• On TechRepublic: Why VISTA HATERS will love Windows 7
December 16, 2008 4:58 PM PST

Why you should choose sex, not the Internet

by Chris Matyszczyk

I have been almost permanently disturbed since reading Dawn Kawamoto's revelations about a survey suggesting that women would rather forgo sex for two weeks than give up Internet access.

When I read that nearly half the women surveyed felt this way, I had a number of purely instinctive reactions.

First came the notion that the Harris Interactive surveyors, at the behest of Intel, had merely been screening women who work in information technology. This would have made the results entirely understandable--for so many reasons.

However, then I shook off this conception in favor of a simple explanation: perhaps it's the men these women are choosing (not) to have sex with. The slightly more than 50 percent who could not give up on, as Richard Nixon would put it, fornication, were possibly either fortunate to be in a rare, healthy relationship with a man or preferred the intimacy of women.

So many men can be, as they put it across distant shores, toerags. And the sexual quality that was (not) enjoyed by this worrying percentage of females might reflect male insensitivity and incompetence, rather than some lasting lust for the Web.

Does she look really happy to you?

(Credit: CC Jared)

While I am obviously unable to help with the immediate need for finding better sexual partners, I can, in an attempt to influence Dawn's poll, offer Six Deadly Reasons why sex will always outscore the Internet.

  1. When a man crashes, he generally does so after sex. A laptop will often choose to crash right in the middle of the video you've been just dying to see.
  2. Sex takes up so much less time than the Internet. With sex, 20 minutes can give you a considerable spike of adrenalin and even a little tingling of the fingers in the company of a living and, usually, breathing human being. With the Internet, you can lose untold days socially networking, till your fingers believe they've just played Rachmaninoff's 3rd at the Lincoln Center. And what do you get for it? A bunch more imaginary friends.
  3. When it comes to sex, you've normally had dinner first. Which means that it is far less messy than most people's evenings on the laptop. They perch it on their knees, fingering the keyboard with their left hand while reaching for Domino's finest cheese, pepperoni, and green pepper with their right. If they're not crisp with their bite, the cheese stretches out like a ghost in a cartoon movie, until it makes contact with the keyboard, sticking to it and sliding into the cracks between the keys. Before they know it, their Apple is cheddared.
  4. Sex exposes you for exactly who you are. There you lie, entirely denuded of pretense, being as much yourself as you could ever be outside of, perhaps, when you play golf. On the Internet, by contrast, everyone lies. The interactions you have are as false as a flamenco dancer's eyelashes. How can anyone take pleasure in that?

  5. Sex gives you something to talk about. It gives the tabloids something to write about. Which gives people something to read about. Which gives them something to talk about. Can you ever imagine a publication solely devoted to what Britney Spears and her fellow cohort of stars do on the Internet? How crashingly dull that would be.
  6. The internet will always be there tomorrow. What about your lover?

Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Technically Incorrect
Craigslist, eBay fighting Michael Jackson scalpers
After Wikipedia, Jockipedia
Wife exposes chief spy's personal life on Facebook
Microsoft chucks vomit ad
Microsoft resorts to vomit to market IE 8
Do URLs matter anymore?
YouTube hoops star accepts Shaq's Twitter challenge
Buy-buy Michael Jackson
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (21 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by uhhhhhhuh December 16, 2008 6:34 PM PST
You can read a book while you're having sex. You certainly can't do that when you're online.

Did i read that wrong? Or are you just plain retarded?
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk December 16, 2008 7:50 PM PST
Whoa,

Chill, there.

I edited that line out. And it somehow appeared. Very odd. It's gone again now.

Still, now that you mention it. War and Peace on a screen? I don't think so.
by BillG08 December 16, 2008 6:57 PM PST
Thank you, When I saw that it was really depressing... Glad someone else felt that way....
Reply to this comment
by selytch December 16, 2008 7:13 PM PST
That's one great comparison! I should stop reading blogs though...
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk December 16, 2008 7:56 PM PST
Ah, now, see here, seltych.

I never said NEVER go online....just, you know, make it a priority to love the one you're with. Because, well, the web isn't faithful, you know.

