August 30, 2009 12:03 PM PDT

Microsoft's Bing decides on bribery

by Chris Matyszczyk
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 98 comments

The new Bing Dynasty desperately wants you to love it.

And it understands you so well in these times of penury and desperation that it knows you have certain vulnerabilities that might be worth exploring: the vulnerabilities that lurk in the area around your pocket.

Therefore Microsoft has launched its first-ever TV ad for Cashback, a nifty system that gives you a little money when you buy something vital--such as sneakers or a camera--through a Bing search.

It does seem like splendidly commercial bribery. However, I do wish that the ad might have been a little less prosaic and a little more inspiring.

You see, if you're a decision engine rather than a search engine, you have to aspire to higher goals. It really isn't enough to produce an ad that might have been the work of JC Penney or KMart in one of their more awkward moments.

I would have preferred something that stirred the emotions, rather than something that feels like it's going through the motions.

Bribery should be alluring, not merely an everyday solution to an annoying practical problem.

Still, you know that even with this mundane execution, it won't be hard for some to decide that binging for your supper is better than singing for it.

Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Technically Incorrect
How iPhone apps can ruin your Christmas
Twitter: Home for your holiday hangover cure?
AT&T's Santa: Better 3G coverage an excellent wish
UK divorce lawyers: A fifth of cases Facebook-related
'SNL' mocks the iPhone
Facebook group 1, Simon Cowell 0
The best Tiger Woods online gift ideas
Microsoft sued over Bing name
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (98 Comments)
by Police_States_of_America August 30, 2009 1:04 PM PDT
no thanks, i think i'll save money by looking for better deals rather than buying from sponsoring retailers
Reply to this comment
by solitare_pax August 30, 2009 1:12 PM PDT
Agreed - this looks like just a new twist on a phishing scam - except you get tossed a few bucks by major businesses to give up your personal information to get spam and junk mail...
by JediJohn82 August 30, 2009 4:32 PM PDT
Actually NewEgg.com is one of the sponsored retailers and they offer excellent prices.
by Random_Walk August 30, 2009 7:04 PM PDT
You can likely get a better deal straight from newegg.com w/o the advertisement markup that makes up for the cashback offer - that is, if you know how. ;)

Sorry, but I use a search engine to, you know, search for stuff... not as some ginormous coupon-factory.
by dowell100 August 30, 2009 7:27 PM PDT
Bing is good, and I have no problem picking up money for free if it is something I'm buying anyway.

The hyperbole is in the fact that Matyszczyk calls this a Bing "bribe." That's utter nonsense. Skilled writers know that a bribe is "making illegal payments to in exchange for favors or influence." Microsoft is not doing that at all. It is simply supplying people with an incentive to use Bing. Such incentives are perfectly legitimate and done every day in business, from store coupons to cash for clunkers.

Maybe Matyszczyk's premise is all wrong. The commercial may not be alluring because it is not a bribe. It is just information for those who want to search and save.
by pjhenry1216 August 30, 2009 7:48 PM PDT
@Random_Walk: Why would you imply its difficult to find something on NewEgg with saying, "that is, if you know how." NewEgg is not only a good deal, but its site is amazingly easy to navigate. Also, I'd be curious to see if there's any difference between prices offered through the sponsorship or just straight from NewEgg. Maybe there will be cheaper brands than what they'll sell through the program, but that doesn't necessarily mean its a better deal all the time.
by jaguar717 August 30, 2009 8:43 PM PDT
@dowell100 -- Do you really think the heavy-handed slant of the article is an accident?

