• On last.fm: Visual radio - New on Last.fm!
December 14, 2008 7:00 AM PST

The MacBook Air's fatal wireless flaw

by Brooke Crothers

Apple's MacBook Air doesn't live up to its wireless promise.

To quote an Apple tagline, "without wires, you're free to go anywhere." But the wireless part of the "air" play on words fails to deliver. (The other half its light-as-air weight: here it does deliver.)

As I've written in the past, I like the Air. I got one in February as soon as it was available at retail and have been pleased with the performance, screen, keyboard, build, and, until recently, the battery life (which has dwindled to under an hour). Of course, the head-turning aluminum aesthetics is also a major appeal to many people.

That said, after a spurt of trips including a 10-day stay on the East Coast and a few treks to Los Angeles, the Air's wireless shortcomings have become painfully clear. In a word (or two), no 3G.

Now, before I get slammed, let me say that I fully realize that I'm not the first person to reach this conclusion so I'm not claiming any unique epiphany. There were a number of observers citing this paradox way back in January. Some frustrated users even attempted hacks to shoehorn a 3G modem into the Air. The point is: because of the price and the way it's marketed, 3G should be built in.

But the full brunt of not having 3G hit me on Friday when I made a trip to Qualcomm to get briefed on a new version of the Snapdragon applications processor (more on this in another post). Sitting there in the nerve center of one of greatest wireless companies in the world, I couldn't get a wireless connection. Everyone else in the room had 3G connections of one kind or another. The Air instantly became the proverbial doorstop (or paper weight--choose your simile, or maybe it's more apropos to say it was a dinosaur.)

It didn't take much prodding from me to get the Qualcomm product manager to point out this fatal flaw.

This came after weeks of not being able to use the Air in many situations when I desperately needed a wireless connection. For instance, not all LA airports have reliable Wi-Fi connections. The John Wayne Airport in Orange County being one example. And when I was on the East Coast, one sprawling place I stayed at for several nights had Wi-Fi only in one inconveniently situated area that was inaccessible at night.

In these situations, the Air is nothing more than a slab of beautifully sculpted aluminum.

Hewlett-Packard Compaq 2510p (L) and MacBook Air. The HP comes with a built-in WWAN option, the Air does not.

Hewlett-Packard Compaq 2510p (L) and MacBook Air. The HP comes with a built-in WWAN option, the Air does not.

(Credit: Brooke Crothers)

Which brings me to the cult of Steve Jobs. Apple was brilliant enough to deliver a groundbreaking design like the Air but why wasn't it savvy enough to build in 3G?

Before I get slammed again, let me throw out some reasons (excuses) why Apple didn't build in 3G, based on reports I've read and my own observations. Apple didn't like the fact that 3G modems often made the user commit to one service provider, i.e., Verizon or Sprint or Vodafone. Or, it believed that if users wanted 3G, they could simply plug in a USB 3G modem.

I have serious problems with both of those reasons. Particularly when you're paying typically more than $1,800 (or $2,500, depending on the model) for a notebook billed as a wireless wonder (for Apple ad copy on why the Air is such a wonderful wireless laptop, just cruise over to Apple's MBA page.) And I have even more of a problem when ultrathin Netbooks are coming with 3G at one-third (and potentially a tiny fraction of) the cost of the Air.

For comparison, let's look at another Valley company, Hewlett-Packard. HP has been selling WWAN (Wireless Wide Area Network) modems in its business laptops for at least two years (and probably longer). The HP-Compaq NC6400 laptop introduced about two years ago was offered from day one with WWAN built in.

Granted, the choice of carriers at first was limited but look at HP's offerings today. Models (including those in the EliteBook line) are offered with Qualcomm's Gobi modem. Gobi obviates the need to have unique radios for each carrier. Gobi supports Verizon, Sprint, and others in one device.

Where was Gobi when Apple refreshed the MacBooks in October? I'm sure Apple has plenty of excuses (for example, not enough space in the Air's ultrathin design).

