• On TV.com: MEGAN FOX Photos
September 16, 2008 9:30 PM PDT

Will that Dell solid-state drive be regular or ultra?

by Brooke Crothers
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 1 comment

Regular or ultra? Consumers will now have at least a couple of performance options when they order solid-state drives on the newest ultraportable notebooks from Dell.

Dell Latitude E4200

Dell Latitude E4200

(Credit: Dell Computer)

Hard disk drives are getting scarcer by the week in the ultraportable notebook market. Dell has officially started selling its new 2.2-pound Latitude E4200 this week with solid-state drives as the only storage option, accelerating a trend in ultraportables away from hard disk drives.

The popular ThinkPad X301 also comes with solid-state drive options only.

The SSD options on the E4200 come in two flavors, standard or "Ultra".

Dell pre-announced the high-performance Samsung Ultra SATA-II solid-state drive in February. The SSD is able to read data at 100 megabytes per second (MB/sec) and write it at 80MB/sec, 60 percent faster than SATA I drives, according to Samsung.

The new SSDs will "leave traditional notebook hard drives in the dust," Dell said when it announced the option. "Our labs benchmarked this drive in a Latitude notebook and saw a 35 percent overall system performance increase over a standard 2.5-inch 5400rpm notebook hard drive using SYSmark '07. That's even more impressive when you realize that the difference between standard 5400rpm and performance 7200rpm drives (in the same generation) is 10 percent on average," Dell said at that time.

Dell's Ultra drive has approximately 20 percent better read/write performance over more conventional SSDs, according to Avi Cohen, managing partner at Avian Securities. And Dell gets its SSDs from sources other than just Samsung, including STEC and Micron Technology, Cohen believes.

SSDs are generally much faster than hard disk drives at reading data (which is what computer users spend most of their time doing). SSDs are becoming popular in ultraportable notebooks because they have advantages crucial for small laptops: they weigh less, generally use less power, generate less heat, and withstand shock better.

Samsung chart comparing SSDs to HDDs. Samsung also makes hard disk drives.

Samsung chart comparing SSDs to HDDs. Samsung also makes hard disk drives.

(Credit: Samsung)

The new SATA II SSD can resist up to 1,500 Gs of shock in a half millisecond compared with a shock resistance rating of 300 Gs in 2 milliseconds for a typical HDD, Samsung said.

Intel is getting into the SSD performance grade act too. The chipmaker offers Extreme SSDs and mainstream SSDs.

Extreme SSDs offer faster write speeds of up to 170 MB/s, while mainstream drives are rated at up to 70 MB/s, according to Intel.

The 80GB and 160GB Intel SSDs for the mainstream notebook market are based on multilevel cell (MLC) technology, while the Extreme 32GB and 64GB for the enterprise market are based on single-level cell (SLC). In 2009, Intel expects to have MLC drives with capacities up to 320GB.

MLC allows drive makers to build higher-capacity drives at lower cost but is neither as fast as SLC nor as inherently reliable.

Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. Follow Brooke on Twitter @mbrookec.
Recent posts from Nanotech - The Circuits Blog
Micron to buy Numonyx for $1.27 billion
Intel meets its match in IBM
Former Intel exec pleads guilty in Galleon case
IBM launches Power7 chip, systems
Analysis of an apology: Toyota, a Japanese thing?
Toyota sued for fatal crash linked to throttle
Toyota's latest woes may be hard-wired
Wozniak cites 'scary' Prius acceleration problem
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
by ElMocoLoco September 17, 2008 11:31 AM PDT
I had read previously that a disadvantage of the SSD was critical failures tended to be drive wide and were more widespread (or more devasting is probably a better way to put it) than traditional drives. Anyone heard anything negative, other than price and speed, for SSD drives? My Fujitsu Lifebook P7230 is great except for the ultra slow drive speed. I'm eager to see the SSD technology proceed if it's mature enough.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

Google's social side aims for some Buzz

Facebook and Twitter are the darlings of the social-media world, not Google--which hopes to change that with Buzz, betting it can organize your online social life.

Watching the birth of a gaming start-up

Stewart Butterfield and his friends are back at it with a new company. CNET's Daniel Terdiman was given exclusive, behind-the-scenes access as they built it from scratch.

advertisement

About Nanotech - The Circuits Blog

Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Nanotech - The Circuits Blog topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right