• On The Insider: Judge Bans Real Housewives Sex Tape
May 15, 2008 4:01 PM PDT

Microsoft, OLPC officially team up

by Ina Fried

So, I guess this makes it Two Operating Systems Per Child.

The One Laptop Per Child project and Microsoft announced Thursday that indeed the XO laptop will be available in both Linux and Windows varieties. The companies plan to sell a Windows-powered XO in five or six countries starting next month, with a broader release in August or September.

"We view it as a major opportunity for OLPC to expand and expand in a couple of ways," OLPC founder Nicholas Negroponte told CNET News.com in an interview Thursday. "One is to have a broader acceptance in the community and the other is to have more software and software developers available."

"When I talk to people and tell them we can run Windows, they are very impressed. You pass a sort of virility test."
--Nicholas Negroponte, OLPC founder

Microsoft announced in December that it was working to see if it could get Windows XP up and running on the OLPC devices. To make it work, it needed to get the operating system to boot from an SD card and to create drivers to work with OLPC's unique features, such as its touchpad and e-book reader mode.

Negroponte said the ability to run Windows is a must-have in some countries. For example, he said, Uruguay made it a requirement in its recent solicitation. Even in other countries where Windows is not required, Negroponte said compatibility with the Microsoft operating system still helps give the laptop credibility.

"When I talk to people and tell them we can run Windows, they are very impressed," he said. "You pass a sort of virility test."

Microsoft and OLPC aren't saying which countries they will start selling the Windows-based XO model in first, although a press release quotes an official in Colombia, so I'd bet that will be one of the first.

Meanwhile, Negroponte stressed that he is not giving up on Linux and ultimately aims to deliver machines that can boot into either operating system.

"There's no premeditated plan that one is going to dominate over the other," he said. "Having both is a very powerful option."

Microsoft, meanwhile, said the first XO laptops with Windows that start rolling out in June will not be dual-boot machines. Microsoft executive James Utzschneider said the XO will help broaden the range of educational machines with Windows. Plus, he said, "There are just a lot of people that have fallen in love with that cute little laptop and they've said we want to see Windows on it."

For his part, Negroponte said starting out with Linux was essential. "For us to launch the laptop, we had no choice but to use open source," Negroponte said. "We needed the community. We needed to get (in) there at the OS level to build devices and drivers...to make our point, to make the laptop."

Negroponte is hoping the move to Windows won't cost OLPC the things that made its product unique. The company is aiming to port the XO's "Sugar" interface over to Windows.

"We are in discussion with several third parties," Negroponte said. "I suspect we will have some conclusion next week or the week after."

He added that the 50-person OLPC Foundation itself lacks the resources to tackle the software project. "Plus, we don't have the skill set," he said.

Microsoft and OLPC have both talked about the importance of getting laptops in the hands of children in developing countries, although they have not always talked in the fondest terms about one another's efforts.

"OLPC hasn't done that well," Chairman Bill Gates said in a January interview.

Meanwhile, speaking at a Linux conference in 2006, Negroponte said of working with Linux and AMD rather than Intel and Microsoft: "AMD is our partner, which means Intel is pissing on me. Bill Gates is not pleased either, but if I am annoying Microsoft and Intel then I figure I am doing something right."

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft. E-mail Ina.
Recent posts from Beyond Binary
Windows 7 may get a 'Family Pack'
Some Vista users say they're getting the Ultimate shaft
Touch in Windows 7: Just for show?
Looking to browse the Web and get a Nickleback?
FAQ: Making sense of Windows 7 upgrade options
Windows 7 preorder a hit--on Amazon
Humor video highlights Bing's challenge
Thumbing Windows 7 onto Netbooks
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (23 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by BigDawgDoug May 15, 2008 8:13 PM PDT
Ohh great. Another attempt to create a mindless Zombie of Windoze users by shamelessly shoving an inferior OS in front of them. They will never know any better. Doesn't this consitute child abuse?
Reply to this comment
by sanenazok May 16, 2008 7:50 AM PDT
Speaking of zombies....how are you doin'?
by BigDawgDoug May 15, 2008 8:14 PM PDT
Ohh great. Another attempt to create a mindless Zombie of Windoze users by shamelessly shoving an inferior OS in front of them. They will never know any better. Doesn't this consitute child abuse?
Reply to this comment
by JFDMit May 15, 2008 8:23 PM PDT
Just what the developing world needs, dependence on a proprietary operating system. Let's bring the kids up on stripped-down Microsoft products, so we can sell them the real stuff when they grow up.

Negroponte is showing his proprietary-software-living stripes if the quotes in this interview are to be believed: "For us to launch the laptop, we had no choice but to use open source," he whines. What he left out was, "because Microsoft didn't want to play with us."

"We needed the community. We needed to get (in) there at the OS level to build devices and drivers...to make our point, to make the laptop." Of course, now that you've got BillG's attention, you don't need the "community" anymore, so it can just bugger off, right? Exactly how much is Microsoft paying you, Nick, or are you just buying your brother's kool-ade about "Linux=terra!"?

