• On mySimon: The North Face Mountain Sneakers for Men
May 23, 2009 10:22 AM PDT

NBA PR man admits he's anonymous commenter

by Chris Matyszczyk
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 16 comments

The Golden State Warriors don't play defense--except, perhaps, when it comes to the indefensible.

Please imagine you're a disgruntled Warriors fan. For two seasons, everything seemed to suddenly and strangely go well. After what felt like 20 seasons of desperation, playoffs were reached. No. 1 seeds were defeated.

Then, for reasons that seem all too evident to those who give the Warriors money (disclosure: myself included), there is a handbasket drifting downward from purgatory with a large Warriors logo printed on its side.

Naturally, fans voice their views on various sites. One of which is WarriorsWorld.net. Much of the commentary lately has been of a negative nature.

One shining beacon of light was offered by "Flunkster Dude." Commenting on a season-ticket holder conference call hosted by General Manager Larry Riley, President Robert Rowell and TV play-by-play man Bob Fitzgerald, he wrote: "I actually enjoyed the call and appreciate their honesty."

Which not so many other commenters did. Even fewer do now, as the WarriorsWorld.net chaps traced the IP back to a certain office. You're there already, aren't you? Yes, to the office of the Golden State Warriors.

Flunkster Dude is, in fact, Flackster Dude. Real name, Raymond Ridder, PR man for the Golden State Warriors.

We believe. Well, we did.

(Credit: CC Permanently Scatterbrained/Flickr)

The journalist who published the revelation this week, Tim Kawakami of the San Jose Mercury News, received a very quaint response from Ridder: "It was 100% me. And I'll take 100% responsibility, if anybody thinks I did anything wrong. It was completely on my own. I've never been told to do anything by anybody here. It was just me."

Naturally, I enjoyed his response and appreciated his honesty. Especially the part about never having been told to do anything by anybody.

However, Flunkster Dude was not done. He continued to offer his honesty in a most disarming way: "It was nothing malicious at all. I just wanted to get the conversation going in a positive direction-I thought we had a good conference call, I had some good conversations with some season-ticket-holders, then I got to my office and I looked on the internet and all I saw was negative comments, complaints, nothing positive."

So the obvious step for a fine PR chappy was to hide that he was a fine PR chappy, in the bizarre hope that, by leaving a positive comment, all like-thinking, enlightened fans, marveling at the Warriors 29 wins last season, would emerge from beneath some unseen parquet and toss more garlands on top of his.

Now here's the fun part. (You thought there wouldn't be a fun part?) This doesn't appear to be the first time Flunkster Dude has flacked his wings and flown.

He admitted to Kawakami that he had posted four other bonmots on WW.net. All, you will be overwhelmed to hear, were dunks on behalf of management.

One was even a negative comment about one of the better (but not, sadly, better-dressed) journalists who follow the Warriors, a tall man who plays a mean game of pickup (he's played and squashed some friends of mine), Matt Steinmetz.

You might think that Flunkster Dude has flunked the very first test of social media.

You might think that someone who posts anonymously about honesty, when himself being just slightly less than entirely honest about his interest in the matter, might just think about a career in politics.

However, I might think that you have never been a fan of the most maddening, ridiculous, disquieting, arrogant, ignorant and, just occasionally, sickeningly lovable mess that is the Golden State Warriors.

I will not hear anyone criticize their sublime fish and chips, though.

(Disclosure and, um, an ad: I appear regularly on Patrick Mauro's nationally syndicated show on Sports Byline USA, Sundays at 11 p.m. Honestly.)

Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Technically Incorrect
Gates: Apple is 'a force in doing good things'
Man allegedly steals bus, posts video on YouTube
Verizon ad describes negotiations with Apple?
Ricky Gervais helps reveal pain of cell phone salesmen
Wife poses as schoolgirl online to snare husband
Convicted murderer sues Wikipedia under privacy law
Microsoft denies Windows 7 is based on Mac OS
Microsoft exec: Mac OS inspired Windows 7
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by cvaldes1831 May 23, 2009 10:34 AM PDT
Congratulations, you scored zero points on the integrity scale. Thank you for playing, Flunkster!
Reply to this comment
by karpenterskids May 23, 2009 11:18 AM PDT
I won't post anything positive about this article, because God forbid that it might cause others to do the same...
Reply to this comment
by tccedar May 23, 2009 4:11 PM PDT
Terrible article. Hard to follow, convoluted; tries way too hard to be cute and clever. Ugh. And who cares who Funkster is? The guy's a dork to try to hide his identity as a Warrior's employee, but big deal! It's not like he was insider trading and cost shareholders millions.
Reply to this comment
by monkeyfun14 May 23, 2009 5:20 PM PDT
Who wants to bet someone will comment on here about a company totally unrelated to the article.
Reply to this comment
by gertruded May 23, 2009 7:46 PM PDT
You just don't what Microsoft brought into this subject.
by PhaseDMA May 23, 2009 6:45 PM PDT
So let me get this straight. Some guy that works for a company commented about that company in a positive way?

What shall we do? CRY!

From this day on we must enact a law. Thou shall not say anything positive about the companies they work for - Negative comments are okay and in fact encouraged though!
Reply to this comment
by wshwe May 23, 2009 7:23 PM PDT
The Warriors should fire Flunkster. What an apt name for a dishonest person!
Reply to this comment
by gertruded May 23, 2009 7:44 PM PDT
It seems as if Microsoft employees comment regularly in Microsoft's favor on this board. How may times have we read how great Visa is, or how good Windows 7 will be?

Why shouldn't people working for other corporations do the same? Honesty and truth have nothing to do with business and marketing. Only money counts.
Reply to this comment
by monkeyfun14 May 24, 2009 10:01 AM PDT
Because anyone who doesn't hate Microsoft products is paid by MS?

So 90% of the computing community must be paid off right?
by benjwah May 24, 2009 8:02 PM PDT
You don't like it, go to.... Wait, there aren't any communist countries left. Wait, I just remembered, North Korea!
by EENetminder May 23, 2009 8:02 PM PDT
Knowing Warriors fans, one has to wonder if Ridder has been editing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_State_Warriors too. No mention of Cohan's ignorance or Bobby Rowell's ineptness in getting rid of Chris Mullen -- just to say that Larry Riley is the new GM.

For that matter, if you read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Riley, it reads like a press release that a low-on-the-ethics-scale PR flack would write.

Sic 'em, Kawakami!! It'll annoy all those Merc readers who can't stand you!!...
Reply to this comment
by ralfthedog May 23, 2009 9:22 PM PDT
When I read about an NBA commenter posting on the internet with a fake name, I thought they might be talking about me. Then I remembered I don't have any relation to the NBA.
Reply to this comment
by baconstang May 24, 2009 12:34 AM PDT
What! OMG, you mean Microsoft isn't the only one who pays trolls?
Reply to this comment
by gertruded May 24, 2009 5:18 AM PDT
I find it very hard to believe that Microsoft would stoop so low as to actually pay people to support their view on any internet forum.

NO company is that bad. Paying people to do that could be considered dishonest.
by dcardozo May 25, 2009 10:45 AM PDT
Well, they don't call it that way.
MS pays to several people that support their view in several internet forums, including this one.
If you ask them, they don't pay people for supporting their view. They would say they pay them as regular employees.
They're hardly the only ones that do that, other companies do the same, just not as much as MS.
And of course, there's nothing illegal in doing that.
by monkeyfun14 May 25, 2009 2:57 PM PDT
@dcardozo

And do you have a source?
(16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

A CNET Conversation with Eric Schmidt

CNET's Tom Krazit and Molly Wood sit down with Google CEO Eric Schmidt to discuss the future of Android, the Chrome OS, the problem of real-time search indexing, and more.

Verizon tests sending RIAA copyright notices

The No. 2 phone company, known for its reluctance to intervene in antipiracy cases, strikes an agreement to forward copyright notices on behalf of the music industry.

advertisement

About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right