May 12, 2009 8:50 PM PDT

Intel: Some Netbook resellers saw 30% return rate

by Brooke Crothers
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 31 comments

Netbooks had a rocky start last year in some markets, Intel's marketing chief said at the Intel investor meeting Tuesday.

"In the first period--June, July, August of last year--there were some in the retail channels that were shipping (Netbooks) as notebooks," Sean Maloney said in a question-and-answer session that was streamed over the Web. "They were running ads that had a continuum of notebooks and had this Netbooky thing in there--it was called a notebook. They had very high return rates and a couple of these guys had return rates in the 30 percent range, which is a disaster."

Maloney continued. "So we gently went back to some of those chains and said if you segment them differently and state up front what they do and don't do, things will be healthier. You've seen some of the European channels saying this (Netbook) product does not do X and being very black and white and very clear."

Intel's marketing chief Sean Maloney showed this slide Tuesday and did a live demonstration showing what a Netbook can't do.

Intel's marketing chief Sean Maloney showed this slide Tuesday and did a live demonstration showing what a Netbook can't do.

(Credit: Intel)

At the investor meeting, Intel demonstrated on stage the performance gap between a Netbook and a mainstream notebook. In the demonstration, a Netbook and a notebook ran the same high-definition video of the NBA basketball playoffs. The video on the Atom processor-powered Netbook was jerky and dropped frames, while the Core 2 chip-based notebook's video was smooth.

The point was obvious: the Netbook's Atom silicon falls short in performing some tasks that a mainstream notebook handles with relative ease.

Along these lines, it also became clear at the meeting that there is a struggle brewing to clearly define to consumers the difference between Netbooks and upcoming ultra-thin notebooks, also referred to as the Consumer Ultra-Low-Voltage or CULV category of laptops. CULV notebooks--due in June--are expected to be priced in a market segment just above Netbooks.

Intel executives were peppered with questions from the audience--mostly representatives from Wall Street firms--about Netbooks. One audience member wondered whether Intel "had considered doing an informational advertising campaign" and asked: "Do you find that at all necessary to clear up some of the misapprehensions about what you can and cannot do with these devices (Netbooks)?" This question elicited the response from Maloney quoted above.

Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. Follow Brooke on Twitter @mbrookec.
Recent posts from Nanotech - The Circuits Blog
Microsoft, Intel to cede tablet market to Apple?
iPhone vs. BlackBerry in the California outback
Broadcom, Nvidia bring HD video to new Netbooks
Intel launches redesigned Atom chip for Netbooks
iPhone, BlackBerry Storm offer contrast in browsers
Memo to FTC: Update your Intel dossier
Intel: New graphics, 'Core' chips coming
Nvidia CEO: FTC action 'transforms' industry
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (31 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by teachtopia May 12, 2009 9:12 PM PDT
The 30 percent number seems high. I would like to see some more data on this.
I think people generally know what they are buying and if the return rate was that high, what other factors led to this? (hardware failure? workmanship? etc..)
Reply to this comment
by BigGuns149 May 12, 2009 9:42 PM PDT
I agree with you that the return rate sound a bit high, but I think that you overestimate the intelligence of a lot of customers. While I wouldn't question that there are probably a good 5% that are DOA in some respect I wouldn't be surprised if the overall return rate was well over 10%. I remember working retail selling laptops before and I remember that easily 10-20% of sub $400 laptops I sold didn't stay sold and came back within the 15 day return period. Some of the cheap laptops came back the next day because customers had so dramatically overestimated the performance of the machines. I can't say whether my experience was typical, but at least at the store I worked in everybody else regardless of their experience of sales skills made a similar observation.

I would point out that the article noted that this was some resellers and it was referring to "June, July, August of last year," which is pretty early in the life of the netbook when a lot of people still didn't understand them. The last several times I have walked through a retail store virtually every salesperson emphasized to customers the difference between a netbook and a regular notebook. I can't say that everybody got that message in June of last year. Furthermore, even customers that do get that message tend to have pessimistic views of the pessimism of the salespeople who they view as simply trying to scheme them into buying a more expensive computer than they need.
by clamenza May 13, 2009 4:33 AM PDT
A lot of people also didn't realize the netbooks often shipped with Linux, which is still a sharp departure from the familiarity of Windows. The return rates on those were extremely high.
by ArtInvent May 13, 2009 9:52 AM PDT
Netbooks are still being returned at a very high rate, even though most of them ship with XP, not Linux. Shipping XP also makes people think this is a regular laptop that can do anything, and insures some level of disappointment. Also, almost none of the early netbooks had a version of Linux worth diddly squat. Even people who are into Linux - the first thing they would do was to wipe the system and install a different version of Linux. I can only imagine what an average person who'd never seen Linux before would have thought.

