• On GameSpot: So-called 'Halo killer' gets 23 to life
May 3, 2008 5:09 PM PDT

Steve Ballmer's letter to Jerry Yang

by Ina Fried

Here is the text of the letter Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer sent to Yahoo chief Jerry Yang after talks broke down on Saturday.

May 3, 2008

Mr. Jerry Yang
CEO and Chief Yahoo
Yahoo! Inc.
701 First Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94089

Dear Jerry:

After over three months, we have reached the conclusion of the process regarding a possible combination of Microsoft and Yahoo!.

I first want to convey my personal thanks to you, your management team, and Yahoo!’s Board of Directors for your consideration of our proposal. I appreciate the time and attention all of you have given to this matter, and I especially appreciate the time that you have invested personally. I feel that our discussions this week have been particularly useful, providing me for the first time with real clarity on what is and is not possible.

I am disappointed that Yahoo! has not moved towards accepting our offer. I first called you with our offer on January 31 because I believed that a combination of our two companies would have created real value for our respective shareholders and would have provided consumers, publishers, and advertisers with greater innovation and choice in the marketplace. Our decision to offer a 62 percent premium at that time reflected the strength of these convictions.

In our conversations this week, we conveyed our willingness to raise our offer to $33.00 per share, reflecting again our belief in this collective opportunity. This increase would have added approximately another $5 billion of value to your shareholders, compared to the current value of our initial offer. It also would have reflected a premium of over 70 percent compared to the price at which your stock closed on January 31. Yet it has proven insufficient, as your final position insisted on Microsoft paying yet another $5 billion or more, or at least another $4 per share above our $33.00 offer.

Also, after giving this week's conversations further thought, it is clear to me that it is not sensible for Microsoft to take our offer directly to your shareholders. This approach would necessarily involve a protracted proxy contest and eventually an exchange offer. Our discussions with you have led us to conclude that, in the interim, you would take steps that would make Yahoo! undesirable as an acquisition for Microsoft.

We regard with particular concern your apparent planning to respond to a “hostile” bid by pursuing a new arrangement that would involve or lead to the outsourcing to Google of key paid Internet search terms offered by Yahoo! today. In our view, such an arrangement with the dominant search provider would make an acquisition of Yahoo! undesirable to us for a number of reasons:

•First, it would fundamentally undermine Yahoo!’s own strategy and long-term viability by encouraging advertisers to use Google as opposed to your Panama paid search system. This would also fragment your search advertising and display advertising strategies and the ecosystem surrounding them. This would undermine the reliance on your display advertising business to fuel future growth.

•Given this, it would impair Yahoo’s ability to retain the talented engineers working on advertising systems that are important to our interest in a combination of our companies.

•In addition, it would raise a host of regulatory and legal problems that no acquirer, including Microsoft, would want to inherit. Among other things, this would consolidate market share with the already-dominant paid search provider in a manner that would reduce competition and choice in the marketplace.

•This would also effectively enable Google to set the prices for key search terms on both their and your search platforms and, in the process, raise prices charged to advertisers on Yahoo. In addition to whatever resulting legal problems, this seems unwise from a business perspective unless in fact one simply wishes to use this as a vehicle to exit the paid search business in favor of Google.

•It could foreclose any chance of a combination with any other search provider that is not already relying on Google’s search services.

Accordingly, your apparent plan to pursue such an arrangement in the event of a proxy contest or exchange offer leads me to the firm decision not to pursue such a path. Instead, I hereby formally withdraw Microsoft’s proposal to acquire Yahoo!.

We will move forward and will continue to innovate and grow our business at Microsoft with the talented team we have in place and potentially through strategic transactions with other business partners.

I still believe even today that our offer remains the only alternative put forward that provides your stockholders full and fair value for their shares. By failing to reach an agreement with us, you and your stockholders have left significant value on the table.

But clearly a deal is not to be.

Thank you again for the time we have spent together discussing this.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Steven A. Ballmer

Steven A. Ballmer
Chief Executive Officer
Microsoft Corporation

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft. E-mail Ina.
Recent posts from Beyond Binary
Microsoft releases Exchange 2010, acquires Teamprise
Ex-Palm trio loads up on Vitamin D
Sesame Street, Droid get Google's love
Microsoft launching health tech video show
FAQ: Buying the right Windows 7 upgrade
T-Mobile says software error behind outage
T-Mobile users still reeling from outage
Microsoft cuts 800 more jobs
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (23 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Picture This
by smashie˛ May 3, 2008 5:41 PM PDT
Ballmer screaming the words while you read it.