Let's continue: "There are just a lot of people that have fallen in love with that cute little laptop and they've said we want to see Windows on it." Who are these people, Nicky? Are they the small children in developing countries, for whom the OLPC project was intended? Or are they the geeks and consumers of the developed world, who want the cache of owning a "charity" machine, without having to deal with the "inconvenience" of using a proper operating system. I'm betting on a $2,000 "Dolce & Gabanna Windows Prick Edition" OLPC by Christmas. Of couse, a few malfunctioning models will get sent to "starving Africans," but the real focus will be "the brand, baby."

What Negropone doesn't realize is that the OS was 75% of what made the OLPC special. Replace the finely-tuned Linux-based OS with some stripped-down version of XP, and you've got a piece of crap that's no use to anyone.

I see the OLPC project is looking for a new CEO. They're making all kinds of noises about how they want someone who understands the needs of developing economies and their peoples, rather than just another beady-eyed salesman, but this move shows that OLPC is far more about extending global corporate hegemony, than it is about doing good.

It's a shame. This program had such potential.
Reply to this comment
by igl00lgi May 15, 2008 9:04 PM PDT
Shouldn't they fix Vista equiped laptops first? Windows doesn't run on my Vista capable laptop, I was conned into buying, how is it going to run on a computer with lower capabilities? Ohh that's right MS is a socialy concious monopolist, err, I mean company.
Reply to this comment
by Commander_Spock May 15, 2008 9:25 PM PDT
"Microsoft, meanwhile, said the first XO laptops with Windows that start rolling out in June will not be dual-boot machines. Microsoft executive James Utzschneider said the XO will help broaden the range of educational machines with Windows. Plus, he said, "There are just a lot of people that have fallen in love with that cute little laptop and they've said we want to see Windows on it..." So, how about a Triple-Boot Machines - "OS/2", "Windows XP" and "Linux"! Now, this would be more encompassing!
Reply to this comment
by sanenazok May 16, 2008 7:46 AM PDT
Sure, OS/2 is great, but all that would need to happen is IBM would need to restart support for this relic. It took MSFT one year to adopt its current OS for use on this machine, how long would it take IBM? A decade? Does OS/2 even support booting from a flash drive? How about a wireless network?
by Norseman May 15, 2008 11:24 PM PDT
So the poor kids are going to get machines with Windows. Poor kids!
Reply to this comment
by The_Decider May 16, 2008 2:47 AM PDT
The OLPC project has lost its way, it is simply a vanity project for this guy.
Reply to this comment
by sanenazok May 16, 2008 7:43 AM PDT
It's all about giving customers what they want, really. The foreign governments were not biting on this proprietary platform. Originally OLPC demanded that laptops be bought in lots of 1 MILLION. With their current offering they got all of 400,000 sales. So yes, they better re-evaluate their product since certainly something is horribly wrong with it.

Sorry, as nice as open source software is, the users of this laptop need to learn marketable skills, and being skilled with a proprietary "sugar" platform is not that useful outside of school. These kids don't need to learn computing (that's easy), they need to learn practical skills. That means learning the OS used by 90%+ of the world (probably 100% pirated in their areas, but that doesn't matter). What's interesting is that per the BBC the cost of the laptops with the Windows addon flash drive is only $10 more. Who wouldn't want that!
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian May 16, 2008 8:54 AM PDT
Wow, it's amazing how much spin it takes to include the terms "open source" and "proprietary" in the same sentence to describe just one item. Which is it? That wasn't a question before, but it has become one now (not really, it's pretty obvious to anyone who's awake). Better yet, you argue against it being "proprietary open source" (LOL) then you turn around and argue it's better now that it has winblows, which is just proprietary. You argue the kids don't need to learn computing skills (ROFL), they just need to learn winblows (what you apparently consider "practical skills"). Gee, that isn't narrow minded, is it. You finish off claiming it's just adding $10 to the price and who wouldn't want that. I for one. The idea of a crippled version of a crippled OS that does NOT allow you to explore computing in a serious way (try tweaking the source code to see what happens - isn't that how most people learn this stuff?) AND leaves you vulnerable to literally millions of viruses and other malware is making me feel nauseous. But hey, who am I to judge. Show the Bill you did your job and get your kool-aide kickback. Hope it helps to pay the bills.
by Tronman161 May 16, 2008 8:46 AM PDT
I thought OLPC rejected OS X when Apple offered it to them because they wanted an OS (i.e. open source) that they could "tinker" with? Something tells me as much as they could have tinkered with OS X, they'll be able to tinker with Windows a lot less!
Reply to this comment
by Papa Chango May 16, 2008 8:55 AM PDT
What good is giving poor kids computers when they dont get all the attached goodness from running Windows like spyware, trojans, virii, malware and such?

I love the drone who speaks of 'marketable skills'.
I guess you could say the same thing about using a Mac as well then because we all know if it aint Windows, it aint real.

