• On TechRepublic: Windows 7: Slower to boot than Vista?
July 17, 2009 11:01 AM PDT

Will Apple sue Microsoft over Laptop Hunter ads?

by Chris Matyszczyk

Back in May, my crystal ball twitched with wonderment at the idea that Microsoft might be feeling a frisson of excitement that Apple had decided to make an ad in response to Redmond's "Laptop Hunters" campaign.

I suggested that Microsoft executives would be dancing with fair glee and abandon.

It seems that, for once, my crystal ball may not have been full of Bay Area fog.

The revelation that Apple's lawyers allegedly called Microsoft to complain about the Laptop Hunters ads has brought much needed amusement to those who have not seen humor in quite some time.

Indeed, Friday, AdAge began to speculate as to whether Apple might become a Microsoft Hunter and drop a little lawsuit on Redmond's charmers.

The report quoted Michael McSunas, an attorney at Chambliss, Bahner and Stophel, who said that legally Apple "would have a leg to stand on."

McSunas continued: "If, indeed, you now can buy a MacBook for under $1,000, then [the 'Laptop Hunters' campaign] would be inaccurate and misleading."

But grinding your teeth and filing suit are two different things.

So McSunas speculated: "Apple seems to have this sort of cool image; I'd be surprised if they'd file suit on something like this...It would be bad publicity and only make people talk about Microsoft being more relevant."

Does having "this sort of cool image" really preclude Apple from suing or at least doing a little more than wearing black and looking superior?

There is precedent for ads being taken off air when the claims within them were no longer accurate. Chrysler, McSunas pointed out, persuaded Ford to remove an ad for its Freestar minivan in 2004.

But the truth is that in any kind of legal action, the PR is more important than the actual legal action.

If there is one area (and, of course, there are more) in which Apple is extremely talented, it is the area of making people feel exactly what the company wants them to feel.

If the company thought there might be PR value in publicly upbraiding Microsoft, you can be sure that it will lay the groundwork meticulously before delivering a nasty two-fingered jab just below the eyebrows.

It is one thing your lawyer calling Microsoft and telling the company to knock it off. It is something slightly different (and a lot more fun) when Redmond tries to make PR capital from your phone call.

Will Apple file suit? Unlikely. But will it let it all just bubble away like a virus on a cheap PC? Somehow, I doubt it.

Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Technically Incorrect
New Verizon ad calls iPhone 'misfit toy'
Bird drops baguette, halts Collider
Want a Droid on the cheap? Let's start a club!
The technology that can eliminate your political opponents
How low can online scammers go?
Woman to live-stream birth of her child
iPhone vs. Droid: Toy boy vs. boy's toy?
The computer engineer who thinks we're doomed
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 4 pages (194 Comments)
by ewsachse July 17, 2009 11:13 AM PDT
I say "Bring It On!"
Reply to this comment
by Kwasiowusu July 17, 2009 12:37 PM PDT
You just beat me to that.
Hey, Apple, "Bring It On Guys!"
This I'd like too see.
Gonna be fun, taking Apple apart in court.
by jabberwolf July 17, 2009 1:46 PM PDT
I'm still laughing that Apple, of all companies, complains about someone ELSE's ads not being completely true?!
.......oops sorry for the delay I had a CPU "kernel panic attack", again.

Guess what, during the dd ( at Fry's electronics) there was a price tag, very truthful... end of story!

Maybe Apple should be taken apart in court by violating the copyright misuse doctrine left and right... this time excluding Palm. Now there is an actual court case for you!
by jedmmj11 July 18, 2009 9:59 PM PDT
(unrelated to above comment)
McSunas is making a mistake. He said "If, indeed, you now can buy a MacBook for under $1,000, then [the 'Laptop Hunters' campaign] would be inaccurate and misleading" but in the ad she said "They only have one computer for under a $1000 and it's got a 13' screen" so the ad is still true because the only computer for under a $1000 has a 13' screen (http://www.apple.com/macbook/)
by thelemurking July 19, 2009 2:53 PM PDT
Wait, didn't they drop the price of a Macbook to $999? Throw in tax and that puts it back over a $1000. I know Apple loves to charge you tax on everything... they even break their tax scheme down by the county you live in to make sure they tax you properly. Now if there is a state in the US that has tax on $999 that comes out to 99 cents, then yeah, maybe. But as it stands, you really cannot buy a Macbook for just $999.

I like how Apple insinuates that a PC does nothing but security updates while not mentioning the fact that Apple unleashes a ton of security updates themselves.
by Dalkorian July 20, 2009 9:39 AM PDT
by thelemurking July 19, 2009 2:53 PM PDT
I know Apple loves to charge you tax on everything...

