Why AT&T didn't fix 'American Idol'
Many of you will, perhaps, remember how Woz was very suspicious (and then suspiciously changed his mind) about the voting on "Dancing with the Stars".
Now we are tormented with cries that local AT&T representatives in Arkansas gave lessons in sending up to 10 simultaneous texts to people at "American Idol" viewing parties. The surprise winner (to some, at least) was Kris Allen from Arkansas.
The New York Times reported Wednesday that Fox and the two companies that produce the show, FreemantleMedia North America and 19 Entertainment, denied that the "enthusiasm" of local representatives nefariously influenced the result.
After all, the "Idol" rule book states: "A weekly monitoring procedure will be in place to prevent individuals from unfairly influencing the outcome of the voting by generating significant blocks of votes using technical enhancements. The producers reserve the right to remove any identified 'power dialing' votes. Note that this applies to both toll-free and Text Messaging votes."
However, I have plowed through the whole of this rule book and can find no restrictions as to how many times you can actually vote.
The key word, therefore, is the word 'unfairly'.
(Credit:
CC JonDissed/Flickr)
One has to assume the technology simply identifies multiple texts sent within nanoseconds of each other. Whereas the hands of normal human beings that would be voting have to at least pause to press send more than once.
Voting is open for a strict two-hour period after the show and only AT&T subscribers can vote by text. Everyone else has to call. There is even a little kink that those who happen to be outside of their phone's area code cannot vote.
So one has to wonder whether the actions of a few enthusiastic AT&T employees could really have swayed the results.
Strong rumors suggest the voting wasn't even close. So even if every single inhabitant of Arkansas voted 10 times, that would still only be around 28 million out of the allegedly 100 million votes cast.
And it's not as if this purported Arkansas cabal won't have been the only voting group out there. There is even a very fine site called "Vote For The Worst" which tries to get people to, indeed, use their cell phones to shoo in the least talented. Vote for the Worst is claiming that it put Allen over the top. Or under the bottom, depending on your perspective.
Naturally, one wonders about the wisdom of allowing people to vote multiple times. Money can be a wicked beast when trying to create reality show rules.
But it is surely far more likely that Arkansas' Allen, who was suitably middle-of-the-road and had never been in the bottom three, simply received far more votes than Adam Lambert, who hails from San Diego.
Lambert is the more original artist by far. But his black fingernails and rock diva personality are not so easily digested in the South.
And just in case none of you has noticed, only one "American Idol" winner has ever not come from the South. Yes, abstinence enthusiast Jordin Sparks from Arizona.
The fix, I fear, is out.
Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. 






At the end of the day the people who watch the show happily make the assumption everything is on the up because that is part of the fun and appeal of the show. If the illusion of competition was not sufficient for people to invest time and the costs for the texts and phone calls then people simply wouldn't watch or participate in the show. Besides, we can't even guarantee that our elected officials are voted in on the up and up yet there is an expectation of legitimacy out of a reality show? ;)
It's not the viewers who are defrauded, it's the hapless contestants and their families who don't understand that they can't win based on their talent, but that they also have to hire a campaign manager and perhaps pay "volunteers" to get out the "vote". Having said that, given that "America" and "fraud" are pretty much synonymous these days, it probably makes sense that an American "idol" would be a scammer.
WHY would they have any decent folks in "entertainment"?
Pop is all low brow junk for the mindless masses.
And let's not forget AT&T and "warrant-less wiretaps" where was AT&T there looking out for their customers privacy?
The show may have been poorly rigged, but it was rigged nonetheless.
I dont believe when Kris won that it was an upset or surprise. Simon Cowell created an unrealistic expectation that Adam should win so everyone expected it even if they liked Kris, Allison or Danny best.
Producer, Simon Fuller has stated unequivocally that there is an electronic system in place that prevents unfair block voting. Also, Fuller has the power to declare Adam the winner, if he felt Adam deserved it.
Kris, Adam, Danny and Allison will do well regardless of all the bickering. I personally like all four of these guys, but voted for Kris at the finale using redial on a land phone and could only get a busy signal for the first three hours.
Also, waiting to hear the A T & T message to the end on a call to vote for Kris couldnt block calls to Adam, as one poster suggested, they have different phone or text numbers.
- by corey1956 June 1, 2009 9:25 AM PDT
- I was very disappointed in the outcome of the show, but even more disappointed to hear that AT&T underhandedly cheated by allowing Kris Allen fans to powertext their votes. Regardless of how many votes were cast through those powertexts, it's absolutely not fair to any other contestant, most of all, to Adam Lambert. This goes against the rules of the show, but because it was the sponsor who did the deceiving, Fox will just allow the rules to be broken. To me, that only confirms how this show is rigged. AT&T & Fox are now trying to downplay their wrongdoing. Regardless of the outcome, this was downright cheating, no matter how you look at it. There is a huge flaw in their voting system. I, for one, will never watch this show again because I feel that the voting is not fair. Also, it seems that America is voting for the contestant based on his/her popularity instead of their talent. I'm not into rock n roll, black fingernail polish or mascara on a man, but Adam Lambert was by far the better contestant. He is definitely nultitalented. Kris Allen, on the other hand, won due to his popularity as a cute, meek, good ole christian boy from Arkansas. He definitely had very little vocal range & no stage presence at all. Actually, he was very boring to watch perform. This show needs to change their voting rules before they lose a lot of their viewing audience.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(15 Comments)