• On mySimon: Radius Toothbrush
July 20, 2009 11:50 PM PDT

Truck dealer aims to spike Web traffic with free AK-47s

by Chris Matyszczyk
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 35 comments

In this tough economy, forearmed is better than forewarned.

At least that seems to be the view of Mark Muller, owner of Max Motors in Clay County, Mo. Because, in August, he is offering a free AK-47 with every vehicle sold.

You might think this promotion a little on the eccentric side. However, Muller is no lily-livered Collapsenikov.

He believes in standing up for one's right to defend oneself. Indeed, he has a motto for his dealership that expresses his feelings very clearly: "God, Guns, Guts and American Pick-up Trucks."

You might wonder how on earth he came to devise such an outlandish, and perhaps slightly unnerving, promotion.

Well, last year he offered a free handgun. And, in an interview with CNN (embedded here), he said: "It spiked our Web traffic and we sold, we estimate, 35 more cars during the promotion than we normally would have."

So the seductive power of the gun seems to work on those who choose the Web to find the best deals.

This year, Muller said, he is looking to sell 100 extra vehicles, hence the attempt to locate your inner Rambo.

Muller explained to CNN: "Look, there's a bunch of evil in the world and we need to protect ourselves."

He added: "There's a tremendous crime problem around here with people doing meth. These people have lost their souls. They don't care about you. They don't care about me. They care about getting more dope."

Hence the need, according to Muller, for something stronger than a little handgun.

In case you were wondering whether he will have a pile of AKs in his showroom, from the top of which he'll take one and present it to every purchaser, well, it's not quite so glamorous.

He will offer a voucher that the lucky truck-owner can take down to a gun store and go through the proper vetting procedure before he gets his precious free gift. Which, should you suddenly feel the urge to pack extra protection, will set you back a mere $450.

However, Muller is keen to point out that just because he lives in a more rural area, this promotion is not indicative of some sort of uncultured nature on his part.

He was quoted in the Telegraph as explaining: "They think we are all cross-eyed rednecks down here. We are not. Tonight I am going to the theater with my wife to see Anything Goes and we will eat sushi on the way."

I am sure there will be at the very least a handgun tickling his hip as he nibbles on his rainbow roll.

However, I feel confident that Muller's strategy will prove to be a good one.

Next year, when he looks to send his Web traffic soaring in an attempt to sell 200 more vehicles, I feel sure he will offer bazookas, a mortar or two, perhaps even a rocket launcher.

Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Technically Incorrect
At last, Google has some parasites
Dad accuses Disney of calling his 11-year-old a hacker
Man loses job after searching too hard for aliens
A slightly unfortunate Twitter billboard
Droid does, iPhone doesn't: The porn app store
How can Dell Netbook be 'perfect for tweeting'?
Black Friday at Best Buy: What's the big deal?
AT&T gets Luke Wilson to hit Verizon again
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (35 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by hightechfanboy July 21, 2009 12:39 AM PDT
A rocket launcher or a bullet proof vest will be very appropriate for next year promotion, and why not some night vision goggles could be a nice bonus too. We need to be prepare just in case there is some sort of revolution or civil war coming soon.
Reply to this comment
by ckurowic July 21, 2009 5:44 AM PDT
Hopefully that wasn't sarcasm, because the way things are going we ARE two seconds away from total collapse.
by sdf0013 July 21, 2009 6:14 AM PDT
I think the vest would be a good idea. I mean, it's something you'd like to have, but probably would never buy on your own.
by Agrainofsalt July 21, 2009 1:02 AM PDT
Sounds like a spiffing idea... until one of those dreaded crack addicts robs one of the the lucky AK-47 owners of their precious possession, and of course their pick-up truck. Then, proceeds to Max Motors and holds up the place with the AK-47. It's Mike Moore all over again.
Reply to this comment
by doubtthat July 21, 2009 7:19 AM PDT
How is getting your gun stolen any different than having your car stolen? If someone steals your car and runs down a pedestrian while fleeing from the cops, do you feel like you are somehow to blame? If someone steals your stuff and does bad things with it; it is the thief's fault and not your own.
by Agrainofsalt July 21, 2009 9:14 AM PDT
I just feel it would be a tad ironic to be held up with a gun that you gave away for free. But to comment on your points.

