• On BNET: Vote: How will Apple blow it?
March 15, 2009 8:00 PM PDT

Surprise! Google Earth used for robbery

by Chris Matyszczyk
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 13 comments

Lead roof tiles are worth a lot of money. And you'll find them, in the United Kingdom, at least, on the top of schools, museums, churches, and the Houses of Parliament.

I may be wrong about the last one, but Tom Berge, a man who truly appreciates the free part of free enterprise, knew where he could pinpoint such buildings: Google Earth.

He sat at his computer, googled away, selected his targets (mercifully, the roofs were unblurred), got into his car, and climbed less than socially toward his riches. He managed to collect about $140,000 worth of lead, which he sold to unsuspecting merchants.

This sign was, apparently, recently hung in front of the Honeywood Museum, one of Mr. Berge's targets. The museum does not appear to legislate for shoes on the roof.

(Credit: Cc Kevan)

A friend of Berge revealed to the Telegraph: "He could tell the lead roofs apart on Google Earth, as they were slightly darker than normal."

Mr. Berge, aged a mere 27, pleaded guilty last week--no, not to an appreciation for official buildings, but rather to theft.

He received a less than leaden eight-month suspended jail sentence and 100 hours of community service. I wonder if he'll be asked to repair a few church roofs.

Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Technically Incorrect
AT&T gets Luke Wilson to hit Verizon again
NBA star won't tweet until he has 1 million followers
Man marries video game character
IKEA's brilliant Facebook campaign
IBM staffer posts pics on Facebook, loses benefits
New Apple ads to Verizon: Can Droid do this?
Police arrest exec for not using Twitter
The Black Friday deals that aren't
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (13 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by ajhoughton March 16, 2009 7:41 AM PDT
While the article raises a serious point, it's a shame about the bad English on the sign, don't you think? Have these people not heard of sentences? Not to mention the silly and unnecessary mention of "health and safety". Apparently good English and common sense are no longer expected of the inhabitants of the British Isles.
Reply to this comment
by HITMAN1659 March 16, 2009 9:26 AM PDT
tats not cool man tat sign in picture
Reply to this comment
by lifeshard March 16, 2009 9:42 AM PDT
$140,000 worth of lead? there appears to be an error in this report. The person must of been selling them for Tiles or Art or something other than just as recycled lead. Current USA price for lead is about 25 cents a pound to make $140,000 USA at .25cents a pound thats 560000 pounds of lead or 280 tons of lead. To carry 280 tons of tiles off roofs is a lot of work, how would he transport it? A one ton truck parked beside the building and he did it 250 times?? Being a USA scrap seller I just having trouble understanding how that much weight and volume was being removed and hauled away. Then again he got caught right? Must of been the ldling dump trucks parked on peoples lawns.
Just wondering.
lifeshard
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian March 16, 2009 10:04 AM PDT
It would only be 90 trips if he had a 3 ton truck.
;-)
by clamenza March 19, 2009 1:31 PM PDT
One of my pet peeves is typing things like "must of". It's "must've", or "must have". "Must of" is nonsensical.
by jafarm66 March 17, 2009 4:27 PM PDT
Sarcasm on - If his trial was in the US, his defense attorney would have said "He was protecting tots from lead exposure" which would lead to the tiles being banned from use. - Sarcasm off
Reply to this comment
by Tomofumi March 17, 2009 8:57 PM PDT
yet another creative use of Google Earth.... :)
Reply to this comment
by nicmart March 18, 2009 5:50 AM PDT
This has nothing to do with "free enterprise," and the association is foolish.
Reply to this comment
by W1gglesnarf March 18, 2009 11:47 AM PDT
Whats sad is I know people who were suprised by this....
Reply to this comment
by myles taylor March 19, 2009 9:13 AM PDT
pleaded? Shouldn't it be pled?
Reply to this comment
by spacydog March 19, 2009 9:28 AM PDT
Both past tense forms are correct.
by myles taylor March 19, 2009 2:01 PM PDT
I understand that they are both correct (I checked before I posted) but it sounds better to say pled.
by zhok March 20, 2009 3:53 AM PDT
looking for some weird and secret places from google earth? try this...
http://www.caughtfromabove.com
Hope you enjoy ;)
Reply to this comment
(13 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

3G wireless still holds promise

The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.

advertisement

About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right