Nearly every mainstream reporter writes this way.
Microsoft = dynasty, desperately, bribery, vulnerabilities, lurk, KMart, awkward, mundane

If it were Apple it would be words like revolutionary, breaks barriers, incentive, consumer empowerment, forward thinking, etc.
by dowell100 August 31, 2009 8:08 AM PDT
@ jaguar717

I hear you. I just think misdirection should be left in the hands of magicians, not writers. Heavy-handedness--to the point of misinformation as we see here--is a character flaw, not a writing perspective, in my view.
by Seaspray0 August 31, 2009 8:08 AM PDT
There are several people that offer you free stuff. One of them even promises to give you a free laptop. Read the fine print. The "requirements" are almost impossible to meet. Manufacturers rebates already have a bad reputation of not giving you the rebate. Sorry, I just don't trust offers like this.
by TheAppleGuy August 31, 2009 9:37 AM PDT
@Chris Matyszczyk and other bashing Bing cashback I love it I got a very good deal when I got MAC and I always use it.

What you have to say for, google checkout when they were throwing $10 just for using them?
by BPMelvin August 30, 2009 1:05 PM PDT
About the only thing Bing is good for is showing who is Paying Microsoft.

Additionally Microsoft discriminates against rural Americans. I live out where there is no mail delivery. I MUST have a PO Box
(BTW of course so do all our GIs overseas)

You cannot register for cash back with a PO Box. Even if it is the only address you can have.
Reply to this comment
by pjhenry1216 August 30, 2009 7:49 PM PDT
That's not really discrimination. There are a lot of things that do that. Its one of the only ways to try and minimize people trying to game the system.
by BPMelvin August 30, 2009 10:05 PM PDT
well yeah it is...there are provisions to check that in fact a zip code is in an area where there is no postal delivery. You can actually just google the zip code.

Even the IRS and courts are required to make an exception.
As far as gaming these places are very small post offices where the postmaster probably has the entire system memorized. They are usually one person post offices.
by vanax August 31, 2009 9:12 AM PDT
Microsoft first bribed Lauren to buy a Windows PC; Now it bribes Mr. and Ms. Public to use Bing; Next MS might want to figure out a way to bribe Google to use Bing.
by ppgreat August 30, 2009 1:11 PM PDT
http://www.bing.com/community/forums/p/649394/9546947.aspx
Reply to this comment
by Random_Walk August 30, 2009 7:05 PM PDT
Ouch... can't imagine buying a plasma TV that way, but still... ouch.
by clickhouse August 30, 2009 1:25 PM PDT
Bing all the time and am quite happy with it.

I don't always use cashback feature but I at least check it out. Sometimes I can get the lowest price with cashback but I wish they had more advertisers.

Commercial is cool, what is the song?
Reply to this comment
by t8 August 30, 2009 2:55 PM PDT
Hows life in Redmond?
by robvme August 30, 2009 4:07 PM PDT
Ditto. I find Bing to be better than I thought it would be. I am pleasantly surprised at how well it compares with Google and the way it allows you to drill into searches by hovering your mouse over the search result. I have to say, that I also like the daily change of art at the search page too. I haven't used cash back yet and probably won't as I don't do a lot of purchasing online. Sadly, Bing will have to be much better to convert many Google users, it isn't enough to be the same, it is going to have to be better.
by markmole August 30, 2009 6:34 PM PDT
Oh, so right, Bing is great! It's pretty marvelous. It may be the best search engine yet. In fact, it could be the single greatest invention of this century. I LOVE it! I think maybe it could cure cancer and figure out how cold fusion might work. Inside it's vast, zesty being there lies the ability to change the weather, and perhaps even travel through space and time. It has sexy long hair, and full voluptuous lips... I want to kiss it and touch it, oh so gently at first..
by toosday August 31, 2009 2:04 AM PDT
Yep, I suppose Bing is good. I can't really say if it's better than Google or worse, but it's definitely on par. Bing's images and video search is way better, though. It includes videos from Hulu and once the Yahoo deal goes through will probably include photos from Flickr. However, it's Maps service isn't that great at all. (You can only save 3 locations.)

I've been using Bing for a couple of months now. Don't miss Google at all.
by brentrbrian August 31, 2009 3:28 AM PDT
Couldn't pay me enough to even try it.