"If someone steals your car and runs down a pedestrian while fleeing from the cops, do you feel like you are somehow to blame? "If someone steals your stuff and does bad things with it; it is the thief's fault and not your own."

A car is a necessary thing for most people, and yes they sometimes get stolen and bad things happen. As long as the car was securely locked and I had taken all precautions to ensure it wasn't stolen, then I wouldn't feel any blame.

A car, however, is a necessary thing for most people, and yes they sometimes get stolen and sometimes bad things happen. AK-47's are not what I call a necessary item for most people, and yes they sometimes get stolen and bad things definitely happen. So, would I feel some sort of blame if someone was killed with an AK-47 that I unnecessarily added to the population. Yes, I think I would.

No matter what way I look at this I can't get past the point of: How does putting assault rifles on the streets make the place any safer? Answer: It doesn't. It makes it that much more dangerous. Remember, the more guns the more chances they have of falling in the wrong hands.
by Agrainofsalt July 21, 2009 9:28 AM PDT
I suppose if he does get shot by one of his own giveaways he would be a prime contender for a Darwin Award.
by Michichael July 21, 2009 4:26 PM PDT
If you apply the same protections you do to your car to a gun, then it shouldn't get stolen. As for whether or not it's necessary, take a look at the direction society is going right now. The 2nd amendment is the only thing keeping the others from disappearing any faster than they already are.
by Agrainofsalt July 21, 2009 6:35 PM PDT
I agree, but the idea of having a gun, according to many of the correspondents here, is to protect your family and property. So, having the gun in an approved gun locker sort of defeats that purpose. I mean, someone enters your house with nefarious purpose. What do you do? Say, "Hang on sec matey, just off to get my gun from the locker. I won't be jiffy."

So if you have a gun you either have to keep it handy where it is potentially able to be stolen or lock it up where it becomes useless in a "protection" situation.

Which brings me back to , Who the hell needs an AK-47 to protect themselves.
by cheema33 July 21, 2009 2:37 AM PDT
I wonder what will a customer do if they felt that they did not get a good deal? If I were this guy, I would certainly look into beefing up security at work and at home. Handing AK-47s to angry customers is probably not a great idea.
Reply to this comment
by PixP July 21, 2009 3:23 AM PDT
Now this is what I'm talk'n bout! Go Max Motors! Go! Finally some sensibility around here!
Reply to this comment
by snklkjlqqe July 21, 2009 4:01 AM PDT
I understand the God, guns, and American pickup trucks but shouldn't either the guns be American or the pickup trucks be Russian? I'm confused.
Reply to this comment
by Bob_Owens July 21, 2009 6:16 AM PDT
The semi-automatic AK-47s--not machine guns or automatics as I've seen reported incorrectly in far too many places--are made in North Carolina.
by Crankypaul July 21, 2009 4:22 AM PDT
There is nothing to say here. This guy, and his customers, would do the world more good by moving to another planet where they can throw their weight around without hurting anyone but like minded individuals.

"Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition!"
Reply to this comment
by sbwinn July 21, 2009 8:36 AM PDT
Sorry, the crazy gun-toters were here first. Sounds like you need an extra line on your 1040 for a NASA contribution.
by ::G July 22, 2009 7:12 AM PDT
Hey, we've got the guns. Why don't you come and try to make us move? Hahaha! It's you that should do us a favor and get the hell out of our country =)
by jture July 21, 2009 4:35 AM PDT
Great, the very thing we want, more idiots driving vehicles twice as big as they actually need and packing firearms they DEFINITELY don't need.
Reply to this comment
by jaguar717 July 21, 2009 5:20 AM PDT
I'd be curious to know if you view 1st (4th, etc) Amendment rights with the same disgust/fear/ignorance.

