• On BNET: 3 worst things about the iPhone 3G S
September 25, 2008 4:00 AM PDT

Intel WiMax to go live, will devices follow?

by Brooke Crothers

Intel's WiMax wireless technology will finally be unleashed in two weeks. But it's not clear how big a following the technology has among device makers.

Samsung will offer Q1 Ultra Premium UMPC with XOHM WiMax upgrade.

Samsung will offer Q1 Ultra Premium UMPC with XOHM WiMax upgrade.

(Credit: Samsung)

Intel and Sprint Nextel will team up to launch the first WiMax network in Baltimore on October 8--what the chipmaker is calling the dawn of 4G broadband because of its high speed.

Sprint will likely announce the rollout next week at WiMax World in Chicago, according to sources familiar with the plans. Sprint's WiMax-based broadband service, called XOHM, is scheduled to go live by the end of this month, according to those sources. (They say the XOHM Baltimore network is actually up now and is being used by company employees.)

Sprint's service will only be offered in Baltimore initially. Other cities such as Portland, OR, Washington D.C., and Chicago are expected to follow next year.

As part of the rollout, a WiMax card for laptops based on the PC Express standard will be offered by Samsung, Sprint said.

U.S.-based mobile WiMax differs from Wi-Fi in that it is intended as a truly mobile technology that can be used, for example, while traveling in a car, just as cell phones are used. The target market--at least initially--is not cell phones, however. "We're thinking beyond the cell phone," said a Sprint spokesperson.

And this is where Intel comes into the picture. Intel will supply chipsets to manufacturers of laptops and small devices. They, in turn, will sell the products to consumers and businesses who would use Sprint's service. The Intel chipset, previously codenamed Echo Peak, is a WiMax- and Wi-Fi-capable product. It is now branded the WiMax/WiFi Link 5050 Series.

Some WiMax-based devices have popped up already. A listing on Amazon, for example, shows a WiMax-enabled Nokia N810 "Portable Internet Tablet." Samsung has announced a WiMax-capable Q1 Ultra Premium Mobile PC with a 7-inch screen.

And laptop suppliers have indicated in the past that they will bring out WiMax-capable machines. Dell, Sony, Acer, Asus, Lenovo, Panasonic, and Toshiba have all indicated in the past that WiMax products will be forthcoming.

"There are several notebook vendors that are going through a certification process to get the notebooks certified on the network. Information about that will be made public on October 8," the Sprint spokesperson said.

"Probably in October there will be several (manufacturers) that have laptops with (Intel's) Centrino Wi-Fi/WiMax card in them," said a source familiar with the companies' plans.

Analysts--the skeptics that they are--have their doubts about the momentum behind WiMax. "It was supposed to be a crossover device market. Devices with 4- or 5-inch screen sizes. The number of (those) devices we were supposed to see by now simply hasn't materialized," said Tero Kuittinen, wireless analyst at Global Crown Capital.

He also said that Intel must contend with a media focused elsewhere. "It's hard for WiMax to cut through media frenzy that surrounds the new smartphones--the iPhone and Google phone. They're sucking up all the media oxygen."

And he says WiMax needs to offer a compelling pricing plan that would lure buyers away from current plans, especially in the economic environment today, when he believes consumers are loathe to commit to yet another payment plan.

Sprint says its plan will be different. "You're not locked into a contract. You're not locked into a device," the Sprint spokesperson said.

Brooke Crothers is a former editor at large at CNET News.com, and has been an editor for the Asian weekly version of the Wall Street Journal. He writes for the CNET Blog Network, and is not a current employee of CNET. Contact him at mbcrothers@gmail.com. Disclosure.
Recent posts from Nanotech - The Circuits Blog
Hard disk or solid-state? Think again
Analyst: Thin laptops have design issues
Samsung breaks Netbook mold with Nvidia chip
Is Apple's Mac Mini a MacBook inside?
Conan O'Brien ribs 'nerds' at Intel science fair
Brouhaha over Intel branding
Apple iPhone 3GS: The sum ($) of its parts
What Intel, Nokia gain in mobile reboot
by dbroham77 September 25, 2008 5:38 AM PDT
Baltimore? how is that a rollout?
Reply to this comment
by bonesbautista September 25, 2008 5:50 AM PDT
A small business owner here. I waited for 18 months for WiMax to hit the street, it's been in "testing" mode here in Portland OR for about that long. No pricing available, no availability date available, SPCS changed their data TOS a few months ago to institute a cap (the 300 MB roaming cap killed it for me). No contracts? - there's no wireless data product to buy.