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wait a second, so you're saying if I buy a Dell or HP or Toshiba or (insert other brand name here) I won't have to pay sales tax on that? Only Apple charges sales tax??

That has to be the single most idiotic red herring I've ever seen anyone wield.
by jag0 July 17, 2009 11:17 AM PDT
If that is the case then Microsoft should sue Apple over the "I'm a Mac" ads because if they're going to use the "inaccuracy" card then those "I'm a Mac" ads are LOADED with them.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan July 17, 2009 11:31 AM PDT
That would be a pretty hard one for Apple to deny. Sure, it's an ad, but even in one ad where they did the very fast scrolling text disclaimers (hilarious BTW), the claims made were largely true about computers in general, not brand r OS specific.

Nah, I don't think this is anything but fluff. I imagine Apple is sitting back and smiling at what others speculate they may do when they know there isn't any chance in Hades that they would do this.

That's just my opinion. Apple could surprise everyone and take Microsoft on head to head in a public court, but the chances of that are pretty slim.
by MaggieRed July 17, 2009 11:32 AM PDT
Please name one.
by Tiggobittie July 17, 2009 11:38 AM PDT
No false statements in any of the apple ads.
by jag0 July 17, 2009 11:40 AM PDT
@ MaggieRed:

The fact that you have to even ask that question is scary...
by Vegaman_Dan July 17, 2009 11:53 AM PDT
@MaggieRed:

Okay, Apple claimed if you % certain there isn't a magic fairy inside every Mac making a backup of your data to some magical land where your data is 100% safe from everyday things like... oh.... external damage, hard drive failures, or water buffalos stepping on the unit, but I believe most people would consider their data important enough to back up. On a Mac, they are led to believe this isn't necessary.

Here's the full text if you want to read it:

http://www.macjournals.com/news/legalcopytext

There's dozens of examples of hyperbole and blatant misrepresentation right there alone. Apple has made it all nicely listed and collected in one ad that I don't think they really want the courts to start going over too closely...
by JasonCe July 17, 2009 12:18 PM PDT
This is ironic. Apple lies about Windows PCs all the time. Their whole snob mac ads are full of lies.

Here are a few examples I can remember:
LIE: - Macs have embedded webcams, PCs don't.
FACT: PCs had embedded webcams way before Macs had any.

LIE: - Macs don't have security vulnerabilities, PCs do.
FACT: Just look at Apple's OS updates and you will find dozens of security holes fixed in each update. The most ironic thing about that ad was that the same month the ad started appearing, a new OSX update was released that had 5x (I think it was 54) security vulnerability fixes in it.

LIE: - Macs have all-in-ones, PCs don't.
FACT: Both PCs and Macs have all-in-one versions. There were many all-in-one PCs (very nice models from Sony, HP and Dell).

LIE: - Macs make better home movies, PCs can't.
FACT: There are far more superior video editing solutions for PCs, let alone the question of "if" they can.

LIE: - Macs have better device support than PCs. (the japanese woman with camera ad)
FACT: This is by far the biggest lie of all. _ALL_ devices have Windows support, only some of them have Mac support. Macs are a closed hardware system, PC world is completely open to new hardware.

LIE: - Macs have automatic backup, PCs don't.
FACT: Windows had automatic backup (in XP) way before Mac had any.

I could go on and on... But just one of these is enough proof that Apple is full of lies. When they lie about PCs, it is somehow okay, when other tell them that Apple is overpriced (simply proven by looking at price tags at the time the ad was filmed), it is not okay! Yeah right.
by MaggieRed July 17, 2009 12:28 PM PDT
Dude you are comical. I read the page reference, and I watched the ad. I see nothing wrong with it. I highly doubt the intention is for someone to actually freeze the frame to capture the text of the parody of mice type. This is not Apple's mice type, this would be MIcrosoft's mice type. And for the most part it is true. Now, if this was a blatant misrepresentation of the truth, that would be a different story.

The problem is you seem to think they are talking about "copy" in the sense of a backup of your system. You are so blinded by your obsession that you missed the context of the ad, it is all the LEGAL small print requirements placed on the product so that Microsoft is not sued for misrepresentation of their product by them saying it is easy to use which is not really the case. It requires more than meets the eye, hence all the "mice type" to explain the true requirements; "Legal Copy."

