• On CBS MoneyWatch: The perfect car for a teenager
January 22, 2009 3:35 PM PST

AMD CEO sees Netbooks going away

by Brooke Crothers
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 31 comments

Advanced Micro Devices' chief executive predicts that Netbooks will eventually disappear. This thinking, though obviously favorable to AMD's strategy, isn't completely at odds with Intel's.

The lightweight HP Pavilion dv2, which uses the AMD Neo processor, is marketed as a notebook

The lightweight HP Pavilion dv2, which uses the AMD Neo processor, is marketed as a notebook

(Credit: Hewlett-Packard)

"The distinction between what is a Netbook and what is a notebook is going to go away," AMD CEO Dirk Meyer said Thursday in the company's earnings conference call.

"There will be a continuum of price points and form factors," he said.

"Given the way Netbooks are configured today, consumers who want a notebook at those kind of (low) price points have to compromise and as a result don't enjoy a full PC experience, particularly around the graphics and media capability of the machine," Meyer said. "And likewise people who wanted a thin and light machine had to pay a lot of money, typically well over a thousand dollars."

Upcoming inexpensive ultra-thin notebooks will meet the need for a small, thin, lightweight laptop that is more powerful than a Netbook, Meyer said.

This sentiment is actually backed up to some extent by Intel's recent behavior. Intel CEO Paul Otellini, in that company's earnings conference call last week, spoke oddly of Netbooks in the past tense. He said the buzz around Netbooks at the Consumer Electronics Show "validates our view that (the market) had a high potential for growth and it was an exciting segment, in particular in this kind of economic environment." (Emphasis added.) Otellini did add, however, that he expected Intel "would do very well in the Netbook market in the course of the next couple of years."

Whether his use of tense is just a way to refer to the Netbook market to date or a Freudian slip tied to Intel's intention to bring out new mainstream Core architecture chips for inexpensive thin notebooks later in the year, is not clear. This chip platform could potentially suck a lot of the enthusiasm out of the Netbook market.

And Intel has small plans for its Atom processor in 2009. Aside from a tiny increase in processor speed and a slight improvement in graphics, nothing big is slated for the platform. Is the demise of the Netbook market as we know it today something both AMD and Intel agree on? We'll see.

Brooke Crothers has been an editor at large at CNET News, an analyst at IDC Japan, and an editor at The Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, among other endeavors, including co-manager of an after-school math-and-reading center. He writes for the CNET Blog Network and is not a current employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Recent posts from Nanotech - The Circuits Blog
AMD: Our claims about Intel have been 'ratified'
AMD talks 'Hemlock' graphics, next ultra-thin laptops
Intel Celeron chip anchors $249 Acer Windows 7 laptop
Nvidia CEO says 'no' to Intel-compatible chip
First iPhone, now Droid. Who needs Windows?
One charge hard to level at Intel: Raising prices
Nvidia CEO unsurprised by Intel lawsuit
N.Y. lawsuit details Intel's 'largesse' toward Dell
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (31 Comments)
by emoslayer6224 January 22, 2009 4:09 PM PST
AMD CEO is getting jealous.
Reply to this comment
by chrisfrary January 22, 2009 4:29 PM PST
So basically just the name. What a misleading title! The 2 wouldn't be so stupid to bypass a market like this.
Reply to this comment
by superswiss January 22, 2009 4:38 PM PST
I never understood the justification behind creating a whole new device category for these things. As far as I'm concerned, Netbooks are just compact underpowered notebooks so far and the lines between a notebook and netbook have already started to blur indicating that trying to box these things into its own category is not going so well.
Reply to this comment
by bakedpatato January 22, 2009 4:41 PM PST
Title is misleading...makes you think that AMD is crying over spilled milk that they don't have a Atom competitor.
should say that the name "netbook" is goin away.
But the distinction will always remain, as people like me will want to buy laptops(and shell out the mega bucks, even if it means taking out a second mortgage :)) to play the latest games on them, and not even Ion can play Crysis, for example.
Reply to this comment
by dennisl59 January 22, 2009 4:42 PM PST
Maybe he should have given Michael Dell a heads up. Dell has an entire product line based on this Product Set and they're already on their Outlet Site. Thank You.
Reply to this comment
by gocard January 22, 2009 5:12 PM PST
Is this even a statement? So he's saying that in the future, they can develop small, lightweight laptops which can handle applications that require more processing power than current "netbooks". Was there a segment of the population who thought this wasn't possible?
Reply to this comment
by pithenumber January 22, 2009 5:42 PM PST
Intel, they gave us a 60MHz increase in clock speed.
by gocard January 22, 2009 5:13 PM PST
I forgot to add "inexpensive"
Reply to this comment
by sundance808 January 22, 2009 6:24 PM PST
its just semantics.. the netbooks of today are better spec'd than the 'average' laptop 3 years ago.. the question is, what version of windows will consumers finally get that will merit ditching XP? Vista (with its fancy graphics and UI) is a resource hog (in memory and processing) that's why the chip makers love it (will increase demand for higher spec'd chips of course) when that didnt happen, well the netbooks appeared and now its more popular then the notebooks. Bottom line is, its increasingly difficult for consumers to buy a higher priced product (ie notebook) when a lower priced one is more than adequate.. meyer had it the other way around, we're already seeing netbooks becoming more powerful while (still) remaining relatively cheap.
Reply to this comment
by pithenumber January 23, 2009 7:53 AM PST
What version? Windows 7, even the Ultimate version that we get as Beta is fast on netbooks, they're going to release a netbook version too.
by nutso101 January 22, 2009 6:46 PM PST
Netbooks are currently holding their own. However, the price of flash based storage is still high for larger capacities. If consumers get tired of waiting for prices to fall so they can get more storage, I feel the popularity of these devices will start to dissolve over time before they can get to be more mainstream.
Reply to this comment
by BigGuns149 January 22, 2009 7:25 PM PST
That is a pretty silly and downright ignorant statement seeing as a lot of nebooks use HDDs. Sure a lot of the early eeePCs used flash memory, but most of the popular netbooks (eg. Acer Aspire, most of the newer eeePCs, MSI wind, etc.) all use HDDs. The only netbook right now in the top 20 in sales on Amazon that has a SSD is the eeePC 1000. While I think given enough time I think SSDs will be the norm on netbooks, at least for the next year or so HDDs will remain more popular even on netbooks where the use of 1.8" drives make the premium for SSDs much less.
by BigGuns149 January 22, 2009 7:53 PM PST
A lot of statements by AMD's CEO are silly if not downright ignorant. Some of the highlights include:

"There will be a continuum of price points and form factors"

So are you telling me that aren't numerous form factors now? There are notebooks for various users that are as light a 2 lbs and as heavy as 15 lbs. There are models with displays as little as 7" and going through 20.1". There are models for performance all the way from low end like the Intel Atom all the way to quad core models. Maybe AMDs product line is only midrange, but Intel seems to realize that there is a broad spectrum of interests and for the most part they have a product to meet interests across the board.

Another funny one was:

"Given the way Netbooks are configured today, consumers who want a notebook at those kind of (low) price points have to compromise and as a result don't enjoy a full PC experience, particularly around the graphics and media capability of the machine"

I think most people realize that they are making a tradeoff. Having sold computers in the past I knew a lot of people who weren't really interested in a full PC experience. While a lot of people won't want to make said tradeoff there is more than enough demand for such laptops to justify their sale.
Reply to this comment
by pithenumber January 23, 2009 7:55 AM PST
looking at return rates, not everyone knows about the tradeoff.
by Maccess January 23, 2009 12:21 AM PST
The best "NetBook" is a decent fast, but lightweight computer that can dock to a full desktop setup. Wait: Apple already did that with the Duos (which unfortunately had awful built-in keyboards), and so did IBM with the X20 and X30 series computers. The x40 and x60 also, although these lost the ability to dock with the various thinkpad docks. Even a Dual core atom would be ideal, but the problem is that would need to have Vista, because XP for Netbooks licensing is limited to single core processors.
Reply to this comment
by pithenumber January 23, 2009 7:57 AM PST
Windows 7, remember that. Runs on netbooks blazing fast.
by ferretboy88 January 26, 2009 4:33 AM PST
X61 Rock on!.
by nutso101 January 23, 2009 12:45 AM PST
Using a regular HD on netbooks is just a way to appease consumers while hoping flash memory prices come down quick enough so they can replace them at that time. Also now, you have a form factor problem using HD's. The devices run hotter than flash, heavier, slower, more prone to failure than flash. A lot of negatives. Not an improvement at all. At this point they are mini "laptops" with very limited functionality. Another reason to see if they will remain popular.
Reply to this comment
by 3bgl January 23, 2009 2:48 AM PST
Asus, the first netbook seller, always reffered to the EeePC as a low-cost sub-notebook. The name "netbook" was made up buy the media (CNET "specialists" on the top, big time) a way later than Sony started to call it a "race-to-the-bottom".

After making it up, now you say it's going away? Now that Sony has reported unprecedented loss?! Along with other CNET article that says netbooks are dead??!
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13512_3-10145482-23.html

Did I just reveal the scheme? How much is Sony paying CNET for such a campaign against the low-cost sub-notebooks? Sounds like manipulation to me.
Reply to this comment
by 3rdalbum January 24, 2009 1:09 AM PST
The name "netbook" was not made up by the media - it was made up by Intel.

