• On The Insider: Judge Bans Real Housewives Sex Tape
September 10, 2008 10:30 PM PDT

'Cutting-edge' MacBook Air silicon getting old

by Brooke Crothers

The cutting-edge MacBook Air is not so cutting-edge these days. The high-profile, ultraslim notebook still comes with the same hardware that was offered initially by Apple nine months ago.

The sleek silver 3-pound notebook was announced with great fanfare back on January 15 with configurations that sported older Merom-class Intel low-voltage processors and a 64GB Samsung solid-state drive.

"I think everyone had widely anticipated that there would be some other product announcements in Steve Jobs' address (on Monday) on the notebook or computing side," said Patrick Wilkison, vice president of marketing and business development at STEC, a supplier of high-performance solid-state drives.

"But it's gotta be coming. They're certainly very committed to the notebook space," he said.

Apple observers claim that a notebook refresh is coming in October, and it is anticipated that updates to the Air will include larger solid-state drives and newer Intel processors.

Whether Apple will turn away from Intel chipsets is a rumor still in play, though Apple is expected to stick with Intel for the main CPU.

On the processor front, Hewlett-Packard may offer some guidance. HP has just refreshed its 3-pound ultraportable lineup with the newest low-power Intel silicon based on the Centrino 2 platform. The EliteBook 2530p line offers Core 2 Duo LV (low-voltage) and ULV (ultra-low-voltage) processors including the 1.6GHz SL9300 and 1.86GHz SL9400. Both are 45-nanometer processors that come with large 6MB caches to speed performance. Current processors in the Air are based on 65-nanometer technology and have smaller 4MB caches.

The EliteBooks use Intel's Mobile Intel GS45 Express Chipset with integrated graphics.

Solid-state drives are the other big question mark. New solid-state drives are hitting the market in quick succession. "Our drive was in mass production in early Q2. Looks like Samsung had theirs ready for the Dell launch, maybe mid to early Q3 timeframe," Wilkison said.

STEC's drives come in capacities up to 256GB. Dell offers a 128GB SSD with its new ultraslim Latitude E4200. (Dell E4200 "fits in an envelope too" video here.)

Meanwhile, Intel is shipping high-performance "X" series SSDs in 80GB capacities now. The drives achieve up to 250MB per second read speeds and up to 70MB per second write speeds.

The 80GB version is priced at $595. Though expensive, these drives deliver performance far better than the standard 4200rpm hard-disk drives used in ultraportables to date.

Dell's 128GB SSD option on its XPS M1530 notebook goes for an extra $450, though performance numbers are unknown at this point.

Wilkison said high-volume 128GB SSDs may get "closer to the $400 range."

Brooke Crothers is a former editor at large at CNET News.com, and has been an editor for the Asian weekly version of the Wall Street Journal. He writes for the CNET Blog Network, and is not a current employee of CNET. Contact him at mbcrothers@gmail.com. Disclosure.
Recent posts from Nanotech - The Circuits Blog
Apple MacBook Air: Cooler graphics
Hard disk or solid-state? Think again
Analyst: Thin laptops have design issues
Samsung breaks Netbook mold with Nvidia chip
Is Apple's Mac Mini a MacBook inside?
Conan O'Brien ribs 'nerds' at Intel science fair
Brouhaha over Intel branding
Apple iPhone 3GS: The sum ($) of its parts
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (25 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by jscott418 September 11, 2008 3:32 AM PDT
The real problem with the MacBook Air was its limitations in other area's. No optical drive, lack of enough USB ports, no LAN card. The list goes on. I think Apple had forgot that mobile means adapting to conditions. Some places you go require a LAN connection or even a Modem in the boonies.
This is why the Mini notebooks are doing so well. Most of them still have what a roady needs and they are cheap to boot! Something Apple really needs to address.
Reply to this comment
by k2dave September 11, 2008 3:47 AM PDT
It's a different market segment. The ultra portables are for the road warriors, the Air is for status.
by o2bpitching September 11, 2008 6:48 PM PDT
Um, the whole point is a lack of an optical drive. It's a feature, not a flaw...
Just thought u should know
by Lerianis September 11, 2008 3:53 AM PDT
Ultra-portables are really a waste of the money you pay for them. Lackluster processors, lackluster video cards, no USB ports in some cases, no LAN card in some cases, etc. etc. etc.
I have to say that my opinion is that only an absolute idiot would buy a ultra-portable, period and done with, at the high prices they are marketed at right now.
Lower it to about 300 dollars, then maybe I will look at an ultra-portable for web browsing..... oh wait.... I do more than web browsing on ANY computer..... (clicks his tongue).... it's desktop replacement quality or nothing for me.
Reply to this comment
by tkindle September 11, 2008 9:57 AM PDT
Clearly you don't travel very often. I'll never buy another laptop over 4.5 pounds. Most folks who buy ultraportables need MS-Office and network access as a priority, the rest is just gravy.
by TheCrudMan September 11, 2008 2:49 PM PDT
There's rumors going around that the October event will be "all about the brick." My favorite theory so far is that they will add additional ports to the charge-brick for all macbooks, including the air, allowing you to use the Air with USB, firewire, and ethernet ports when plugged in, just not on the go (when you don't really need them anyway.)
by mbenedict September 11, 2008 4:06 AM PDT
Today's MacBook Air also offers:

the same overheating issues...
the same lockup issues...

I'll pass.
Reply to this comment
by Goodbye Helicopter September 11, 2008 4:44 AM PDT
more speculative apple articles designed to drive cnet site traffic and adclick sales
Reply to this comment
by Perry_Clease September 11, 2008 6:15 AM PDT
Exactly!
by rocketjam--2008 September 11, 2008 4:56 AM PDT
9 months without a refresh?!!! Unbelievable!!!
Reply to this comment
by WhuzYoDaddy September 11, 2008 5:14 AM PDT
MacBook Air = all the style but without all that pesky substance
Reply to this comment
by DarkHawke September 11, 2008 6:31 AM PDT
You mean it's the Obama of computing?


Sorry, totally could NOT help myself. Move along, then. Nothing to see here.
by bornlikethis38 September 11, 2008 1:50 PM PDT
haha burn!
by john55440 September 11, 2008 6:01 AM PDT
Apple doesn't refresh their computers as often as other computer companies. The end result is stale, ovepriced, computers.

That said, like every other company, I'm sure that they will have new releases by Christmas Shopping Season.
Reply to this comment
by setgo September 11, 2008 6:02 AM PDT
The guy Patrick Wilkison that thought that Jobs was going to announce a MacBook on the same day as the iPods doesn't know much about Apple or marketing.
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto September 11, 2008 6:42 AM PDT
ZOMG! Nine whole months!? Why, I'd never own a car that has such old tech in it! (as he types this on a Hackintosh cobbled together out of odd parts, which sits next to a 4-year-old Mac that has run flawlessly since the day he bought it).

Clue: Nothing out there can touch the Air for what it was built for, period.

Clue #2: if my crappy but still running old Sony Vaio Z1RA is any indication, most folks don't bother buying notebooks every 6-9 months.

The funny thing is, it makes perfect sense for Apple (or any OEM, really) to not spend obscene amounts of cash constantly re-tooling their products every six months without a damned good reason. Doing so would be stupid financially, and sometimes pointless. Sort of like the article I just read...
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan September 11, 2008 10:07 AM PDT
Answer to Clue #1: You're right. Nothing can compare to it. But then nobody wants to compare to it. People buy products they can use everyday instead. The Air was and continues to be a status symbol, to be seen with one but not necessarily actually using them. Their sales figures have demonstrated that quite clearly.


Answer to Clue #2: The Sony systems were one of the first entries into the sub notebook market and they demonstrated that you have two different classes- those systems that compromise on functionality/usability for the sake of looks / ego, and those systems that are coming out now that are just as small or smaller that lack none of the functionality or features, which makes them a better choice for sub notebook mobility.


The funny thing is that Apple wasn't the first to do this. They are nearly a decade late to the market and even then their claims of the lightest/longest battery life/size were immediately proven to be complete bunk. Don't believe it? Just look at the Toshiba Portege 2000 that was out some six or so years ago. It was lighter, smaller, longer battery life, had built in ethernet, plentiful USB ports, etc, etc, etc. Look at the new Dell, HP, and Toshiba systems. There's plenty that cost 1/3 the cost of an Apple product that can do 3X the work. That demonstrates to me that the Air is a status symbol- and a very successful one at that. If you want to look like you are important or are too important to be seen with a working laptop, then you can have the Apple Ego- err, Air.