I am so TIRED of Microsoft IGNORING their core business to chase GOOGLE CRUMBS ... where is the "great innovator"? Copycat is more like it ...
by Seaspray0 August 31, 2009 9:43 AM PDT
@brentrbrian. "Couldn't pay me enough to even try it." "where is the "great innovator?"

So basically you are complaining about something you have never seen or intend to see and wonder why you haven't seen any inovation where you've never looked.
by BingItOn September 1, 2009 11:13 PM PDT
@t8

I have heard Seattle/Redmond weather is very good.

How about your side? I mean in hell :)
by MeepMan September 4, 2009 9:37 AM PDT
I like googling things with Bing! It redefines googling as we know it!

*sarcasm*
by mjconver August 30, 2009 1:28 PM PDT
@ppgreat: What a fantastic link! Bing Rebates is proving to be a cesspool of inadequate planning and under-resourcing.
Reply to this comment
by CDubber August 30, 2009 1:42 PM PDT
Microsoft will do anything for your love. Even pay you.

Sad.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan August 30, 2009 1:43 PM PDT
This tactic is also known in the retail world as a REBATE. It doesn't seem to bother people there if they can get a better price.

Hmm. Dunno that this would make any difference at all in my search behavior as I don't use search for shopping online at all- as in I don't so *any* shopping online. I do this strange thing of buying things from local stores and businesses.
Reply to this comment
by BPMelvin August 30, 2009 1:54 PM PDT
me too local stores... but I do a LOT of shopping on the internet as I am limited to a "mercantile" "(general store) that is less than an 80 mile round trip
by The_happy_switcher August 30, 2009 2:50 PM PDT
So Dan, Microsoft doesn't give you Sundays off?
by rsrupert1972 August 30, 2009 3:29 PM PDT
Isn't it sad that when MS does anything, everyone wants to bash, even if it's something everyone else does?
by robvme August 30, 2009 4:08 PM PDT
happy switcher....

Does Burger King give you Sunday off? Really? Come on...is it okay to like something and not be accused of being a MS insider?
by The_happy_switcher August 30, 2009 4:22 PM PDT
@rob: I probably make more in a day than you make in a week. I'm sure you're still wearing a name tag at your workplace and frequently ask 'would you like fries with that.'
by Vegaman_Dan August 30, 2009 6:04 PM PDT
@The_Happy_Switcher:

Sorry boss, you said I had to work thsi weekend. Would you please quit texting me with your world domination plans through the use of iPods and Cottage Cheese?

As for you making more in a day than most people do in a week- is that in Peso? :)


I was thinking about this promotion and wondered how exactly si this different from any other promotion? Since THS is a strong Apple proponent, perhaps you can explain why Apple was giving away iPod Touches if you bought a new Mac for college? Isn't that bribery as well? And considering the price of an iPod Touch, that is pretty high bribery too. Most people would consider that just a package deal, but you seem to believe more in the bribery angle so... how is this different?
by Random_Walk August 30, 2009 7:07 PM PDT
There's a reason rebates suck... it usually involves giving up your personal info to a third party, takes weeks or months, and odds are almost good that you don't get that paltry sum sent to you.

I won't even go into the time involved to get it all sent out and done (which means that for some of us, it's actually a money-loser if per-hour payrates were applied to the process...)
by Vegaman_Dan August 30, 2009 9:57 PM PDT
@Random_Walk:

You've got it exactly. Companies count on people like you who give up and take the easy way out. They get to keep the money then. Now then, who is the loser in that situation?
by mooseontheloose89 August 30, 2009 2:01 PM PDT
I've used it quite a bit, though it might not look like much at first, the savings do add up, especially when some stores offer as much as 40 percent cashback.
Reply to this comment
by FF2009 August 30, 2009 2:29 PM PDT
hey look. I am so freaking cool. I can do what others have done for years too. Besides, my page has a Hip looking background and a few irrelevant search terms that take half of your screen way and the other half looks so freaking cool. Why don't you like me? I am your first Hooker. Decide on me First!
Reply to this comment
by August 30, 2009 2:36 PM PDT
A desperate move to sucker people to use their product with sponsored puchasing? How much more does it really cost. Find your own better price & skip the kick-backs. Interesting to note also that to find tech bulletins on the Microsoft website, I STILL have to use Google. Bing has failed several side by side tests to find information. I'll pass on Bing.
Reply to this comment
by shldvebnacwby August 30, 2009 8:47 PM PDT
I actually have just used bing's cashback thing after searching around the internet and finding good prices. It just so happened that where I wanted to order from was one of the businesses working with MS on cashback. It isn't much, but I won't complain about $5 back on stuff that I had already planned on buying. (Even if it does take 60 days to actually access the money.) I probably won't go out of my way to buy from the cashback vendors, but a lot of the online retailers that I use are on the list.
by The_happy_switcher August 30, 2009 2:44 PM PDT
First they try to buy off iphone developers now this. Talk about desperate.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan August 30, 2009 6:09 PM PDT
And Apple gave away iPod Touches in an effort to convince people to buy laptops for college.

Your point? Be ready to condemn your own Holy Apple if you are going to cast about stones.
by Random_Walk August 30, 2009 7:13 PM PDT
Hrm... I wonder if the students had to wait 60 days for their iPods...
by Vegaman_Dan August 30, 2009 10:00 PM PDT
@Random_Walk:

No... but they do have to tive out their persoanl information including social security and other identification to a third party company to verify their student status, then if found to be lacking or quit school before the term is up, forced to pay the full 100% retail price of the products instead of any discount.

That fine print will get you every time. I had plenty of time sitting at the Apple store waiting to get helped to read the brochure and the terms/conditions associated. 45 minutes to get a sales clerk to sell me an iPhone. They had lots of staff present, but only two were authorized to actually make sales. Sheesh.
by robvme August 31, 2009 8:02 PM PDT
Vegaman_Dan

No you don't give your SSN or anything beyond your address and phone number. Also, you can use Paypal for your rebates and recieve them faster than the 60 days everyone seems to be stating. You deal directly with the merchant you are doing business with and Bing Cashback is a go between. The merchant gets your business because it was found with Bing, presumably MSFT charges for that "click thru", but then passes it to you the consumer.

I just signed up to see exactly what was involved and a simple Live or Hotmail account and then a couple of fields to identify your physical location and that's it. Really minimal amount of info, which I would think is needed to actually get the rebate to you.

Don't get me wrong, all kinds of metrics are being collected along with your IP address I am sure, but that is par for the course for ecommerce no matter who you buy from.

Check it out, you can always plug fake info in if you are concerned, you can even setup a dummie hotmail account.
by cnote1287 August 30, 2009 2:46 PM PDT
anti microsoft ppl are just gonna jump all over this. bet you if apple did something like this with a made up site the same ppl wouldnt say a thing :-P
Reply to this comment
by 8301 August 30, 2009 2:54 PM PDT
In fact, they'd probably use it as another reason that Apple is the best little mom-and-pop company in the world, and so much better than the evil Microsoft corporation.
by drewbyh August 30, 2009 8:48 PM PDT
The problem with that scenario is the Apple wouldn't do the same thing. Apple doesn't feel the need to have it's hand in everything aspect of the tech world.
by robvme August 31, 2009 7:45 PM PDT
Actually, Apple does do this. Just go to http://www.apple.com/promo/ and you can find their latest rebates. This a common practice and in this case Microsoft is trying to carve a niche out of online shopping which is not a Google strength. What people are missing is that Microsoft is trying to turn the click thru advertising market on its head, change the model and they can gain market share. That's all there is to it and a very small part of the overall strategy. This is why Google is crapping itself over what looks like small share, but equates to millions of dollars a day and potentially a paradigm shift in the online advertising market. Not to mention it distracts Google from developing online office apps. It the same thing with Linux, all of these are business levers and counter levers to protect the core. We should be glad these companies are checking each other. Their fight is our gain.

