July 27, 2009 4:50 PM PDT

Samsung chip hits 1GHz. Is it bound for the iPhone?

by Brooke Crothers
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 18 comments

On Monday, Samsung and Intrinsity jointly announced one of the fastest processors to date aimed at devices like Apple's iPhone.

Samsung-Intrinsity chip bound for iPhone and/or iPhone-class devices?

Samsung-Intrinsity chip bound for iPhone and/or iPhone-class devices?

(Credit: Apple)

The new 1GHz chip co-developed by Austin, Texas-based Intrinsity and Samsung is similar to the processor that currently powers the iPhone 3GS: a 600MHz Samsung processor based on the ARM Cortex A8 design. U.K.-based ARM licenses its low-power chip designs to many of the world's largest chip suppliers including Samsung, Texas Instruments, Qualcomm, and, more recently, Nvidia.

The new Samsung-Intrinsity chip, code-named "Hummingbird," could be bound for a future iPhone or like device. "Yes, I think it's possible," said Tom R. Halfhill, senior analyst at the Microprocessor Report.

"Samsung could drop Hummingbird into the existing S5PC100 design with few or no changes," Halfhill said in response to an e-mail query, referring to the S5PC100 processor now used in the iPhone 3GS. "Bingo! A next-gen iPhone that could run at speeds up to 1.0GHz," he said.

Halfhill added that Samsung will likely use Hummingbird for future smartphones and discussed Hummingbird at length in an article that appeared Monday in the Microprocessor Report, where he also addressed the possibility of the chip making its way into a future Apple device.

Increasingly sophisticated smartphones will demand faster processors, according to Halfhill. One way to get there is cranking up the chip's speed--referred to as "clock speed"--something that ARM has not emphasized in the past because its designs, to date, have been all about power efficiency not about high-performance.

But that is changing. "The biggest challenge in mobile processor core design and implementation is to achieve high clock speed performance while keeping the power consumption low," said Jae Cheol Son, vice president, SOC Platform Development, System LSI Division, Samsung Electronics, in a statement.

And there's plenty of competition--one of the hallmarks of the ARM chip industry. Qualcomm is currently shipping a 1GHz ARM chip that is used in the recently-announced Toshiba TG01 smartphone. And Texas Instruments has announced that its future OMAP chips will pack multiple processing cores and hit GHz speeds.

In Intrinsity's case, to get to 1GHz it uses a 45-nanometer manufacturing process. Most ARM chips on the market today use a 65-nanometer or "fatter" process. Typically, the smaller the chip's geometries, the faster and more power efficient it is.

According to market researcher Forward Concepts, the ARM's Cortex-A family could account for about half of the total market for mobile application processors by 2013. The main processor in a smartphone is called an application processor.

Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. Follow Brooke on Twitter @mbrookec.
Recent posts from Nanotech - The Circuits Blog
Leaked HP, Gateway 'Core i3' laptops are low-cost
Reinventing the MacBook Air
Unannounced HP 210 Netbook 'in stock'
Verizon sees rise of 'slate' computers in 2010
Microsoft, Intel to cede tablet market to Apple?
iPhone vs. BlackBerry in the California outback
Broadcom, Nvidia bring HD video to new Netbooks
Intel launches redesigned Atom chip for Netbooks
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (18 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by MyRightEye July 27, 2009 4:53 PM PDT
Tablet.
Reply to this comment
by cvaldes1831 July 27, 2009 5:43 PM PDT
If the tablet is a product placed somewhere between the iPhone and the MacBook Pro, it is questionable whether or not a smartphone processor is adequately powerful enough to cover the functions that Apple would want this phantom tablet to perform.

Nay, I think the next generation iPhone will have ARM processors designed in-house by P.A. Semi.
by tipoo_ July 27, 2009 6:02 PM PDT
P.A Semi makes PowerPC processors, not ARM. That buyout still doesnt make sence to me.
by cvaldes1831 July 27, 2009 6:12 PM PDT
It was reported a couple of weeks ago that P.A. Semi was split into two teams, one working on an ARM processor for the next-generation iPhone, the other working on a processor for a tablet.