But Apple should have had 3G from the beginning and certainly in the October refresh. In today's 3G world, continuing to call it the MacBook Air brings another meaning to the play on words: lightness of weight with a touch of advertising hot air.

Additional comments::
The point is not that a user can potentially add an external WWAN modem (though even that's not necessarily easy to do), the point is that the Air should come with 3G capability built in considering how the computer is marketed.

Brooke Crothers has been an editor at large at CNET News, an analyst at IDC Japan, and an editor at The Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, among other endeavors, including co-manager of an after-school math-and-reading center. He writes for the CNET Blog Network and is not a current employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Recent posts from Nanotech - The Circuits Blog
Nvidia CEO says 'no' to Intel-compatible chip
First iPhone, now Droid. Who needs Windows?
One charge hard to level at Intel: Raising prices
Nvidia CEO unsurprised by Intel lawsuit
N.Y. lawsuit details Intel's 'largesse' toward Dell
Marvell touts new e-readers, partnerships
Intel comments on iPhone sync glitch
Former AMD chief Ruiz leaving spin-off
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 3 pages (108 Comments)
by Penguinisto December 14, 2008 7:50 AM PST
Err, you do realize that 3G, while common in Europe and parts of Asia, can currently only be found in only parts of the US, right? (and even then - it gets spotty in many areas).

I realize that y'all may think Silly Valley to be the center of the civilized world and all, but 3G (then, and mostly now) is not yet useful enough to be worth the effort.

See for yourself: http://www.wireless.att.com/coverageviewer/
Reply to this comment
by Goodbye Helicopter December 14, 2008 7:53 AM PST
boo hoo.
who wants to trudge along at the speeds of US 3G?
and who wants a modem that does not work in other countries?
hmm.... maybe everything to everyone is not possible.

the fatal flaw is the individual who never read the specs before buying.

or maybe just the usual c|net using apple in a story title to drum up click ad sales...
seriously, you guys write more about apple than any other computer maker.
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo December 14, 2008 7:58 AM PST
With Apple it has ALWAYS been about style not function. Pay a lot more...and get a lot less. But Mac-Tards say it looks cool , so it`s worth it.
Apple`s other laptops don`t even have express card slots or card readers built in ! What a joke.
HP and Dell laptops can be ordered with 3G built-in or you can easily add it on with an express card.
So glad to be a PC ! So many options.
Reply to this comment
by themainbreeze December 14, 2008 8:04 AM PST
ignorance is bliss???

or in this case just pure - ignorance...
Reply to this comment
by echols85 December 14, 2008 8:15 AM PST
I have to agree with Helicopter: while 3G is just dandy on a phone, it still is slow for things like Flash or streaming video of high enough quality to look decent on a laptop screen. And with technologies like WiMAX (I live in Baltimore, so it is of interest) on the horizon I question why we are interested in keeping laptops on cellular networks and causing further bottlenecks when providers like AT&T were not even postured to keep up with 3G traffic from iPhones. I think the technology was probably left off because of the lack of benefits gained from having the 3G option. In this day in age, wifi hotspots are never more than a stone's throw away and for all those moments in between, isn't that what cell phones are for? And if AT&T opens up tethering to more phones (ie iPhone), this would seem to solve a lot of the anguish. Other providers could certainly offer similar arrangements.

The one final thing I would say about it is that people do not like service contracts: who here likes paying a cell phone bill? along with cable, satellite, power, etc. Adding one more contract for laptops, unless absolutely necessary, is just another headache to deal with.
Reply to this comment
by CyberBob859 December 14, 2008 8:30 AM PST
Why not get a 3G phone that allows you to use it as a modem and tether it via Bluetooth to your MacBook Air?
Reply to this comment
by Magicland December 14, 2008 8:33 AM PST
Silly author, if you wanted 3G, you should have bought the mac air 2G, which will have all the features the air doesn't at half the price (subsidized by your 3G carrier of choice). Oh, wait, that was the iphone. No matter, something similar will happen with the air. Or not, doesn't matter, iDiots will buy them anyway, despite there being better and cheaper options available.
Reply to this comment
by mpitogo December 14, 2008 8:33 AM PST
My Air runs just fine with a USB2.0 EVDO Rev A and mighty fast at that. In most places faster than my iPhone's 3G. Though not as neatly packaged as a built-in wwan card its more convenient since you can choose which vendor you want and you can move your wwan card among other computers.
Reply to this comment
by jragosta December 14, 2008 8:35 AM PST
Why not simply get a USB 3G device?

