• On TechRepublic: 10 cool USB flash drive tricks
July 2, 2009 7:57 AM PDT

Microsoft chucks vomit ad

by Chris Matyszczyk
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 88 comments

Update at 8:50 a.m. PDT: The video has now disappeared from the ad agency's site as well.

Earlier this week, we were all rather intrigued by the appearance of a Microsoft ad, in which a wife borrows her husband's laptop and suffers a technicolor nightmare when she espies a site that he has been, um, enjoying.

By Wednesday night, however, Microsoft had second thoughts about the pulling power of puke.

The ad has been pulled from the IE8videos channel on YouTube. It's also has been removed from the BrowsefortheBetter.com site, which is part of the ad campaign. The vomit ad's slot has been replaced by a tag that says "coming soon."

This could have meant that a new ad is coming soon, or that the upchuck was uploaded too soon.

A copy of the vomit ad is still available on YouTube, though not via Microsoft.

The truth is that Microsoft wasn't 100 percent happy with vom-com.

"We make a point of listening to our customers," a Microsoft representative said in an e-mail Thursday morning. "We created the OMGIGP video as a tongue-in-cheek look at the InPrivate Browsing feature of Internet Explorer 8, using the same irreverent humor that our customers told us they liked about other components of the Internet Explorer 8 marketing campaign. While much of the feedback to this particular piece of creative was positive, some of our customers found it offensive, so we have removed it."

Although many CNET commenters on Wednesday thought that the ad was funny, some criticized the piece as condoning surfing for porn (shame, shame, shame), as well as the generally less than perfect taste associated with yellow stuff exploding from a nice-looking lady's mouth.

However, Bradley and Montgomery, the agency responsible for the whole campaign--which features Superman actor Dean Cain--still proudly displayed the ad on its own site as of early Thursday morning.

And so it should. The ad has already created exactly the aftereffect for which the agency likely hoped.

But, as so rarely happens, I spoke too soon. Here we are at 8:50 a.m. PDT Thursday, and the ad has now been removed even from the Bradley and Montgomery site.

Even though the wife in the ad might, one feels, stand by her man, it appears the agency has decided not to stand by its ad.

Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Technically Incorrect
Man allegedly steals bus, posts video on YouTube
Verizon ad describes negotiations with Apple?
Ricky Gervais helps reveal pain of cell phone salesmen
Wife poses as schoolgirl online to snare husband
Convicted murderer sues Wikipedia under privacy law
Microsoft denies Windows 7 is based on Mac OS
Microsoft exec: Mac OS inspired Windows 7
Dating site for cute people says Brits are ugly
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 3 pages (88 Comments)
by myles taylor July 2, 2009 8:11 AM PDT
The worst part about this ad was that IE 8 is the second to last browser to get the feature they are advertising. Are they trying to get people to upgrade from earlier versions of IE. Are they reaching out to Firefox, Safari, and Opera users? Would any of those people who consciously made the choice to go away from IE to another browser actually consider switching back, especially for a simple little feature that now is included on every major browser and that was pioneered by Safari?
Reply to this comment
by Rawnchie14 July 2, 2009 8:24 AM PDT
Pioneered by Safari?

Looks like someone is drinking the koolaid.
by monkeyfun14 July 2, 2009 8:53 AM PDT
Lol what? IE was one of the first.
by KanineLupus July 2, 2009 9:07 AM PDT
Just like every other Mactard. Feaures available to the Windows or Linux user tend to take forever to reach OS X... and when it finally does, Apple loves to claim, with mush fanfare "here's our new creation". And because the usual Mactard has been solely dedicated to Apple's own hardware (well it is three times the price, so it must be better.. right??), they swallow it hook line and sinker. Just a pity everyone else knows better :)

Just look at the average Fanboi reaction to Windows Sidebar. The fanbois ranted on about how "Microsoft was copying Apple's Dashboard". The sad thing is, PC users (Windows and Linux alike) had had access to widgets long before [i]either[/i] OS developer decided to bundle them. Unfortunately, Microsoft, seeing the popularity of this phenomonen, announced their inclusion into the then code-named Longhorn..... about six-months prior to Apple releasing OS X. Funnily enough, a feature which devs swear wasn't included in beta releases, found its way into the final release of OS X only months later.... and of course the Mactards took all Apple fed them as gopel!