I hope that Intel stops putting resources into netbook architecture, and that AMD never enters it. It would be a good chance for ARM and MIPS (read: Non-Windows-compatible) processors to make their way into netbooks. Naturally, they'd need to run Linux or Unix...

I think the netbook market will probably grow, and stimulate the rebirth of the desktop market. People having a desktop computer for real processing power, and a netbook for out-and-about. That's a much better idea than buying a "desktop-replacement" laptop that is not really very powerful and not very portable. Netbooks are good enough really; I use mine as a miniature media centre playing H.264 videos on my TV!
by basraw January 23, 2009 7:04 AM PST
Sony is making great strides on their small powerful laptops - but they are expensive.

For portability - the netbooks are great. Once we hit 10 hr run time on battery for netbooks - that'll be even greater!
Reply to this comment
by ggibson1 January 23, 2009 10:24 AM PST
NetBooks are nothing more than a name. I owned a "tiny laptop" back in the late 90s and it was novel, but it was under powered, too small keyboard, too small screen, external cd drive/floppy drive ... just like NetBooks today. Netbooks cost about $400... I can get a full fledged laptop for about that which includes all the extras like Lightscribe DVD drive etc off Ebay or even TigerDirect. In fact that is exactly what I did for my wife for college. My Verizon Windows Mobile phone is just as useful and a whole lot smaller and convenient.

Netbooks do not give the best bang for the buck and never will... laptops continue to get cheaper and will easily absorb whatever is left of the netbook market in the next two years. Why spend the money on one of these when the very next app my daughter wants to use may not run well or at all on it? Yet I can get a laptop for about the same price and it will for sure?
Reply to this comment
by gthurman January 23, 2009 10:24 AM PST
In today's economy, it is as likely to see a CEO dropped, as a product line. When I entered the 'super-computer' market several years ago, I quickly learned R&D was whatever the CEO wanted it to reveal.
Having used a netbook for a month, I'm waiting for the tabletpc versions to ship. That should provide, not a notebook, but a 'super-PDA'; larger screen, larger storage, WinXP and/or Linux programs. Anyone that has Wi-Fi in the house, should try a netbook. It's the electronic umbilical to the e-world that cell phones didn't realize. Look for movies at the lunch table, check the sales from the breakfast table. Or just look up those endless things your wife asks while watching Fringe, Eleventh Hour or CSI.
Reply to this comment
by cnetcommentor January 23, 2009 10:41 AM PST
to me netbooks are a great alternative to itouch .. just waiting for a nice touch netbook now ..
Reply to this comment
by happyweasel January 23, 2009 12:20 PM PST
I guess I kinda agree that the word "netbook" is going to disappear. Netbooks are 1. Laptop minus optical drive 2. (ultra)Portable (a standard laptop is movable but hardly portable) 3. Energy Efficient (how long does your honkin' laptop last?) 4. Connectivity focused. This naturally will be the future laptop market. The overriding limitation of today's "netbooks" are not the processor (though Atoms and similar will appear and improve) but rather graphics. Most currently use Intel's junky integrated graphics but that is changing this year. Nvidia's Ion gpu (9400) is inevitably the next standard bearer... not to mention touch screens *shivers*.
"Netbooks" are/ will be driving laptop innovation. Lines WILL disappear.
* & for the record, The Macbook Air is a netbook... an absurdly expensive netbook
Reply to this comment
by petermpham2003 January 23, 2009 12:34 PM PST
No wonder why AMD is losing $B.
Reply to this comment
by Dan_Ackerman January 23, 2009 2:56 PM PST
It's rare that I jump into these things, but there's some nonsense here that needs to be set straight. Obviously both Intel and AMD (and Dell, HP, Acer, etc.) would love to sell you more expensive, higher-margin products rather than less expensive, low-margin products.

To this end, all parties involved have disparaged the Netbook concept to some degree, but it's clearly a case of trying to push consumers towards the products they want to sell you, rather than creating the products consumers are demanding.

On another note, all public statements by tech company CEOs (even more so than the regular PR drones) should be filtered through the "What outcome am I trying to influence?" test.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (31 Comments)

As alternative energy grows, NIMBY greens

With more renewable energy projects trying to come online, the country grapples with the balance between local land use and a national push for clean energy.

Google to remake programming with Go

A Unix co-creator is among those behind a language Google hopes will speed computers and programming. Today, Go becomes open-source software.

advertisement

About Nanotech - The Circuits Blog

Brooke Crothers was formerly editor-at-large at CNET News.com, an analyst at IDC (International Data Corp.) Japan, and an editor at The Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly (The Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones), among other endeavors, including a recent hiatus from the tech industry when he co-managed an after-school math and reading center. Nanotech covers computer chip technology and how it defines the computing experience. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Nanotech - The Circuits Blog topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right