Nothing says progress like using an OS that is 8 years old and wont be supported very soon.
Reply to this comment
by fronbi May 16, 2008 9:13 AM PDT
Me.
Marketable computer skills do not require a windows os nor should they. Open source offers the chance for people from all over the world to participate and contribute. Proprietary shops will never keep pace with the free exchange of ideas and information with the internet reaching every corner on earth.
Reply to this comment
by sanenazok May 16, 2008 12:35 PM PDT
How can open source be "proprietary?"

Easy: proprietary software can refer to any program created under the impression that it will be used for only one specific purpose, with specific equipment. Generally used to refer to software and hardware made by a given company that does not conform to established industry standards.

The OLPC laptop is proprietary - learning how to use it doesn't teach anything beyond using the device. Kids don't need to learn how to use computers - that's easy for any literate child and it takes hours to days. Kids need to learn software that is useful down the line once they're outgrown the proprietary OLPC PC and OS.

Tweaking the source code as a means to learn computing - ROFL - that's from the assembly computing era! How many normal computers do you know that want to tweak the source code of their computer's OS? Hint: 1% of the computing public, if that. People, including needy children, want to learn something that's directly useful (i.e. Windows).

Regarding the "millions of viruses" - well that's part of computing in the modern world. Now a days, malware is spread over the web, and these laptops connect to proprietary mesh networks, not the web at large. Using something like firefox eliminates vast majority of problems.

Reply to this comment
by Gayle Edwards May 18, 2008 12:04 PM PDT
What an unbelievable amount of SPIN, and utter-nonsense. Dealing with Windows-viruses is just part of how computers work..? An "Open-Source" computer (using entirely-OPEN, standardized, user-modifiable and readily-available computer elements) is actually... "proprietary"..? Forcibly, attempting to lock people into truly-proprietary, over-priced, closed-source, antiquated, buggy, insecure, commercial-software (since, Microsoft has flatly, long, opposed, both, the "Open-Source OLPC" or even "dual-booting" with non-Microsoft OSes) is, somehow, the best thing for, the underprivileged, new consumers, and the computing-environment, in general..? Using any -new- technology (to accomplish any new, but non-Microsoft, goal... cheaply, and efficiently... I.E. the "mesh network" -which allows Internet-access... where it DOES NOT already exist) is, inherently, BAD..? And, finally, intentionally turning third-world citizens into, mere, USERS of TRULY-PROPRIETARY software (instead of giving them the actual power to control their own futures) is whats, actually, best for them..? You, clearly, arent just drinking the KOOL-AID... Youre one of the people, actually, trying to serve it-up.
by sanenazok May 16, 2008 12:40 PM PDT
One other thing: who cares about what we think comprises "marketable computer skills."

It's the buyers of the laptops that decide - and they have decided they want Windows (or Windoze for the so inclined).

"Windows support on the XO device means that our students and educators will now have access to more than computer-assisted learning experiences," said Andres Gonzalez Diaz, governor of Cundinamarca, Colombia. from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7402365.stm

Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo May 17, 2008 12:12 AM PDT
I`m for anything that puts Mac further in the dust...bwahahahaha !!!!!
Reply to this comment
by solitare_pax May 17, 2008 3:47 AM PDT
Yep - knew you were going to say that.
by solitare_pax May 17, 2008 3:47 AM PDT
I hope there's plenty of PC repair shops out in the undeveloped world to fix the Windows OS when the machine stops working - oh, wait, there aren't. I think I'll save my money and send it to the poor oil well owners & clam bake club - seems like a worthier cause than this OLPC & Microsoft team-up.
Reply to this comment
by cmwalden May 17, 2008 9:52 PM PDT
Reply to this comment
by rapier1 May 18, 2008 1:22 PM PDT
So one of the biggest problems with OLPC is that NO ONE WAS BUYING THEM. A number of institutional buyers had rejected them out of hand because they didn't see the value of the Sugar interface. Maybe this is a failure on the part of the buyers or a failure on the part of OLPC to understand the needs of the market. However you decide to look at it though the *customers* have said, clearly and loudly, that they want XP on the laptops. Personally, I'd rather have seen linux but you can't force this sort of thing on people. If they want XP then give them XP.
Reply to this comment
by edroid May 20, 2008 6:13 AM PDT
As a long-time Linux advocate, I was alarmed when it was announced that the OLPC project was being held-up to give Microsoft time to retro-fit XP to dual-boot on it. I really don't believe Negroponte could be that stupid - I think he just sold out.

But now I'm glad to hear that the OLPC will not be a dual-boot machine. Because of this complete reversal from Linux to Windows makes two things clear to all the right people:

1. Microsoft can't stand ANY competition.

2. Those who believe Microsoft is sincere when it claims to embrace Open
Source are fools.
Reply to this comment
(23 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About Beyond Binary

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft.


Beyond Binary is a look at how technology is changing our lives and the people behind all that life-changing stuff, with an extra emphasis on that which emanates from Redmond, Wash.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Beyond Binary topics

Binary Bits

    Follow Ina on Twitter (Twitter name: InaFried)
    advertisement
    advertisement
    Click Here

    Inside CNET News

    Scroll Left Scroll Right