If netbooks are marketed correctly, with their limitations squarely stated up front, and if there was a highly polished version of Linux like Ubuntu Netbook Remix available, then things go much smoother. Indeed, this is basically how Dell and HP are selling their netbooks now - each continues to offer Ubuntu in slightly different versions.
by spoonman522 May 13, 2009 10:07 AM PDT
No, really dont think ppl know what they are buying sometimes. I work at a retail store and I have helped many customers who are interested in netbooks. I talk to them and try to find out what it is that they are trying to do, and often times they would be much better served buying a laptop. I explain this to them, but they rather still buy the netbook because they underestimate what it is that they are going to do with it, overestimate their capability, and are attracted by their lowprice and small form factor. Now i wouldn't say we have as high of a return as this article states, but i definitely do see more netbooks returned than i see laptops.

p.s. I'm not against netbooks, i think they are cool products, and i have sold many to customers who i believe might actually serve their purpose.
by regulator1956 May 13, 2009 10:58 AM PDT
Hey teachtopia,

"Netbooks had a rocky start last year in some markets, Intel's marketing chief said at the Intel investor meeting Tuesday."

This was at an investor meeting by Intel's marketing chief. If he's not telling the truth, you can file a Whistle Blower lawsuit and retire.
by BigGuns149 May 12, 2009 9:30 PM PDT
I somehow think that most retail salespeople realize that they are not the same thing as notebooks whereas capabilities, but I would wager that a lot of customers think that they "know" better. Having worked in retail electronics I know a lot of people who buy computers in a retail store who think that they know more than they really do. Furthermore, a lot of people are cheapstakes beyond belief. I remember years ago one situation where a customer could have gotten twice the RAM, three times the HDD space, a DVD burner instead of CD burner, and a faster processor and they only had to pay an extra $50. Even despite showing that the cheaper box took a full 25 seconds longer to boot, the customer still picked the cheaper box that was clearly penny wise and pound foolish.

Often times they would come back and complain that the computer was slow and I would reply that I am not surprised while biting my tongue to remind the customer that we told him/her that when they bought their low end computer. I know it is somewhat cliche, but you get what you pay for and a lot of people refuse to accept that.

While a lot of employees working in retail electronics stores are pretty dumb the customers that walk through the door make the idiot employees seem like geniuses. I've encountered customers who couldn't figure out how to plug in a USB keyboard. Say what you will about the idiots that most retail stores purport as trained, but a lot of customers despite admittedly knowing little about the products ignore advice to buy a higher end machine even if it comes from someone who has no stake in the transaction. I remember seeing other customers concur with the salesperson that a slightly higher end machine was a better deal, but the customer still buy the cheap machine.
Reply to this comment
by cvaldes1831 May 12, 2009 9:34 PM PDT
The tech media has reported ongoing netbook returns for many months; the 30 percent return rate matches previous reports (particularly in Europe). This isn't news. Hardware failure should probably be limited to one or two models, not an entire category of devices. The biggest problem with netbooks is that they don't do anything particularly well enough to justify their size versus smartphones.
Reply to this comment
by cvaldes1831 May 12, 2009 9:48 PM PDT
Just to mention, I live in the heart of Silicon Valley and I think I've only seen one netbook in the wild (outside of a store) in the past six months. I can go into any downtown Mountain View coffee shop and see dozens of people working on notebook computers, but no one with a netbook. It's entirely possible that people who have a poor understanding of what functionality a netbook brings are the ones who are buying (and returning them). The locals (mostly high-tech folks) probably understand how brain-damaged the current offerings of this market segment are, and are staying away. Far away.
by Cheese McBeese May 12, 2009 11:32 PM PDT
@cvaldez1831 - as soon as Apple puts out a Netbook, all the fanboys where you are will have one. Or, if Twitter branded an EEPC as a 'twitter book', it would be a must-have for all of the tweet-heads where you live. The 'heart of Silicon Valley' is not a good benchmark for mainstream society because it is VERY fad-oriented and there is far too much inbreeding. Opinions in Silicon Valley are like flags - they change with the wind.
by 3tire May 13, 2009 1:42 AM PDT
@cheese, and you know all this because you are an astute observer who did clinical research of the population of the valley or did you get annoyed by a guy once when you were driving through a couple years ago and now feel the need to spout off?
by gerrrg May 12, 2009 9:37 PM PDT
Wow. 30% return rate? I wish I could get a 30% return rate on my money market account. ;)
Reply to this comment
by spencer_tennant May 16, 2009 5:53 PM PDT
me 2 i invested in cd's my invester said they wouldn't be out dated like EightTrack but he was wrong 404 wrong :(
by oassaf May 12, 2009 9:42 PM PDT
I work at an electronics retailer and I can tell you first hand that the return rate is probably higher. And it is completely the customer feeling the know better then the sales people. I think all but 1 of the netbooks I have sold in the past 2 weeks just as an example have come back. And I even distinctly remember telling one customer "sir this is not the right product for you, I can almost guarantee you will bring it back" his reply, "No I think for my application this is the right product for me" Next day product was returned. People just see it as a cheap laptop and think it works, but they are wrong. Just like the above poster said, there is yet nothing to distinguish them from smartphones. There is barely anything a smart phone can't do that a netbook can.
Reply to this comment
by BigGuns149 May 13, 2009 12:32 AM PDT
I agreed with you right up until you claimed that there was nothing to distinguish them from a smartphone. Show me a single smartphone that can run a real office suite, nevermind a smartphone with a decent resolution for web browsing or a phone that you can type anything much more complicated than a quick text message or a brief email. Smartphones really aren't well suited for data entry. While I wouldn't write a doctoral thesis on a netbook they are large enough that you could type a considerable amount. Save for some games and some content creation tools pretty much anything else will that will run on a regular notebook will run on a netbook albeit decidedly slower. Provided the program doesn't need dedicated graphics it probably can run on a netbook, which gives FAR more programs than exist on Apple's AppStore or any similar mobile application repositories.