What is even more laughable, is how much time and effort GCSF, Inc. went to and they themselves missed the context of the ad as well. Matter of fact they were so obsessed that they actually captured the fake mice time and attempted to analyze it for content and grammar. Now that is truly funny, pathetic, but funny.

Try again.
by monkeyfun14 July 17, 2009 12:32 PM PDT
"The problem is you seem to think they are talking about "copy" in the sense of a backup of your system."

Because Mac HDD magically never fail?
by MaggieRed July 17, 2009 12:33 PM PDT
JasonCe

I highly doubt the authenticity of the comments you made. In fact please, name one ad where you took content from where those exact words were stated. We don't need to see all your Lie/Fact nonsense. Just find one ad, provide the name, each has a name, and quote the exact text in which it matches what you stated.
by websterphreaky July 17, 2009 1:32 PM PDT
crAPPLE Kool Aid Drinker Trolls at work!

Macs are SOOOOOOO reliable??? How about when the FTC MADE APPLE extend the G3 iBook's warranty to THREE YEARS because there were so many complaints of RANPANT LOGIC BOARD FAILURES and several school districts sued Apple because of in excess of 21% FAILURE RATES on G3 iBook within the first 12 months!!!??? I know, I worked for one of those school districts that was suckered into buying 2800 G3 600mHz iBooks!

And THAT is just ONE of hundred of complaints about FAULTY and BUGGY Macs! How about Cracking and Peeling Paint on G4 Titanium PowerBooks, Failing internal LCD cables on ALL G4 PowerBook models, LCD strips on MacBooks and MacBook Pros, and more and more .... ALL DOCUMENTED ON THE INTERNET!!
See more comment replies
by Remo_Williams July 17, 2009 11:21 AM PDT
Such as the implication that owning a Mac makes you cool. Decidedly the opposite.

--#
Reply to this comment
by Tiggobittie July 17, 2009 11:34 AM PDT
No... owning a MAC doesn't make you cool. But most MAC owners are cool.
by sgirard July 17, 2009 11:36 AM PDT
Mac users are HOT.
http://macenstein.com/default/archives/category/mac-chick-of-the-month
by CrashPad63 July 17, 2009 11:42 AM PDT
Tiggobittie, Hardly!!! If anything owning a Mac is nothing more than a status issue. Keeping with the Jobses if you will. Thats not cool that is plain insecure about oneself.
by Tiggobittie July 17, 2009 11:43 AM PDT
Actually we are very cool. My life is great. I'm great looking. People love me. And i look cool with my iPhone and MAC. Thanks Steve Jobs!
by CrashPad63 July 17, 2009 12:09 PM PDT
"Actually we are very cool. My life is great. I'm great looking. People love me. And i look cool with my iPhone and MAC. Thanks Steve Jobs"
You really are making this too easy. Learn to think first.
by Tiggobittie July 17, 2009 12:25 PM PDT
I do think first... in fact, i just thought "I love my MAC. I love me too!".

I bet your fat!
by Perry_Clease July 17, 2009 1:10 PM PDT
"
I do think first... in fact, i just thought "I love my MAC. I love me too!".

You love your Media Access Control address?

"I bet your fat!"

My fat is not yours to bet, use your own. :)
by CrashPad63 July 17, 2009 1:28 PM PDT
Trigg you just lost. Payup chump. If you have any left after your feel good Apple fix.
by websterphreaky July 17, 2009 1:37 PM PDT
Not cool .... definetily Arrogant Liberal SOBs with their heads up their butts all day long. How's life in Fantasy Land the world of crApple denial?
by jabberwolf July 17, 2009 2:05 PM PDT
Tiggobittie
haha not really.

Most mac users are people that try to pretend to be computer savvy but the mac was made to be simple for the simpletons and are limited but they don't notice because the users are so simple.

Are most dumb blondes and trendy people cool?
I'm sure they think they are!
But reality for them, like most mac users, isnt...well... quite real !!
See more comment replies
by Randomletters1 July 17, 2009 11:22 AM PDT
I think they'd have a long way to go for this one, as the commercials normally show Macs as being overpriced for the features needed by the Hunters. I'm not positive on the details, but I recall one hunter needing a lot of RAM for video editing, and specifically mentioning that the Mac with the RAM he/she needed was far out of the price range. The commercials weren't about cheap laptops per se, but were about getting the bells and whistles desired without breaking the bank.

