• On CHOW: Sexy vampire party
June 2, 2008 12:07 PM PDT

Yahoo fails to keep pay plan details secret

by Ina Fried
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 5 comments

There's even more information now public on the lengths to which Yahoo went to create a compensation program that critics say was aimed at making a takeover bid more costly.

Yahoo had sought to keep the details from being made public, but a Delaware Chancery Court judge unsealed the information on Monday.

"I conclude that defendants have not satisfied their burden to show good cause for the continued filing of the portions of the complaint under seal," Judge William Chandler III wrote in his opinion. As a result of the ruling, the proposed class-action suit against Yahoo's directors was made public in its entirety, including various e-mail exchanges by the Yahoo workers and outside consultants that worked on the compensation plans.

Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann, the lawyers bringing the suit on behalf of two Detroit municipal retirement plans, posted the newly unsealed documents on their Web site.

The suit charges that Yahoo's directors breached their fiduciary duties by their actions, including failing to negotiate a deal with Microsoft and enacting the compensation plan. It seeks invalidation of the compensation program as well as an injunction barring the directors from engaging in actions contrary to increasing shareholder value.

Among the juiciest of the e-mail exchanges is one that took place on February 5 between two executives at Compensia, an outside compensation firm hired by Yahoo.

In the first message, principal Michael Benkowitz describes Yahoo's plans to cover all employees in an exchange with firm President Tim Sparks. "Their latest proposal is to provide 100 percent equity acceleration for everyone," Benkowitz wrote.

"That's nuts," Sparks replied.

For those who have been living in a cave, Microsoft went public with a $31-per-share bid for Yahoo on February 1, after failing to reach a deal privately. Yahoo rejected the offer. The two sides held a couple of face-to-face negotiations but never got on the same page, with Microsoft ultimately pulling its offer earlier this month. The two sides now say they are discussing a business deal short of a merger, said to center around Microsoft acquiring Yahoo's search business.

Update: Another tidbit worth noting is that when Microsoft proposed buying Yahoo in January 2007, it was willing to pay "about $40 per share," according to the suit.

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft. E-mail Ina.
Recent posts from Beyond Binary
Windows 8 in 2012?
Sinofsky's Windows plan: More data, less testosterone
Ballmer: Windows 7 selling like hotcakes
Windows boss on building his first laptop
Livescribe pen gets an app store
Office 2010 beta goes public
Windows Azure containers on display in LA
PDC Day 2 live blog: Office 2010, IE 9 on stage
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by JCPayne June 2, 2008 1:38 PM PDT
Prove it... Was the agreement to "make the merger more costly..." Or... Was it to allay fears and concerns among Yahoo staff and thus keep them happy *coding* instead of looking for greener pastures fearing an eminent downsizing after a hostile take over........ Prove it was one and not the other.
Reply to this comment
by ranpha June 2, 2008 5:12 PM PDT
From the document, it is confirmed that Microsoft will spend up to 1.5 billion to retain staff, and Jerry Yang knows about it but the Yahoo employees and shareholders didn't. Why is that not told to the employees? Why the need for the severance package if 1.5 billions is already there?

If you read the document, Yahoo CTO Ari Balough knows that Yang is doing the wrong thing and he tells Yang exactly that. Yang ignored his own CTO recommendations and do the walkout plan anyway.

And the $40 offer in January 2007 was rejected too, without knowledge of the shareholders. What do you think about that?
by MMC Racing June 2, 2008 5:57 PM PDT
If Yahoo cared about its employees, it would have not just let 1000 go at the time.. The reaction of the consulting firm shows how unusual the request was. it would be nice to see what other evidence there is. This isn't Microsoft suing and it is costly to sue.
Reply to this comment
by Idyot June 3, 2008 12:20 AM PDT
Microsoft has a history of purchasing companies in order to 1) enter a market and 2) silence the competition. Remember its play for Intuit? I still believe that Microsoft's game plan was "if we can't buy Yahoo, we'll devalue them". What is easier - expanding your market share in a mature market, or creating a void in a mature market the you could possibly capture?
Reply to this comment
by df561 June 10, 2008 3:56 AM PDT
I applaud Yahoo for taking this step to keep hostile/disrepectful bidders at bay...if you want Yahoo do it right. I like it when bullies get their &$% kicked.
Reply to this comment
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The 411 on early-termination fees

Verizon Wireless has doubled its early-termination fees for smartphones, but what does it mean for the rest of the industry?

Google has its own plan for Netbooks

No, the search giant isn't saying it will build a Netbook. But it sure knows what it would like one running Chrome OS to resemble, and that's a little different from the Netbook of today.
• Screenshot tour of Chrome OS

About Beyond Binary

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft.


Beyond Binary is a look at how technology is changing our lives and the people behind all that life-changing stuff, with an extra emphasis on that which emanates from Redmond, Wash.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Beyond Binary topics

Binary Bits

    Follow Ina on Twitter (Twitter name: InaFried)
    advertisement
    advertisement

    Inside CNET News

    Scroll Left Scroll Right