Smartphones are neat and useful no question about it and they have their purposes, but there is a certain niche of customers where a netbook would make sense. That being said I think due to their low price customers want to believe that a netbook can do more than it really can. While I haven't worked in an electronics retailer recently, even back when I did people had a similar behavior of trying to rationalize a lower end purchase than is ideal for their purpose.
by renGek May 13, 2009 10:48 AM PDT
remote desktop which is really what netbooks should only do.
by primejunta May 12, 2009 10:01 PM PDT
Funny, I'm posting this from a netbook (Acer Aspire One running Jaunty Netbook Remix). And I have a smartphone. As I'm posting, I'm drinking my morning coffee. This is something I can do from a netbook but not my smartphone -- the phone's screen is too small to comfortably read the article, its processor is too slow to comfortably render the page, and its keyboard is WAY too small to easily type a reply.

I bought this machine on a whim last year, and somewhat to my surprise it's found its niche. It kinda replaces the morning paper -- it's approximately as portable, only networked. I'd never use it as my primary computer, though, and I don't think I would even if it was ten times more powerful.

I think the return rate may be related to Linux, by the way. If you're expecting Windows, it'll be a bit of a shock, especially the rather ugly and Spartan variants usually factory-installed on these things.
Reply to this comment
by No invasion of privacy May 13, 2009 1:45 AM PDT
Then you evidently bought completely the wrong "smartphone" as I can do all of that with extreme ease on mine.
by Cheese McBeese May 12, 2009 11:23 PM PDT
The disappointment with Netbooks is understandable and should have been expected. Consumer expectations were badly mismanaged. Netbooks are Web optimized devices. What operating systems do they ship with? PC operating systems. Duh!!! Does anybody see a problem here? If I see a Windows desktop (or even a Linux desktop) and I am conditioned to run PC apps on it, that's what I'll do. And I'll be disappointed.

Game consoles are gaming optimized PCs. They don't ship with windows or Linux. When you turn them on, it's clear that they are gaming machines. Netbooks need that kind of optimization or they will fail. The device companies built cost-reduced laptops and called them netbooks but nobody thought about optimizing the software. BIG mistake. BIG! Maybe even big enough to kill the category if they don't react quickly. Right now, Netbooks are being perceived as crappy laptops, not as Web optimized browser devices. BIG mistake. BIG BIG BIG!
Reply to this comment
by forever4now May 13, 2009 12:49 AM PDT
I agree. Running Windows on netbooks raises expectations that it is just a smaller, slower, cheaper Windows notebook.

If netbooks shipped with a smartphone OS (e.g. Android, Symbian, WinMo, etc.), included smartphone hardware (3G, GPS, accelerometer, compass, touchscreen, etc.) and supported cell phone calls, consumers would view them as a smartphone with a larger keyboard & display and adjust their expectations to that.