That being said, I doubt that the Fruit Stand will sue, but all manner of rabid fanboys on both sides of the aisle will go ape on countless comment boards.
Reply to this comment
by Randomletters1 July 17, 2009 11:28 AM PDT
And, the ad in the embedded video is still completely valid, as the hunter wanted a 17" screen, and the only Macbook you can get for under 1K is a stripped, 13" model. Truth remains the ultimate defence.
by Randomletters1 July 17, 2009 11:31 AM PDT
Lord, can I get all my thoughts in one comment? Nope. Referencing my last, *** is a lawyer doing commenting in this way without watching and listening to the ads that nullify his argument? Somebody smack him for me, I'm busy pretending to work.
by Vegaman_Dan July 17, 2009 11:56 AM PDT
If you use Apple Approved/Supplied memory, then yes, the prices skyrocket. You can easily pay hundreds / thousands more on a system to use Apple certified memory. If you use generic, yeah, it will probably work and cost a fraction of the amount, but it isn't certified so Apple can always deny you any service or even invalidate your warranty if they find you were using non-certified hardware on the system.

Heck, just ask Leo Laporte about the price his media server ran to upgrade the memory on that Mac.... Wow... I could buy a car for less.
by Random_Walk July 17, 2009 12:36 PM PDT
"Heck, just ask Leo Laporte about the price his media server ran to upgrade the memory on that Mac.... Wow... I could buy a car for less."

You obviously haven't priced server memory from HP or Dell (which, unlike the Macs, is notoriously proprietary and impossible to find outside of the server vendor - especially HP).

I could buy a house (literally) in most areas of the US for less than what it costs to get an extra 64GB of RAM onto either a Dell or HP server...
by eadeguzman July 17, 2009 2:15 PM PDT
Random_Walk... You can't compare Mac memory with server memory.

All things sold for the enterprise are overpriced because they are not as mass-produced as their desktop counterparts... There are also service considerations, etc... There is competition in that landscape, so if they're really overpriced, companies can go somewhere else.
by Random_Walk July 17, 2009 3:11 PM PDT
"You can't compare Mac memory with server memory."

Dan did, which is why I found it amusing enough to point it out to him. ;)
by bluemist9999 August 12, 2009 10:28 AM PDT
What? They will swing from branches, beat their chests and throw dung at passing tourists? :-)

Then again, considering how most fanapes are, well, that's not far from the metaphorical truth.

As long as your favorite computer, be it a Mac, PC (running Linux, Windows, BeOS or _fill in the bank here_), Atari 800, Commodore 64, Amiga, Atari ST, does what you need it to do, it's the perfect machine for your needs.
by dragonbite July 17, 2009 11:27 AM PDT
It could also be countered if the store doesn't CARRY any Macs for under $1,000 in which case them saying "You can't get a Mac for under $1,000" can be assumed, since they are in the store, that they are referring to in that location.

This may get interesting, but probably won't be the fireworks people hope for.
Reply to this comment
by jessiethe3rd July 17, 2009 12:05 PM PDT
If you asked for a Mac for under $1000 in the store they'd probably say you can go online and order it.
by dlauber July 17, 2009 11:27 AM PDT
As an attorney I feel comfortable in writing that Apple would be extremely foolish to sue. It would be a fairly frivolous suit -- and Microsoft could easily get around Apple's complaint by adding a disclaimer to the commercials that states the commercial is accurate as of the date on which it was filmed.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan July 17, 2009 11:57 AM PDT
Bingo on that one. At the time of filming, there were no sub-$1000 MacBooks in this category.
by Random_Walk July 17, 2009 12:38 PM PDT
I agree, dlauber - and I doubt that even entertained the idea.
by DrtyDogg July 17, 2009 1:05 PM PDT
You also missed the other big point: She asked for a computer under a thousand dollars with a 17" screen. Even now Apple doesn't offer that. So the ad is still accurate now.
by santuccie July 17, 2009 4:19 PM PDT
Watch the commercial again. Lauren DID say there was a Mac available for under $1,000, but it only had a 13-inch screen. When I do a search, I'm finding the same thing. There are 13.3" Macs for under $1,000, but that's it. No falsification I can see.
by santuccie July 17, 2009 4:34 PM PDT
Correction: Apple now has refurbs from $749. But even if these were around when the commercial was launched, I doubt they were in the store Lauren walked into.
by Vegaman_Dan July 17, 2009 11:27 AM PDT
If Apple sues, then they have to be ready for the countersuit on every single Mac vs. PC ad they have run in the last decade.
=
This sounds more like a reporter trying to stir things up for page views and attention.

But then the people set their own criteria, and if the sub $1000 Macbook doesn't meet their needs as they list them in the ads, then Apple doesn't have much to say about it, especially since the ads started before Apple dropped the price to under $1K.