Anyone surprised it happens again??
by mentalward July 2, 2009 9:33 AM PDT
@monkeyfun14
Try actually reading the last sentence. He was referring to the private browsing feature, not browsers in general.

@Rawnchie14
Safari was the first major browser that had private browsing built in, introduced in v2.0 in April 2005. Mozilla didn't introduce a similar feature until Firefox 3.1 beta 2 in December of '08, and MS just introduced it in IE8. I am not aware of this feature being in Opera at all
by myles taylor July 2, 2009 9:46 AM PDT
As mentalward said, I was talking about the Private Browsing feature, which this ad is really about. To my knowledge, Safari was the first browser to have this feature. Let me know if I'm wrong.

@KanineLupus I agree that sometimes people claim Apple pioneered something that they didn't. Often Apple mainstreams things that are nascent features available in other systems which is just as important. However, I believe Safari was the first browser to offer Private Browsing and this ad is specifically advertising that feature.
by friday04 July 2, 2009 9:51 AM PDT
@KanineLupus

Konfabulator, a widget program for Mac OS X first, was purchased by Yahoo. Yahoo then called it Yahoo Widgets and made them available for PC. Then Apple decided to include widgets with the OS and they called it Dashboard. Microsoft followed suit by adding the sidebar and calling them Gadgets.

But it started on the Mac.

Signed,
You're friendly neighborhood Mactard.
by dbloyd July 2, 2009 1:26 PM PDT
Microsoft will still be on IE 6 if Firefox never came out. And Safari was the first to provide private browsing. I am glad Microsoft has a sense of humor with their ads.
by DrtyDogg July 2, 2009 6:28 PM PDT
@Friday04: you forgot Active desktop circa 1997.
by Random_Walk July 2, 2009 8:21 AM PDT
Damn... finally... FINALLY! Microsoft got a sense of humor and puts out a funny advert. Finally! Microsoft got, if only for a brief moment, a personality. Finally! Microsoft stood up and did something that made people notice.

They could have told the complainers to grow a sense of humor - but noOOoo... instead they caved, and it's back to mediocrity and a personality of warm tapioca pudding.

Idiots. And they wonder why most folks look at the name "Microsoft" and go "meh."
Reply to this comment
by Seaspray0 July 2, 2009 8:46 AM PDT
All they have to do is go look at the top video's on youtube. People like to see other people do stupid things in short clips that are the length of a commercial. How hard can it be?

And I didn't get to see the AD! Wwaaaaaaaaa....
by Vegaman_Dan July 2, 2009 11:13 AM PDT
@Random_Walk:

Wow... you certainly have a mighty big chip on your shoulder, don't you? Can you even walk under the weight of it?

Perhaps if you thought about your comments and put them into a logical and meaningful manner instead of the imbecilic method you convey currently you might start to generate some respect. Right now though- well, the comments are spot on for a 12 year old. If you're 12 or younger, then good going! If you're older than that, then I apologize for mistaking you for such a child.
by Proud_Geek July 2, 2009 11:16 AM PDT
Most of us in the Real World feel same way, whether or not we have the guts to stand up and f***ing say it.
You beat me to the punch. My hats off to you :)

Like Seaspray0 said (Transformers FTW!), it's a simple formula: 2.5 minutes of Hot Chick + stupid/disgusting stuff + Implied Pr0n + Superman = $$$ATTENTION AND RATING$$$.

You'd think a big company like M$ would know this simple social fact.

Anyway, too bad I missed the ad.
by Seaspray0 July 2, 2009 2:11 PM PDT
It's not too late. There ARE remnants out there (I found it). Just search for "O.M.G.I.G.P." I liked the 5 min mash better.
by Random_Walk July 2, 2009 4:05 PM PDT
Dan... you don't get it, do you?