Amazing that almost a year after the Air's introduction, you are STILL whining about limitations that are easily addressed with about 30 seconds worth of research. It's not as convenient as built-in, but it saves weight and cost for those of us who don't need it.

So how much does Dell pay you to write stupid, mindless Apple-bashing articles?
Reply to this comment
by giff1 December 14, 2008 8:42 AM PST
Bluetooth. 3G phone. Done.

Advantages: I can't think of a situation where I would need to be online and not also have my phone with me. I can add Phone as Modem plan to most any carrier. I can (and have) used a cheapie GSM phone with pay-as-you-go in Europe for 3G connectivity, while taking advantage of Sprint's cheapo prices here for their decent EVDO network.

At this point, built in 3G chips are more soon-to-be-outdated marketing ploys for an individual domestic carrier. If it wan't clear from the iPhone marketing plan, Apple tries to stay with standards that are globally deployable or simply leave them out. For the Air, a dedicated chip or swappable bit and pieces would be the sort of cumbersome additions that overcomplicate most tech products.

Bluetooth, phone, 3G. Wifi where possible. Done.
Reply to this comment
by Seaspray0 December 14, 2008 8:43 AM PST
The air not having 3G isn't a flaw, it's in the specs as not having it. You knew what you were getting when you paid for it. The flaw is in the author's desire to have 3G after the fact. Well? You can still use a USB wireless... along with the USB card reader, USB optical drive, etc, but that would sure add alot to your travel case.
Reply to this comment
by giff1 December 14, 2008 8:43 AM PST
Bluetooth. 3G phone. Done.

Advantages: I can't think of a situation where I would need to be online and not also have my phone with me. I can add Phone as Modem plan to most any carrier. I can (and have) used a cheapie GSM phone with pay-as-you-go in Europe for 3G connectivity, while taking advantage of Sprint's cheapo prices here for their decent EVDO network.

At this point, built in 3G chips are more soon-to-be-outdated marketing ploys for an individual domestic carrier. If it wan't clear from the iPhone marketing plan, Apple tries to stay with standards that are globally deployable or simply leave them out. For the Air, a dedicated chip or swappable bit and pieces would be the sort of cumbersome additions that overcomplicate most tech products.

Bluetooth, phone, 3G. Wifi where possible. Done.
Reply to this comment
by s. maller December 14, 2008 8:46 AM PST
The Air has USB and Bluetooth, which gives users the flexibility of using any existing solution. The "all-in-one" thing is a waste of money, motherboard space, power and UI complexity. I've been using my Blackberry as a modem (with Sprint) for years, and it's perfectly acceptable in a pinch. Between that and my free roaming AT&T Wi-Fi account (which works at most Starbucks, for example), I can get online 99% of the time. I would not appreciate having to pay for a crappy, carrier-specific built-in modem.

Good call, Apple.
Reply to this comment
by professionaladventurer December 14, 2008 9:10 AM PST
I use a Sierra wireless 882 3G USB with my 17 Macbook Pro. Is there some sort of magic that prevents you from using this with the Air?
Reply to this comment
by whiplash55 December 14, 2008 9:14 AM PST
The poor little Mac Nazi's can't handle the truth. The Air is an overpriced, over-hyped piece of crap. The 12" Powerbook was far superior and robust computer. The Lenovo Thinkpad X300 walks all over the Air, with it's lack of usable ports, and now pathetic battery life. The touch pads new right click "feature" looks spastic and stupid. As usual the fanboys line up to buy them despite the obvious faults of the all style no substance computer.
Reply to this comment
by parasubvert December 14, 2008 9:40 AM PST
I didn't think it was possible to make oneself look like a fool but also raise the quality of posts around them to such a degree. Calling a group fanboys, nazi's, and a piece of equipment spastic, and stupid, I think you've done nothing but prove your complete lack of taste and judgement.