Meh. I would love to see them try it. I just don't think Apple is going to have the guts to take on Microsoft head to head in a fight they have very little chance of winning and a huge chance of embarassing themselves in the public view point. Much better to just make new and better ads on their own to counter the claim.
Reply to this comment
by ckh1272 July 17, 2009 3:34 PM PDT
"by Vegaman_Dan July 17, 2009 11:27 AM PDT
If Apple sues, then they have to be ready for the countersuit on every single Mac vs. PC ad they have run in the last decade.
=
This sounds more like a reporter trying to stir things up for page views and attention. "

---And yet you people fell for it hook, line, and sinker. I will just sit back and laugh at that fact for the rest of the day. BTW, this will be my only post so don't start with the "well you posted here too' mess. I will not respond and will keep on laughing.
by rallynochaos July 17, 2009 11:27 AM PDT
My HP Pavilion laptop is a piece of crap. I had it a little over a year and I had to end it in to the the motherboard and cd drive replaced, although they did fix it for free and pay for shipping both ways, but reluctantly. I received it back, fixed, 5 days after I shipped it to them.

My friend's Asus laptop is also a piece of crap. He had his for a year and a half and also had his motherboard die. Asus fixed it but he had to pay to ship it to them. And they took over 2 weeks.

My other friend's MacBook Pro is also a piece of crap. He had to take it into the Mac store 3 times in the first year for battery issues. Apparently the MacBook was in some way overloading and destroying the batteries. They gave him new batteries the first 3 times (notice they did no actually fix anything) and once the limited warranty expired they wanted to charge him to even look at it, although they knew the history of the issue.

Bottom line: All computer and laptop manufacturers make cheap pieces of crap. Some just change more for their crap than others.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan July 17, 2009 12:00 PM PDT
HP Pavilions don't have a shining reputation for quality control, I'm afraid. :/

Can't speak for the Asus. Don't have enough of those around to speculate.

Apple- I had to pay for service on my iPod Touch even though it was under warranty. Oh, the warranty repair itself was free, but I had to pay them to ship it to the service center even though I drove there in person. Where was it going to be repaired? Right there on site. Why did I have to pay $48 for shipping when they weren't going to actually ship it anywhere? I was told that was to help subsidize people who have to ship their systems from more distant locations. HUH? Okay..... but if I wanted to upgrade and extend my AppleCare coverage, it would be free. My 'free' repair ended up costing me $54 to upgrade the AppleCare coverage. Meh.

I wish I could say that was unique to Apple, but that's becoming more and more common amongst all the service hardware industry- computers, televisions, consumer electronics in general. :P
by ssicomputers July 17, 2009 2:49 PM PDT
"Bottom line: All computer and laptop manufacturers make cheap pieces of crap. Some just change more for their crap than others."

I'd suggest you check out Lenovo. If you're looking for a business-oriented notebook or workstation you can't beat a ThinkPad or ThinkCentre. They're the most consistently reliable and long-lasting PCs out there imho. Not to mention the side benefit that their support is top-notch, and based in Atlanta, GA.

As a side note, their home PCs aren't too shabby either. :)
by Super2online July 17, 2009 11:31 AM PDT
Apple is so good at making people feel like they want them to feel because Mac fans are so eager to buy up any and everything thrown at them from Apple.
Reply to this comment
by CrashPad63 July 17, 2009 12:12 PM PDT
Whats the line a sucker born every minute. Thats Jobsy's favorite hook for all the rabid mac fans.
by Random_Walk July 17, 2009 12:39 PM PDT
...really? Tell us about your love of Vista, gents. (and remember, you do have a posting history, so be honest... ;) ).
by Super2online July 17, 2009 1:00 PM PDT
I don't have a love of Vista but nor do I think it's bhe best thing on the market. I do use it on all our systems except one which uses XP and have had no issues. However, I wasn't one of those winers complaining about drivers and old apps not working when it came out. I upgraded one app and two pieces of hardware and added one meg of memory to most systems. They were very responsive and ran like a champ from that point on.
by CrashPad63 July 17, 2009 1:25 PM PDT
Love Vista here. Had three driver issues. All of which goes squarly on the hardware vendors shoulders. The longest developement cycle, most tested OS ever and the vendors cant get their act together to code a driver??? Go figure. One of them is nefariuos for dumbing down their hardware as the OS could use the hardware to its fullest potential.
So Random... you got enough to respond back or are you just whistling dixie.
by Seaspray0 July 17, 2009 4:28 PM PDT
@random walk. I think vista is still a resource hog. When it was released, I discouraged people from upgrading their XP boxes to it. I don't recommend vista for any computer made prior to vista sp1 because I don't see them as resource capable. From a usability standpoint, I don't care for the aero interface, I think the rotating 3-d scroll of tabing through your windows is useless, but I do like the gadgets and navigation. Even after setting up several installations, I don't find the UAC annoying (unless you are installing software or making a configuration change, it rarely comes up). If given the choice between XP and Vista on a new 32 bit computer, I would choose either one equally. If it was a 64 bit computer made after vista sp1, I would choose vista without question. For upgrades, I will recommend staying with XP. I beleive there are too many versions... a home and business version would have been acceptable.

