Is Microsoft's Bing cementing its porn credentials?
I tend to believe that life's pleasures should be experienced with real human beings, relatively sober, and free of excessive chemical content.
However, I understand there are those who make use of search engines to fuel their various needs, including those of pornographic succour.
Which brings me to Bing.
There seems to be some agreement among the cognoscenti that Microsoft's fine search engine offers optimal results for those who are seeking the filmic freshness of the flesh. Blocking such freshness can also be a difficult maneuver.
You see, Bing has excellent video search properties. And you might be astonished to hear that one of the major types of video for which humanity's needy search is video of a pornographic bent.
However, TechCrunch claims to have encountered evidence that Bing has entered an entirely new realm of raunch.
An enterprising TechCrunch employee decided to google the term "pornography" and was perhaps simultaneously astonished and elated to discover a sponsored link from Bing.
No, there is no suggestion that Bing is the better search engine for drug paraphernalia.
(Credit: CC James Wheare/Flickr)The artful ad was headlined "Free Video." It then extolled Bing's remarkable access to "thousands of videos."
Somehow, I feel there may be more than thousands.
I know those of a technical leaning might suggest that sometimes when you do quite a few searches in succession the ads don't seem to keep up, so the ads that you see for your second search might have been generated by your first search.
I was still dissatisfied. I could not understand why anyone would search "pornography" when the very simple "porn" would have clearly sufficed. Is the suggestion that only those of a elevated snootiness, those who refer to pornography by its full name, get the Bing ad?
Then I stumbled into a blog post by Aaron Goldman, who seems to be quite au fait with the digital marketing world.
Goldman claims that he googled "Google porn searches" and immediately encountered an ad for Bing. Now the minds of those of a suspicious disposition must truly be wandering and wondering.
I would never be the one to suggest that Microsoft deliberately seeks out porn business.
However, business is, indeed, business. So one wonders just how much awareness there is among bingers of this alleged arousing serendipity?
Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. 





-----
OMG PORN!!!! A search engine returns PORN! THINK OF THE CHILDREN!
Microsoft sucks.
------
See? That's what you sound like when you're not preaching to the choir. Seriously, a search engine returns porn video? That's your gripe? What is this, 1950's Ohio?
The internet has porn. People watch porn. It doesn't affect you, if you don't like it don't search for it. The end.
If MS has indeed paid for ads off of keywords involving porn, then they are just as dumb as we all make them out to be, but make no mistake if you think other search providers has chaste in this arena.
Here is a simple explanation:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-19518_3-10256171-238.html
Other search engines do not do this.
Bung is different, not only is it a substandard search engine, it is a security flaw and detriment to productivity.
As for the AD tieup, I doubt Microsoft explicitly bought sponsored space linked with porn, they probably just screwed up and bought a link for VIDEO, and were too dumb to realize that most of the video on the web is porn.
On another note, I found the photo choice for this article hilarious. It is not a photo of a head shop, but a carnival game.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-19518_3-10264128-238.html?tag=mncol
This was an issue when bing came out ... but as soon as it was realized what an issue it was measures were taken to correct the problem.
"the fact that only M$ prostitutes will defend or use it."
Except that I talked my Mac-using friends into trying Bing and they've all switched to it from Google. The only fact you proved is that anti-Microsoft people like yourself, which are easy to point out because they say "M$", will never be happy with any product by Microsoft no matter how good it is. They very rarely even try them and somehow just "know" they are awful products. Therefore, there is no reason for them to fill up blog discussions with their crap opinions. Thanks.
teehee. For research, I'm sure.
As for porn and Bing, I must admit the first time I heard about Bing at all was through a TC article about its easy porn results which outraged me enough to try it. Several hours later I made Bing my default search engine but only because it's such a good search engine with its finding things on the internet and such.
It looks like this article has used up Bing's porn advertising budget. The ad doesn't show any more!
However, I understand there are those who make use of search engines to fuel their various needs, including those of pornographic succour."
" And you might be astonished to hear that one of the major types of video for which humanity's needy search is video of a pornographic bent."
so Mr.Chris , you have never looked at porn on the internet??
i mean internet porn is a well known fact, it should not come as a surprise to anyone
I wouldn't be surprised to be honest.
I'd be surprised if you were being honest.
- by therealgeeves September 11, 2009 1:09 AM PDT
- developers developers developers. oh and - a big thank you to the developers with software that can download porn at least a million time faster than when you were on XP!
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(24 Comments)