Nvidia CEO says 'no' to Intel-compatible chip
Despite persistent rumors, Nvidia's chief executive says the graphics chip supplier is not working on an Intel-compatible chip.
Nvidia CEO Jen-Hsun Huang
(Credit: Nvidia)In an exclusive interview with CNET Thursday, I asked CEO Jen-Hsun Huang about the possibility of Nvidia coming up with its own x86 (Intel-compatible) chip technology, after the company reported strong third-quarter earnings. A recurring rumor has it that Nvidia is developing a chip that would be able to run the same software that runs on all Intel- and AMD-based PCs worldwide.
"No," he said when asked if there was any truth to the rumor. "Nvidia's strategy is very, very clear. I'm very straightforward about it. Right now, more than ever, we have to focus on visual and parallel computing."
Huang went on to describe where the chip supplier sees its best opportunities for growth. "Our strategy is to proliferate the GPU (graphics processing unit) into all kinds of platforms for growth," he said. "GPUs in servers for parallel computing, for supercomputing--and cloud computing with our GPU is a fabulous growth opportunity--and streaming video."
"And also getting our GPUs into the lowest power platforms we can imagine and driving mobile computing with it," Huang added, referring to its Tegra chip, which, for example, powers Microsoft's Zune HD media player.
Despite Huang's denials, Doug Freedman of Broadpoint AmTech is the latest to postulate that Nvidia will enter the x86 central processing unit market. "We feel Nvidia could become a supplier of x86 CPUs by necessity, perhaps in the next 12 months (if not sooner) to preserve both GPU and chipset revenue," Freedman said in a note recently.
"We believe the company has hired former Transmeta staff extensively," Freedman said. Transmeta was at one time a low-power x86-compatible chip supplier. Earlier this year, Intellectual Ventures acquired the patent portfolio of Transmeta.
Huang also dismissed the the possibility of Nvidia using Globalfoundries as a manufacturing partner--typically referred to as a "foundry" or a "fab"--for its chips, after saying in the earnings conference call that Nvidia's longstanding foundry partner--Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)--was not allocating it enough capacity.
"Globalfoundries is an AMD fab, right?" he said. "Globalfoundries is AMD's fab. Our strategy is TSMC."
Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. Follow Brooke on Twitter @mbrookec. 





I do wonder how well these cards will work as co-processors on fibre optic buses in the future.
I personally think the X86 might become a thing of the past surpassed by the IA 64 RISC version which Intel can now produce for the commercial market as of late 2009. Anyway I'm sure that much is yet to change and this is only half the story of what will actually be of microprocessing in the long haul.
what if, for some bizarre (example) reason the TSMC plant got burnt down?
that would effectively kill NVIDIA production dead.
- by quadibloc November 9, 2009 5:31 PM PST
- Given that AMD bought ATI, I would think that Nvidia has a very good relationship with Intel, so I would be very reluctant to take a rumor of Nvidia coming out with an x86 microprocessor seriously in any case.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by sasquatch3 November 11, 2009 3:17 PM PST
- nv hates Intel. i don't see much reason but they do.
- Like this
-
(8 Comments)It's true that Intel does include low-end video in some support chips it makes to allow motherboards to include video, so they could be regarded as a competitor to Nvidia - and while this has been confined to the low end, Larrabee is changing things - but I still don't see this as likely, at least not yet.