You wanted an honest review? There ya go. Would you like to ask me what I think of windows 7? I'll tell you anyway... I think it rocks!
by lennie22 July 17, 2009 9:48 PM PDT
I've had no problems with Vista black edition (read: vista ultimate), though had a couple problems but they weren't Vista's fault, 1 was nvidia's F'd up drivers which they fixed, the other was a java problem. and I had overclocked my system too far and got a blue screen (the ram sticks were sucky)
by thelemurking July 19, 2009 5:17 PM PDT
@ Random Walk - here's my only Vista issues, 7950gx2 drivers on Vista 64 blue screened during fist installation - nvidia had horrible driver support for the 7950gx2. Not Microsoft's fault.

No 64 bit driver for my HP Photosmart 5950 - again, not Microsoft's fault.

No 64 bit driver for my Microsoft Fingerprint Reader - *** Microsoft?

A lot of people seem to think Vista was some horrible OS where nothing was compatible... yet they like to proclaim their love for XP. Yet when XP came out, there was a ton of stuff that did not work with XP.

Another Vista problem I have had is on my Toshiba laptop, when coming out of sleep, I sometimes have to disconnect / reconnect over WiFi to get my IP address back.

No if that's the only problems I have had out of Vista, then that's incredibly minor. It makes me wonder what the heck all these other people are doing?

I know a lot of people like to complain about UAC, but it's really no different than OS X and Linux in that aspect. I am prompted for Administrator password any time I want to update or install something on my Ubuntu box and I have no problem with that.
by thelemurking July 19, 2009 5:21 PM PDT
@ CrashPad

"Love Vista here. Had three driver issues. All of which goes squarly on the hardware vendors shoulders. The longest developement cycle, most tested OS ever and the vendors cant get their act together to code a driver?"

EXACTLY! Why people like to fault Microsoft for this is beyond me. It's almost inexcusable for lack of drivers and software support. The beta was out for a long long time. Vista underwent several delays, so why these manufacturers could not get off their lazy ***** and write some new drivers is beyond me. You can't blame Microsoft because some printer or scanner company didn't write drivers for a new OS.

No one blames Apple for software written for PowerPC not working properly on the Intel based systems.
by sgirard July 17, 2009 11:33 AM PDT
@jag0:

"If that is the case then Microsoft should sue Apple over the "I'm a Mac" ads because if they're going to use the "inaccuracy" card then those "I'm a Mac" ads are LOADED with them."

Name them. Name the inaccuracies.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan July 17, 2009 12:02 PM PDT
Take a look at the list Apple prepared themeselves in one ad alone:

http://www.macjournals.com/news/legalcopytext
by jessiethe3rd July 17, 2009 12:10 PM PDT
The virus issue for one. It's a very broad statement. i have Vista, run an AV package - no issue. They make a lot of blanket statements that just don't hold up. Then the crap about the disclaimers. I think the Hunter ads are smarter than Apple by far. By trying to jump down Microsoft's throat they have gotten slapped upside the head and the timing is very smart. I like how in one commercial the kid and the mom yelll... "Blueray!!!" I was cracking up laughing so hard - go to a Mac store and ask for a Macbook with Blueray... you'll get blank stares of, "huh?"

Seriously - the Microsoft commercial take the cool out of it and state the facts simple, want a inexpensive computer? Buy a PC and no... you don't have to be cool to buy a PC... it's okay to be average as you can realize your own potential through you versus buying some consumer goods.
by korbycon1 July 20, 2009 11:55 PM PDT
the one that's most prevalent in my mind is image tagging. I recall an ad where the PC is digging through photos, at which point Justin Long mentions that IPhoto has image tagging to help you find your images. Meanwhile, as the ad is playing, I'm going through my Windows live photo gallery tagging more of my photos. I guess Apple forgot about Windows live...
by TX-Sunset July 21, 2009 9:35 AM PDT
I also remember MAc ads where the Mac guy stated Macs do not crash or lockup. That is the bigest piece of crap I have ever heard a MAc commercial vomit. I work in an office that has some macs. I see them crash or lock up all the time. I just laugh.
by ballmerisanape July 17, 2009 11:33 AM PDT
Quote From MDN:

