AMD sets new game PC specifications
Advanced Micro Devices will try to make buying a game PC more like selecting a game console.
"AMD Game!" will put badging on game PCs and set minimum standards for PCs that carry these badges. The idea is to allow gamers to select a PC like they would an Xbox 360 game console model and to drive home the point that an integrated graphics chip (from Intel, for example) is not good enough for a decent gaming experience.
AMD's specifications will target mainstream PC gamers, not high-end enthusiasts necessarily. Initially, the specifications will cover only desktops, with notebook standards coming later.
About a dozen resellers will launch systems with the badging, including Acer, Alienware, iBuypower, and Velocity Micro. Microsoft and Logitech will also support AMD Game!.
AMD Game! minimum requirements
(Credit: AMD)
AMD has good reason to revisit its game PC strategy. The PC gaming alliance estimates 263 million gamers worldwide, with global PC game (software) revenues estimated to be $9.6 billion in 2008. But more importantly, AMD's acquisition of ATI has put it in a unique position to be the only chip supplier in the x86 PC market that offers both a CPU (central processing unit) and discrete, high-end GPU (graphics processing unit).
And it needs a larger presence in the game PC market. Most of the game PCs from resellers like Falcon Northwest and Voodoo come with Intel CPUs and Nvidia GPUs. An equally dangerous trend is the proliferation of PCs using Intel-based integrated graphics: These PCs are not capable of playing games the way they should be played, according to AMD.
"We're not doing a good job of getting that balanced solution to people," said Brent Berry, product marketing manager for AMD. By "balanced," Berry means a cost-effective solution that offers a more precise balance of CPU and GPU performance. Nvidia calls this the "optimized PC."
"Consumers are not getting a great gaming experience with IGP (Integrated Graphics Processor)," Berry added.
Badges will direct consumers "to solutions that are specifically validated for gaming," Berry said.
The standard AMD Game "user experience" target will be a system with 1280x1024-pixel high-definition (HD) resolution that can achieve 30 frames per second, Berry said. The AMD Game Ultra will be "beyond HD" at 1600x1200 pixel and 30 frames per second.
AMD Game! badging
(Credit: AMD)"In North America, about 60 percent of consumers say they plan on using their PCs for video games," said Berry. "But when you do a check on what people actually did on their PCs, you find out that 80 percent actually played games on their PCs."
AMD Game! minimum requirements are an AMD Athlon 5600+ X2 processor, ATI Radeon HD 3650 graphics, and an AMD 770 chipset or Nvidia nForce 500 series chipset.
AMD Game Ultra minimum requirements are a Phenom X4 9650 processor, ATI Radeon HD 3870 graphics, and an AMD 770 chipset.
Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. Follow Brooke on Twitter @mbrookec. 
However, PC gaming is dieing because of devs. They want to code for highend too much and then want consumers to buy both new hardware and software.
Those days are nearly gone. Something is going to have to give! Either card makers are going to have to fund devs or 3D hardware need to get CHEAP.
They should be coding for the graphics cards of 2-3 years ago, not the latest and the greatest graphics cards.
The biggest problem however is that they have to cut down on the 'eye candy' and simply make a game well that looks REASONABLY good. I don't need 'real time moving grass in the wind!' like lately they have been thinking that we do.
- by baswwe May 19, 2008 8:21 AM PDT
- I won't buy into it.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by Lerianis May 19, 2008 8:43 AM PDT
- Actually, in most cases..... they are just as good as NVidia, once you take into account that Ati graphics cards, even high ends, take less power than the comparable NVidia card..... one of the main reasons why I am sticking with Ati in my computers.
- Like this
-
(4 Comments)Where are Nvidia min specs?
ATI isn't as good as NVidia