Ideally his behaviour had a lot to do with Yahoo's rejection.
Reply to this comment
ballmie == bushie
by theantibush May 5, 2008 8:03 AM PDT
don't expect msft to figure it out
Good Riddance
by assclownbush May 3, 2008 5:43 PM PDT
No deal is a good deal.
Reply to this comment
Good
by UMTopSpinC7 May 3, 2008 6:13 PM PDT
This is the best thing that could have happened for Microsoft. Yahoo! wasn't worth that much money anyway. After their outsourcing of part of their search technology I don't see why the company has a whole lot of value. Sure MS would get all of Yahoo's customers but in the long term I don't think it was a smart idea. The logistics and money required to effectively combine MSN and Yahoo! or even get them to work together would be ridiculous. Ballmer may seem crazy, but I'm very happy with his decision on this one.
Reply to this comment
I'm happy too...
by lkrupp May 3, 2008 6:29 PM PDT
But not for the reasons stated in the above post. The borg have
finally been beaten back. Think about about how far along the
online revolution would be if not for the stifling, monopolistic
behavior of Microsoft. Think of how useful the internet would be
by now if it had not been held back by such a dull, barely
useable piece of crap like Internet Explorer. Think of all the
innovation lost or postponed because Microsoft killed off or
bought up the competition by hook or by crook (mostly crook).
Imagine where we all would be if Microsoft had not flooded the
market with mediocre software and then forced it down people's
throats. It's truly sad that Microsoft even exists. Hopefully their influence is on the wane so the online world can move forward.
View reply
lost opportunities
by gerrrg May 3, 2008 6:27 PM PDT
I like Google a TON (hell, I'm a Google fanboy), except that I don't like the idea of any one company holding a near-monopoly of anything. Therein lies the rub...Microsoft also holds a near-monopoly in the OS market and the productivity suite market. As much as I'm scared of the big gorilla in the room (MS), I'm also scared of the other gorilla outside the door (Google).
I know that Google's mantra is to do no evil, but they're a public company; public companies have little room for goodness unless there's profit involved (and reason for the stock price to go up), bottom line.
Backing MS is hedging that so long as the big gorilla in the house is the biggest gorilla around, we don't need to fear the other one...Google.
Hence, a lost opportunity.
Reply to this comment
you know...
by linadragon May 5, 2008 1:49 PM PDT
Its somewhat hypocritical of Ballmer to say less consumer choice when Microsoft already has a search program themselves that barely anyone uses and yes he criticizes yahoo and google for merging a little when he wants to merge yahoo with ms who already has MSN so its a bit off for him to say anything to that effect really. Oh hey im mad cuz they are doing what i was trying to do it just doesnt work :P
"combinatin of our companies"
by loserguy3000 May 3, 2008 7:02 PM PDT
I appreciated Balmer's use of language on this item. He seemed to imply something far less sinister than what would have eventually first bled dry then harvested whatever remained of the once-dominant Yahoo name and entity.

I'm not an alarmist, but Microsoft sees best for what Microsoft sees. The company has demonstrated in the past a complete lack of perspective within the new market and as such as seen practically every innovation (if you could call them that) fail under their leadership.

MS + Yahoo is short term, to the eventual destruction of one at the bequest of the other. Microsoft really is the Borg of this world, as pathetic as that may sound. Good for Yahoo... beat the suckers back and give inspiration to other companies to stand up for themselves and not feel intimidated at this once indomitable, smoking shell of a former superpower.

Stand up to them...its possible to do this! Don't give in!
Reply to this comment
Beat the Suckers
by Fireweaver May 5, 2008 8:28 AM PDT
Yahoo only served to hold off a take over. To say that they "beat the suckers" will only be true if their stock doesn't completely tank and their company can thrive over the next year.
That's a big "if"
BUY: Microsoft; SELL: Yahool
by ClubbieTim May 3, 2008 7:32 PM PDT
Watch Yahoo's stock tank to $15/share....Oh those sorry shareholders...Today $30/share, tomorrow $15. Ouch...This is like the cool fat girl getting getting a marriage proposal from, um, a nerdy rich guy, say Bill Gates and then refusing it.

Her parents are going to be so pissed!

I'm glad I own MSFT calls! Booyah!