Certainly some people who just do basic things (email, web browsing, etc.) could use it as their only machine, but most people would still have a more powerful notebook/desktop, to do desktop-type things.
by zyxxy May 13, 2009 5:26 AM PDT
By this fall you will start to see Netbooks that are much closer to being a smartphone. Full 3G support along with WiFi and running Android/Symbian/WinMo. The battery run times will also be considerably longer. As you stated, they won't be confused with PCs, they will just be web connected devices with reasonable displays and keyboards. Just right for browsing and 'cloud' computing, but of no use for PC apps. I think that will resolve a lot of the perception conflicts.
by winstein May 13, 2009 4:45 AM PDT
Comparing Netbooks to Notebooks are silly. Many people use Netbooks as portable media players with Internet. They should just position Netbooks between iPod Touch and a Laptop, not as a low-end computer.
Reply to this comment
by baconstang May 13, 2009 12:55 PM PDT
Exactly, that's why have a Touch and a laptop. Don't think I'll be trading them in for a Netbook though.
by MadLyb May 13, 2009 5:46 AM PDT
First, give it a cheap price.

Then, have every media outlet between here and moon continuously spout off about how cool they are.

And you will have a lot of people buy one with unrealistic expectations.

I started to even believe these things might be useful, but 10 mins of playing with one reminded me that I like big screens and fullsize keyboards combined with hardware that can run all of my applications, not just my browser and email clients.
Reply to this comment
by ilsthey May 13, 2009 11:52 AM PDT
I think many people on this technology discussion list under estimate how many people out there do just that with their computers... browser the internet and read e-mails.

I'm am expecting our first netbook computer by FedEx before the end of this week. We got it as a promotion with the new laptop I bought myself this past weekend. The laptop is going to be the most powerful hardware I've ever owned, 2GHz quad core CPU with 8GB of memory. I expect this laptop will never actually run sitting on my lap, not without insulation between it and my legs anyways.

But we started shopping for a new portable computer because my wife's five year old laptop is beginning to fail. I was expecting to shop separately for a laptop and a nettop before serendipitously finding the nice package deal. The reason? For the last 5 years, the only thing my wife has ever done on her computer: read email and browse the internet.

But I agree, with many statements that many customers either through their own optimistic expectations or misinformation have gotten something that did not meet their needs.
by Raabscuttle May 13, 2009 10:10 AM PDT
What do you expect from a processot that runs at half the speed of a Celeron. Maybe if they called it Celeron SX or Celeron Lite that people may get he point that it is an underpowered processor originally aimsed at the MID market, not MIDs masquarading as laptops.
Reply to this comment
by NWLB May 13, 2009 10:28 AM PDT
I use the Acer Aspire One, even manage to play LOTRO rather well using it. Watched the presidential inauguration with it. That said, I un-installed every single bit of bloatware that came with the system, disabled the Windows XP Luna theme, and setup a page file using only the SD card I put into it. And I can make the thing do most anything I need within reason. The size is right, the price is right.

These netbooks are a bigger possible market than Sony's PSP, or even the Kindle, if they are done right.
Reply to this comment
by renGek May 13, 2009 10:51 AM PDT
I think a large part of the blame for the cruddy jerky video playback is the wonderful *sarcastic* intel integrated graphics. Those 3 words will always turn me away from a product regardless of the said product's feature set. They should change the name of that thing because its become an ongoing joke.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan May 13, 2009 11:02 AM PDT
Netbook + Win7 = Great combination.

By this time next year, I expect netbooks will be likely in every home. It's the perfect school sized device too- not heavy like larger laptops and still as a good keyboard to keep up with note taking. Heck, you can even record a lecture if you really want to with the on board microphone or webcam.

If/when Apple releases one, it will be more expensive than the rest, but should still be affordable. The danger to this is that it may cannibalize sales of their entry level notebooks. It's a tricky area for them to deal with. There's obviously a lot of money to be made in that market and to ignore it is to lose out entirely.
Reply to this comment
by baconstang May 13, 2009 12:58 PM PDT
If Apple does come out with a Netbook like device, I'll bet they won't have a 30% return rate. Not even 3%.
Reply to this comment
by mailbox001 May 13, 2009 2:27 PM PDT
I got my wife a Dell Mini 9 a few months ago and she loves it. She uses for college work, mostly Internet, email and Word. But she doesn't have any issues with it. She knows it not as powerful as other laptops, but for her situation and the small size, its perfect.
Reply to this comment
(31 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Nanotech - The Circuits Blog

Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Nanotech - The Circuits Blog topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right