Chris
by Imalittleteapot December 16, 2008 9:00 PM PST
Well it was less than half. Perhaps a simple explanation. What percentage of women were simply single and weren't getting any sex anyway? In that situation why would you give up the net? Also, what percentage of women couldn't give up the net because they need it to do their job. Yeah, some of them are probably just crazy though.
Reply to this comment
by willdryden December 17, 2008 4:54 PM PST
Then there are the ones you need half a bottle of Jack Daniels before you would ask her out.
by aka_tripleB December 17, 2008 7:51 AM PST
How was the survey conducted? Was it a web based survey? That would completely discredit these finding.
Reply to this comment
by hassan_bin_sober December 17, 2008 8:09 AM PST
Maybe I've been looking in the wrong places to get laid!
Reply to this comment
by man_w_balls December 17, 2008 8:15 AM PST
so this means, next time I go into an internet café with my gold chains, chest hair exposed, and tight pants sporting engorged boner, that I should just give up on the pick-up lines?
maybe I should get on the internet to pick up the ladies
Reply to this comment
by Pete Bardo December 17, 2008 11:12 AM PST
I'm with imalittleteapot. But it's not just single women who aren't getting any. It would also include married women. I'd bet there are plenty of married women (and men) not having sex every two weeks, so giving it up doesn't mean a thing.

Reading a book while having sex isn't that far off base. Why did you edit that line out? Reminds me of a joke:

Q: "How do you know if your Jewish American Princess had an orgasm?"
A: "She dropped her nail file."
Reply to this comment
by kevinskrause December 17, 2008 11:15 AM PST
What about intimacy and romance? Distractions like the internet and television have completely stunted our ability to interact on a more personal level. Nobody knows how to carry on a meaningful conversation and build a strong, and hopefully sensual, bond with a member of the opposite sex. Being in a committed, live-in, relationship for the last 4 years; I refuse to allow computers or televisions in the bedroom. And my sex life is much more frequent and healthy because of it. Get a clue people. Start enjoying the more finer things in life.
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk December 18, 2008 10:52 AM PST
Kevin,

Thank you. You appear to be one of the more balanced members of the readership.

And I feel sure you will have happier holidays than many others.

Chris
by stewedbylunch December 23, 2008 9:20 AM PST
I'm with Kevin also. Lately I've been pining for a time when we didn't have always on high speed internet and 200 channels worth of junk flooding my personal space and relationships. I guess my wife would in the group that would give up sex over the internet.
by lalomartins December 17, 2008 2:20 PM PST
Two weeks only? I'd have given the same answer, and I'm a guy.

Seriously, I can live quite well without sex for two weeks, although I'd rather not. But 2 weeks without internet makes a major difference.

Now 6 months? I'd give up internet.

I think what the survey is really showing is that web+email access is a more immediate need than sex, that's all.
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk December 18, 2008 10:51 AM PST
Yes, lalomartins,

And at this difficult time in our society's development, we should all be examining our needs very carefully.

Chris
by Admirable December 17, 2008 3:16 PM PST
Maybe they are doing it wrong....
Reply to this comment
by walwebster December 18, 2008 3:30 AM PST
How many different ways ARE there to use the internet?
by Mikebanks December 18, 2008 1:36 PM PST
Individuals vary. But in general women have an easier time doing without sex than men. This is based on my interviews with thousands of women (no, I wasn't "with" all of them. But it's amazing what people will tell you when they know they can trust you). So of course most women could do without sex for two weeks easier than giving the Internet access.
--Mike
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk December 18, 2008 6:57 PM PST
Mike,

You interviewed THOUSANDS of women? And they ALL trusted you?

Tell us more.

Chris
by MrMurder April 15, 2009 1:19 PM PDT
I have the opposite opinion about the article. Would you risk having sex at the time you're fifteen-year-old walks home? Nope. And thanks to the Internet, elementary school kids know what it is and what porn is. Me? I think porn is a sick obsessity for Americans and people of other races. I know a kid who thinks porn is man's best friend, but I try to instill in him that sex and porn are bad obessities. He probably only cares what's beneath the girl's clothes rather than the girl herself. He makes me sick just like you Chris.
Reply to this comment
(21 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Look before leaping to short URLs

Fueled by Twitter's rise, services that scrunch Web addresses are taking off. They bring a host of problems, but some are working to fix them.

In Utah desert, it's bombs away

road trip At the massive Utah Test & Training Range, the Air Force runs 15,000 sorties a year to ensure that pilots and weapons are on the mark.
• Photos: Training and testing

About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right