February 5, 2009 9:30 PM PST

Intel delays 'Tukwila' server chip--again

by Brooke Crothers
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 2 comments

Intel has delayed a high-end server chip, billed as the world's first 2 billion transistor microprocessor, originally expected as long ago as 2007.

Tukwila is a quad-core update to the Itanium processor, which has had a less-than-promising run since the original version was announced back in 2001. The chip's architecture--based on explicit instruction-level parallelism--is a radical departure from the x86 design used in PCs today. It was believed at one time that Itanium would replace x86 chips in many Intel-based computers.

So, what's delaying it this time? Intel has "made some engineering enhancements to the Tukwila platform," according to a statement Thursday from Intel. As one enhancement, Tukwila and its follow-on processors on the Itanium roadmap, Poulson and Kittson, will be socket compatible. Intel is also introducing a technology called "scalable buffered memory" to Tukwila platforms. Scalable buffered memory enables higher memory capacities and uses newer DDR3 (Double Data Rate, third generation) memory.

The number of CPU pins that can be dedicated to a memory interface is limited. Scalable buffered memory acts as a memory expander by connecting to multiple DDR3 RDIMMs (Registered Dual In-line Memory Modules) for each CPU memory interface, thus increasing the total memory capacity compared to natively attached memory configurations, according to an explanation provided by Intel.

"Validation testing of the Tukwila processor with the new memory will move the Tukwila platform launch from early '09 to mid '09," and Intel spokesperson said.

Current and past users of Itanium processors include Hewlett-Packard, SGI, NEC, Fujitsu, Unisys, and Hitachi.

The processors are targeted at high-end enterprise servers and high-performance computing systems.

Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. Follow Brooke on Twitter @mbrookec.
Recent posts from Nanotech - The Circuits Blog
Reinventing the MacBook Air
Unannounced HP 210 Netbook 'in stock'
Verizon sees rise of 'slate' computers in 2010
Microsoft, Intel to cede tablet market to Apple?
iPhone vs. BlackBerry in the California outback
Broadcom, Nvidia bring HD video to new Netbooks
Intel launches redesigned Atom chip for Netbooks
iPhone, BlackBerry Storm offer contrast in browsers
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
by iamarcin February 6, 2009 8:41 AM PST
will it be better then the I7?

I did a lot of searching before putting together my desktop in January09. Heard the i7architecture is best and will not be topped for 2 years. Didn't hear anything about this line. I assumed that since itanium wasn't that popular it was crap and not be continued. I am using 3.0itanium at work and my dual code 1.6 athalon home laptop is better. Same amount of ram. Just have heat issues on laptop with high cpu use.
Reply to this comment
by Mr. Dee February 7, 2009 11:59 AM PST
They are two very different platforms, Itanium competes where the CoreI7 is not designed to go. Its a RISC based processor used for massive database warehousing, OLTP and other types of scenarios. Intel has been working on this thing since the late 80's and its still suffering. Not even Microsoft could have saved it with a 64 bit version of Windows. I once thought that Itanium would truly be the successor to x86-x64, but with these constant promises and delays, looks like another good technology in theory.
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Nanotech - The Circuits Blog

Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Nanotech - The Circuits Blog topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right