Or do you view it as a Bill of "Needs"?
by txag1981 July 21, 2009 6:08 AM PDT
I'm so glad to see someone who actually knows what I need and don't need.
by sdf0013 July 21, 2009 6:15 AM PDT
Oh, Oh! His next promotion should be gear to prepare for the zombie apocalypse. Then he'd get gamers too.
Reply to this comment
by MaLvaDo39 July 21, 2009 6:33 AM PDT
This is great! All law abiding, stable, and good people should know how to own and shoot their guns.
i like this idea.
Reply to this comment
by Gorgeclimber1 July 21, 2009 6:53 AM PDT
"...there's a bunch of evil in the world..." starting with Max Motors.
Reply to this comment
by PixP July 21, 2009 7:07 AM PDT
I'm all for peace and a world without war. Unfortunately, we don't live in this make believe utopia that some of you subscribe to. The need to protect ones self and family is a must whether it's by guns, or whatever, and some of you far left fanatics would be the first to run for help with a look victim-ism to those with the guns.
by Magallanes July 21, 2009 7:19 AM PDT
WOW, Americans are uniques!

Anyways, the mix beer and guns is way more dangerous than truck and guns.
Reply to this comment
by chrisjames80 July 21, 2009 7:29 AM PDT
vehicles are just as dangerous as a firearm. both inanimate objects, equally deadly when handled by idots.
Reply to this comment
by Agrainofsalt July 21, 2009 9:17 AM PDT
So why put one of each in an idiots hands?
by myles taylor July 21, 2009 7:42 AM PDT
We need to get more guns in the hands of the citizens. Gun laws only prevent law-abiding citizens from owning guns and the law-breakers continue to break them. It only takes away from protection from us.

I admire this guy.
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian July 21, 2009 10:19 AM PDT
Here I thought I was the only sane person left on the planet. Thanks Myles for making me feel less alone. Isn't it amazing how many "Americans" are arguing for repealing the First?
by libertyforall1776 July 21, 2009 8:04 AM PDT
This is a real hoot, that host cannot seem to grasp the concept of self/home defense.
Reply to this comment
by monkeyfun14 July 21, 2009 8:36 AM PDT
Yes lets give away military grade weaponry...

I respect the need to protect yourself but you can do that with something besides an assault rifle..
Reply to this comment
by txag1981 July 21, 2009 9:46 AM PDT
If you feel that one can be protected with something other than an "assault rifle" then you should drive a vehicle that cannot exceed the maximum speed limit. All vehicles can get you to work or go shopping but why do you need one that can go 120+mph?
by Nataku4ca July 21, 2009 11:20 AM PDT
@txag1981 run away from bad guys? lol

well if u take it as a constant then u probably dont need it, but if ur just trying to pass a vehical... then i would really have more speed to reduce chance of hitting on coming traffic

(don't tell me i shouldn't pass the guy driving 10 miles/hour on a 60 zone...)
by jaguar717 July 22, 2009 2:16 AM PDT
Contrary to what Herr Pelosi would have you believe, you can't just buy an "assault rifle". Those are select-fire, and have been heavily regulated since 1934.

The AK is single-fire, just like any other rifle, except that it fires an "intermediate" round with 1/3 to 1/2 the energy of a boring old deer rifle.

But it looks scary, so make up terms like "assault weapon" and ban it based on cosmetic features...the Command and Control types love the ignorance that empowers them.
by Dalkorian July 21, 2009 10:25 AM PDT
An idea for Max Motors next year, I hear the M-1 Abrams tank is pretty fashionable. I can even help with a slogan ... "built tough as a tank", "declaring war on high prices", or maybe "buy a truck - get a freakin TANK"

Customers will be breaking down your doors for that one.

;-)
Reply to this comment
by alegr July 21, 2009 11:07 AM PDT
"Guns don't kill people. People kill people"

"Drugs don't kill people. People kill themselves with drugs"

Now, why drugs are illegal and guns are legal? Surely, drugs are safer than guns. You can't kill someone at a distance with a bunch of weed.

"NRA. Protecting your right to have an universal solution for all your life's problems, be it wife, kids, or neighbors".
Reply to this comment
(35 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Inside the Apple, er, Microsoft Store

Although Redmond's foray into retail bears a big resemblance to Apple's approach, Microsoft has added some distinctive features to draw casual PC buyers and techies alike.

Big marketing budget drives Moto Droid sales

Verizon and Motorola are spending big bucks--$100 million--on marketing the new smartphone, and it looks like it will pay off with 1 million devices sold by year's end.

advertisement

About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right