• On GameSpot: So-called 'Halo killer' gets 23 to life
October 12, 2009 6:20 PM PDT

SanDisk ships 'X4' flash chips

by Brooke Crothers
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 8 comments
Share

SanDisk said Monday that it is shipping memory chips that will allow consumers to store more data on tiny Secure Digital flash cards.

SanDisk X4 chip

SanDisk X4 chip

(Credit: SanDisk)

The Milpitas, Calif., company's X4 technology packs four bits of data into each memory cell. To date, flash memory chipmakers typically stored one bit or two bits per cell. Each individual die--or chip--holds 64 gigabits of data, or 8 gigabytes. This is the highest capacity per die in the industry, according to SanDisk.

The technology is not yet shipping in cutting-edge retail products, however: it is currently being used in 8GB and 16GB SDHC (Secure Digital High Capacity) cards as well as 8GB and 16GB Memory Stick PRO Duo cards, the company said.

Future related technology from SanDisk--possibly not based on current X4--is expected to yield SD flash cards that hold 64GB of data and larger capacities. Currently, mainstream SanDisk SD cards top out at 32GB.

Flash memory cards sold at retailers are typically not as reliable as solid-state drives--which also use flash chips--sold with laptops. And the higher the density per chip and the more bits per cell, the bigger the challenge for maintaining data reliability. SanDisk says it has met this challenge.

"Our challenge with X4 technology was to not only deliver the lower costs inherent to 4-bits-per-cell but to do so while meeting the reliability and performance requirements of industry standard cards," Sanjay Mehrotra, SanDisk's president and chief operating officer, said in a statement.

But X4 will, for the time being, be hampered by poorer performance and endurance than X3 (3-bits-per-cell) technology, said Gregory Wong, founder and principal analyst at Forward Insights, which does research on flash memory technology.

The memory technology itself--the 4 bits per cell 64-gigabit memory--is codeveloped and co-owned by SanDisk and Toshiba. The X4 controller technology is solely owned by SanDisk.

Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. Follow Brooke on Twitter @mbrookec.
Recent posts from Nanotech - The Circuits Blog
IBM: Envisioning the world's fastest supercomputer
Apple MacBook vs. HP Envy (part 2)
Intel: Initial Larrabee graphics chip canceled
Acer 17-inch, Intel dual-core laptop falls to $479
The FTC is talking to Nvidia about Intel
Intel sees rush to Netbook app store
Windows, Netbook. Android, smartbook? Hmm
HP Envy eclipses the Apple MacBook
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Lerianis3 October 13, 2009 1:47 AM PDT
Are these faster or slower than current offerings, and will you able to use them in regular old SD slots? Unless the answer is yes, that they are backwards compatible with the SD slots in computers like the ones that I have, these aren't going to catch on very fast or at all.
Reply to this comment
by solitare_pax October 13, 2009 2:05 AM PDT
I believe it would have to be an SD-HC card, because they had to revise the original SD specs to get a theoretical upper limit of 1 tetrabyte on a chip.

It would be nice to know for certain though.
by TotallyMadeUpName October 13, 2009 4:57 AM PDT
Reread the article.

"The technology is shipping now in 8GB and 16GB SDHC (Secure Digital High Capacity) cards"
by Masterface7 October 13, 2009 8:30 AM PDT
SDHC seemed to catch on pretty fast over regular sd cards and they dont work in regular sd card slots. You have to buy new card readers and get firmware updates yet people still buy them. So i think any expansion of memory especially to this degree will get eaten up by the mainstream very rapidly not to mention they should work in sdhc card readers.
by bdg2 October 13, 2009 3:29 PM PDT
They're normal SDHC but likely to be slower and less reliable.
by chuchucuhi October 13, 2009 9:24 AM PDT
Well it will go along way for SDHCX and reaching that 2TB limit, hehe.
Reply to this comment
by basraw October 13, 2009 10:25 AM PDT
So are current cards not reliable or are they reliable with industry standards? Which is it?

Are we talking SLC or MLC solid state drives?

---------------------------------------

"Flash memory cards sold at retailers are typically not as reliable as solid-state drives--which also use flash chips--sold with laptops. And the higher the density per chip and the more bits per cell, the bigger the challenge for maintaining data reliability. SanDisk says it has met this challenge.

"Our challenge with X4 technology was to not only deliver the lower costs inherent to 4-bits-per-cell but to do so while meeting the reliability and performance requirements of industry standard cards,""
Reply to this comment
by bdg2 October 13, 2009 3:28 PM PDT
X4 will be harder to make reliable than X3 was.

X4 is only 33% higher capacity than X3 but is arguably 100% harder to make reliable.

X4, X3 and what could be called X2 are MLC.

What could be called X1 is SLC.
(8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.

advertisement

About Nanotech - The Circuits Blog

Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Nanotech - The Circuits Blog topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right