• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
October 7, 2008 7:45 AM PDT

AMD finds 'fabless' alternative

by Brooke Crothers
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 9 comments

Advanced Micro Devices appears to have found an alternative to going fabless.

The dramatic announcement by AMD Tuesday, which focuses on a new entity known for now as The Foundry Company, shows that there is another way to restructure that doesn't entail completely jettisoning manufacturing operations--referred to in the semiconductor industry as fabs or fabrication facilities.

"Real men have fabs." This quote attributed to former AMD CEO and Chairman Jerry Sanders has some import here. Though fabless concerns, such as Nvidia, have been held up as lean, mean chip-supplying machines that don't have the burden of funding costly manufacturing facilities, the downside is often ignored by Wall Street.

Going completely fabless separates the company from key process technologies that are needed to stay ahead. That's especially true in AMD's case, where the sole processor rival is chip behemoth Intel, which derives much of its strength by moving quickly from one chip manufacturing process to another. Going to a new manufacturing process typically results in faster, more power-efficient processors.

AMD New York facility

This artist's rendering shows what AMD expects its New York facility to look like when it opens for business about three to four years from now.

(Credit: AMD)

Look no further than the state AMD finds itself in today. It is a generation behind Intel, which has been shipping chips based on the 45-nanometer process for almost year. AMD is currently struggling to get out its first generation of 45nm processors.

The newly created Foundry Company was described by AMD Chief Executive Dirk Meyer on Tuesday as a "brand-new and leading-edge semiconductor manufacturing company." It will be run by Doug Grose, who will relinquish his current role as AMD's senior vice president of manufacturing operations to become CEO of The Foundry Company.

Two things will happen as a result of the backing by the Abu Dhabi-based investors. First, AMD, through the joint company Advanced Technology Investment Co. (ATIC), will expand its current manufacturing facilities in Dresden, Germany, and transform this into a foundry company that also builds chips for other companies.

As part of this expansion, Dresden will bring in IBM's silicon-on-insulator (SOI) and so-called "bulk silicon" technologies. "We deepen and widen our relationship with IBM," AMD said Tuesday. "So we'll be able to take bulk and SOI together to the 22-nanometer generation and beyond." (The next generation of chips will be made on a 32-nanometer process, followed by 22-nanometer in the 2012 time frame.)

AMD Dresden facility

AMD's Fab 36 in Dresden will focus on IBM's silicon-on-insulator (SOI) and so-called "bulk silicon" technologies.

(Credit: AMD)

Second, AMD will move forward to build manufacturing facilities at the Luther Forest Technology Campus, near the town of Malta, N.Y. "At the earliest opportunity we will break ground on upstate New York and begin work on what we believe will be the most sophisticated manufacturing facility in the United States," AMD said.

The intention is to "bring that fab online in the late 2011, 2012 time frame," AMD said. "And further cementing that upstate New York corridor as one of the leading (areas) in the world for nanotechnology." The planned facility will provide 1,400 jobs for the region, according to AMD.

AMD may also expand beyond Dresden and New York. "Once we complete the Dresden expansion and build out upstate New York--and if commercially justified--we will consider the creation of research and manufacturing facilities in Abu Dhabi," said Grose.

Hector Ruiz--the current AMD chairman--will relinquish his role as AMD's executive chairman to become chairman of The Foundry Company.

Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. Follow Brooke on Twitter @mbrookec.
Recent posts from Nanotech - The Circuits Blog
Windows, Netbook. Android, smartbook? Hmm
HP Envy eclipses the Apple MacBook
Major Intel chip upgrade coming to new Netbooks
Will the 'smartbook' be a better Netbook?
Firefox: Heat and the CPU usage problem
AMD upgraded as 'Fusion,' 16-core chip future looms
Dell's 'Mr. A' is a key figure in Intel defense
AMD unveils 'world's fastest' graphics card
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by pugster October 7, 2008 9:42 AM PDT
This is a good move for AMD. AMD tried the Intel formula but it does not work. AMD makes good processors, but they are not making money because of the amount of money invested in fabs. AMD as a separate company can outsource production of their own chips in other companies' plants while other companies can use the AMD fabs to make other's chips.
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto October 7, 2008 12:44 PM PDT
Wow - not sure if it'll work for them.