Would it surprise you that Apple actually offers discounts to Microsoft employees? It does. Remember, MSFT makes Office for Mac, and it is a highly profitable business. Also recall that a few years ago MSFT floated a loan to Apple to help them out. Yes, Apple repaid and no MSFT doesn't own any significant share of Apple. As for Google and Search, well isn't having a choice good? Most of the posters on this site bash MSFT for the exact opposite. Its okay not to like MSFT, its okay to love Google, but when you follow the dollars, are any of these companies enriching you personally? So really, why not enjoy the best that each has and ignore what you don't care for. It doesn't have to be a religion. If you can bank on a rebate, whether it comes 1 day or 60 days so what? As for personal information, I can't think of anything more personal than giving a company your credit card info online. That is tied to all kinds of info about you that is bought and sold everyday.
by t8 August 30, 2009 2:58 PM PDT
Google doesn't even advertise and they have the lion share of the search market.
Microsoft pays people, and they have a minority share.

Paying people to use a service basically says we don't have many customers so we will pay you for a while till we can find a way to hook you in permanently.

It looks cheap.
Reply to this comment
by msjonker August 30, 2009 7:58 PM PDT
That's the way the market usually works. People won't just flock to your site because its new. You have to give them an incentive over the leaders, such as competing on price or features. Microsoft has chosen to compete on price.
by pjhenry1216 August 30, 2009 8:03 PM PDT
Actually, it makes sense. If you're in the minority, you'd like to try and do whatever you can to get people to notice you. Hell, the only way they'd beat Google with searching alone is if they were at least 10 times better. Any less and people wouldn't care enough to switch their habits. Companies in virtually all kinds of markets do this. Ever see a store offer a sale or promotion? In essence, its like they're trying to pay you to come into the store. Coupons? Rebates? This kind of thing happens ALL THE TIME. Honestly, I couldn't care less about it as I'm usually pretty specific when I go to purchase something online and doubt it'll match up with a sponsor, but nonetheless, I also don't see any problem with it whatsoever.

I don't even see why an article was written about it in the first place. Thats like writing an article for when McDonalds had that limited time sale on double cheeseburgers for a buck (i think that was it) and then saying its a cheap way just to get people to purchase their food over someone elses and they should just compete on quality.

This is a non-story.
by Dalkorian August 31, 2009 4:38 PM PDT
As cheap as any filthy diseased prostitute laying legs spread on the filthy cobblestone streets. That's msn search ... oh, I mean live search ... oops, today they want to call their abortion bing ... for you.

The sad part is this - look at the comments here, look at all the people who are willing to sacrifice their respect for a few pennies. Prostitute-mart customers, each and every one I'll bet. Oooh, I saved a few cents on my purchase today, who cares if my children have a future? They are capable of saying "welcome to walmart - I love you" just like the idiot down the street. My children don't need a future, I need to save a few cents on garbage I only want and don't really need.

Pathetic. The whole lot of them.
by mistasandman August 30, 2009 3:03 PM PDT
I think my IQ has dropped just from reading some of the above comments... Microsoft is not trying to bribe anyone, BING is a great search engine, much better than Google or Yahoo. I really wouldn't expect any less from the Apple fanboy zombieism that cnet has become. Instead of trying to attack Microsoft for innovating and making great products.... channel your anger where it belongs, at Apple for charging you guys $29 for that stupid upgrade that Microsoft would have given for free as a service pack :)
Reply to this comment
by t8 August 30, 2009 3:14 PM PDT
Microsoft give upgrades for free because they don't want to be sued for all the viruses that their bad programming let's in. They are just fixing vulnerbilities. It's not an upgrade for features.
by CraigC2000 August 30, 2009 3:19 PM PDT
I always find it ironic when someone who is a 'fanboy' bashes people who are fanboys of some other product.