In any case, I owned a Macbook Air SSD for 2 weeks early this year before I exchanged it for a Macbook Pro (and got $750 back !). The SSD model cost way too much, obviously, but I wanted to see if it would make a difference. And it was damn fast .. certain things took about as long as a regular book, but a few things were blistering. For the most part, the air was a fine machine: fast, extremely light, great wireless performance.

And 3G didn't even enter into the equation. 3G phones generally suck so personally I don't think it's a required feature, and frankly when I need email or web access in a pinch, I just use my phone.

The thing that killed the Air for me was the original embedded Intel graphics performance. The shared GPU would eventually overheat the machine if you tried to play a game.

Fortunately, this has been fixed with the NVidia 9400M in the latest model, but I've already bought my Macbook Pro. Tempted to get the next Pro with the new clickpad and dual GPU setup. (But not that tempted ;-)
Reply to this comment
by Inconnux December 14, 2008 9:43 AM PST
This 'flaw' can't be as bad as the dell/hp/pc etc.. flaw... they run Vista
Reply to this comment
by ltullos December 14, 2008 9:50 AM PST
Maybe you've heard of power and battery life? If you were Jobs, which would you rather have people complaining about - a few who can't get 3G connection without tethering (to their separately powered phone) or many more that can't keep enough charge to do anything useful? And didn't you say something about already having less than one hour battery life? Oh yeah, you wanted ultra-sheik thinness.
Reply to this comment
by jasonaorr December 14, 2008 10:51 AM PST
In what sense is this purported flaw a "fatal" one? Are MacBook Air sales tanking on account of their lack of an internal 3G modem? If so, it's news to me. The MBA is not advertised to allow you to have internet access whereever you go; it does advertise to offer wireless capabilities in nearly all of its functions. I don't see that it fails to deliver this; you can transfer and back up files, read discs, and use Bluetooth devices without a single wire. You can access wifi connections for internet, where they are available (which is increasingly common). Call the MBA overpriced, or say that its features are inconvenient, but 3G? If anything Apple has made it clear that it is conservative about adopting new technological trends (see: netbooks). Apple wants to perfect proven technologies and innovate the user experience of them. Sure, you could criticize this as a company strategy, but that discussion should reach outside of the MBA and warrants a longer, better researched article.

Sometimes I feel like CNET just forces its staff to write articles that can have the word "Mac" or "Apple" in the title, only because it gets visitors to click on them.
Reply to this comment
by KillersDad December 14, 2008 11:07 AM PST
Not only has the writer confused his options but if he's killed his battery in 10 months, he hasn't learned how to operate his computer. It's easy to get 2 years out of an Apple battery. I routinely run my battery all the way down, then charge it completely. My original iPhone purchased on the first day it went on sale still gives me 18 hours of service before charging and my MacBook battery purchased in August 07 still lasts in excess of 3 hours.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 3 pages (108 Comments)
advertisement

FAQ: Buying the right Windows 7 upgrade

Readers still have lots of questions on just which version of the software they need to buy in order to upgrade their PC. CNET News tries to offer some answers.

N.Y. lawsuit details Intel's 'largesse' toward Dell

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's federal antitrust case filed Wednesday alleges a longstanding symbiotic relationship between Intel and Dell.

advertisement

About Nanotech - The Circuits Blog

Brooke Crothers was formerly editor-at-large at CNET News.com, an analyst at IDC (International Data Corp.) Japan, and an editor at The Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly (The Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones), among other endeavors, including a recent hiatus from the tech industry when he co-managed an after-school math and reading center. Nanotech covers computer chip technology and how it defines the computing experience. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Nanotech - The Circuits Blog topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right