• On GameSpot: Wii Fit tells 10-year-old she's fat
October 7, 2008 10:05 AM PDT

Virgin turns down $1 million for galactic porn movie

Posted by Chris Matyszczyk
  • Font size
  • Print

These days it's hard for a porn producer to find new ways to go where no man (or woman or beast) has gone before.

So it is perhaps unsurprising that Virgin Galactic, the company that plans to fly passengers into orbit from late 2009, announced that it has received a $1 million offer to allow a porn movie to be shot on one of its spacecraft, an offer the company has declined.

As I understand it, the producers thought they would be able to find a completely different kind of action if the participants were under the influence of zero gravity.

It is, however, difficult to understand how they thought they might be able to shoot such a movie.

Virgin Galactic's Richard Branson acknowledges the pleasures of the service.

(Credit: CC Tanya Ryno)

Virgin Galactic's proposed flights offer, for a return ticket of $200,000, only a five-minute period of weightlessness.

However, those who involve themselves in the pleasures of pornography explain to me that the copulatory scenes tend to last a little longer than your average real-life five minutes. And sometimes they involve multiple physically demanding entanglements.

I am, therefore, unclear as to whether the producers (who remain strangely unnamed) wanted to rent the spacecraft solely for their own purposes or whether they were merely looking to book seats for the performers and a single member camera crew.

If it were the former, then surely the $1million offer has something of a derisory nature.

If it were the latter, might Virgin Galactic have charged the other passengers a little extra, given that they would be in the presence of an entirely otherworldly transport that would truly make the trip a once-in-a-lifetime experience?

One's mind is also somewhat disturbed by whether sex in space really is such an easy pleasure. Would there not be a problem with synchronization?

Still, Virgin's extraordinary and surprising intransigence on this alluring space sexperiment means that those who have had to tolerate suboptimal sex for so many years will also have to do without suborbital sex for a while longer.

We really are living in very difficult times.

Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Technically Incorrect
Ad agency in 'virgin' controversy
Craigslist rant may put man in jail
Should Microsoft buy itself some cool?
U.K. lawyers send porn download bills to upstanding citizens
Man with no arms caught driving car with his feet
Microsoft shuts down LeBron James
iLike? No, I don't
5 tech products you can do without in a recession
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 13 comments
by Michichael October 7, 2008 11:41 AM PDT
I believe NASA already did experiments on this kinda stuff. You'd need a special elastic band to make it work and even then it wasn't very... fun. I forget where I read it though.
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk October 7, 2008 12:05 PM PDT
A special elastic bad? Eek. That just sounds so fabulously dreadful.

I can imagine that must have upset you...

Chris
by Ghostdog2 October 7, 2008 11:59 AM PDT
There was actually a zero gravity porn movie shot a long time ago called 'The Uranus Experiment', it wasn't in space but in one of those planes where you can experience zero gravity. Here's an article about it:

http://www.space.com/sciencefiction/movies/uranus_experiment_000516.html
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk October 7, 2008 12:06 PM PDT
Now how come you knew about that Ghostdog2? Huh? Did you actually watch it?

Chris
by Solaris_User October 7, 2008 1:27 PM PDT
Virgin is only delaying the inevitable.. some day we will have space porn.
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis October 8, 2008 9:38 AM PDT
I'm sorta surprised that we DON'T have porn in a place that looks like the international space station. I could have sworn that I saw an amateur production on one of the streaming porn sites that was in this genre.
by doconn7 October 7, 2008 2:35 PM PDT
If it takes porn to make space travel happen for the rest of us, why not?
After all isn't that where all the money is? Come on! Flying around in a giant phallic symbol with Virgin stamped on its back and a pin up painted on the front! Tell me that's not indecent. . .
Reply to this comment
by Swooley October 7, 2008 10:14 PM PDT
This would be great for Virgin. Not only would they get publicity, but look at their name, "Virgin," no one could ever forget them. Besides porn is the reason why normal people began to use the internet. I feel this could be the same concept, the catalyst for commercial space travel.
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk October 8, 2008 8:58 AM PDT
Hah. Brilliant logic, Swooley. You could be right.

Chris
by Rick Cavaretti October 8, 2008 7:45 AM PDT
Still, Virgin's extraordinary and surprising intransigence on this alluring space sexperiment means that those who have had to tolerate suboptimal sex for so many years will have to also have to do without suborbital sex for a while longer.

That line busts me up. Well done.
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk October 8, 2008 8:59 AM PDT
Rick,

You are more than kind. Thank you.

Chris
by BenFlavoredCandy October 8, 2008 8:13 AM PDT
Reminds me of an episode of Futurama where Scruffy, the janitor, is reading a magazine called "Zero G Jugs".

As fun as that film may be, $1 mil. is too low. And certainly pornography is a) not 'publicity' for a huge corporation like Virgin, and b) definitely not what they would be remembered for, what with hundreds of pop artists on the Virgin label.
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk October 8, 2008 9:01 AM PDT
Now why would you have remembered that particular scene, Ben?

Chris
advertisement

In the news now

Slowing expectations at a green-tech start-up

Six months ago, biofuels start-up Mascoma had the wind in its sails, as did the rest of the clean-tech sector. Now, the company is treading carefully and scaling back.


With JavaFX, Sun seeks new coders, new revenue

With the launch of JavaFX 1.0, Sun is trying to reclaim Java's strength as a foundation for rich Internet applications. But it's no longer the incumbent.


Tim Lincecum, motion capture star

San Francisco Giants pitcher, who won the Cy Young award last month, dons a motion capture suit for 2K Sports' Major League Baseball 2K9 video game.


Resource center from CNET News sponsors
Business. Ready.
Sony VAIO® Professional PCs.

Click Here!
A new grade in mobility demands a new kind of notebook. And Sony delivers.Tough, portable and featuring up to 7.5 hours of battery life! VAIO® Professional notebooks are built for business. Learn more.

Click Here!
Built tough for business.

Learn more about the rigorous quality testing Sony puts its notebooks through.

Protect your investment.

Find out why VAIO® tech support recently won a Laptop Editors' Choice Award, July 2008.

Long battery life.

Up to 7.5 hours of battery life! See how VAIO® PCs will keep you productive longer when on the road.

Travel light

Check out our ultraportable line-up, starting at 2.87 lbs.

PCs for every need.

Find out which VAIO® notebook is right for you.

About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right