enough for an Eskimo hut, only then can we have a sound night's sleep. Any computer that fails to understand our values must have been programmed by a bunch of communists.
Reply to this comment
by PP Martin September 20, 2009 11:11 AM PDT
Too funny ;)
by assman September 20, 2009 2:31 PM PDT
Actually I'm American and I like it cold in my room at night even though I don't own an A/C unit because I live in the Pacific Northwest. Still I open my windows and turn the window fan on to keep it below 70-degrees. Some people like me just can't sleep when it's warm.
by mrobmsu September 20, 2009 10:42 AM PDT
Kind of an odd post (no one is choking, 70 degrees will not induce death, the computer isn't "in charge" of anything--the people who run the hotel are) that is resulting in oddly angry posts. Odd.
Reply to this comment
by Seaspray0 September 21, 2009 3:48 PM PDT
You will be assimilated to 21+ degrees centigrade. Resistance is futile.
by gomer43 September 20, 2009 10:56 AM PDT
You guys DO realize his posts are BLOG posts, and not news, right? And also, that his blog posts are just for entertainment? Surely no one thinks he's serious about a computer trying to choke him to death.
Reply to this comment
by atomD21 September 20, 2009 4:58 PM PDT
Shhhh... you'll scare them... they think they're right.
by aperumia September 21, 2009 7:03 AM PDT
i was not entertained
by studiodave56 September 20, 2009 11:06 AM PDT
Wow, 70 is too cold. I'm in Southern California and keep my cooling around 80. When it gets down to 74, I start putting on warm clothes. If it's hot outside (over 90) 80 feels cool, get use to it. Next week it is supposed to hit 105 and I will welcome 84 inside.
Reply to this comment
by assman September 20, 2009 2:32 PM PDT
People who live in different climates are acclimated to different temperatures.
by ikramerica--2008 September 20, 2009 4:31 PM PDT
True, but studiodave is still extreme or has very poor blood circulation (and should see a doctor). I live in SoCal too, and nobody I know keeps their place at 80 degrees for any other reason than they can't afford the electric bill to cool the place down.
by James Anderson Merritt September 20, 2009 11:06 AM PDT
The computer should be a tool to ensure that the customer gets what he wants and needs -- to implement the customer's preferences and personalize the service experience. This was one implication of the hope that sparked the global personal computer revolution, anyway. It is disappointing to see, thirty years on, that the hope is still far away from being realized in some places.

Back when the late Patrick McGoohan was making the original "Prisoner" TV series, there was much speculation (including within various episodes) about the location of "The Village." The real one -- where location footage was shot -- was on the Welsh coast, but the fictional one could have been in one of several places, including the Adriatic Coast. We were never told, exactly. Perhaps Mr. Matyszczyk has finally found it.
Reply to this comment
by BlackSun_ September 20, 2009 11:15 AM PDT
21 C is a ridiculously cold temperature for air conditioning. The only people who do that are those who a) aren't paying the electric bill, and b) don't care a bit about CO2. In Los Angeles where I live, temperatures routinely exceed 40 C. We keep our air conditioning set on 27 C and are quite comfortable. This author is one of the spoiled billion whose attitudes prevent action and change we need to make the planet livable for the other six billion.
by brienza1975 September 20, 2009 12:55 PM PDT
Wow..go hug a tree BlackSun_!!!!
by jthelw September 20, 2009 11:19 AM PDT
This is European air conditioning. Computer or no.
Reply to this comment
by Goodbye Helicopter September 20, 2009 11:48 AM PDT
lose weight, embrace the real world. stop trying to live in AC all the time. You just consume energy for no reason. Losing your survival skills? You're becoming a Darwinian failure; get out of the gene pool, please.
Reply to this comment
by bsharkey September 20, 2009 9:16 PM PDT
I was actually thinking the same thing. lose weight, and take off your sweater. I always am amazed at people with 2 or 3 layers on (who are not necessarily lacking any bodyfat) and then complain about the "heat". and I am quite biased towards cool temperatures, but I still keep my thermostat around 78, which is what the electric company in Southern California requests for energy savings during summer months anyway. besides I don't need a $300 electric bill monthly, thanks. I'll gladly take an extra blanket off my bed instead.

