• On MovieTome: Keanu updates COWBOY BEBOP!
January 9, 2009 3:45 PM PST

Intel talks USB 3.0 at CES

by Brooke Crothers
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 6 comments

LAS VEGAS--At the Consumer Electronics Show, Jeff Ravencraft of Intel talked about the status of SuperSpeed USB 3.0 and how fast it really is.

The most salient benefit of SuperSpeed USB is the 10X improvement in data transfer speed over current USB, version 2.0. So, for example, transferring a 25GB HD movie will take 70 seconds instead of almost 14 minutes.

Transfer of a 25GB HD movie:

  • USB 1.0: 9.3 hours
  • USB 2.0: 13.9 minutes
  • USB 3.0: 70 seconds

In the video below, Ravencraft, who is president of the USB Implementers Forum, discusses the merits of SuperSpeed USB and the schedule for commercial rollout.

Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. Follow Brooke on Twitter @mbrookec.
Recent posts from Nanotech - The Circuits Blog
Big hurdles for rumored Nvidia x86 technology
The $199 tablet according to Freescale
Dell laptop using Intel Core i3
Intel Atom chip spawns Toshiba, Gateway Netbooks
Leaked HP, Toshiba 'Core i3' laptops not pricey
Reinventing the MacBook Air
Unannounced HP 210 Netbook 'in stock'
Verizon sees rise of 'slate' computers in 2010
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by derilium January 9, 2009 4:15 PM PST
sweet i can't wait for the new super fast speeds!
Reply to this comment
by bjb7293 January 9, 2009 4:19 PM PST
Very cool. Very fast. Very awesome.
Reply to this comment
by karpenterskids January 9, 2009 6:10 PM PST
Yayyyy...only about a year more, even though it seems like forever!

I'm surprised that there's over a 9-hour time difference when transferring 25GB between USB 1.0 and 2.0...maybe I just forgot how slow the process was a few years ago, though.
Reply to this comment
by PaulTwo January 9, 2009 7:11 PM PST
yes USB 1.0 is so painful.
by OziIan January 10, 2009 10:36 PM PST
Anyone compared USB3 with eSata which is here NOW and actually appearing on laptops and external HDDs?
Reply to this comment
by herbertificus October 11, 2009 2:18 PM PDT
Yes, the speed is terrific . . . but the standards commitee SCREWED UP AGAIN! They should have increased the voltage spec in the power wire from a gutless and semi-useless 5V to FireWire's 12V. There's only a gazillion things you can do with 12V that you can't do with 5V. There are all kinds of devices that can be powered by 12V but not 5V. Many devices have batteries that could be charged by 12V but can't be charged with just . . . 5 . . . gutless . . . limp-wristed . . . volts. And the higher voltage gives you more wattage: FireWire pumps out 15 watts of power, whereas USB 3 will pump out just less than 1/3 of that, 4.5 watts. I'm all in favor of paring the list of connection types from at least 7 (SCSI, Serial Attached SCSI, SATA, eSATA, PATA, FireWire, USB) down to a gloriously universal *ONE*, but that one really needs to have the two central, key features of utility, versatility and convenience: speed and electrical power (hot-swappability is a given).

THEY SCREWED UP.
Reply to this comment
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Five New Year's resolutions for Google

Stakes are high as Google attempts to maintain one of the Internet's greatest cash machines while pushing into new and risky markets.
• Android event set for Jan. 5

For eBay sellers, a holiday hamster hangover

The gift frenzy over Zhu Zhu Pets leaves some power sellers feeling like they've just run a marathon--but the steep price tags lead to some impressive profits.

About Nanotech - The Circuits Blog

Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Nanotech - The Circuits Blog topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right