But regardless of that fact, Microsoft is paying people to use their search engine. It's not a rebate, as the cashback program has been subsidized by money from Microsoft whenever they offer double cashback and other promotions, and not the retailer themselves. That isn't necessarily a bad thing, as Microsoft is using the promotion to attract people to their product, but it is what it is.

And while I personally prefer google for search, I am more than happy to accept free money from Microsoft for as long as they offer it whenever I make a purchase from a participating bing cashback retailer. Regardless of whether you dislike Microsoft or not, it's tough to argue against getting free money! ;)
by t8 August 31, 2009 2:12 AM PDT
@ CraigC200

I always find it ironic when someone bashes Microsoft (for good reason) that they suddenly become an Apple Fanboy. I don't own one Apple product.

I own Windows XP, LInux, and I love the Web.

I care nothing for expensive OS's that include Paint, and Wordpad. All I am interested in is booting up a browser. I am waiting for Chrome OS to be set free to use the best platform in the most efficiently way.

The best platform of course is the Web. Windows and OSX are nothing compared to it.
by Dalkorian August 31, 2009 4:34 PM PDT
W7 is free now?

You have no clue as to what you're talking about and have only embarrassed yourself, but hey maybe M$ will pay you for that post anyway.
by t8 August 30, 2009 3:13 PM PDT
How about a bribe for Vista?
Pay me $100 and I will use it for a year on an old unused PC I have at home.
Reply to this comment
by Random_Walk August 30, 2009 7:10 PM PDT
...or give me a top-end laptop with a Ferrari log on it, and maybe I'll write something nice about Windows 7, like they tried to get to happen for Vista.
by Vegaman_Dan August 30, 2009 10:04 PM PDT
@Random_Walk:

Why would you want an Acer Ferrari? Like the car, they are exceedingly expensive, very pretty to look at, fail frequently and aren't supported by the OEM beyond one year.
by t8 August 31, 2009 2:13 AM PDT
@ Vegaman_Dan

Are you sure you aren't talking about Windows?
by Seaspray0 August 31, 2009 10:15 AM PDT
@t8. Blue screens of death are very uncommon and most can be traced back to faulty drivers written by the hardware manufacturer (not written by microsoft). The lifecycle on a windows OS support is 8 years, and even that has been extended for some versions. I have no doubt you already knew this, so why the stupid flame?
by t8 August 31, 2009 2:21 PM PDT
Did I mention "Blue screens of death".
No.

Please make your comments real.
by Dalkorian August 31, 2009 4:32 PM PDT
by t8 August 30, 2009 3:13 PM PDT
Pay me $100 and I will use it for a year on an old unused PC I have at home.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

I wouldn't. Up that offer by an order of magnitude and I still wouldn't even consider it. My freedom and self respect is worth more than a few trinkets from a slave master.
by MeepMan September 4, 2009 9:46 AM PDT
P.S. Seaspray:

Ubuntu Jaunty can use generic drivers to run on your computer well. MS, with all of its resources, should be able to do likewise.
by SlimGem August 30, 2009 3:33 PM PDT
I don't see this as being any different than cash-back from credit card issuers.

It's money saved no matter who is doing it. It's not like using Bing is going to benefit dog fight promoters or whaling ships. I'd bet that Ben Franklin would use it.
Reply to this comment
by BigGuns149 August 30, 2009 4:47 PM PDT
It depends... as others have noted. Their preferred vendors may not be the best price even after the rebate.
by Vegaman_Dan August 30, 2009 6:09 PM PDT
It's not a new concept. Rebates and sales have been around forever.
by Random_Walk August 30, 2009 7:11 PM PDT
"It's not a new concept. Rebates and sales have been around forever."