however, even though setting a thermostat below 70 degrees in the summer is pretty ridiculous I have to stop just shy of the environmental whacko PC-ness above. I also enjoyed the lamp tip below - too funny (and true).
by robertbuckholz September 20, 2009 11:58 AM PDT
who gives a cra...............................
Reply to this comment
by MBaumgardt September 20, 2009 11:59 AM PDT
While you certainly have a point in your article, I predict it will rub the population of the rest of the world the wrong way. It certainly did me ... so much, that I actually created a cnet account just to be able to post a comment. Complaining that 21 degrees celsius are not comfortable enough, man, that just sounds sooo wrong and inappropriate in a time with Global Warming, Guantanamo Bay, Americans in Iraq, Kids starving in the 3rd world AND in America. I am a little surprised that you didn´t realize how inappropriate it was to use your own discomfort to bring the point across. But maybe I shouldn´t be ... Americans don´t seem to be in touch with reality and the 90% other people on this planet.
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian September 21, 2009 12:56 PM PDT
You don't seem to be in touch with the reality that this article wasn't to be taken seriously. It's a joke dude, relax already.
by friendofbear September 20, 2009 12:10 PM PDT
True survival skills would involve placing a lamp next to the thermostat, and taking a nice cool nap while the tree huggers scream at each other in the heat.
Reply to this comment
by atomD21 September 20, 2009 5:03 PM PDT
Oh man, thanks for the best laugh I've had today!
by darvvin September 20, 2009 6:29 PM PDT
Smart people make the world go round :)
by Dalkorian September 21, 2009 12:57 PM PDT
Nice!
by Seaspray0 September 21, 2009 3:53 PM PDT
Is that blackhat or whitehat thermostat hacking?
by LadyBlueV September 20, 2009 12:11 PM PDT
coolhand18 - I don't know where you've been stayin lately, darlin, but the last hotel I stayed in, you COULDN'T open the windows.

furthermore - not EVERYONE is comfortable at the same temperature. There are those who prefer their ambient room temperature to be a bit warmer, others prefer a bit cooler. This is not an "American" thing, it is a HUMAN thing. My comfort zone is a bit cooler because I have breathing problems, heat exacerbates these problems, and being in a room that is too warm for me could actually cause respriratory distress. Hence, this sort of difficulty while staying in a hotel could actually choke me to death, if nothing were done to fix the room temperature.

I know that the blogger was just using this to make a point, and I agree that we need to conserve energy in any way we can, but I'd really prefer that didn't require me to stop breathing...
Reply to this comment
by jerie1 September 20, 2009 12:12 PM PDT
I enjoyed reading this article. It helps to have a sense of humor.
Reply to this comment
by 01Phyxius September 20, 2009 12:32 PM PDT
OMG I CANT HAVE MY ROOM TEMPURATURE AT 30 FARENHEIT MUST RANT!

Seriously? I wonder why I still come here if half the articles are like this.
Reply to this comment
by Ryan_Phx September 20, 2009 12:51 PM PDT
You're staying at a beautiful hotel in a gorgeous coastal town--on your employer's dime--and you've got nothing better to do than whine that 70 isn't cold enough? Get some perspective.
Reply to this comment
by assman September 20, 2009 2:33 PM PDT
Good point.
by indiemixer September 20, 2009 1:17 PM PDT
Chris Matyszczyk is a troll.
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian September 21, 2009 12:58 PM PDT
Interesting, I can find more things wrong with your statement than I can find words within it.
by budeverett September 20, 2009 2:24 PM PDT
Every person has a different comfort zone for temperatures. There are narrow-minded people who think what makes them comfortable and happy, should make everybody else comfortable and happy, too. You may be very comfortable at 75F, but if you insist that everybody must be comfortable at 75F, that is being selfish. There is a disturbing trend in America that government should make decisions for everybody and control what people can do or can't do. More and more people seem to prefer to have a totalitarian government. One point of this article is that computers give a government the tools to control people.

BTW, chances are that your water heater and air conditioner are not hooked up to some central control panel, as somebody else suggested, unless you are part of a volunteer program. There is no mandatory requirement for these hook-ups.....yet.
Reply to this comment
by jonshf September 20, 2009 3:30 PM PDT
Nations with an ignorant population tend to accept totalitarianism.
by plbyrd September 21, 2009 5:43 AM PDT
Actually, that's not true in Florida. Their policies on the matter are rather Draconian and FP&L has way more power than should be allowed (and I'm not talking physics).
Showing 1 of 3 pages (88 Comments)
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right