I wish I could say otherwise, but the product's 9 month history is hard to dispute.

by renGek September 11, 2008 1:18 PM PDT
So its ok for apple to retool iphone, itouch and ipods every 9-12 months because that wouldn't be stupid financially or pointless unlike air?
by Swift2 September 11, 2008 8:58 AM PDT
So, if there are RUMORS that Apple is introducing something, generated almost exclusively by the tech press, then Apple is WRONG if they don't do what you want them to? Doesn't anybody else see something wrong with this? Now, I presume they're preparing processor/storage improvements, but the sales might just be okay right now, and the final design for MacBook Air II isn't ready. How many children is that going to kill?
Reply to this comment
by Seaspray0 September 11, 2008 9:31 AM PDT
Perhaps sales weren't what apple expected and the air is slated for the chopping block?
Reply to this comment
by Dulwithe September 11, 2008 11:09 AM PDT
"Clue: Nothing out there can touch the Air for what it was built for, period. "

Seems like a fanboy comment. My 5 year old Toshiba Portege R100 is lighter (2.4 lbs), lasts 7.5 hours on batter with "strap-on" battery, smaller (but just a bit thicker), built in LAN, built in modem (yes it is true that when working on the road, sometimes you end up at hotels with no internet connection - modems are still good to have), AND it fits in an envelope!!! Ooohh, ahhh, eeeehhh! It fits in an envelope! It must be great!

I put my hands on a macbook air a few days ago. I thought, oh god, heavy, big, and overpriced. I can get my r100 nowadays for $850 CDN.

http://cnet.nytimes.com/laptops/toshiba-portege-r100/4505-3121_7-30425845.html

And check out the new Toshiba Portege - UltraThin WITH DVD/CD onboard!!

http://www.toshiba.ca/web/product.grp?section=1&group=1&product=7170

Toshiba Portégé R500

R500-02G
? One of the world's lightest notebooks
? The world's first notebook with the slimmest optical disc drive
? The world's first notebook with transflective LED
? One of the world's thinnest notebooks
? One of the world's longest battery operating times

It also fits into an envelope, onboard DVD/CD and all!!!

With LAN, wifi, bluetooth, and still ONLY 2.4 pounds (less than the Macbook AIR). 120Gb or 160Gb HDD, OR 128Gb SSD.

So, I wonder about your statement, "nothing touches it". Really out of line.

And if you want to bash the fact that it has windows vista in it, you can always upgrade to linux or move sideways to OS-X. (Yes, if you REALLY want to, you can install OS-X in a PC.)

D.
Reply to this comment
by witheredmind September 14, 2008 12:05 AM PDT
The thing I find funny is that there are two kinds of anti-fanboys for the Air. One set constantly bemoan the meager specs while the other set constantly compare it to other laptops in the ultraportable category with far weaker specs.

The Air isn't there to be the be-all-end-all to mobile computing. Desktop-like performance comes in those 9+ pound desktop-replacement laptops.

As for other laptops in the same category, if they come with an optical drive then they almost certainly have a ULV 1.1/1.2 Ghz processor with 2 Mb cache and cost at least $2,000 (like the mentioned R500). Half the cache and a 30-50% slower processor for $300 more just to have an optical drive? Quite the trade off...
by twyrick September 12, 2008 8:41 AM PDT
Regardless of how the Macbook Air "stacks up" vs. the other ultra-portables, it IS the only one of them that can legally run OS X. Ultimately, THAT is why some people will choose one.

Despite being a pretty avid Mac user at home, I didn't find the Air very compelling for my needs. (I vastly prefer using a desktop system whenever possible, because I want things like a big 24" LCD display, more drive space and better video capabilities - plus a full-size keyboard that's easy to type on. When I do take a portable with me, a Macbook Pro fits the bill much better for me. I want something that's reasonably light-weight and thin, yet can actually be considered a "desktop replacement/substitute" in as many ways as possible).

Still, I can see a definitely niche for the Air. It's not a good "only computer" or "main computer" for almost anyone (at least at its price). It's possibly a great 2nd. computer for someone (especially a Mac user) who uses it as more of a complimentary system to their main desktop.
Reply to this comment
by Joliet Eddie September 12, 2008 11:53 AM PDT
$1700 for a lightweight super portable laptop when the new netbooks are $400 and less? Gimme a break. Apple sucks you in again with overpriced one-source hardware. Open up Apple, it's the 21st century and we don't need to go single-source-supplier anymore.
Reply to this comment
by witheredmind September 14, 2008 12:13 AM PDT
A "netbook" is called so because it is best at doing that one thing: getting on the internet. I don't think a 1Ghz processor, 8Gb Hard Drive and 256Mb of memory lets you do much more than that. For $400, I think you get what you pay for.
(25 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About Nanotech - The Circuits Blog

Brooke Crothers was formerly editor-at-large at CNET News.com, an analyst at IDC (International Data Corp.) Japan, and an editor at The Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly (The Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones), among other endeavors, including a recent hiatus from the tech industry when he co-managed an after-school math and reading center. Nanotech covers computer chip technology and how it defines the computing experience. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Nanotech - The Circuits Blog topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right