Intel to rev up Atom development, executive says

Intel will accelerate development of the Atom processor, according to an executive, marking a different tack than the slow-but-steady strategy to date.

The Atom chip is used most prominently in Netbooks, and its hallmark has been power efficiency--not speed. But Intel will put more focus on speed, according to Sean Maloney, an Intel executive vice president.

"We'll spin Atom more frequently. Do more like a tick-tock on Atom. Make it faster, faster, faster," said Maloney in an interview at Intel Developer Forum last week.

The tick-tock Maloney refers to is Intel's strategy for its mainstream processors: one year--the tick--Intel delivers new manufacturing process technology; the next year--the tock--it delivers a new processor microarchitecture.

Atom is slated to get its biggest makeover to date with a technology code-named Pine Trail, due at the end of this year--or early next year, at the latest. This will put the graphics function directly on the central processing unit, or CPU--a first for Intel.

And what does this single-chip processor-graphics combination mean? "Better battery life. But performance more than anything," Maloney said.

Intel executive vice president Sean Maloney

(Credit: Stephen Shankland, CNET News)

Intel will likely ratchet up processor speeds. The Netbook-based Atom chip has been holding steady at about 1.6GHz for more than a year.

Another way to boost Atom's performance is to add processing cores. Currently, however, there are no plans to make Atom dual-core, at least not in the immediate future for the low-power Netbook market. Intel already sells a relatively power-hungry dual-core Atom for tiny desktop PCs called Nettops.

"We don't currently have plans to introduce dual-core Atom processors for Netbooks. But we will base our product road map on market needs," Intel said in a statement Monday.

This would be a tough call for Intel, as it now walks a fine line between Netbook and notebook processors. Intel already has very power-efficient dual-core notebook processors such as the Ultra-Low-Voltage Pentium SU4100 and Core 2 Duo SU7300.

These chips are now used in so-called "ultrathin" laptops that claim up to 10 hours of battery life. But these are different processor architectures and, at least theoretically, would not be able to achieve the power efficiency of a dual-core Atom. Nor would they be used in laptops as inexpensive as Netbooks.

[Yelonde]

The atom is a decent processor, and although I understand that it is a budget product, I seriously think that intel should speed it up.

[Forked_Tongue]

Oh well if Intel doesn't want my money then I'll wait and see if either Via dual-core nano with an nVidia gpu comes out or if Amd will with a cheap low energy dual-core with an Ati gpu. In fact if some of the arm processors with Linux makes their way in I'll consider them as well since I run Linux on two of my computers. I don't understand Intel's reluctance to give the customers what they've asked for, a $500 or less netbook with a dual-core processor and a discrete gpu (nVidia with a dual-core atom), hopefully their competition is listening, some of us are about the hardware and not the name brand.

[man_w_balls]

They won't sell dual-core Atom's in netbooks/laptops until they have gouged enough money from the ripoff Core2 lineup.

[fdunn3]

I think AMD may have changed Intels bottom end pricing when they came out with the Phenom II 620 & 630 Quad Cores but with no L3 cache. You would think this would be a disadvantage to Intels Quads but at $95-$100 the 620 is besting the Q8300 and the 630 at $120-$130 is besting the Intel Q9400 both almost twice the price.

I think Intels price list will change this month.