Circuit City used to be huge about rebates... So, umm, what happened to them again?
by pjhenry1216 August 30, 2009 8:06 PM PDT
@Random_Walk: What does that have to do with anything? Your example of Circuit City doesn't counter any argument or even address any points made in the sentence you quoted. In fact, they're barely even superficially related. They just both mention rebates. Aside from that, there's nothing connecting the two.

You can't just quote a sentence and then make a completely different point. Especially if that point isn't related at all to the overall argument.
by Vegaman_Dan August 30, 2009 10:08 PM PDT
@Random_Walk:

You're absolutely right to bring up Circuit City. That's an excellent example. Let's try looking at the ot her companies too, shall we?

Apple Computers.
Red Hat.
Honda
Toyota
Mazda
IBM
HP
Lenovo
Frigidaire
Sears
Boeing
Airbus
Peterbilt
Walmart
Exxon
Mobil
Barnes & Noble
Random House
Del Rey
Amazon
Ebay

I could go on if you want, but I really don't see any point to doing so. Your rebuttal is... well, rebutted. :)
by t8 August 31, 2009 2:18 AM PDT
Microsoft have now dropped to the level of Circuit City with this cheap bribe.

Point is that Google doesn't advertise, and they are the best and have pole position.
Microsoft pay people and are a distant 3rd.

Pretty sad for Microsoft, when you consider how many people must use their search engine because IE came loaded with Windows Live MSN Hot Search Bingy.

[CNET editors' note: Personal attack deleted.]
by mistasandman August 30, 2009 4:15 PM PDT
Like I said... Quit trying to blame your unhappiness with Apple (ugly UI, expensive service packs, exploding ipods, imacs that burst into flames, imacs trying to copy Windows 7, ect...) and pretending like Microsoft are the bad guys. The only entity trying to rip off the public is Apple. You can argue among yourselves all you want... it doesn't change the fact that Microsoft is the ONLY ones innovating what they do... Apple just tries to copy them :) Which they have failed at over the years judging by the low fanatical following they have ;)
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian August 31, 2009 4:29 PM PDT
ROFLMAO @U.
by JediJohn82 August 30, 2009 4:31 PM PDT
I already took advantage of this last week. Bing was offering 10% cashback on my NewEgg.com order. I love Google, but I can't beat $50 back on my $500 purchase of computer parts. The sucky part is you have to wait like 60 days to get the money.
Reply to this comment
by mickeymjay August 30, 2009 4:51 PM PDT
I agree that this cashback feature is pretty nice. I also agree 60 days does suck but at least it is a bonus.
by Vegaman_Dan August 30, 2009 10:09 PM PDT
Only a fool would turn down free money when making such a purchase. I see no harm in it.
by t8 August 31, 2009 2:24 PM PDT
@ vege

What about "Only a fool would purchase software when there is a free alternative"?
by Dalkorian August 31, 2009 4:29 PM PDT
Only a '**** would hand over even more data to their M$ masters for pennies on the dollar. Being bribed to use a search engine that isn't even smart enough to call itself a search engine (decision engine??? how offensive!! I'LL make the decisions, thank you very much M$.) is offensive to the extreme.
by jaximflash August 30, 2009 4:55 PM PDT
When I am looking to purchase things off the net, Bing is one of the sites I stop at to see if I can get the best times and often times with their cashback program, they are. Sometimes it is justa few dollars cheaper and sometimes it's 10-20 dollars. It's definitely worth it to bing.
Reply to this comment
by 8301 August 30, 2009 5:13 PM PDT
This has got to be the only place in the world where people will complain about a program where they can save a little money while inputting almost zero effort.
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian August 31, 2009 4:26 PM PDT
Yeah, keep selling your apparently useless soul to your cruel master for pennies on the dollar. And they say prostitution is illegal.
by 8301 September 1, 2009 7:26 PM PDT
You sure do take your search engine use seriously. I wish I could be as passionate over my choice of web services as you.
Showing 1 of 2 pages (98 Comments)
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right