In your haste to hotly defend all that keeps you sustained, I actually (brace yourself now) ... praised Microsoft for coming out with the ad in the first place (and said as much in the CNET story that announced its existence. Go check if you like - I'll wait...)

My kick was that the one flash of inspiration they had, the one thing that actually grabbed attention... got suffocated by the beige fog of mediocrity that plagues far too many large corporations these days.
by cp256 July 2, 2009 8:22 AM PDT
Bwahhahahahah

Trying to teach a little common sense to the sheeple. If you are too stoopid to hide your tracks when you peruse the seamy side of the web they you deserve to get barfed on by the wifey!
Reply to this comment
by nopinktoday July 2, 2009 8:30 AM PDT
I thought the commercial was pretty funny. Can't people just look at it that way?
Reply to this comment
by cvaldes1831 July 2, 2009 8:48 AM PDT
Sorry, not everyone is like you.

"De gustibus non est disputandum."
by myles taylor July 2, 2009 9:47 AM PDT
I thought it was too. However, I agree that everyone watching TV should not be forced to watch this.
by thelemurking July 2, 2009 11:19 AM PDT
I thought it was hilarious... and for those who do not like the commercial, I am fairly certain you have the ability to channel up or down and all around during commercial breaks.
by Inconnux July 2, 2009 12:59 PM PDT
probably the funniest ad I've seen by Microsoft...


and people use the web for other things than Porn??? :)
by Random_Walk July 2, 2009 4:33 PM PDT
well, FWIW, it wasn't on television - just on their website for IE8.
by sanjayb July 3, 2009 11:56 AM PDT
I thought they overdid it on the spewing. She only needed to spew once. Otherwise it was pretty funny.
by solitare_pax July 4, 2009 2:55 AM PDT
But it was in such good taste...
by Mweaver2k9 July 2, 2009 8:31 AM PDT
"We make a point of listening to our customers,"

M$ might be listening but they don't respond to their customers, they will do their own thing
Reply to this comment
by SteveWiilliams July 5, 2009 6:23 AM PDT
Which explains why took into consideration practically everything sent to them via the feedback utility embedded into the beta edition of Windows 7, before going on to build an operating system that is probably the best they've managed to create to this date.
by bimmin July 2, 2009 8:35 AM PDT
*Rolls eyes*
Reply to this comment
by epiac1216 July 2, 2009 8:36 AM PDT
I don't find this ad funny at all. Seeing a woman puke all over her husband just to get the attention of an IE feature all other browser's have is absolutely disgusting. No wonder Microsoft is always catching up.
Reply to this comment
by pithenumber July 2, 2009 11:15 AM PDT
get a sense of humor
by Proud_Geek July 2, 2009 11:17 AM PDT
Dude, lighten the eff up. IT WAS FUNNY.
by sanjayb July 3, 2009 11:57 AM PDT
Seriously. What would u rather have - another head scratching commercial with Jerry and Bill?
by davidmcelroy_dotmac July 5, 2009 12:06 PM PDT
You're right. It wasn't funny in the least to me. It was like a spot written for (and by) 13-year-olds.
by DragonWizard July 2, 2009 8:43 AM PDT
Disgusting, vile, overly sickening (sorry for the pun), disturbing, and most of all stupid... I LOVE IT !!!
Reply to this comment
by ArsFragica July 2, 2009 8:43 AM PDT
IE 8 is like Firefox 2.
Reply to this comment
by eswinson July 2, 2009 8:45 AM PDT
This ad rocks!.. too bad it got pulled.
Reply to this comment
by Perry_Clease July 2, 2009 8:50 AM PDT
"MicroSoft chucks vomit ad"

