Steve Jobs' return and the Journal's ad placement
Sometimes ads run where they shouldn't even loiter.
I once was involved in a TV spot that was clearly meant for later viewing (it featured a CEO in a restroom, reading a newspaper) that suddenly aired at 6 p.m. to howls of uproar. We were mortally upset, of course. The media buyer was showered with, um, beer.
Which is why I wonder just what the creators of an ad for Grandin Road, a purveyor of furniture and other domestic items, must have wondered when their ad for happy Halloweeny items became entangled with a Wall Street Journal article about Steve Jobs' return to Apple stage performance.
(Credit:
Wall Street Journal)
You see, the Grandin Road ad features two skeletons. And some perhaps insouciant soul at The Wall Street Journal had decided to place it opposite the Steve Jobs coverage which happened to enjoy a picture of the still very slim Apple uberpresence.
Jobs' health problems have been well-documented, and one might have imagined that someone might have noticed the unfortunate symbiosis of the Jobs picture and the one in the ad.
The chosen picture of Jobs makes it seem as if he is declaiming to the skeletons, offering to sell the bony ones a new iPod or two. In fact, it looks as if the skeleton on the right is somewhat aghast at something Jobs has revealed. The new pricing, perhaps.
It all makes for a peculiar conjuncture of editorial picture choice and ad placement.
My fanciful, hardened heart wonders whether it could have been some enterprising, well-connected PR person's attempt to get the ad talked about. But my left brain is sure this was not the case.
So it's very possible that no one at the Journal noticed. These things do happen, even to the very best. But is it also possible that someone did and thought it, in a fleeting moment of whimsy, somehow amusing?
Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. 






He is the CEO of a technology company, not the second coming.
The same thing happens here on CNET - although not as awkwardly, considering the range of advertisers here...
Why don't you look at your comment, think about someone you love having that disease and then make a really really crass joke about it.
Feel better now. Grow up and become a human being.
Is a few raised eyebrows worth reporting on CNET? It seems to me you guys will report anything these days to get page views. Bravo! CNET seems to be well on its way to becoming the National Enquirer of online tech news.
@4wight: Don't wish someone else ill, that's not cool - no matter what they said.
The ******** and Apple Kool Aid Drinkers just can't take it ... but boy can they dish it out in those BS Apple vs MS commercials. They can physically make fun of Bill Gates and have an ABSURDLY YOUNG Jobs alter ego, compared to the real Baldy Mr Skelletor Stevie Gods!
Yeah, looks like you're not the only one who didn't appreciate it.
But one thing is sure: "GrandinRoad" is enjoying this.
Noone's going to complain when, all of a sudden, their ad gets more bang for the buck.
Especially in these economic times.
Skydiving company ad on same page as funeral home ad...
The Nerve Of Some Media Groups!
It seems you are reading too much here. And it might be because you love Apple so much. Or may be you are becoming a FanBoy (remember the Fanboy Checklist c|net published few weeks ago; check that for yout symptoms).
I am pretty sure, you wouldn't have even noticed of the similar ad was displayed next to a world leader or even a political figure.
Or Are you trying to tell Journal.. how to do things? As if c|net does or you do?
If intentional, it's disgusting and heartless.
- by jmm12 September 20, 2009 6:28 AM PDT
- Ok, so you have never worked at a newspaper before. The ads are layed in before the content... only the ads are blocked from the newsroom. All they see is FP AD HERE. Nobody was taking shots at anyone. Newspaper companies dont have time to connect ads with content... could be why they are dying themselves no?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(30 Comments)