Venture firm picks up Transmeta chip patents
Updated at 10:45 p.m. PST with additional information about Intellectual Ventures
Intellectual Ventures has acquired the patent portfolio of Transmeta, an erstwhile supplier of low-power Intel-compatible x86 processors.
Intellectual Venture Funding, an affiliate of Intellectual Ventures, has picked up 140 U.S. patents and additional pending patent applications owned by Transmeta, which was acquired by privately held Novafora in November of last year.
The Transmeta technology will be used "through two distinct routes," according to an Intellectual Ventures' statement. Novafora will improve its own proprietary designs by using some of the technologies invented by Transmeta. And Intellectual Ventures will provide other companies with access to Transmeta's former patent rights under non-exclusive licensing terms.
The portfolio contains many patents issued in the last few years and has generated, in total, approximately $300 million in revenue, the firm said.
Transmeta's claim to fame as a low-power x86-compatible chip supplier was transitory, and in 2007, about seven years after the company formed, it restructured and ceased being a chipmaker. It reorganized as a Rambus-like IP (intellectual property) company that sues other companies for patent infringement. Transmeta's technology is centered on "code morphing" techniques and very long instruction word (VLIW) design architecture.
"These (patent) additions cover inventions in high-performance, low-power, and embedded processors," Paul Reidy, vice president of semiconductor licensing at Intellectual Ventures, said in a statement.
Intellectual Ventures was founded by Nathan Myhrvold after he retired from his position as chief strategist and chief technology officer of Microsoft.
Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. Follow Brooke on Twitter @mbrookec. 




Of course that is what HE would say, as someone who represents the firm that just PAID MONEY for the patents he is describing. Why not actually ask someone who looks like (even a little bit) an impartial professional in the computer architecture industry?
I haven't seen that much of what TransMeta was doing, but what I did see awhile back looked like a direction I don't expect to be successful in a market that is now heavily focused on low-power multi-core designs.
LT: "patents are very much used to stop competition, which is undeniably the most powerful way to encourage innovation. Anybody who argues for patents is basically arguing against open markets and competition," (http://www.simple-talk.com/opinion/geek-of-the-week/linus-torvalds,-geek-of-the-week/)
looks like Linus has changed his mind and is (at least indirectly) selling his inventions to pure IP player.
In Transmeta IPR portfolio Linus is inventor or co-inventor of at least 8 issued US patents: US7404181, US7331041, US7111096, US7096460, US6990658, US6880152, US6714904, US6615300 and US6594821
- by inachu February 2, 2009 12:34 PM PST
- So far from the last few years. Anyone who buys a portfolio of patents then they go class action lawsuit crazy.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by mikeburek February 6, 2009 4:07 AM PST
- I wonder what the lifestyle of IP lawyers is. Long days or short days? Houses like the movie stars?
- Like this
-
(9 Comments)It seems that once they get hired, the IP lawyers have unending billable hours.