I wish I owned YHOO puts!!! To bad...
Reply to this comment
Why is it every time...
by ppgreat May 3, 2008 7:38 PM PDT
...I hear or read a Microsoft exec say "innovate", I start to giggle?
Reply to this comment
RE: Why is it every time...
by protagonistic May 4, 2008 7:47 AM PDT
Perhaps because you have a well developed sense of humor? And
perhaps because unlike a previous poster you have the ability to
envision what might have been if we had not come under MS
innovative ideas. :-)
Would just love to see it...
by linux101 May 3, 2008 8:07 PM PDT
Now wouldn't you all just love to see Google gobble it up for some
outrageous price? I sure would!
Reply to this comment
Prayers work!
by mayadanteamihan May 3, 2008 9:02 PM PDT
Prayers work! I would hate to see Yahoo fall into Steve Ballmer's
hands. There's something not quite right about his business ethics.
Google's open source consumer-oriented mindset is more aligned
with Yahoo's. Yahoo's visual ads and Google's text ads should work
together fine as long as they open it to everyone.
Reply to this comment
Balmer is Smart!
by desmondhaynes May 4, 2008 3:51 AM PDT
Balmer did nothing wrong - why do I say? He screwed with one of his ad competitors (yahoo) made them look like dog sh*t; smoked out Google and finally nothing like getting the troops at msft at least moving again..they have been lame competitors since the DOJ ********... Balmer had nothing to lose and a ton to gain on the competitive strategy side..finally good to see Yahoo get competitive or at least hitting the proverbial gym..

This was doomed from day 1

http://techwatch.reviewk.com/
Reply to this comment
Nothing wrong?
by snatchmo May 4, 2008 5:00 AM PDT
Ballmer did nothing wrong except bid about $12B too much for
Yahoo in the first place. After all the press. all the employee and
shareholder angst, Yahoo and MSFT are tired and distracted,
Google strengthened and all of us poorer for the aborted attempt.

But after 3 months he finally did do the right thing. Just a slow
learner, Ballmer is.
Google doesn't need Yahoo
by  Brian May 4, 2008 5:24 AM PDT
Google is bigger than Microsoft and rightfully so.

Unlike Netscape, Google was smart enough to win and keep on
winning.

If Google accepts Yahoo's partnership, this would not benefit
Google's long term strategy one bit, unless they fear a Microsoft-
Yahoo merger (doubtful).
Reply to this comment
The antibush's letter to ballmie
by theantibush May 5, 2008 8:31 AM PDT
Dearest ballmie,
I see yo mouth has cost msft 20% of the search ? ad biz. Oh well.
And it must suk to loose an extra quarter bil a year over last year?s half bil loss on
on-line svcs.

Here?s an idea 4u...and you can tell billy you dreamed it up all on your own:
msft makes lots of prods, even populist garbage for hicks.
Why not give what few customers u have ?hick credits? uhh... ?click credits?
against said garbage 4 usin ur bland me2 svcs?

Or even against what you are already burning through (cash, if I have to draw u a pic).

And Im sure ur ?devs devs devs? can weed out the chronic clickers.

You see, if you cant buy the company, why not buy the customers?

(Buy? I see a glow commin from ballmies bald head)

yeah goog will copy that...but wouldn't that be
cool, to be the copied for a change?

And stop screamin so damn much.
it will make ur hair fall out.

uuhh...nm
Reply to this comment
No The Letter I Expected.
by open-mind May 5, 2008 5:06 PM PDT
I was expecting...

Dear Jerry,

Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.
Developers, developers, developers, developers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMU0tzLwhbE

;-)
Reply to this comment
by toddbeckett September 15, 2008 8:29 PM PDT
Short Microsoft
I have been using vista (with much reluctance) for a couple weeks with office 2007, and I can tell you. The good news is Vista isn't nearly as terrible as it was a year ago. The bad news is, the commercials are wrong, it still sucks. Microsoft has messed up both of their flagship products in short succession. No doubt that open office still sucks worse and google docs aren't really there yet, but MS you picked a terrible time to mangle your 2 best products.

If you think I am wrong, try to paste special or make a graph in excel. Nearly impossible. Worse, it seems the reason for all this change is to make things look cuter. That is right after years of telling the world that function is more important than form ms has veered off into the realm of glidey graphics. Honestly, MS, those ads are correct. You aren't cool. You have never been cool. Frankly when you try to be cool, you look like an idiot. MS, I tell you this from experience and because I feel like I know you, don't bother. Just stick to being the best. Make people's lives simpler, do cheaper (or free), and do it faster.

QWAN Microsoft, QWAN.

In the meantime, I am shorting your stock.

Love Todd

PS - This isn't real investment advice since only a moron shorts a company with a googleplex dollars in the bank.
Reply to this comment
(23 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.

About Beyond Binary

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft.


Beyond Binary is a look at how technology is changing our lives and the people behind all that life-changing stuff, with an extra emphasis on that which emanates from Redmond, Wash.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Beyond Binary topics

Binary Bits

    Follow Ina on Twitter (Twitter name: InaFried)
    advertisement
    advertisement

    Inside CNET News

    Scroll Left Scroll Right