Sure, ARM and the like are fabless, but they're not competing directly against Intel in the x86 market. Intel can pull it off because they have a tight design and manufacturing energy, and can keep their fabs humming along at full capacity.

AMD has probably had a very rough time of it with keeping their fabs going full-tilt (which is the only way you can actually make a profit on running the things), and having to schedule fab-time with third-party design houses is going to be a screamer.

Kinda sad, really - AMD once had a drop-powerful answer when the Opteron came out, and Intel had nothing to answer it with for years (Intel basically flopped around with HT and "EE" and Xeons, but couldn't touch the Opteron for what - two to three years?) ...then the Core Duo came out. AMD should have used the time they had to continuously find new and more powerful chips, but they let the chance slip through their fingers... it would've been very interesting to see a real 4+ core answer (and not the stupid 3-core critter), or better yet - an earlier integrated CPU+GPU solution... but it's like they had a corporate brain-seizure or something.

/P
(disclosure - I have worked for Intel in the past).
Reply to this comment
by Zaunto October 7, 2008 1:00 PM PDT
AMD did have a corporate brain seizure. It's name was Hector Ruiz. Since he will be the chairman of "The Foundry", we have to wonder what effect that will have on things. Hopefully none. It cannot be argued though that the long money behind AMD now will definitely change things. The elimination of 1.2 billion in debt changes the game for them.
by 3tire October 7, 2008 3:54 PM PDT
"(disclosure - I have worked for Intel in the past)"

As what? The security guard? Oh wait, maybe you're some line tech? OOOOOOH. Your comments reveal how little knowledge you actually have towards semiconductor design and manufacturing.
by Penguinisto October 7, 2008 8:26 PM PDT
@ Zanuto: Agreed to an extent - Ruiz had a perfect opportunity to bust ahead, and he squandered it on... well, buying ATI, farting around with no new direction apparent, and suchlike. To be fair, maybe (maybe) they were wanting to redefine the x86 architecture and become the pioneers instead of simply chasing Intel. With the whole Netburst debacle that Intel was still wading through, AMD did have a shot... too bad they didn't hedge their bets at least.

AMD did lose the debt, yes - but they also lost the fabs. The last x86 clone corp to give it a shot fabless was Transmeta, and they didn't do so well. Sure AMD has the name and some momentum still, but damn...

@3tire: Whatever, kid. I only state my affiliations past and present to remove any appearance of fanboyism or astroturfing (unlike a lot of the MSFT-employed commenters in here...)

/P
by Zaunto October 7, 2008 12:52 PM PDT
There are two important points here:

1.) AMD will use The Foundry fabs to produce both AMD and ATI chips without incurring the costs of operating those fabs nor the cost of expansion. Those fabs will be expanded to build chips for others in addition to AMD.

2.) This deal gives AMD an enormous injection of cash that will fund research and development as well as reduce their operating debt (1.2 billion of debt will now be gone from the books).

This is a great move for AMD and will allow them to kick goth Intel and NVidia's tails all over the school yard while actually making a profit doing it. As of 2:50pm today, AMD's stock has risen 11.47%. That isn't an earth shattering gain, but at a time of economic downturn, a good deal that injects cash into such a company while also providing them with flexibility shows confidence in the company, the product, and the company's management.
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto October 7, 2008 8:28 PM PDT
You do know that those fabs (which IIRC retains the debt) will have to stay alive in order for AMD to actually produce anything, yes?
by AppleSuxLeo October 7, 2008 11:38 PM PDT
I like AMD. Makes for lower prices for us and drives innovation to have more than one player.
Saw the boss on CNBC and he said the upstate NY facility would add like 14000 new jobs.
Thats also good for America`s economy. Yay AMD !
Reply to this comment
by Travler_121 October 9, 2008 4:05 PM PDT
I think that AMD has truly made a great decision to bring in outside cash in order to survive...and NY will certainly gain in so many ways. However, one thing that scares me in this setup is that Ruiz will now head up The Foundry. He showed little to no leadership to capitalize on the MPU market when the Opteron device was introduced, so why would I think he would show anything more now?
Reply to this comment
(9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

S.F. hacker space: Heaven for the DIY set?

The Noisebridge hacker space offers sewing and Mandarin classes, soldering workshops, Internet-controlled front door access, and a server room with no door.
• Photos: Circuits, code, community

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

advertisement

About Nanotech - The Circuits Blog

Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Nanotech - The Circuits Blog topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right