• On MovieTome: See the villain of IRON MAN 2!
January 9, 2009 3:45 PM PST

Intel talks USB 3.0 at CES

by Brooke Crothers
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 6 comments

LAS VEGAS--At the Consumer Electronics Show, Jeff Ravencraft of Intel talked about the status of SuperSpeed USB 3.0 and how fast it really is.

The most salient benefit of SuperSpeed USB is the 10X improvement in data transfer speed over current USB, version 2.0. So, for example, transferring a 25GB HD movie will take 70 seconds instead of almost 14 minutes.

Transfer of a 25GB HD movie:

  • USB 1.0: 9.3 hours
  • USB 2.0: 13.9 minutes
  • USB 3.0: 70 seconds

In the video below, Ravencraft, who is president of the USB Implementers Forum, discusses the merits of SuperSpeed USB and the schedule for commercial rollout.

Brooke Crothers has been an editor at large at CNET News, an analyst at IDC Japan, and an editor at The Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, among other endeavors, including co-manager of an after-school math-and-reading center. He writes for the CNET Blog Network and is not a current employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Recent posts from Nanotech - The Circuits Blog
$1.25 billion later, can AMD take business from Intel?
AMD: Our claims about Intel have been 'ratified'
AMD talks 'Hemlock' graphics, next ultra-thin laptops
Intel Celeron chip anchors $249 Acer Windows 7 laptop
Nvidia CEO says 'no' to Intel-compatible chip
First iPhone, now Droid. Who needs Windows?
One charge hard to level at Intel: Raising prices
Nvidia CEO unsurprised by Intel lawsuit
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by derilium January 9, 2009 4:15 PM PST
sweet i can't wait for the new super fast speeds!
Reply to this comment
by bjb7293 January 9, 2009 4:19 PM PST
Very cool. Very fast. Very awesome.
Reply to this comment
by karpenterskids January 9, 2009 6:10 PM PST
Yayyyy...only about a year more, even though it seems like forever!

I'm surprised that there's over a 9-hour time difference when transferring 25GB between USB 1.0 and 2.0...maybe I just forgot how slow the process was a few years ago, though.
Reply to this comment
by PaulTwo January 9, 2009 7:11 PM PST
yes USB 1.0 is so painful.
by OziIan January 10, 2009 10:36 PM PST
Anyone compared USB3 with eSata which is here NOW and actually appearing on laptops and external HDDs?
Reply to this comment
by herbertificus October 11, 2009 2:18 PM PDT
Yes, the speed is terrific . . . but the standards commitee SCREWED UP AGAIN! They should have increased the voltage spec in the power wire from a gutless and semi-useless 5V to FireWire's 12V. There's only a gazillion things you can do with 12V that you can't do with 5V. There are all kinds of devices that can be powered by 12V but not 5V. Many devices have batteries that could be charged by 12V but can't be charged with just . . . 5 . . . gutless . . . limp-wristed . . . volts. And the higher voltage gives you more wattage: FireWire pumps out 15 watts of power, whereas USB 3 will pump out just less than 1/3 of that, 4.5 watts. I'm all in favor of paring the list of connection types from at least 7 (SCSI, Serial Attached SCSI, SATA, eSATA, PATA, FireWire, USB) down to a gloriously universal *ONE*, but that one really needs to have the two central, key features of utility, versatility and convenience: speed and electrical power (hot-swappability is a given).

THEY SCREWED UP.
Reply to this comment
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

A CNET Conversation with Eric Schmidt

CNET's Tom Krazit and Molly Wood sit down with Google CEO Eric Schmidt to discuss the future of Android, the Chrome OS, the problem of real-time search indexing, and more.

Verizon tests sending RIAA copyright notices

The No. 2 phone company, known for its reluctance to intervene in antipiracy cases, strikes an agreement to forward copyright notices on behalf of the music industry.

advertisement

About Nanotech - The Circuits Blog

Brooke Crothers was formerly editor-at-large at CNET News.com, an analyst at IDC (International Data Corp.) Japan, and an editor at The Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly (The Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones), among other endeavors, including a recent hiatus from the tech industry when he co-managed an after-school math and reading center. Nanotech covers computer chip technology and how it defines the computing experience. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Nanotech - The Circuits Blog topics

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right