Did they upchuck it?
Reply to this comment
by terminalblue July 2, 2009 8:55 AM PDT
that was freakin hilarious, and i use firefox.
Reply to this comment
by tedbragg01 July 2, 2009 9:25 AM PDT
MSIE 8.0 = BARF. Yep. Kinda sums up M$, doesn't it?
Reply to this comment
by svgtom July 2, 2009 9:26 AM PDT
What MS should have done is have had the woman watching an "I'm a Mac/I'm a PC" ad. Now THAT would have been funny!
Reply to this comment
by 4score20 July 2, 2009 9:32 AM PDT
I thought it was hilariously gross like a David Lynch flick. Oh well, maybe they could get Ron Howard to direct the next one. Maybe put Tom Hanks in there -- call it, "Fox/Nix". heh
Reply to this comment
by ofmyony July 2, 2009 9:34 AM PDT
Bad ad bad browser whats new
Reply to this comment
by pithenumber July 2, 2009 11:15 AM PDT
good ad, bad browser
thats new
by gerrrg July 2, 2009 9:44 AM PDT
Google's Chrome has Incognito.
Reply to this comment
by SteveWiilliams July 5, 2009 6:25 AM PDT
And Firefox and Safari have private browsing features as well. That puts Microsoft at least fourth.
by davidmcelroy_dotmac July 2, 2009 9:45 AM PDT
Even if you think the ad was funny, why can't people understand that being funny isn't necessarily the same thing as being effective? The creative community produces a LOT of funny ads that don't move products. The idea that something is a good ad BECAUSE it's funny just shows that people don't understand marketing or advertising. Sadly, as Al Ries and Jack Trout have shown for years, many people in the agency world don't get it, either, because they're busy churning out entertaining spots which don't achieve companies' objectives.
Reply to this comment
by cary1 July 2, 2009 9:58 AM PDT
I agree. Look at the Mac vs PC ads. They are funny, to the point, sometimes flat lies, regularly updated, have been coming on TV for more than 2 years and still they haven't made a significant dent in PC's market share.
by TCMercury July 2, 2009 9:58 AM PDT
Stupid Microsoft... As if anyone who has either switched browsers or computers (I'm on a Mac) will want to switch back to a PC. Even more unlikely is that I will want to download that crap onto my computer in the first place, even if it was the PC version.
Reply to this comment
by wtfguy July 2, 2009 10:09 AM PDT
@kaninelupus:

"Just like every other Mactard." - I must say that this kind of comment does in fact offend me greatly. I used to be a Microsoft user, had been since the very beginning. I switched over 3 years ago and have been very pleased with my experience since going to the Mac. I also work for a living in IT dealing with Windows day in and day out. I'm not going to sit here and preach about MS or Apple, but to essentially call some "retarded" begs one to ask whether or not the poster is looking at himself in the mirror. There really is no need to post low-brow comment like that on ANY forum. Myles Taylor was not making any personal attacks towards you was he? Anyhow, please keep your biggot comments to yourself.

As far as the add is concerned, it was funny to see. It does seem funny how far we as society have allowed the media to push the envelope of things being broadcasted. I doubt with utmost certainty that this add would have been aired in the 60's, or 70's, heck, maybe even the 80's. I suppose though that the graphical nature of some adds tend to stick in the mind better than more sublime ones. Just my two cents for what it's worth.
Reply to this comment
by Kev_Orng July 2, 2009 10:48 AM PDT
Thank you!
I've been railing against the name calling forever, but it's nice to see it from someone else

Seriously, I made a choice of one consumer electronic product over another based on extensive experience with both, is this really grounds to call me names?

If anything, most Mac users are sort of dual citizens. We use or have used both. Most of the people who insult me for my decision to buy a Mac probably can't make the same claim.
by SteveWiilliams July 5, 2009 6:30 AM PDT
The way I see it, use what you want. Use what suits your needs. Leave others to use what they want to use and don't be immature about it.

And this ain't directed at you by the way.
Showing 1 of 3 pages (88 Comments)
advertisement

A CNET Conversation with Eric Schmidt

CNET's Tom Krazit and Molly Wood sit down with Google CEO Eric Schmidt to discuss the future of Android, the Chrome OS, the problem of real-time search indexing, and more.

Verizon tests sending RIAA copyright notices

The No. 2 phone company, known for its reluctance to intervene in antipiracy cases, strikes an agreement to forward copyright notices on behalf of the music industry.

advertisement

About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right