• On CBS.com: David Letterman welcomes U2
January 12, 2009 6:54 PM PST

5 questions for woman selling her virginity online

by Chris Matyszczyk

Her pseudonym is Natalie Dylan. Because she is a woman of impeccable taste, I imagine that she named herself after Natalie Wood and Bob Dylan.

If you have not yet been propositioned by her publicity, Natalie, 22 years old, is selling her virginity to the highest bidder at Bunnyranch.com. The leading man's offer currently stands at a breathtaking $3.8 million.

The Bunny Ranch, for those who haven't been initiated, is an extremely famous brothel in Nevada, and perhaps you, on hearing this news, will be wondering just what criteria she will be using to cherry-pick her premier partner.

As a concerned citizen and businessperson, I have some questions.

1. Who is she, really? Although she has appeared with Tyra Banks and Howard Stern, among others, she claims that she took on the pseudonym for her own 'safety.' Strangely, I can find no online trace of her real name.

She says she is a student at Sacramento State. You would have thought that fellow members of her undergraduate Women's Studies program would have performed their social-networking duties, and twittered and facebooked away about her enterprise and her true self.

There is one quote of hers they might wish to enlighten us about. It came from an interview Natalie did with a CBS affiliate. She said: "I'm a big fan of anonymity."

2. Why is it all auction and no action? Ms. Dylan has been on this quest since last September. She says she needs the money in order to pay for a Master's Degree in Family and Marriage Therapy. But does Sacramento State have gold bidets in the bathrooms? Or is she thinking Harvard? The Sorbonne, perhaps?

In the CBS interview, she mentioned that she was going to write a book and set up in practice with her sister, Avia--who seems also to have occasionally burrowed down at the Bunny Ranch to earn a little cash. But isn't $3.8 million quite a handsome sum? Or has she discovered it comes with not such a handsome (or Mensa-some) owner?

This is not the Bunny Ranch. But you probably knew that already.

(Credit: CC Robyn Gallagher)

3. Why does she insist on intelligence in her suitor? I can't help but imagine that she will not be in flagrante delicto for longer than an episode of The Office. So why is it that she feels it important for her suitor to have brains?

Most people might consider several words or phrases for a man who would sacrifice upward of $3.8 million for one night of (anticipated) excitement: "rich," "sad," or even "didn't do business with Bernie Madoff, then." But why would she wish for the first suitor to desuit her to know who Shakespeare is? Or even how to spell his name?

4. Does she intend to film the event? I ask only because the site states that she will personally correspond with the applicants first. What might they be talking about? Could it be that, not content with making money for her studies, her book and her practice, she is seconding the notion of a DVD? Or even, as it were, a live feed?

Most men with money tend to be big fans of anonymity. Could it be that those with the financial wads are concerned that their physical wads might be displayed for all the world to see?

5. Does she want the winner to do more than just have sex? I am very concerned that the highly educated, wealthy, single, divorced, or strangely brazen men who have already bid may be stumped by an unexpected request on Natalie's part. She was quoted in the Daily Mail as saying: "I think me and the person I do it with will both profit greatly from the deal."

But if I have more wads of cash than I can waste any other way, why would I wish to make a profit from this act of love? Is Natalie imagining that she and her temporary beau will be doing another tour of the talk shows before they enjoy the Bunny Ranch's thread count?

Or, dare one even consider the thought, is she already setting up interviews for both of them after Money Honey has enjoyed Sugar Daddy? Can anyone imagine Tyra Banks smiling sweetly at the highly educated, wealthy, etc., man and asking: "Did the earth move for you?"

Sometimes love just isn't what it seems.

Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Technically Incorrect
After Wikipedia, Jockipedia
Wife exposes chief spy's personal life on Facebook
Microsoft chucks vomit ad
Microsoft resorts to vomit to market IE 8
Do URLs matter anymore?
YouTube hoops star accepts Shaq's Twitter challenge
Buy-buy Michael Jackson
Google or Bing? Where's the pic of Sanford's lover?
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by ImRob January 14, 2009 6:09 AM PST
I bet all those virgins in internet porn films are really kicking themselves now. No wait, that'll be her when she loses her virginity to a fat, bald middle age man with more money than sense.

She'll need every penny to get a memory transplant or at the very least a lifetime supply of drugs to forget the whole experience.

It really begs the question is bad sex, awkwardness and blood really worth $3.8m? I can think of about 3.8 million better ways and, quite frankly, less gross ways to spend that amount of money.
Reply to this comment
by loloss2008 January 23, 2009 6:33 PM PST
mmm, sounds like you have more sense than money. you fat, bald, middle aged man. any man that is willing to fork over $3.8m for a piece of ass certainly at one point had the sense to acquire the surplus of cash. no? $3.8m to that dum dum is like $380.00 to a fat, bald, middle aged you. man. as for natalie or what ever her name is good for her. finally a college kid paying her own way, the old school way, with her hymen. 'cause, let's face it, mom, dad, even god couldn't afford tuition at harvard.
by ErnieTheBear January 15, 2009 1:07 PM PST
I had to drop out at 3.5. Anything beyond that is just plain crazy. I have a budget, too, ya know?
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk January 15, 2009 5:20 PM PST
Oh, Ernie,

Couldn't you ask the bank for a mortgage?

Chris
by DanielaDineva January 17, 2009 1:27 AM PST
Anything beyond 3.5 is just plain crazy? Muahahahhahaha, your comment really made me laugh. Do you mean that 3.5 is reasonable then?
by DanielaDineva January 17, 2009 1:22 AM PST
Don't I wish I was a hot virgin!
Reply to this comment
by loloss2008 January 23, 2009 6:44 PM PST
the not being a virgin part, not so important.... are you hot? we can start the auction off at say, $350,000.00
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right