• On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!
July 17, 2009 11:45 AM PDT

EATR creators: Our robots won't eat corpses

by Chris Matyszczyk
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 19 comments
Share

My CNET handler woke me early on Friday.

"It's those corpse-eating robot people," he barked down the phone. "They're after you."

"But I'm not dead yet," I replied. "I just look pretty rough first thing in the morning."

Still, he made me stagger to my laptop and the Robotic Technology site. There, I espied the words: "IMPORTANT MESSAGE CONCERNING EATR."

For those of you who have been asleep since Tuesday, the Energetically Autonomous Tactical Robot, or EATR, is a steam-powered robot being developed for military purposes. Its claim to fame is that it can "can find, ingest, and extract energy from biomass in the environment (and other organically based energy sources)."

No, he was not eaten by a robot, OK?

(Credit: CC Kareem Mohammed/Flickr)

I had noticed that the boffins at Fox News had suggested that this robot would therefore be free to munch on dead bodies. This seems to have been chewed over quite vigorously at Robotic Technology.

Here is what its important message said Friday:

In response to rumors circulating the Internet on sites such as FoxNews.com, FastCompany.com, and CNET News about a 'flesh eating' robot project, Cyclone Power Technologies Inc. (Pink Sheets: CYPW) and Robotic Technology Inc. (RTI) would like to set the record straight: This robot is strictly vegetarian."

Well, now. I know many folks who tell me they are strictly vegetarian, and then I see them over at In-N-Out Burger sampling more than the lettuce. So please forgive me if my skeptical nerve registers an involuntary fizzing sound.

However, the robotic folk are keen to point out that "desecration of the dead is a war crime under Article 15 of the Geneva Conventions and is certainly not something sanctioned by DARPA, Cyclone, or RTI."

Indeed.

The important message concludes with the words of Harry Schoell, the CEO of Cyclone Power Technologies (The EATR project is a joint venture between Robotic Technology and Cyclone Power Technologies):

"We completely understand the public's concern about futuristic robots feeding on the human population, but that is not our mission. We are focused on demonstrating that our engines can create usable, green power from plentiful, renewable plant matter. The commercial applications alone for this earth-friendly energy solution are enormous."

It is not my mission to be concerned. It just sometimes happens, you know?

Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Technically Incorrect
Last call for i-Booze delivery service
New Droid ad: iPhone is 'digitally clueless'
Doctors told to say no to Facebook come-ons
Wicked online cash grab out of Tiger Woods scandal
Verizon nixes holiday ads to continue AT&T-bashing
Groom updates Twitter, Facebook at the altar
At last, Google has some parasites
Dad accuses Disney of calling his 11-year-old a hacker
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (19 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Pete Bardo July 17, 2009 12:03 PM PDT
Hey Chris,
What's the deal? You really believe everything you read and/or hear from FOX News?

The robot is steam powered. It burns 'biomass' to make steam. It takes a lot of fire to burn a human body.

So, you'd rather believe FOX News than the company?

But, on the other hand, the article did fit well with the title of your blog as it was actually Technically Incorrect.
Reply to this comment
by monkeyfun14 July 17, 2009 12:16 PM PDT
Everything you can hardly believe anything...

That company has the biggest political agenda i've ever seen.
by professionaladventurer July 17, 2009 12:11 PM PDT
Fox news, that was your source? Now I see the problem.
Reply to this comment
by mikeofmars July 17, 2009 12:41 PM PDT
oh I love the way people just want to jump on Fox , you know zip other than a little blurb you just read you have no idea what was in the story . Did you read the whole story ? I read CNET News ,FastCompany.com
and FoxNews.com . The sad thing is you might use CNN or MSNBC for your News .I will Pray for you
Reply to this comment
by punterjoe July 17, 2009 12:43 PM PDT
So there's still a market opening for flesh eating robots? Woo Hoo! Back to the lab. Still not sure whether to call them zombots or roggots. :P
Reply to this comment
by worsethannormal July 17, 2009 2:30 PM PDT
I'm kinda still wondering what's wrong with flesh eating robots? It's not like soldiers on the battlefield haven't resorted to caniballism in the past. Besides the things just looking for biomass. If there's a lump of it laying around, what does it matter if its human or non-human, as long as it's dead? Besides, its not like other things aren't already eating it and turning it into energy. Wow, you humans are so silly...I mean...
by clamenza July 17, 2009 2:33 PM PDT
^ You're indeed worse than normal. Intelligence-wise.
by sirishgauni July 17, 2009 8:54 PM PDT
@worsethennormal
i agree with him/her, fleshing eating robots can be used in battlefield to clear the dead corpses which if isn't can cause spread of diseases, also its environment friendly isn't it?
by dadburnit July 17, 2009 12:58 PM PDT
Touche, Harry Schoell (CEO of Cyclone Power Technologies)

However, now I can picture a future where EATRs are clear cutting the Amazon faster than humans.

<Oh, how I love the law of unintended consequences>
Reply to this comment
by gibsonelliot July 17, 2009 1:41 PM PDT
Ok, as I see it rev 1 would likely adhere to the original purpose, but the military is great at altering things after conception. A quick change of spec, or an add-on that is able to-digest animal carcasses would likely get approval, hey it's just another source of material after all, right. Now what really scares me is that EATR is being combined with a system that will allow these robots to be self-replicating and self repairing. The spec calls for a robot that can assist in it's own assembly. Combine the 2 and it's a small step to the Golden Army ( Helboy II ) or the terminator. Most robotic systems are self targeting and autonomous. Make it a learning system and we won't survive the first "Accident". I am an engineer and in the field of robotics no less, and I want to see this combinations of features killed. We won't have a second opportunity to stop this if it gets out of control.
Reply to this comment
by joyofsomeone July 18, 2009 4:45 AM PDT
Buuuut, who's to say this isn't merely the next step in evolution?
From these things, you could have a whole new, silicon-based ecosystem... And wouldn't that be a sight to see!
by disco-legend-zeke July 17, 2009 3:34 PM PDT
three laws safe?
Reply to this comment
by gibsonelliot July 17, 2009 3:51 PM PDT
3 laws of robotics have been chucked out the window, long ago, with the advent of autonomous drones...
by knowles2 July 20, 2009 7:56 AM PDT
Robots could not function in the modern world with the three laws.
they could not even turn on a tv because that power might come from a coal power station which releases co2 and other chemical harmful to humans, which is against the three laws.
by granite01 July 17, 2009 3:57 PM PDT
will this contribute to desertification, all we need is a robotic goat in a semi-arid region munching on the sparse vegetation.
Reply to this comment
by charlesbor July 18, 2009 5:14 AM PDT
Carrying this to the next logical step, who cares if the thing can eat living flesh much less dead flesh, if we are talking about a battlefield? Of course, it brings a whole new meaning to "Friendly Fire."
Reply to this comment
by solitare_pax July 20, 2009 2:42 AM PDT
Now we know why Skynet and the Terminators were so keen on harvesting humans.
Reply to this comment
by galeso July 20, 2009 8:07 AM PDT
No, no, do not eat the dead bodies - only the living ones.
Reply to this comment
by dmm August 5, 2009 7:03 AM PDT
So they have a robot that goes around indiscriminately eating plants? I think that is called a white-tailed deer.
Reply to this comment
(19 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.

advertisement

About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right