"The MacBook Pro that Microsoft falsely advertises as retailing for US$1,999.99 in their ad actually costs $1,699 (see it via YouTube here). It's been that way since June 8th, but Microsoft kept running their false advertising anyway. Microsoft's ad also subliminally throws in the $2,499.99 price because Microsoft has nothing but an upside-down and backwards poorly-faked Mac OS running on junky, thick, heavy, cheap hardware, so in order to move their inferior crap, they have to resort to all kinds of tricks. Just like the ones that Mr. Turner performed in his little act yesterday. $1,999.99 vs. $1,699 is a very significant price difference that Microsoft apparently didn't want to bother fixing until they were compelled to by Apple's legal department. That resulted in the greatest single phone call that Microsoft COO Turner has ever taken in his business history, which says quite a bit all by itself.

In addition to falsely advertising the wrong price for the 15-inch MacBook Pro, the ad has always been misleading in that the shot of the Apple product shown before the price tag is of a now-discontinued aluminum 13-inch MacBook, which at the time retailed for $1,299 and has since been replaced by the new 13-inch MacBook Pro starting at $1,199 or $800 less than the 15.4-inch MacBook Pro price card that Microsoft shows in their misleading ad. Not only do they lie in the visuals, but Microsoft lies in the audio, too: In the ad, while showing the 13-inch MacBook, Microsoft's actress states, "This Mac costs $2000" (see it via YouTube here)."
Reply to this comment
by ballmerisanape July 17, 2009 11:36 AM PDT
Sorry... Here's the link:

http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/21807/

Their (MDN) reaction is a bit over the top.. but they make some excellent points.
by Vegaman_Dan July 17, 2009 12:04 PM PDT
Alright, let's toss aside your devotion and biased comments and say that everything you claim is true about the revised prices and specs.... the fact remains that even then, the systems offered did not meet the criteria that the consumer had dictated.

So it was better, but still not good enough to compete.
by CrashPad63 July 17, 2009 12:14 PM PDT
MDN is a slime infested blog which does not even pretend to report news just any swill to promote Apple and ter down everything else. But thanks for the headsup, need ot go over there and crack some skulls again.
by Super2online July 17, 2009 12:52 PM PDT
ballmerisanape, I guess that user name says it doesn't it. I have to take issue with your assertion that Microsoft is advertising inaccurate prices. Microsoft does not set the prices shown in the spots, the retailers do. So if you don't like the prices they set, try complaining to them!
by eadeguzman July 17, 2009 2:45 PM PDT
So, just because Apple changed their prices last month, Microsoft now has to spend a lot more money to throw away the existing Ad and create a new one?

It's one thing that the price is totally fictitious it's another if the price was changed. It's not Microsoft's fault that the price of the Mac was like that when it was shooting the Ad.
by Seaspray0 July 17, 2009 4:40 PM PDT
Have you noticed that every macboi has resorted to very fine details of information in their complaints recently? This week's moan and groan complaint against microsoft is because the ads have the wrong price because apple changed the prices. That's such a good reason mac's are better, right?

Get a clue. The I'm a mac/pc mud slinging honeymoon is over.
by bowlie1 July 17, 2009 11:34 AM PDT
Do you really think that, if this is true, that Microsoft would have waited weeks to announce this to the world? My theories;

1. Whoever phoned Microsoft lied when they said the worked for Apple (It was a spoof, or a joke)
2. Whomever at Microsoft is making it all up.

I'm tending towards the latter, but the former is also reasonable - but doesn't explain why the waited so long to drop this on the media.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan July 17, 2009 12:06 PM PDT
Considering that all calls to Microsoft are logged and those phone records are legally able to be subpeonead for legal action, then I would doubt that claim highly. If Apple felt there was any falsehood in this, they would be going after them legally for making a false claim of the call's existance.

I just don't buy that claim that it didn't happen.
by jag0 July 17, 2009 11:34 AM PDT
In the words of Brian Cooley recently on Buzz Out Loud:

"Most Apple users aren't tech savvy...they're style savvy"
Reply to this comment
by jessiethe3rd July 17, 2009 12:11 PM PDT
AKA FAD! See skinny jeans and hipsters for lessons in what's cool today isn't necessary cool tomorrow.
by goodspeed8701 July 17, 2009 11:35 AM PDT
Apple can't sue.
Reply to this comment
by monkeyfun14 July 17, 2009 11:37 AM PDT
Apple doesn't have the case to challenge Microsoft...