Sorry Sprint, you've taken too long to get the product out the door - your corporate stores were telling me in May it'll be just a few more weeks. Between tethering, ATTWS & VZ data cards, and WiFi have me covered. I'll see if SPCS and WiMax are still around and relevant in a couple of years when my contracts expire...
Reply to this comment
by gerrrg September 26, 2008 11:00 AM PDT
You are confused. Portland's network was built by Clearwire and is owned by Clearwire.

Reports suggest that it would be at the end of '08 when the agreement closes between Clearwire, Sprint, Google and a bunch of other players. At that point Clearwire will open the Portland network up.
by scottthesculptor September 25, 2008 10:14 AM PDT
Sprint is still pushing EVDO and ruining any idea that a faster wireless gets you better internet connection. When I got EVDO 2 years ago I clocked a 1.8Mbps transfer.
Two years later that's below 400k max and worse than that in normal usage.
Sprint then decided to disable my access in order to try and sell me a new contract.
Thats when I told Sprint to take a hike and closed the account.
4G is MOTS
Reply to this comment
by Squashman2 September 25, 2008 10:32 AM PDT
I finally got EVDO this year in the City I live in. They finally expanded that out to my house just this past week. I could get it in the city but not out in the suburbs.
Reply to this comment
by shadowself September 25, 2008 12:19 PM PDT
WiMax (even the so called "mobile" variant) has huge issues with either end of the wireless link traveling at more than about 35 mph (56.3 kph) in an urban environment.

It turns out that the MIMO principles used to get such high data rates for static and nearly static terminals at each end work against it when there is a significant differential motion. The problem, as some might guess, is not doppler, but rather doppler dispersion in the different paths of the signals coming in.

The effective throughput drops to virtually nothing at any significant speed.

Thus, in the real world, the suggested "U.S.-based mobile WiMax differs from Wi-Fi in that it is intended as a truly mobile technology that can be used, for example, while traveling in a car, just as cell phones are used." is just not realistic.
Reply to this comment
by jregina September 25, 2008 12:45 PM PDT
If a mobile Wi-Max is not feasible it may be ideal for cell phones. It would force people to focus on driving and if they want to talk, text or browse the internet they should pull off the road.
by gerrrg September 26, 2008 11:35 AM PDT
Your 35 mph seems suspicious.

Clearwire did a test where the average speed was 35 mph, but went as high as 55 mph, and they averaged 6.5 Mbps during the 30 minute test around Portland.

'Virtually nothing' and 'significant speed' is like listening to Greenspan talking to Congress about the health of the economy...totally meaningless, without substantiation of numbers and obfuscates the facts.

Given that WiFi and WiMax aren't even the same technology (though both are wireless), and have completely different coverages, you're nuts to even relate the two. I'd need 1000+ WiFi points to cover an area that would take maybe a handful of WiMax antennas. How many antennas would you have to switch when driving? And EVEN when you're switching antennas, reality says that your packet loss is going to be hell of a lot less than WiFi.
by zeke2.0 September 25, 2008 3:23 PM PDT
I've been waiting for WiMax for a long time. The problem isn't WiMax, the problem is I don't want to use Sprint. There are good reasons they are losing so much market share (absolutely worst customer service of all the carriers for starters).

Hopefully another carrier will come on board or this has little chance to succeed. But, if there is no contract and the true throughput is significantly better than my Verizon wireless broadband (and no 5gig limit), I may check it out when it hits the DC area. Then switch to someone else when possible. (Then spend 3 months trying to get Sprint to stop billing me, hehehe).
Reply to this comment
advertisement

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About Nanotech - The Circuits Blog

Brooke Crothers was formerly editor-at-large at CNET News.com, an analyst at IDC (International Data Corp.) Japan, and an editor at The Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly (The Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones), among other endeavors, including a recent hiatus from the tech industry when he co-managed an after-school math and reading center. Nanotech covers computer chip technology and how it defines the computing experience. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Nanotech - The Circuits Blog topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right