• On TechRepublic: 10 most annoying default configurations
June 3, 2008 7:41 PM PDT

Survival of the fittest: Google and Amazon

by Dan Farber

Sanford C. Bernstein analyst Jeffrey Lindsay is betting that Google and Amazon.com will loom as the two giants of Internet. According to Lindsay's report, "U.S. Internet: The End of the Beginning," cited by Reuters, "Both Google and Amazon.com are still racking up annual growth rates in the 30-40 percent range, with only a relatively modest slowdown in sight."

Given how those two companies own their respective fields, it's not a stretch to forecast them as long-term winners in the coming years. Google and Amazon have done the best job of creating clear value propositions for online users in the last decade, although Google has the better margin business selling ads on search pages.

Google owns search, with a nearly 70 percent share, and is moving into the applications space; Amazon is the premier online, personalized retail shopping site; and both are poised to become major providers of computing infrastructure services for the planet

.

Google and Amazon have momentum and traction, but that doesn't mean they are invulnerable. They have only a decade of history, and they would acknowledge that they could be knocked off, just as they knocked off a variety of competitors on their road to greatness.

A scenario in which Google or Amazon are taken down isn't likely in the next several years, however. The two are well established and the online market is reaching early adolescence, making it more difficult for newcomers to be supremely disruptive to incumbents. If competitors become a nuisance, Google and Amazon have the clout and deep pockets to acquire or extinguish them, if they see them coming.

The two big winners in Lindsay's report could take some lessons from Microsoft if they want to stay on top. Microsoft can provide examples of how to diversify and grow, as well as cautionary tales about treading on antitrust laws, getting big and missing major shifts, such as the initial phase of the Internet. Having the smartest people in house has helped Microsoft and the newer giants succeed, but ultimately they have blind spots. They would do well to heed the advice of former Intel executive Andy Grove: Only the paranoid survive.

Dan Farber is editor in chief of CBS Interactive News, which includes CBSNews.com and CNET News. He has more than 25 years of experience as an editor and journalist covering technology. E-mail Dan.
Recent posts from Outside the Lines
Track business executives' tweets with ExecTweets
Wolfram Alpha: Next major search breakthrough?
Microsoft's Live Mesh top innovation at the Crunchies
Macintosh at 25: Still the innovation leader
Print news is fading, but the content lives on
More speculation on Yahoo's CEO choices
Google's 2008 Zeitgeist lists of most popular searches
The information flow from Mumbai
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Tony McCune June 3, 2008 9:35 PM PDT
The thing that is similar between Google/Amazon and Microsoft is that they are offering the next generation of computing platforms. When Microsoft released the first generation of computing (Windows) is generated a whole generation of technology innovation. Google and Amazon's biggest contribution right now is building a cloud computing platform for the next generation. We wouldn't be where we are at http://www.digitalchalk.com if we didn't run on Amazon.
Reply to this comment
by Tony McCune June 3, 2008 9:35 PM PDT
The thing that is similar between Google/Amazon and Microsoft is that they are offering the next generation of computing platforms. When Microsoft released the first generation of computing (Windows) is generated a whole generation of technology innovation. Google and Amazon's biggest contribution right now is building a cloud computing platform for the next generation. We wouldn't be where we are at http://www.digitalchalk.com if we didn't run on Amazon.
Reply to this comment
by lifeonamazon June 3, 2008 10:28 PM PDT
Well this just rips at my soul. My life is on Amazon.com but I use Google and blogger http://www.lifeonamazon.com to document it, but as you will see in my post yesterday I urge Amazon to fix that. Competition always benefits the consumer. EMAHTSKCBLVDT!!!
Reply to this comment
by g15host June 4, 2008 8:04 AM PDT
While Google offers unique capabilities from the outset and continue to innovate, Amazon IMO built its fortune worst than Walmart & Dell, by underselling using investor dollars to stay afloat in the red for 5+ years until it has destroyed all good local small books/records businesses. Frankly if Amazon disappears or no one uses it there is no loss to the society whatsoever. Not true for Google or Apple and such.
Reply to this comment
(4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About Outside the Lines

Dan Farber is the editor in chief of CNET News. He has covered technology for more than two decades, and he previously served as editor in chief of ZDNet, PC Week and MacWeek. Outside the Lines explores the intersection of business and technology.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Outside the Lines topics

Subscribe to the EIC² podcast

Editors Dan Farber of News.com and Larry Dignan of ZDNet, square off in EIC² in this weekly podcast. The two editor in chiefs talk about the big tech stories of the day and provide insight and analysis.

Subscribe to this podcast using an RSS reader other than iTunes

Subscribe to this podcast using iTunes

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right