And considering Microsoft has a hell of alot more cash to throw around then Apple does Microsoft is not simply someone they can blow over with legal fee's in court.
Reply to this comment
by klh2000 July 20, 2009 7:42 PM PDT
What......

Do you guys listen to yourselves? Do you actually spend this much time each day telling everyone how superior you are? Each format has its good and its bad. It's funny though that it takes seven or eight of you PC lovers to show off for each other. Why not spend the time doing something constructive.... Like reading. And to the guy who gets all his information off of the Internet. Do you really think that all of it is true? Sorry...
by klh2000 July 20, 2009 7:43 PM PDT
What......

Do you guys listen to yourselves? Do you actually spend this much time each day telling everyone how superior you are? Each format has its good and its bad. It's funny though that it takes seven or eight of you PC lovers to show off for each other. Why not spend the time doing something constructive.... Like reading. And to the guy who gets all his information off of the Internet. Do you really think that all of it is true? Sorry...
by klh2000 July 20, 2009 7:45 PM PDT
Excuse Me. Apple has a ton of cash sitting around. More than you might imagine. I assume you read that on the Internet. Remember, MS spends a lot of their money on anti-trust suits they have all over the world.
by Sardonik July 17, 2009 11:41 AM PDT
What I don't get is why Microsoft doesn't make an ad spot about PC gaming, I mean obviously it's not the main use of all PCs but it's certainly a strong sale point.
Reply to this comment
by NotForNuthin July 17, 2009 12:03 PM PDT
My guess is that there is a LOT more that you "don't get"...
by d4nowar July 17, 2009 12:12 PM PDT
Because that would take away from their gaming cash cow: the Xbox.
by jessiethe3rd July 17, 2009 12:15 PM PDT
They have talked about it on a few occassions in the ad campaign - it just hasn't been a central focus. The one with the kid in the mom talks about gaming. Realizing that Microsoft is trying to continue to bolster it's Xbox environment as well as its PC environment.
by AppleSuxLeo July 17, 2009 12:19 PM PDT
Actually the ad with the little kid and his mom mentions Blu-Ray AND gaming.
But you are correct. MSFT Windows is gaming. One of many reasons I have always used Windows.
And the flexibility of building my own machine.
by puterhead July 17, 2009 12:00 PM PDT
I really don't understand why an obviously contrived story meant to break the ice and get a laugh at a public event is getting days of coverage by CNET "journalist" and expanded on far beyond any of the original material to now be "if indeed Apple does sue Microsoft..." Good to see that todays internet NEWS sites have passed right on through the National Inquirer territory and into the digital age of make it up as you go journalism.

Used to be Newspaper and even TV journalist wouldn't have even run with the first part of the story about the phone call as being anything factual without some sort of supporting proof. Todays "journalist" print stuff that is on the level of " I read it on a twitter from a guy that saw it on another guys facebook page that he talked to a girl that works for a guy that...."
Reply to this comment
by masonx July 20, 2009 7:54 AM PDT
Welcome to blog world.
by ballmerisanape July 17, 2009 12:00 PM PDT
"But grinding your teeth and filing suit are two different things."

..which is why this will never happen. A
Reply to this comment
by jessiethe3rd July 17, 2009 12:02 PM PDT
I love it, "I guess I am just not cool enough for Apple." hhahahahahahhahahahahaa!!!!
Reply to this comment
by thelemurking July 20, 2009 8:38 AM PDT
yes! gotta love sarcasm ;)
by AppleSuxLeo July 17, 2009 12:10 PM PDT
I can see it now. Apple`s lawyers will whine that competition is illegal ! Bwahahahahaha
Apple`s new motto...Reality Bites or Reality Bytes LOL
Reply to this comment
by scott2400 July 19, 2009 6:37 PM PDT
Finally finished with the one-handed keyboard exercise and cleaned your room like your mother asked? Good boy, Leo! Bash away! I know it probably makes the humming in your head go away... at least for a while..
Showing 1 of 4 pages (194 Comments)
advertisement

FAQ: Buying the right Windows 7 upgrade

Readers still have lots of questions on just which version of the software they need to buy in order to upgrade their PC. CNET News tries to offer some answers.

N.Y. lawsuit details Intel's 'largesse' toward Dell

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's federal antitrust case filed Wednesday alleges a longstanding symbiotic relationship between Intel and Dell.

advertisement

About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right