Could the tablet be another ARM design? A PowerPC design?

http://deals.venturebeat.com/2009/07/13/look-for-pa-semis-chip-designs-in-upcoming-apple-tablet/

Here's an older Cnet article mentioning the ARM design work at P.A. Semi:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10041809-37.html
by ca5ter July 27, 2009 6:41 PM PDT
The Ford Phone interface will be much better than the iPhone or the Pre. It has a rock solid graphics platform and works on all types of cell networks. Once it hits the stores in 2010, I'm sure it will use this chip.
by ikramerica--2008 July 27, 2009 5:16 PM PDT
Gelcap.
Reply to this comment
by baconstang July 27, 2009 6:29 PM PDT
Soft chew.
by Mergatroid Mania July 27, 2009 7:31 PM PDT
"The new Samsung-Intrinsity chip, code-named "Hummingbird," could be bound for a future iPhone or like device. "Yes, I think it's possible," said Tom R. Halfhill, senior analyst at the Microprocessor Report."

Or like device? Did you just use the name iPhone to try and get more clicks? The article should have been called "Samsung chip hits 1GHz. Is it bound for Mobile Phones?", or "Is it bound for Smart Phones?"

I bet Tom R. Halfhill would have said yes to either of those. In other words, this article really has nothing to do with iPhones, but rather with smart phones in general.

I've noticed more and more writers at CNet are using "iPhone" in the titles to their articles when it is actually about all mobile phones.

What a cheap way to get clicks.
Reply to this comment
by jakeZ2 July 27, 2009 8:05 PM PDT
I agree, but it's the same all around the web. Everyone is on the bandwagon now. Hopefully the wheels will break before too long, it's really getting, sad, boring and old. There are a lot of exciting devices out there, that just are not getting coverage. Too bad for us readers I guess.
by baconstang July 27, 2009 9:42 PM PDT
Such is the price of fame.
by CristGarage July 28, 2009 4:06 AM PDT
Wait just one minute. Let me get this right, you're saying there are OTHER smart phones?? Has that been confirmed?
by cnetpre July 28, 2009 7:08 AM PDT
I also agree. Writing news articles and choosing their headlines are supposed to be held at a higher standard. This sounds more like news for the Samsung combined with editorial and personal opinions to try to put iPhone on a pedestal despite the fact that all smartphones in general are capable of utilizing a 1GHz chip. Case in point, the Palm Pre currently uses the 600MHz OMAP chip from Texas Instruments and can also easily be swapped with the 1GHz chip.
by Someone-else July 28, 2009 7:32 AM PDT
I agree, many sites use it, but Cnet is exaggerating, every single article they write needs to mention either the iPhone or the MacBook. I really liked Cnet, but it's making me come here less, because I'm tired of all this iPhone, MacBook or whatever Apple do.

It remembers me this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BnLbv6QYcA
by mattmarkel July 27, 2009 10:02 PM PDT
Is a faster chip going to make the network faster? This video demonstrates the speed of the AT&T network vs. using the iPhone with a Sprint Mi-FI.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZHRgNtNj9M
Reply to this comment
by Button Boy July 28, 2009 8:22 AM PDT
What is this "iPhone" of which they speak?
Reply to this comment
by Spanwite July 28, 2009 9:03 AM PDT
600, 800 and now 1000Mhz this is the way it goes.
The wireless Networks are the bottleneck, nothing will change that so soon.
The latest iPhone just came out last month, so it's still 11month to go for the next one! And by then Apple will use the Chip designers and Company's they bought to make there own unique chips. Then they will have something new again no one else has. No Copycat possible, possible many steps ahead of the competition again!
Reply to this comment
by TCVG29C July 28, 2009 12:36 PM PDT
The S5PC100 is not in the iPhone 3G S, despite all the reports that it is. It won't
be in production until 2010. iPhone has custom device that is only fabbed by Samsung.
It may share some IP, but it is NOT S5PC100.
Reply to this comment
by ARM-Linux_CEO July 29, 2009 12:24 PM PDT
Apple's #1 goal in life (after creating a good product) is to prevent others from copying it.
That's why they've bought a chip-design company.
So NO they aren't going to base their money-mill i-Phone on a CPU that anybody can buy and build clones with!
Reply to this comment
(18 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Nanotech - The Circuits Blog

Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Nanotech - The Circuits Blog topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right