• On ZDNet: Why I Will never buy a Mac
April 28, 2008 11:35 PM PDT

AMD quad-core chip hits compatibility snag

by Brooke Crothers

Update: Circuit board makers using Advanced Micro Devices' high-end quad-core Phenom chips claim that there are compatibility issues with select boards. This comes as the chipmaker struggles to churn out processors that are competitive with Intel's offerings.

AMD quad-core Phenom X4

AMD quad-core Phenom X4

(Credit: AMD)

This issue was reported Monday at the Web site HKEPC.

AMD confirmed Monday that some motherboard suppliers are mismatching high-end quad-core Phenom processors with a lower-end chipset. (The motherboard is the main circuit board in a PC. The chipset allows the processor to interact with other components, among other functions.)

"What people have done, mistakenly, is paired a 780G (chipset-based) motherboard with the higher frequency Phenom--the 125-watt Phenom," said Jake Whitman, an AMD spokesperson.

Whitman is referring to the fact that the high-end 9750 and 9850 Phenom processors have a Thermal Design Power (TDP or thermal envelope) of 125 watts versus the lower-end 9600 and 9550 models that have a TDP of 95 watts. The higher-watt parts will not work with motherboards that contain the 780G chipset. The lower-end models do not have these TDP issues.

"They've taken an enthusiast-class quad-core part and paired it with a mainstream motherboard," Whitman said. "And not all motherboard manufacturers have tweaked their boards to support a 125-watt TDP." Whitman says that AMD's 790 chipset--not the 780--should be paired with the 9750 and 9850 processors and that a number of motherboard makers are already doing this.

"We've never made claims that 780G motherboards are enthusiast-class motherboards," Whitman said.

The inability to use high-end quad-core AMD processors on some motherboards may be symptomatic of a larger challenge. AMD is finding it difficult to compete head-on with Intel quad-core offerings in the consumer segment. Hewlett-Packard and Gateway, for instance, offer desktops with only the lower-performance Phenom chips, such as the 9100e (1.8GHz) and 9600 (2.3GHz). Neither HP nor Gateway offer desktops with higher-performance 9750 (2.4GHz) or 9850 (2.5GHz) Phenoms.

Meanwhile, Intel-based systems from these companies--though usually more expensive--come with quad-core chips ranging up to a 2.83GHz Q9550.

Whitman says there's a reason for this. First-tier PC makers "are not necessarily interested in building the fastest AMD-based quad-core systems, but are more interested in price." He expects wider adoption of the high-end Phenom chips with system builders and game-enthusiast PC makers.

In related news reported by CNET News.com on Monday, supercomputer maker Cray said it would adopt Intel quad-core processor designs for its supercomputers. Though Cray says it will continue to offer configurations with AMD chips too, the move by Cray is seen as an endorsement of Intel multicore designs. Before this announcement, Cray had been using AMD processors only.

Brooke Crothers is a former editor at large at CNET News.com, and has been an editor for the Asian weekly version of the Wall Street Journal. He writes for the CNET Blog Network, and is not a current employee of CNET. Contact him at mbcrothers@gmail.com. Disclosure.
Recent posts from Nanotech - The Circuits Blog
Hard disk or solid-state? Think again
Analyst: Thin laptops have design issues
Samsung breaks Netbook mold with Nvidia chip
Is Apple's Mac Mini a MacBook inside?
Conan O'Brien ribs 'nerds' at Intel science fair
Brouhaha over Intel branding
Apple iPhone 3GS: The sum ($) of its parts
What Intel, Nokia gain in mobile reboot
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Mam00th April 29, 2008 5:51 AM PDT
Hmmm, this isn't very nice since you do expect you new CPU to work with you mother board since it have the same socket. I know this isn't great logic, but still...
Reply to this comment
by cschlise April 29, 2008 7:30 AM PDT
Give me a break. Matching the right motherboard, socket, memory type, etc, etc has been more of a challenge with Intel parts than AMD for a while. This "issue" is no more of problem than if you buy any Intel parts today.

Where AMD needs to watch out is creating too many of these "unique" configurations, because, let's face it, most people going with AMD are looking to build less expensive systems.

Getting a realitively "cheap" 9750/9850 Phenom and a 780G motherboard would have been a great combo at a great price. Going with the 790 X/FX boards adds about a $30-$50 premium to the price, plus you'll need to add a seperate graphics card since the 790 chipset doesn't come with integrated graphics. This means at a minimum another $40 for an HD 3000 series Radeon or NVidia equivalent.
Reply to this comment
by W2Kuser April 29, 2008 9:34 AM PDT
Death of AMD

Wow, this seemingly small side story could literally be spelling the death of AMD.

Thier new high-end CPU only works in low-end MBs? How retarded is that? This just shows how far out of touch and behind the curve AMD has fallen.

AMD will be out of business by 2010.
Reply to this comment
by ronch79 April 30, 2008 8:45 AM PDT
I think Whitman's explanation that AMD never said you can use a 780G with high end Phenoms is so lame. 780G-based boards are supposed to support AM2+ CPUs along with HyperTransport 3.0. It's not the chipset, but rather, board makers not designing their boards to support 125W TDP Phenoms.

When I buy an AM2+ CPU and an AM2+ board, I expect them to work together, unless AMD explicitely warns me that I shouldn't get a 780G-based board for my 125W Phenom. They should clean up their AM2+ spec guidelines instead of coming up with such lame and stupid excuses. Now, I like AMD, but I think Jake should be given the pink slip. It's guys like him who make AMD look bad.

Then again, maybe they just wanna take the blame for it and avoid maddening the board makers by pointing the finger at them because they failed to provide clear AM2+ design guiidelines.
Reply to this comment
(4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About Nanotech - The Circuits Blog

Brooke Crothers was formerly editor-at-large at CNET News.com, an analyst at IDC (International Data Corp.) Japan, and an editor at The Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly (The Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones), among other endeavors, including a recent hiatus from the tech industry when he co-managed an after-school math and reading center. Nanotech covers computer chip technology and how it defines the computing experience. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Nanotech - The Circuits Blog topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right