Court rejects 'GPS made me do it' argument
It appears that, strangely, some BMW drivers are actually submissive.
In what may be the first case of its kind, Robert Jones was found guilty this week of what they call in the U.K. "driving without due care and attention" for daftly following the orders of the soothing voice of his GPS when the more urgent voice attached to his brain cells might have suggested he, um, think.
You may be rendered temporarily numb, when you hear the details of this story, to discover that Jones delivers cars for a living.
You see, when Jones' GPS suggested he drive down a narrow, unpaved, cliffside lane, you might have imagined, given that he is an experienced driver, that he would have experienced a little doubt.
You might have also imagined that bears only use lavatories in large country homes.
According to the Daily Mail, Jones kept on going until his car made the intimate acquaintance of a wire fence and became stuck at the edge of a drop of some 100 feet.
The prosecutor, Waseem Raja, seemed to foster a certain glee in describing Jones' actions.
"The path was not designed for motor vehicles, yet Mr. Jones slavishly continued to follow the satnav system to the point where his eyes and his brain must have been telling him otherwise to such a degree he was not exercising proper control of the vehicle," Raja told the court.
For his part, Jones offered the court a stirringly self-aware defense: "I might have been an idiot for taking the wrong road or carrying on, but I have not driven without due care or attention."
Unfortunately, the police officer who first appeared at the scene in Todmorden, West Yorkshire, chatted with the farmer upon whose land Jones had strayed. The farmer told him he wouldn't even take his horses down the path.
Jones, however, chose to take his considerable horsepower down there because his Tom Tom stood over him in tight leather garb brandishing a whip.
Oh, when will humanity ever learn to think for itself?
Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. 





I know Tom Tom is very bad about giving you an "updated" map that undoes the correct centerline data, only to be replaced with 40 year old WSGS centerline data and when called they take no responsibility for the mistakes.
It's not the GPS's job to drive the car. It's the driver's job. Do your job.
My gps tells me to continue for X kilometres before turning down X road. Does that mean I should ignore all stop signs, lights, and other vehicles between me and my next turn? The gps said to keep going.
I...must...keep...going...ignore...all...other...distractions...gps...says...go...straight...must...keep...going...must...keep...going...ignore...child...under...tires...gps...says...go...says...go...says...go
@tektaktyks - Should all dangerous roads be removed from every map too? Should they be drawn in some eye-attracting bright yellow? Why should we work so hard to protect a mind that is so obviously oblivious to the wire fence in front of them or the lake rapidly approaching? Anyone who has that complete lack of observation skills should not be driving in the first place. If you turned down a road that was so rough that "The farmer told him he wouldn't even take his horses down the path" AND kept going despite the alarms going off in your head telling you it's unsafe wouldn't you stop to re-evaluate your route and question the one provided by your gps unit?
At that point, we turned it off. He might not know how to get to my new house, but I do.
The point is, normal people don't blindly follow the directions of machines. Those that do are the kind of people who fall for phishing scams, hit rocks with their boat, or insist that its supposed to be sunny when it's clearly not. They wonder why their bowl of cornflakes doesn't have strawberries in it, like it does on the box.
You live in a world of suggestions, use them to help you make your decisions, but make your own decisions.
Love that thought; very eloquently expressed.
Whenever using a nav system, proper judgement isn't suspended. Driving in an unfamiliar area? Your GPS isn't a valid excuse for disregarding traffic signs--or common sense.
All I'm saying is that it's the GPS manufacturer's job to make sure that the data they provide is safe to follow. They shouldn't have to be responsible for someone crossing a median or driving over a cliff (at least, under any set of circumstances I can think of), but it's unreasonable to expect someone to know where a dirt road leads them, or that there's not some alternate route to get to their destination.
To properly use a GPS unit, you must first be smarter than the GPS unit. If it ever outsmarts you, it's time to shred your license and take the bus.
Maybe I should start an experiment and randomly start telling people I see walking on the sidewalk to drive off a cliff, just to see how many of them run to their cars and kill themselves driving off cliffs.
Stupid is as stupid does. To properly use a GPS unit, you must first be smarter than the GPS unit.
- by nixermac September 17, 2009 10:37 PM PDT
- I landed up in the middle of a farm (obviously there was the dirt road). There was a road sign when i entered the dirt road. It was well into the night and I didn't realize that it was a dirt road till I was well into it for some distance. Thankfully I was on a 4x4. My spouse was not too amused at the fact that the road did not have any lights. I believe that I should have sued Magellan. They have such an obsolete map system that the roads displayed are antique. I live in "sue happy USA".
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(32 Comments)Life goes on and I have learnt not to trust the GPS unit as much as my wit and keep my humor when I take the freaking wrong road.
I don't blame Mr. Jones. He must have assumed that the unit was taking the best short route.