The $8 an hour shuttle driver behind a Nobel Prize
Aren't you momentarily stunned when your cab driver or your shuttle driver at Hertz or your local car dealership says something that really makes you think? Don't you wonder how someone so smart ended up driving you around?
Please, therefore, consider what it must be like to be Douglas Prasher.
Prasher, or as he should be known, Dr. Prasher, makes around $8 an hour as a courtesy shuttle driver for an Alabama car dealer. And he's been stunned to hear that the fruits of his work have led to a Nobel Prize for chemistry--which just happened to be awarded to two other scientists.
A couple of years ago, Prasher was involved in a slightly different kind of shuttle--the one occasionally shot up by NASA. And a few years before that, in 1992 to be precise, he isolated the gene that makes jellyfish glow in the dark. At the time, he believed this discovery could be used to study some of humankind's most debilitating diseases. He was right.
It's just that at the very moment he made his breakthrough, his funding, which had once come from the American Cancer Society, ran out.
He could have kept his work to himself. Instead, he mailed a couple of test tubes to Roger Tsien at the University of California and Martin Chalfie at Columbia University.
"It was more important to me to hand over the tool to other scientists with the funding than to have individual glory," Prasher told London's Daily Mail.
So how did he end up driving those nice folks in Alabama to and from Bill Penney's excellent and, no doubt, munificent Toyota dealership?
"After I gave up my work on the jellyfish, I eventually found another dream job, with the U.S. space program, but I was laid off in 2006 and I haven't been able to get another scientific position," Prasher said.
Prasher has three children and, apparently, had just taken out a large mortgage when he was laid off by NASA. But is it really possible that someone with so much evident ability can't get a more appropriate position in America's scientific community than helping to shift a Scion?
It's not as if Chalfie and Tsien don't concede Prasher's role. Tsien even sent him an e-mail to apologize. But doesn't Prasher deserve something more than a little acknowledgment?
If this were a movie--and perhaps it will be--Chalfie and Tsien would visit Prasher and offer him a cut of the $1.5 million Nobel Prize.
And then, in the last scene, he would get another knock on his door--a new sponsor to finance his future research. That sponsor would be Toyota, wouldn't it?
You're going to tell me life isn't like the movies, right?
Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.






Chris
Selflessness and concern for others in an era dedicated to individual glory. Thank you Dr. Prasher your ingenuity and effort.
This guy actually laid the groundwork for the Nobel Prize and should have been acknowledged. But the Nobel committee has become a joke already, with their political views dictating more than the peace prize. Their economic prize was politically motivated, and who knows if their chemistry prize is not influenced by other factors.
amazed by the selflessness
it also goes to show that qualified people often go begging for work - but are kept out of the labor force because they are too qualified for more junior roles - until they tumble down to the bottle washer roles
everyone talks of human resources being a strategic asset - but few actually embrace it.
on behalf of all the other overqualified and unemployed/underemployed
wishing you only the very best!!!
By the way, the ACA can cross me off as a contributor to them via the United Way. I think I'll send their donation to the Boy Scouts of America next year.
He sued but got nowhere (the New York Court holding that a party to a contract cannot rely on the promise of the other), only years later to find out that the defendant paid elected officials in a pattern matching the unique adverse litigation event pattern. Meanwhile - 15 years later - some 450,000 patients diagnosed with fulminant liver failure died needlessly that could have been saved with the regeneration method.
Nobody makes a big deal about the 4.0 GPA student graduating from MIT but they sure plaster all over the news how much Madonna is paying her soon to be ex-husband!
BTW, did they cite Prasher in their work or did they plagerize his work?
Yes, I agree the system is rigged, but it's not all about $$
And as for Roger Tsien sending him an e-mail to apologize. Wow Roger, how generous of you - you should run for office! Your family must be so proud of you, Martin Chalfie, and all of your achievements!
You rock Douglas Prasher - all the best sir - just remember: the truth has a habit of finding it's way!
peace,
HMK
This is a true shame to the Nobel Committee and all subsequent recipients.
As for the H1-B promoters, and job offshoring head hunters, curse you and your greed! GW Bush and the rest of your cronnies, just look at what you have done to this country! I hope you have not brought past the point of no return.
-
by zeplin10ten
October 22, 2008 8:03 AM PDT
- "You're going to tell me life isn't like the movies, right?"
-
Reply to this comment
-
(22 Comments)No. Life is not like a "good" movie. It's like a bad, lost and wandering movie. Or, like the end of a series of bad, lost movies where the main characters (heroes) are anti-heroic, larger than life figures which resemble real people only in the way that, in Greek theatre, characters represented human masks of abstract, concept-life.
In the current Douglas Prasher, shuttle-driver movie in a movie, we can see another glimpse of life beyond the dueling masks of "humility" and "conquest." And ask, if "humility" and "conquest" are seen, not as opposite and necessary poles of a universal law of metaphysics, but as elements of mental evolution -- then:
1) In terms of the universal laws of effectuality, which is more evolved, a) humility, b) or conquest?
2) Which is a) a necessary element of the creative, art and science life that's trying to boogie in our heads, and b) which is a hindrance?
3) Do our heads free-associate a) on their own, or b) only in response to our will power and control?
4) And if we, now, can see dramatic masks as masks, then isn't that because a) with a light turned on inside our own brain cells, we can see the life behind the mask of concept-life, or b) huh?
If you're answering "b" above, then you're a) missing something, b) wrong, and c) on the side that's rooting for the species' belly-up.